House of Representatives Committees

| Parliamentary Joint Committee on Joint Standing Committee on Treaties

Navigation: Contents | Next Page

Preliminary Pages

Membership of the Committee

Chair

Mr Kelvin Thomson MP

 

Deputy Chair

Senator Simon Birmingham

 

Members

Ms Sharon Bird MP
(until 14/3/12)

Senator David Fawcett

 

Mr Jamie Briggs MP

Senator Scott Ludlam

 

Mr Laurie Ferguson MP
(from 14/3/12)

Senator the Hon Lisa Singh

 

Mr John Forrest MP

Senator Matthew Thistlethwaite

 

Ms Sharon Grierson MP

Senator Anne Urquhart

 

Mr Harry Jenkins MP
(from 7/2/12)

Senator Dean Smith
(from 9/5/12)

 

Ms Kirsten Livermore MP

 

 

Ms Melissa Parke MP

 

 

Ms Michelle Rowland MP
(until 7/2/12)

 

 

The Hon Dr Sharman Stone MP

 

 

Committee Secretariat

 

Secretary

James Catchpole

David Monk
(from 26/3/12 – until 11/5/12)

Inquiry Secretary

Kevin Bodel

Senior Researcher

Dr Andrew Gaczol

Administrative Officers

Heidi Luschtinetz

 

Michaela Whyte

 

Resolution of Appointment

 

The Resolution of Appointment of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties allows it to inquire into and report on:

a)                  matters arising from treaties and related National Interest Analyses and proposed treaty actions and related Explanatory Statements presented or deemed to be presented to the Parliament;

b)                  any question relating to a treaty or other international instrument, whether or not negotiated to completion, referred to the committee by:

(i)                 either House of the Parliament, or

(ii)               a Minister; and

c)                  such other matters as may be referred to the committee by the Minister for Foreign Affairs and on such conditions as the Minister may prescribe.

 

List of recommendations

 

3     The National Interest Analysis

Recommendation 1

That National Interest Analyses of treaties clearly intended to have an economic impact include an assessment of the economic benefits and costs of the treaty, or, if no assessment of the economic benefit of a treaty has been undertaken, a statement to that effect, along with an explanation as to why it was not necessary or unable to be undertaken.

Recommendation 2

That the Australian Government commissions an independent and transparent assessment of the economic and social benefits and costs of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

5     Copyright

Recommendation 3

That, in circumstances where a treaty includes the introduction of new criminal penalties, the treaty’s National Interest Analysis justify the proposed new penalties.

Recommendation 4

That the Australian Government publishes the individual protections that will be read into the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) from the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement and how the protections will apply in relation to the enforcement provisions contained in ACTA.

Recommendation 5

That the Australian Government clarify and publish the meaning of “aiding and abetting” as it applies to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

Recommendation 6

That the Australian Government clarify and publish the meaning of “commercial scale” as it applies to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

6     Intellectual Property

Recommendation 7

In the event that the Australian Government ratifies the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), the Government prepares legislation to:

  • Exclude patents from the application of the civil enforcement and border measures parts of ACTA;

  • Ensure that products produced in Australia as a result of the invalidation of a patent or part of a patent in Australia are not subject to the counterfeiting prohibition in ACTA; and

  • Ensure that the expression ‘counterfeit’ in ACTA is not applied to generic medicines entered or eligible for entry on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.

    8     Conclusion

    Recommendation 8

    That the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement not be ratified by Australia until the:

  • Joint Standing Committee on Treaties has received and considered the independent and transparent assessment of the economic and social benefits and costs of the Agreement referred to in Recommendation 2;

  • Australian Law Reform Commission has reported on its Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy; and the

  • Australian Government has issued notices of clarification in relation to the terms of the Agreement as recommended in the other recommendations of this report.

    Recommendation 9

    In considering its recommendation on whether or not to ratify the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a future Joint Standing Committee on Treaties have regard to events related to ACTA in other relevant jurisdictions including the European Union and the United States of America.

     

     

  • Navigation: Contents | Next Page

    Back to top

    Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print