Chapter 3 Amendments to Appendices I and II to the Convention on the
Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn, 23 June 1979)
done at Bergen on 25 November 2011
The proposed treaty action amends Appendices I and II to the Convention
on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the Convention),
done at Bonn on 23 June 1979. The proposed amendments were adopted by the
10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention, held in
Bergen, Norway, from 20 – 25 November 2011.
The Convention includes two appendices listing the species to which the
Convention provisions apply. Appendix I lists migratory species which are
endangered and Appendix II lists migratory species which have an unfavourable
The proposed amendments that are the subject of this treaty action list
five additional species of migratory animals in Appendix I and three additional
species in Appendix II.
Operation of the Convention
The Convention entered into force generally on 1 November 1983 and
Australia has been a Party since 1 September 1991. The Convention seeks to
conserve terrestrial, avian and marine species that migrate across or outside
national jurisdictional boundaries. Parties to the Convention must protect
migratory species listed on Appendices I and II that live within, or pass
through, their jurisdiction.
Article I of the Convention establishes two categories that define the
conservation status of a migratory species: ‘endangered’ for a migratory
species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
proportion of the area of land or water that it inhabits (its range), and
‘unfavourable conservation status’ where the conditions set out in
Article I for a ‘favourable conservation status are not being met’.
The Convention then goes on to place the following obligations on
parties to the Convention:
n Article II(1&2)
All parties to the Convention must acknowledge the importance of conserving
migratory species and the need to take action to avoid migratory species
n Article II(3)
The parties agree to promote, cooperate and support research relating to
migratory species and endeavour to provide immediate protection for migratory
species included in Appendix I. Parties shall also endeavour to conclude
agreements for the conservation and management of individual migratory species
listed in Appendix II.
n Article III (1, 4
& 5) parties that are Range States for species listed in Appendix I are
required to endeavour to take specific measures to conserve the species and its
habitat, to prevent the adverse effects of activities that impede or prevent
migration and, wherever possible, to prevent or minimise factors that endanger
the species. The taking of Appendix I species is prohibited, subject to limited
A Range State is defined in Article I
of the Convention as a State that exercises jurisdiction over any part of the
range of a migratory species, or a State whose flag vessels take that migratory
species outside national jurisdictional limits.
n Article IV (1
& 3): This lists the obligations of parties in relation to species
listed in Appendix II of the Convention. The principal obligation in relation
to species included in Appendix II is that parties must endeavour to conclude
agreements where these would benefit the species and give priority to those
species having an unfavourable conservation status. Article V provides
guidelines for such agreements.
In addition to the obligations in the Convention:
n Article XII(2):
The Convention does not affect the rights or obligations of any party deriving
from any existing treaty or convention.
n Article XII(3):
The Convention does not affect the rights of parties to adopt stricter domestic
measures concerning the conservation of any listed migratory species.
The Convention and Australia
Australia is a Range State for two of the species that are the subject
of this treaty action: the giant manta ray and the eastern curlew.
The giant manta ray (Manta birostris) is one of a small number of species
of ray with a large, flat disk shape. In Australia’s range, the giant manta ray
is native to the oceans off Western Australia. This amendment to the
Convention has listed the giant manta ray in both Appendix I and Appendix II of
The eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) is a migratory wading
bird that breeds in Siberia and migrates to Australia annually during the
northern winter. In Australia, the eastern curlew’s range is limited to coastal
areas across the whole of Australia. This amendment to the
Convention has listed the eastern curlew in Appendix I of the Convention.
Domestically, species listed on Appendices I and II are protected under
the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC
Act). As ‘migratory’ species under the EPBC Act, it becomes an offence to kill,
injure, take, trade, keep or move the species in Commonwealth waters. The EPBC
Act specifies that the list of migratory species must include all species that
are ‘from time to time included in the Appendices to the Convention and for
which Australia is a Range State under the Convention’. As a result of the
listing of the giant manta ray on Appendices I and II to the Convention, the
list of migratory species pursuant to section 209 of the EPBC Act needs to be
amended to include this species. An amendment to the list of migratory species
contained in the EPBC Act is an amendment of a legislative instrument.
As a Range State, Australia must endeavour to take specific measures to
conserve the giant manta ray species and habitat, to prevent the adverse
effects of activities that impede or prevent migration, and, to the extent
feasible and appropriate, to prevent or minimise factors that endanger the
Australia must also cooperate in the development of multilateral conservation
agreements where this will benefit the giant manta ray species listed. Australia
is a signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Conservation of
Migratory Sharks, which was developed under the Convention. Including the giant
manta ray as part of that MoU may be considered by signatories in the future.
All provisions of the EPBC Act relevant to ‘listed migratory species’,
in particular Parts 3 and 13, will apply to both the giant manta ray and the
eastern curlew once the list has been amended to include the giant manta ray. Currently,
those Parts already apply to the eastern curlew.
The proposed amendments to the Appendices are not expected to impose any
additional costs on Australia in terms of meeting its obligations under the
Convention. Australia already has a strong protection and conservation
management regime in place for migratory species included in Appendices I and
II. The proposed amendments will not require any additional domestic management
arrangements to be put in place for commercial and recreational fishing
operations that may occasionally interact with the giant manta ray. Commercial
fishers will be required to report any interactions that may occur with giant
manta rays, as they are currently required to do for any listed migratory
In early February 2012, the Minister for Sustainability, Environment,
Water, Population and Communities, the Hon Tony Burke MP, wrote to the
Committee noting that the amendments to the Appendices of the Convention relating
to the eastern curlew and the giant manta ray would enter into force 90 days
after the Conference of the Parties that adopted them concludes. As such, the
amendments entered into force on 23 February 2012.
As the Minister acknowledged, the Australian parliamentary calendar
precluded the Committee’s consideration of the amendments before they came
automatically into force. The Minister indicated, however, in the same
correspondence that he would delay the concomitant amendments to the list of
migratory species under the EPBC Act until the Committee had reviewed for
itself the amendments to the Convention Appendices. The Committee notes the
unfortunate timing of events but has reviewed the amendments to the Convention
The Committee concurs with the NIA’s assertion that the proposed treaty
action is in the national interest as Australia is committed to the
international protection and conservation of migratory species and to the
national protection of such species whilst they are located in, or pass
through, areas within Australia’s jurisdiction.
The Committee welcomes advice from the Department of Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Population and Communities that broad support has been
provided by state and territory agencies, conservation organisations and
commercial and recreational fishing stakeholders for the inclusion in the
Convention Appendices of the eastern curlew (now to Appendix I) and giant manta
ray (Appendix I and II). This agreement was
sought before Australia supported the listing of the endangered eastern curlew
and the giant manta ray.
Australia has long been active in international agreements to protect
endangered species. In addition to being a Party to the Convention, Australia helped
establish the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership and has entered bilateral
agreements with Japan, China and South Korea to help protect migratory birds.
The challenge will be to protect endangered species in the territories or from
the fishing fleets of those countries which are not parties to the Convention
or other conservation agreements.