Bills Digest no. 70 2011–12
PDF version [571 KB]
WARNING: This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.
Social Policy Section
1 November 2011
Key provisions and issues
Date introduced: 21 September 2011
Portfolio: Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations
Commencement: Sections 1 to 3 and Schedule 1 on Royal Assent; Schedules 2 to 4 the later of 1 January 2012 and Royal Assent.
Links: The links to the Bill, its Explanatory Memorandum and second reading speech can be found on the Bill's home page, or through http://www.aph.gov.au/bills/. When Bills have been passed and have received Royal Assent, they become Acts, which can be found at the ComLaw website at http://www.comlaw.gov.au/.
The purpose of the Higher Education Support Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2011 (the Bill) is to amend the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) to:
- increase the maximum grant amount for the Commonwealth Grant Scheme for 2011
- increase the maximum grant amount for Other Grants and Commonwealth Scholarships for the 2012-14 calendar years and to include the 2015 calendar year
- reduce the HECS-HELP up-front discount from 20 per cent to 10 per cent
- reduce the voluntary repayment bonus for HELP debts from 10 per cent to 5 per cent and
- clarify that students of higher education providers who are studying primarily at an overseas campus of the provider are not entitled to Commonwealth support.
The Act provides for funding of higher education providers and the Government’s income contingent student loans program: Higher Education Loan Program (HELP).
The Bill will implement 2011–12 Budget measures to reduce discounts for up-front HELP payments (from 20 to 10 per cent) and the bonus for voluntary repayments (from 10 to 5 per cent) made under HELP and the former Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS).
The Government also announced changes to a range of programs administered under the Other Grants provisions of the Act. These changes include funding for the Promotion of Excellence in Learning and Teaching, decreased performance funding, the cessation of the Capital Development Pool and discontinuation of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council. These changes affect the maximum amounts for Other Grants.
The Bill has been referred (along with other education Bills) to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Employment, Inquiry into Bills referred on 22 September 2011, for inquiry and report.
The Bill provides an additional $1.13 billion over four years to 2015 to fund Grants made under the Act. Some of this additional funding comes from savings and redirections announced in the 2011–12 Budget.
The Act provides for maximum amounts for annual funding of Commonwealth Scholarships and Other Grants. The maximum amounts are amended on an annual basis to provide for variations, indexation and to add an additional funding year.
The Bill increases the maximum amounts for Other Grants under section 41-45, and Commonwealth Scholarships under section 46-40 of the Act to provide for indexation and other variations affecting the 2012-14 years and to include the 2015 funding year. Item 1 clarifies that despite an earlier repeal of section 30-5 of the Act that section applies in respect of 2011.
The variations to the maximum amounts for Other Grants are affected by decisions announced in the 2011–12 Budget including:
- the discontinuation of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council of $87.7 million over four years. Initially all this funding was to go to the National Disaster Recovery and Rebuilding measure, however, the Government has reduced this to $37.7 million and will redirect $50.0 million to funding for the Promotion of Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
- the cessation of the Capital Development Pool with savings of $298.0 million over four years to be used for the National Disaster Recovery and Rebuilding measure. Other than base funding, the source of infrastructure funding will now be the Education Investment Fund and
- the delay of $95.0 million over two years (2011–12 and 2012–13) in reward funding from the Higher Education Performance Funding.
Schedule 2–Up-front payments
Schedule 2 deals with provisions to reduce the HECS-HELP up-front discount from 20 per cent to 10 per cent. The items are mechanical and adjust various references to how the discount is reduced.
Under present arrangements students receive a 20 per cent discount on their HECS liability if they pay up-front rather than deferring their loan. The discount aims to offset the implicit loan subsidy gained when a student defers the HECS-HELP liability.
The discount on up-front payments was a feature of HECS when it was introduced in 1989 and it was set at 15 per cent. It was increased to 25 per cent in 1993 and the percentage of students paying up‑front also increased from 20.3 per cent in 1990 to 28.5 per cent in 1997 then gradually declined after 1998 to about 21 per cent.
In 2005 the bonus was reduced from 25 per cent to the current 20 per cent. This reduction did not further reduce the overall percentage of students paying up-front. However, analysis of the data for equivalent full-time student places, rather than for all students, does show a decline from 21 per cent in 2005 to 17.5 per cent in 2009.
By reducing the discount the Government estimates savings of $229.5 million over four years will be made from reductions in the amount the Government will need to pay universities for the equivalent amount of the up-front discount. This amount counts as an expense to the Government and appears as expenditure in the Budget.
The Government has explained this measure on equity grounds claiming that ‘discounts advantage those with the capacity to pay their fees upfront. Analysis of the upfront discounts provided in 2009 showed that only around 12 per cent of these students came from low-SES postcodes’. The Government will use savings to fund the commitment to a demand driven supply of undergraduate places and ‘ensure low income people get the opportunity of higher education’.
The Government expects that the number of students paying up-front will halve. Budget figures predict a saving of $29.4 million in 2011–12 rising to $62.5 million in 2012–13. Savings will depend on the number of students who continue to pay up-front with the discount halved to 10 per cent: the fewer numbers who pay up-front, the greater the savings to Government as their HECS liability will be deferred and not counted as an expense.
In the longer term there may be a cost to Government if more students defer their liability. Some HELP debt is never repaid due to a range of circumstances including the death of the debtor, the income threshold for repayment not being met or the debtor moving overseas. The Government predicts this doubtful debt in annual reporting of HELP. On 30 June 2009, the accumulated HELP debt was $17.82 billion of which $4.25 billion (nearly 24 per cent) was not expected to be paid.
Furthermore there are costs associated with deferral which ‘arise due to the income contingent nature of the repayment arrangement ... resulting from payments being received over an extended period’. The 2010-11 estimate for deferral costs is $735.00 million.
Schedule 3 deals with reducing the voluntary repayment bonus for HECS-HELP debts from 10 per cent to 5 per cent. The items are mechanical in nature and adjust various references to how the bonus will be reduced.
Currently voluntary repayments of $500 or more of HECS-HELP debt results in a 10 per cent bonus. Thus a student’s account (maintained by the Australian Taxation Office) is credited with an additional 10 per cent of the payment thus reducing the debt to the Commonwealth. Like the reduction in the up-front payment discount this measure is designed to reduce expenditure. The Government estimates that $63.9 million will come from this measure over four years and be returned to funding the commitments made to the demand driven system of undergraduate places.
Provisions in Schedule 4 clarify that Australian citizens (domestic students) enrolled for the majority of their course at offshore (overseas) campuses of Australian providers are not entitled to Commonwealth supported places (previously called HECS places), HECS-HELP, FEE-HELP or VET-HELP loans.
The Government has not provided data on how many students are affected. The second reading speech states that the ambiguity in the Act ‘has resulted in a small number of Commonwealth supported places being offered by Australian universities to Australian citizens studying at overseas campuses’. In 2008 only 568 students (0.7 per cent) enrolled offshore were domestic students. Furthermore the numbers seem to be falling: in 2004 there were 904.
Despite the small number of enrolments at offshore campuses the Government is concerned that students may not return to Australia and therefore are not required to repay HECS-HELP debts. The second reading speech states ‘As students are only required to pay back their HECS-HELP debt if they file an Australian tax return, there is a higher risk that HECS-HELP debts incurred offshore will not be repaid, or not repaid for a longer period of time’.
Delaying or non-repayment of debt is a cost to the Government and concerns have periodically been raised regarding the amount of HECS HELP debt that remains unpaid due to the debtor living overseas. However there are no precise figures reported by the Government. As at 30 June 2009 1.37 million persons had a HELP debt of whom 31 428 (2.3 per cent) were listed in the ‘Other’ category defined as ‘those overseas or with an invalid or incomplete postcode’. The total debt for ‘Other’ was $313 million, out of a total of $17.8 billion.
The Bill appropriates $1.13 billion in additional funding to provide for Commonwealth supported places and Other Grants made under the Act. Some of the funding comes from savings and redirections including savings through reduced discounts and bonuses in the HELP scheme. This measure provides an immediate saving to Government but in the longer term there may be a cost. As economist Bruce Chapman commented ‘while the measure would probably raise money for the Government in the short term, it was poor economics ... the 20 per cent discount represented the right "implied" interest rate cost on HECS loans, and that reducing it effectively increased the taxpayer subsidy to students’. If so the provisions to reduce the discount and bonus seem at odds with the clarification on study at overseas campuses aimed at avoiding additional costly doubtful debt.
Members, Senators and Parliamentary staff can obtain further information from the Parliamentary Library on (02) 6277 2709.
. Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2, 2011–-12, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, pp. 163–4.
. Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2, 2011–-12, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, p. 170.
. Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2, 2011–-12, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, pp. 163-4.
. Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2, 2011–-12, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, p. 170.
. If students elect to defer payments under HECS, the charge becomes a debt which is owed to the Government. The debt is indexed to the inflation rate, so that its real value is maintained over time. No explicit interest rate charges are applied to the debt. This arrangement provides an implicit loan subsidy to students that elect to defer their HECS payments. The implicit loan subsidy arises because graduates are not required to contribute to the full costs incurred by the Government in providing the loan, including administration costs, default costs and the financing costs.
. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Higher Education report, 2005–09, Canberra, various years.
. Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2, 2011–-12, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, pp. 163–4. In contrast HECS that is deferred is regarded as a loan to the student and does not count as expenditure.
. C Evans (Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations), Gillard Government funds growth and quality in nation's universities, media release, 10 May 2011, viewed 31 October 2011, http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22media%2Fpressrel%2F776443%22. Analysis by the Higher Education Council in 1997 also revealed low rates of up-front payments by equity groups: 10.5 per cent were low SES students and 16.6 per cent were rural students. See: Higher Education Council, Twelfth report to the National Board of Employment, Education and Training on the operation of section 14 of the Higher Education Funding Act 1988 and the Higher Education Contribution Scheme, Canberra, 1998, p. 50, viewed 17 May 2011, http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/030FA022-86B6-4A85-9D8E-01B3E0F54E8D/3954/98_04.pdf
. P Garrett, ‘Second reading speech: Higher Education Support Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2011’, House of Representatives, Debates, 21 September 2011.
. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Annual report 2008–09, p. 82, Canberra, DEEWR, 2009.
. Australian Government, Portfolio budget statements 2011–12: budget related paper no. 1.6: Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Portfolio, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, p. 159.
. Australian Government, Portfolio budget statements 2011–12: budget related paper no. 1.6: Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Portfolio, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2011, Table 3.2.7, p. 152.
. P Garrett, op. cit.
. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Students: 2008 Summary of Higher Education Statistics, Canberra, DEEWR, p. 26.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to email@example.com.
Disclaimer: Bills Digests are prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament. They are produced under time and resource constraints and aim to be available in time for debate in the Chambers. The views expressed in Bills Digests do not reflect an official position of the Australian Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion. Bills Digests reflect the relevant legislation as introduced and do not canvass subsequent amendments or developments. Other sources should be consulted to determine the official status of the Bill.
Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: firstname.lastname@example.org
. Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.