Chapter 1 Introduction
Referral of the Bill
On 24 November 2011 the House of Representatives Selection Committee
referred the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Maintaining Address) Bill 2011
to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (the committee) for
inquiry and report.
Origins and purpose of the Bill
Currently, an eligible elector must
initiate new enrolments or direct the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to
make a change to their enrolment. The Electoral and Referendum Amendment
(Maintaining Address) Bill 2011 (the Bill) amends the Commonwealth Electoral
Act 1918 (Electoral Act) to allow the AEC to directly update an elector’s
enrolled address details ‘following the receipt and analysis of reliable and
current data sources from outside the Australian Electoral Commission that
indicate an elector has moved residential address’.
This Bill does not provide for the
direct or automatic enrolment of eligible electors who are not already on the
The Bill is described in the Explanatory Memorandum (EM) as implementing
recommendation 10 of the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters’ Report
on the conduct of the 2007 federal election and matters related thereto. It
was a unanimous recommendation. The members of the committee for that report
Mr Daryl Melham MP (Chair)
Senator Simon Birmingham
Mr Scott Morrison MP (Deputy Chair)
Senator Bob Brown
Bruce Scott MP
Jon Sullivan MP
the Hon Michael Ronaldson
In the report on the 2007 election the committee considered strategies
for maintaining an effective electoral roll. Recommendation 10 proposed that data
received from approved agencies be used to update the electoral roll. It
The committee recommends that the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 be
amended to allow the Australian Electoral Commission to receive and use
information for the purposes of directly updating the electoral roll, where
that information has been:
n provided by an
elector or electors to an agency approved by the Minister as an agency which
performs adequate proof of identity checks; and
n the elector or
electors have indicated their proactive and specific consent to opt in for the
information to be used for the purposes of directly updating the electoral roll;
n the data has been
provided by that agency to the Australian Electoral Commission for the purposes
of updating the electoral roll.
The Government response to the report was provided in March 2010. In response
to recommendation 10, the Australian Government indicated its in principle
support for the recommendation, stating:
The Government agrees that efficiencies and benefits would be
gained by allowing data provided by trusted agencies to be used for the
purposes of directly updating the electoral roll. The Government considers that
providing for the direct update of data in relation to individual electors is
an important step towards improving the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the
electoral roll. The implementation of this recommendation will require the AEC
to develop bilateral agreements with relevant agencies, and work through a
range of agency-specific issues related to the collection, use and storage of
personal information. Noting that the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 requires
all Australian citizens to be enrolled, the Government will ensure that
appropriate privacy protections, including provisions for opt-out where
appropriate, are incorporated into the arrangements to be developed. The AEC
will consult with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and conduct detailed
Privacy Impact Assessments in the course of developing agreements with trusted
The Special Minister of State, the Hon
Gary Gray AO MP, in his second reading speech indicated that the aims of this
Bill are to improve electoral roll accuracy and to ‘assist in meeting the
urgent need to arrest the decline in enrolment rates across Australia’.
The AEC currently uses Continuous Roll
Update (CRU) to assist with maintaining the currency and accuracy of the
electoral roll. The AEC described this method as:
The most significant method now used by the AEC to actively
review the roll and encourage enrolment...introduced in 1999. The core of the
program is regular mail reviews, in which the AEC conducts large mail-outs to
specific electors and to specific addresses where it believes eligible persons
who are not on the electoral roll or not correctly enrolled reside. The mail
reviews are, in some cases, supplemented by targeted field work. Follow-up
activity aimed at people who have not responded to an initial mail-out, is also
The targeted mail-outs are often based on data received from third party
sources that indicate address details of enrolled persons may have changed. CRU
places the onus on the elector to confirm the address details at which they are
eligible to be enrolled. The AEC advised that response rates were generally
between 15 and 20 per cent for the monthly mail-outs during periods when there
are not major electoral events.
While electors’ address information
cannot currently be updated based on third party data, electors can be removed
from the roll as part of the objection process in Part IX of the Electoral Act.
If the AEC has reasonable grounds for believing that a person does not live at
their enrolled address, the AEC will contact the elector and indicate that they
will be removed from the roll. If no response is received within 21 days of the
notice, the elector is removed from the roll. Consequently, the person in
question will not be able to vote in a federal election unless they re-enrol.
The amendments in the Bill also enable
the Electoral Commissioner to discontinue the objection process and update an
elector’s address details rather than remove an elector from the roll.
The Special Minister of State asserted
that the Bill will also serve to reduce removal of eligible electors from the
roll by the objection process, stating in his second reading speech that:
The Electoral Commission currently
uses this information as the basis to remove someone from the electoral roll.
The result is that eligible electors are being removed from the roll despite
the fact that the Electoral Commission has accurate information on the
elector’s current address. This restriction is having a detrimental effect on
Requirement to enrol and update details
Under the Electoral Act, it is compulsory for eligible electors to enrol
to vote in federal elections, and to update their residential address details
within 21 days after having lived at the new address for one month. Section 101
provides that an eligible elector who does not fulfil these obligations is
guilty of an offence and is punishable by a fine of $110.
However, the AEC estimates that around 1.5 million Australians who are
eligible are not on the roll. When questioned by the committee, the AEC advised
that no prosecutions for non-enrolment had been pursued in recent years.
Part IX of the Electoral Act sets out the objection process under which
electors can be removed from the electoral roll.
A person enrolled in a particular electoral division may object to the
enrolment of another elector if they believe the person is not entitled to be
enrolled in that division or is enrolled at an address at which they do not
currently live and have not lived for at least one month.
Section 114 also requires the Electoral Commissioner to object to the
enrolment of an elector in these circumstances. The AEC indicated that objection
action initiated by the Electoral Commissioner ‘are most commonly triggered by
CRU mailing based on third party data’. The Electoral
Commissioner writes to the elector notifying of the AEC’s intention to remove
them from the electoral roll. If the elector does not respond to this notice
within 21 days of the notice being issued, they will be removed from the roll.
The AEC will then send a second notice to the same address advising the elector
that they have been removed from the electoral roll.
Contents of the Bill
Schedule 1 of the Bill seeks to standardise references to the Electoral
Commissioner by substituting a number of occurrences of the ‘Electoral
Commission’ with the ‘Electoral Commissioner’. The EM indicated that the Electoral
and Referendum Amendment (Pre-poll Voting and Other Measures) Act 2010 made
a number of amendments to the Electoral Act that specified the Electoral
Commissioner as the person responsible for enrolment related and pre-poll tasks
and functions rather than the AEC.
Item 1 of Schedule 1 also extends the Electoral Commissioner’s power in
section 28 to delegate the roll review functions under section 92.
Schedule 2 contains the significant amendments of the Bill to enable the
Electoral Commissioner (or a delegate) to change the address at which an
elector is enrolled. It includes the insertion of new section 103A ‘Updating or
transferring a person’s enrolment without claim or notice from the person’.
Item 3 sets out proposed section 103A, which covers:
n the circumstances in
which this direct update of address mechanism will apply—s 103A(1);
n the action the
Electoral Commissioner may take to update an elector’s address—ss 103A(3)-(5);
n that the Electoral
Commissioner may notify the relevant elector when a change of address is
proposed (s 103A(2)) and must notify when the address is updated or of the
decision not to update—ss 103A(6)-(7); and
n to allow the
Electoral Commissioner to provide the required notices by electronic means,
whether or not the recipient has consented to receiving information by
electronic communication—s 103A(8).
Item 2 amends section 101 (that requires eligible electors to enrol and
update their address details) by providing that if an elector’s address details
are updated under section 103A then proceedings must not be brought against that
elector for their prior failure to update their details.
The Bill also proposes to change the operation of the objection process,
by requiring that the Electoral Commissioner must not complete the removal of
challenged electors from the electoral roll in certain prescribed
Item 4 provides that objection action must not be taken against electors
who have been issued with a notice under subsection 103A(2) of the Electoral
Commissioner’s intention to update their address.
The Electoral Commissioner must also dismiss an objection in the
following circumstances (Item 5):
n if a notice under
subsection 103A(2) has already been issued prior to a person challenging the
elector, and the person does not provide information inconsistent with data
that formed the basis of the notice; or
n if a notice under
subsection 103A(2) is issued to the elector after the objection was made but
before notice is given of the objection.
In cases where an objection notice has already been issued, the
Electoral Commissioner ‘must not determine an objection’ if a subsection
103A(2) notice is issued, and must advise the person who initiated the
objection and the challenged elector accordingly (Items 7 and 8).
Item 9 provides that a person who raised the objection can, within 28
days of the notice of the decision, request an internal review of the Electoral
Commissioner’s decision, under section 118, to dismiss or not determine an
An elector who has had their address updated may also seek an internal review
of the decision to change their enrolled address.
Items not explicitly mentioned above are smaller amendments
consequential to the more substantial changes.
The increasing numbers of eligible Australians missing from the
electoral roll has motivated the examination by the AEC of strategies to combat
this trend. Currently, the AEC estimates that around 1.5 million Australians
who are eligible to vote are not on the electoral roll and so cannot exercise
their voting rights.
The AEC advised the committee during the inquiry into the 2010 federal
election that over 200 000 people cast pre-poll, absent and provisional
votes at the election that were rejected, due to these individuals being incorrectly
enrolled or not enrolled. The Electoral Commissioner suggested that ‘they are
clearly potentially part of the group that have fallen off the roll because, at
some stage, they did not respond to an AEC letter’, and were removed under the
One key strategy that the Australian Government is pursuing to arrest
this trend in non-enrolment—not applying to be on the roll or failing to update
their address details and potentially being removed from the roll—is by
providing the AEC with greater powers to make changes to eligible electors’
enrolment. In general terms, this involves removing the onus from eligible
Australians to initiate enrolment and update their information, and enabling
the AEC to perform these actions in certain circumstances based on data
obtained from third party sources.
Systems of direct enrolment currently operate at the state level in New
South Wales and Victoria.
This Bill focuses on updating the information for enrolled electors, who
have already established their identity and eligibility. However, direct
enrolment and the reinstatement of eligible electors who have been removed in the
objection process are the subjects of another bill.
Date of effect
The amendments in the Bill will take effect from the day following Royal
Objectives and conduct of the inquiry
The objective of this inquiry is to investigate the adequacy of the Bill
in achieving its policy objectives and, where possible, identity any unintended
On 13 December 2011, the committee Chair, Mr Daryl Melham MP, issued a
media release announcing the inquiry and called for submissions to the inquiry.
The committee received five submissions for this inquiry, which are
listed in Appendix A. Public hearings were held in Canberra on 8 and 15 February
2012, during which the committee heard from the Australian Electoral Commission
and the Australian Privacy Foundation (see Appendix B). The submissions and
transcripts of evidence are available on the committee’s website at: