Bills Digest No. 31 2004–05
Parliamentary Service Amendment
Bill 2004
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Parliamentary Service
Amendment Bill 2004
Date Introduced:
21 June 2004
House: Senate
Commencement: Royal
assent
No one more sincerely wishes the spread of
information among mankind than I do, and none has greater
confidence in its effect towards supporting free and good
government.
Thomas Jefferson to Hugh L. White,
1810.(1)
The Bill concerns
the future structural arrangement of the parliamentary research and
information services under the auspices of a Parliamentary
Librarian. As employees of the Information and Research Services
Group of the Parliamentary Library, the preparation of this Bills
Digest raises a conflict of interest. Every effort has been made to
canvas the range of issues generated by the Bill and we have
referred to the approach taken by other jurisdictions. We are
grateful to the three external readers who have provided an
additional perspective. We appreciate the generous gesture of
Professor George Williams, Director, Gilbert + Tobin Centre of
Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales,
Professor John McMillan, Commonwealth Ombudsman and Ms. Lorraine
Weinman, Legal Library Adviser and former Principal Librarian,
Commonwealth Attorney-General s Department in providing critical
comment on this publication.(2)
The purpose of the Bill is to create a
statutory position of Parliamentary
Librarian and to set out the functions, resourcing and reporting
obligations of the position.
The Parliamentary Library was established in
June 1901. The Joint Library Committee was appointed in June 1901
to supervise the Library of the Commonwealth Parliament. The
Public Service Act 1901 recognised the Library as a
separate Department of State under its own Permanent Head, the
Parliamentary Librarian. Like the Joint House Department, it was
jointly controlled by the Senate and the House of Representatives
by the Speaker and President.
The Bill is in response to the recommendations
of the Review by the Parliamentary Service Commissioner of
aspects of the administration of the Parliament, (more
popularly know as the Podger report) in respect of the creation of
the role of Parliamentary Librarian.(3) Podger s report
stated that the amalgamation of the three service provision
departments (the Department of the Parliamentary Reporting
Services, the Department of the Parliamentary Library and the Joint
House Department) would deliver cost efficiencies, while not
impinging on the independence of the chamber departments or
adversely affecting the services provided to senators and
members.(4) In his report, Podger detailed the history
of the amalgamation proposals.(5) The report emphasised
that the [amalgamation] option would need to be implemented in a
way that would protect the independence of the Librarian
.(6)
The Podger report noted that:
The Parliamentary Librarian could act as the
executive manager of the library function, with independence from
the Departmental Secretary in respect of the Library s confidential
and impartial client service functions.(7)
The Podger report made four recommendations in
relation to the structure of the parliamentary departments and the
role of the Parliamentary Library within an amalgamated structure.
Those recommendations were:
Recommendation 5.1: The position of
Parliamentary Librarian be established at a senior level within the
amalgamated service provision Department.
Recommendation 5.2: The independence of the
Parliamentary Library be granted by Charter from the Presiding
Officers.
Recommendation 5.3: The independence of the
Parliamentary Library be reinforced by strengthening the current
terms of reference for the joint Library Committee.
Recommendation 5.4: The resources and services
to the Library in the amalgamated department be specified in an
annual agreement between the Departmental Secretary and the
Parliamentary Librarian, approved by the Presiding Officers
following consideration by the joint Library Committee.
Recommendations 5.1 and 5.4 are matters which
have been addressed in the Bill. Recommendations 5.2 and 5.3 are
matters to be pursued by the Presiding Officers and the Library
Committee.(8)
The Podger report noted that the provision of
non-partisan advice and services is:
a requirement of the Parliamentary Service
Values, which is reinforced by the core Library personal values of
professionalism, confidentiality, impartiality and
integrity.(9)
Podger considered whether the independence of
the Library itself should be protected.(10)
Podger flagged, and then put to one side, the question of statutory
recognition of the independence of the Library.(11)
Podger did not make any specific recommendations in
relation to the role or independence of the Library.
Commissioner Podger saw the need to safeguard
the independence of the role of Parliamentary Librarian. Podger
believed that core values [Parliamentary Service Values and Library
personal values] are a critical element of the ongoing independence
of the Library .(12) Podger canvassed the option of
creating a statutory position of Parliamentary Librarian - however,
he stopped short of recommending the creation of such a
position.(13)
In response to the Podger report s
recommendations, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the
House of Representatives tabled resolutions establishing the
Department of Parliamentary Services
(August resolutions).(14) The resolutions emphasised the
importance of protecting the independence of the Parliamentary Library and
specified a range of protective mechanisms to that end.
The steps leading to the creation of the role
of Parliamentary Librarian were summarised in the second reading
speech tabled by Senate President Paul Calvert on 18 August
2003.(15) Both Houses of Parliament resolved to abolish
the three joint parliamentary departments, to replace them with a
new Department of Parliamentary Services and to create a statutory
office of the Parliamentary Librarian within the new
department.
In relation to the other matters that Podger
mentioned, Parliament also explicitly supported strengthening the
role of the Library Committee, provided for direct reporting by the
Parliamentary Librarian to the Library Committee and called for the
development of a resource agreement between the Parliamentary
Librarian and the Secretary of the joint
Department.(16)
On 24 March 2004, the Presiding Officers
announced in Parliament the terms of the package of proposals that
would implement the Podger report and August
resolutions.(17) They included matters agreed in the
August resolutions, but added:
Another element of protecting the library s
independence is that the bill will require the Parliamentary
Librarian to have professional qualifications in librarianship or
information management and/or professional membership of a
recognised professional association in such a discipline.
The Bill has two schedules: the first
establishes and provides for the office of the Parliamentary
Librarian and is explained in detail below; the second makes minor
related amendments to the Long Service Leave (Commonwealth
Employees) Act 1976 and the Remuneration Tribunal Act
1973.(18)
The Bill establishes and provides for the
office of the Parliamentary Librarian by inserting a new Division 3
into Part 4 of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999
(item 8 of schedule 1). Currently, Division 1
provides for the employment of Parliamentary Service employees and
Division 2 establishes the Senior Executive Service. Proposed
Division 3 would deal with the Parliamentary Librarian.
Proposed section 38A
establishes the office of the Parliamentary Librarian.
The office will be established within the
Department of Parliamentary Services (or such other joint
department as the presiding officers designate) (item 2 and
item 10 of schedule 1).
This part of the Bill implements the
parliamentary resolution to provide for a statutory position of
Parliamentary Librarian within the new joint service department
.(19) As mentioned above, by making the Parliamentary
Librarian a statutory office, the Bill goes beyond the Podger
report recommendation that the position of Parliamentary Librarian
be established at a senior level within the amalgamated service
provision Department .(20)
The Parliamentary Librarian s function will be
to provide high quality information, analysis and advice to
Senators and Members of the House of Representatives in support of
their parliamentary and representational roles
(proposed paragraph 38B (1) (a)).
In addition, the Secretary may confer on the
Parliamentary Librarian other responsibilities within the
Department of Parliamentary Services, provided that those
responsibilities are:
-
consistent with the first mentioned function
-
conferred in writing, and
-
have the approval of the President and Speaker (proposed
paragraph 38B (1) (b)).
This provision gives the Secretary of the
Department of Parliamentary Services the flexibility to broaden the
responsibilities of the Parliamentary Librarian provided there is
no detrimental impact on the fulfilment of the statutory function
of providing high quality information, analysis and advice.
Conditions on the manner in which information,
analysis and advice must be provided are imposed by
proposed subsection 38B (2). The information,
analysis and advice must:
-
be timely, impartial and confidential
-
maintain the highest standards of scholarship and integrity
-
be on the basis of equal access for all senators, members,
parliamentary committees and staff of the same, and
-
have regard to the independence of Parliament from the
Executive.
The Bill defines for the first time in
legislation the term Library Committee . The Library Committee is
the committee or committees of the Houses of Parliament that advise
the Presiding Officers in respect of the functions of the
Parliamentary Librarian (item 3 of schedule 1).
The Senate and
the House of Representatives elect their own Library Committees,
which then meet together as a joint Library
Committee.(21) The chair rotates between the President
and the Speaker, both of whom serve on their respective Committee.
The Committees have no powers of inquiry or report and function as
advisory bodies to the Presiding Officers in relation to the
operations and administration of the parliamentary
library.(22)
The Parliamentary Librarian must report on the
performance of his or her function to the Presiding Officers
annually (new subsection 65(3) in item
12).(23) Requiring a report to the Library
Committee is consistent with Podger s recognition of the important
role of the Library Committees. The Parliamentary Librarian must
also report on the performance of his or her functions on request,
and at a minimum once every financial year, to the Library
Committee (proposed section
38H).(24)
This provision can be interpreted in a number
of ways. It could be interpreted that the Parliamentary Librarian
has a purely formal reporting obligation to the Library Committee.
Alternatively, it may authorise the Parliamentary Librarian to
develop an ongoing presence at regular meetings of the Library
Committee.
A narrow reading of the Parliamentary
Librarian s role and engagement with the Library Committee could
limit the opportunities for the free flow of ideas and expectations
between senators and members and would reverse the past practice of
the Parliamentary Librarian attending Library Committee
meetings.
The Parliamentary Librarian will be appointed
for a fixed-term appointment of five years (proposed
subsection 38C (1)), and the appointment is subject to
termination by notice in writing at any time (proposed
subsection 38D (1)). The Bill is silent on the issue of
whether the Parliamentary Librarian can be re-appointed for
additional terms of office.
The Presiding Officers will determine
appointment and termination, but the Bill guarantees other input
into these decisions. In the case of appointment, the Presiding
Officers decision is subject to receiving a report from the
Secretary of the Department of Parliamentary Services regarding the
vacancy (proposed subsection 38C (2)). This is a
sensible approach given the close working relationship between the
Secretary and the Parliamentary Librarian.
In the case where the termination of the
Parliamentary Librarian is being considered, the Presiding Officers
must first receive a report from the Parliamentary Service
Commissioner (proposed subsection 38D (2)). This
guaranteed consultation with the Commissioner is consistent with
the Commissioner s functions and provides an element of protection
for the Parliamentary Librarian.(25) The Presiding
Officers may appoint an acting Parliamentary Librarian, but the
appointee in those circumstances must meet the same professional
requirements as stipulated for the Parliamentary Librarian
(proposed section 38F).
Ms Weinman, former Principal Librarian,
Commonwealth Attorney-General s Department, argued that a Deputy
Parliamentary Librarian should be appointed to assist the
Parliamentary Librarian in carrying out his or her functions.
According to Ms Weinman, as the requirements for an acting
Parliamentary Librarian mirror the requirements for the principal
position, and are specific, there is a need to create a deputy
position in order to smoothly deal with absences by the
Parliamentary Librarian and to enhance succession planning
(proposed subsection 38F (2)).
The Bill requires the appointee to have either
or both of the following:
-
professional qualifications in librarianship or information
management,
-
professional membership of a recognised professional association
in the discipline of librarianship or information management
(proposed subsection 38C (3)).
The requirement for specific librarianship or
information management-related qualifications is consistent with
the Podger report s recommendation. The report notes that:
The Library provides an integrated library and
research service and it would be important that the Librarian had
strong relevant professional qualifications.(26)
It is conceivable that
Podger s recommendation could have included other
qualifications besides librarianship and information management.
The central issue is whether the nature of the Parliamentary
Library requires professional library and/or information management
qualifications for the person chosen to be the Parliamentary
Librarian. One argument is that it does. Formal training in the
acquisition, management and dissemination of the multitude of
public information now available especially how to evaluate,
organise and distribute this in a directed and efficient manner
could be viewed as significant to the Australian Parliamentary
Library's role as an information and research service for the
Parliament.
Information-management skills are likely to be
highly relevant to the position. However, it is arguable that there
are other relevant professional qualifications that could yield a
strong candidate for the position. Exceptional leadership,
management, communication and organisation skills may be found in a
range of professional areas and it would seem to be
counterproductive to unduly narrow the pool of potential applicants
for the position of Parliamentary Librarian. The eventual appointee
may in fact have librarianship or information management
qualifications; however, from an institutional perspective it may
be preferable to be able to consider a wide pool of applicants with
the necessary experience to undertake the role.
Press
commentary on relevant qualifications for the Parliamentary
Librarian
The announcement in Parliament on 24 March
2004 of the package of proposals that led to the Bill drew some
commentary in the Canberra Times, in its monthly
supplement, the Public Sector Informant. In April, May,
June and July, the Informant ran articles and a letter
that considered the question of relevant qualifications for the
Parliamentary Librarian position.(27)
Arguments against linking eligibility
for the position to those with librarian or information
management-related qualifications or membership included that:
-
in principle, the pool of candidates should be drawn from as
wide a field as possible
-
the range of work within the library requires an equivalent
skill-range in its leaders
-
there is precedent for successful leadership without those
qualifications(28)
-
it may operate to restrict development of other appropriate
services and structures, and
-
morale may decline among those staff barred from the top
position in the organisation.
Arguments in favour of
specifying particular qualifications included that:
-
the primary function of the Parliamentary Library is to operate
as a library and in that context leadership requires specific
qualifications, and
-
the position, as head of a flagship institution within the
library profession, is a key one for the profession.
The Presiding Officers will set the
remuneration and other conditions of employment of the
Parliamentary Librarian (proposed subsection 38E
(1)). However, they must seek, and take account of, advice
from the Remuneration Tribunal (proposed subsection 38E
(2)). Determinations are to be made public by publication
in the Gazette and tabling in both chambers of the
Parliament (proposed subsection 38E (3)).
The Secretary of the Department of
Parliamentary Services is to provide the resources for the
Parliamentary Librarian pursuant to an annual agreement between
them that is approved by the Presiding Officers after taking the
advice of the Library Committee (proposed section
38G(1)). Podger noted that it is important to ensure that
the Library receives adequate resources and services from the
service-provision department .(29) The wording of
proposed section 38G(1) refers only to the
provision of resources rather than resources and services as
specified in the Podger report.(30) It is unclear
whether there would be any significant effect caused by this
wording of the Bill.
Sections 48A and 104A of the Copyright Act
1968 make special provision in relation to libraries that
provide library services for members of Parliament.
Proposed section 38I ensures that those provisions
continue to operate in relation to the part of the Department of
Parliamentary Services that provides library services and that the
Parliamentary Librarian heads.
Schedule 1 of the Bill also makes the
following minor changes consequent on the establishment of the
office of the Parliamentary Librarian. It:
-
augments the objects of the Parliamentary Service Act to include
the definition of the powers and responsibilities of the
Parliamentary Librarian (item 1)
-
constitutes the Parliamentary Librarian within the Australian
Parliamentary Service (item 5)
-
renames the title of Part 4 of the Act to include reference to
the Parliamentary Librarian (item 7)
-
ensures that the Presiding Officers may determine that judgment
debts may be deducted, where necessary, from the salary of any
Parliamentary Librarian as well as from the salary of the Secretary
or a Parliamentary Service employee (item 13),
and
-
ensures the effective operation of the Department of
Parliamentary Services by authorising the Secretary to delegate
powers or functions to the Parliamentary Librarian, who can then
further delegate such powers or functions (items 14 to
17).
It is instructive to consider the approaches
to the notion of impartiality in the provision of information to
elected representatives and accountability of parliamentary
libraries in other jurisdictions. The major parliamentary
libraries, such as the House of Commons Library (United Kingdom),
the Library of Congress (United States) and the Library of
Parliament (Canada) all emanated from the 18th century
Age of Enlightenment .(31) The philosophies of the
Enlightenment valued democratic ideals in
government.(32)
The House of Commons Library had its
beginnings in 1547 when the Clerk of the Commons compiled the first
manuscript journal of the proceedings of the
Commons.(33) In 1742 the House of Commons printed the
journals, which later became the ordered and authoritative record
of parliament .(34) The House of Commons Library was
made an independent Department of the House in 1967. This
independence was enshrined in legislation as part of the House of
Commons (Administration) Act 1978 [UK]. However, the Act does not
specifically mention the independence of the service provided to
members.
In 1835, Librarian of the Commons Thomas
Vardon summarised the services of the library when he said that the
essential purpose of the Library is to supply Members with
information rapidly on any of the multifarious matters which come
before the House, or to which their attentions are drawn by their
parliamentary duties .(35)
The Library of Congress was created in 1800.
Its purpose was to acquire such materials as will enable statesmen
to be correct in their investigation and, by a becoming display of
erudition and research, give a higher dignity and a brighter luster
to truth .(36) By 1914, the library had become a
national library and a discrete unit was formed to serve members
exclusively. In 1946, this service was made a separate library
department called the Legislative Reference Service. The
requirements of the service are set out in the Legislative
Reorganization Act 1946 [US]. The Act also provided for senior
subject specialists to be employed in particular areas of interest
to the Congress. The service was examined again in the 1960s and in
1970 the Legislative Reorganization Act 1970 [US] changed its name
to the Congressional Research Service. As a consequence of the
amendments, the Congressional Research Service acquired
responsibility for servicing congressional committees.
The obligations of the Congressional Research
Service to Congress are set out in the United States Code
Annotated.(37) The Librarian of Congress is required to
grant the Congressional Research Service complete research
independence and the maximum practicable administrative
independence consistent with the functions and objectives of the
Congressional Research Service as set out in the
Code.(38)
The Library of Parliament in Canada can trace
its origins to 1791. Like the Library of Congress, and the
Australian Parliamentary Library, it developed as a national
library and served this function until the National Library in
Canada was created in 1952. (The National Library of Australia was
constituted as a separate entity from the Australian Parliamentary
Library in 1960.)
Canada s Library of Parliament serves a wide
range of clients, including senators, members, their staff,
officers of the two houses, justices of the Supreme Court, the
Federal Court, the Governor-General, Members of the Privy Council
and the Parliamentary Press gallery. However, the services of the
research branch are restricted to parliamentarians
only.(39) The Library of Parliament is a separate unit
within Parliament and its authority is derived from Part V of the
Parliament of Canada Act [Canada].(40) The
Parliamentary Librarian reports directly to the Speakers of the two
Houses of Parliament, who are responsible for the direction and
control of the Library.(41)
The Library of Parliament s Research Branch
offers non-partisan research services to all members of Parliament,
across a broad range of subject areas.(42) Caccia, a
member of the Canadian parliament notes that:
If knowledge is a form of power, one has to
recognize that access to knowledge of good quality is already
available to the average MP [in Canada].(43)
There is an inherent tension in the view
reflected in the Bill that there should be legislation ensuring
independence for the Parliamentary Librarian but not necessarily
for the Library or research and information services managed by the
Parliamentary Librarian. For example, in the United States, the
Librarian of Congress is required to grant the Congressional
Research Service complete research independence and the maximum
practicable administrative independence [as consistent with section
166(b)(2) Title 2 of the United States Code]. In other
jurisdictions there has been an explicit recognition of the
separation of role and function between the manager of the library
and the library itself. This Bill is silent on the issue. There is
no mention of the Parliamentary Library or a comparable information
and research service performing that function.
Podger envisaged that the Parliamentary
Library s independence would be sufficiently protected through:
-
the creation of a senior position of Parliamentary
Librarian within the joint Department with independence
granted by charter from the Presiding Officers in respect of
the library s confidential and impartial client service
functions
-
the strengthening of the terms of reference of the
Library Committees that advise the Presiding Officers on matters
affecting the library to charge them with considering any matter
relating to the independence of the Parliamentary Librarian
-
granting the Parliamentary Librarian direct reporting
to the Library Committees and the Presiding
Officers(44)
-
a resource agreement to be negotiated annually between
the Secretary of the Department of Parliamentary Services and the
Parliamentary Librarian, approved by the Presiding Officers after
consultation with the joint Library Committee
-
the Parliamentary Librarian having strong relevant
professional qualifications, and
-
the core values of the staff of the Parliamentary
Library, including professionalism, confidentiality, impartiality
and integrity reinforced by the values in the Parliamentary
Service Act 1999.(45)
With the possible exception of the
qualifications required of the Parliamentary Librarian, the Bill
corresponds with the specifications set out in the Podger report.
The Presiding Officers parliamentary resolutions aimed at
protecting the independence of the Parliamentary Library went one
step further than the Podger report and required the creation of a
statutory position of Parliamentary Librarian and a direct
reporting mechanism between the Parliamentary Librarian, the
Presiding Officers and the Library Committees of both Houses of
Parliament.(46) However independence for the Library
itself was not covered by the Presiding Officers and has not been
provided for in this Bill.
The statutory function of the Parliamentary
Librarian while brief can be interpreted broadly.(47)
This raises important questions about the
role and resourcing of the Parliamentary Librarian. The potential
scope of the statutory function is likely to attract candidates
who, with the Secretary s agreement, can shape the position.
However, Parliament should note that the consequence of a narrow
interpretation of the statutory function set out in
proposed subsection 38B(1) could be that the
resource agreement may be limited to just that function.
A review of the approach taken by other
parliamentary research services is instructive in any consideration
of the role and function of the Parliamentary Librarian under this
Bill. Other parliamentary libraries have, either legislatively or
by convention, been conscientious in preserving the independence of
information and research services provided to elected
representatives.
It may be that the continued independence of
the research and information services provided to the Australian
Parliament will be sufficiently protected by the creation of the
statutory office of Parliamentary Librarian and the implementation
of the safeguards the Presiding Officers set out in the August
resolutions. However, the prescriptive wording of the Bill in
relation to the qualifications of the Parliamentary Librarian and
the larger question of whether there should be a legislative
safeguard for the independence of the information and research
services provided to the Parliament are matters worthy of careful
consideration.
-
T. Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas
Jefferson (Memorial Edition), Lipscomb and Bergh, (eds.),
Washington D. C., vol. 12, 1903-4 at p. 387.
-
We would like to thank Libby Bunyan, Patrick O Neill, Catherine
Lorimer and Sarah Miskin for their contribution to the development
of the Bills Digest. We are very appreciative of the research work
undertaken by Patrick O Neill in relation to the history of the
office of Parliamentary Librarian .
-
A. Podger, Review by the
Parliamentary Service Commissioner of Aspects of the Administration
of the Parliament, Final Report, September 2002.
-
ibid., p. 45.
-
The amalgamation of the Departments of the Senate, the House of
Representatives and the three service departments into a single
department was proposed in 1910, 1933, 1953, 1996, and into two
departments in 1997. An attempt to amalgamate the former Department
of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff and the Department of the
Parliamentary Library was made in 1993. Finally, there were four
earlier attempts to amalgamate the three service departments, in
1977, 1980, 1988 and 1996. See the Podger report, ibid., pp.
41-44.
-
ibid., p. 46.
-
Podger report, op. cit., p. 47.
-
Section 2 of the Parliamentary Presiding Officers Act
1965 specifies that Presiding Officer means:
(a) in relation to the
Senate the President of the Senate;
(b) in relation to the House of
Representatives the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
-
ibid., p. 47.
-
ibid., p. 48.
-
ibid.
-
ibid., p. 47.
-
ibid., p. 47. Previously, the Secretary of the Department of the
Parliamentary Library was effectively the Parliamentary Librarian.
All the Secretaries report to the Presiding Officers, with
oversight from the Library Committee, and that has been constant
since 1901.
-
Parliamentary departments: proposed Department of Parliamentary
Services , House of Representatives, Debates,
14 August 2003, p. 18509; Parliamentary departments: proposed
Department of Parliamentary Services , Senate, Debates,
18 August 2003, p. 13780.
-
Senator Paul Calvert, Parliamentary departments: proposed
department of Parliamentary Services , Senate, Debates, 18
August 2003, p. 13498.
-
Parliamentary departments: proposed Department of Parliamentary
Services , House of Representatives, Debates,
14 August 2003, p. 18509; Parliamentary departments: proposed
Department of Parliamentary Services , Senate, Debates,
18 August 2003, p. 13780.
-
Parliamentary Library matters , House of Representatives,
Debates,
24 March 2004, p. 27003; Parliamentary Library , Senate,
Debates,
24 March 2004, p. 21755.
-
The President and the Speaker may delegate their powers under
the Long Service Leave Act (Commonwealth Employees)
Act 1976 to the Secretary and officers in the Department of
Parliamentary Services (subsections 9B(1) and (4)). Item 1
of schedule 2 allows the President and Speaker also to
delegate to the Parliamentary Librarian.
The Remuneration Tribunal provides advice in
relation to terms and conditions, including remuneration and
allowances, for the office of Secretaries to Parliamentary
Departments (subsection 5(2D)). Item 2 of schedule
2 enables it also to provide that advice for the office of
the Parliamentary Librarian.
-
Parliamentary departments: proposed Department of Parliamentary
Services , House of Representatives, Debates,
14 August 2003, p. 18509; Parliamentary departments: proposed
Department of Parliamentary Services , Senate, Debates,
18 August 2003, p. 13780.
-
Podger report, op. cit., recommendation 5.1, p. 49.
-
House of Representatives Standing Order 326; Senate Standing
Order 20.
-
In 1981, in the context of the appointment of a new
Parliamentary Librarian and an earlier proposal to merge the three
joint parliamentary departments, there was an unsuccessful attempt
by Opposition Senators to give the Senate Library Committee power
to pass substantive resolutions, with the aim of influencing the
proposal. Odger records that:
dissatisfaction with the committee s inability
to influence this process led to the resignations of the Opposition
senators on the committee. After debate over two days, the
following, amended resolution was agreed to:
(1) That the Senate is of the opinion that the
Joint Parliamentary Library Committee should be given specific
terms of reference, including the power to pass resolutions.
(2) That the President be requested to ensure
that in the appointment of a new Parliamentary Librarian, the
Parliamentary Library Committee be kept informed of the procedures
to be adopted in the appointment of such Librarian, and given an
opportunity to express its views. (26/11/1981, J.705; SD,
24/11/1981, pp 2483-8 and 26/11/1981, pp 2666-72).
The matter of specific terms of reference has
not been pursued. H. Evans (ed.) Odgers Australian Senate
practice, Department of the Senate, Canberra, 2001, pp.
371-372.
-
Item 12 of the Bill states that this report must be part of the
Department of Parliamentary Services annual report.
-
The term Library Committee is defined in the Bill.
-
The Parliamentary Services Commissioner s functions include to
give advice to the Presiding Officers on the management policies
and practices of the Parliamentary Service . See generally
Parliamentary Service Act 1999, s. 40.
-
Podger report, op. cit., p. 47.
-
D. Woolner,
When is a library not a library? , Canberra Times
Public Sector Informant, April 2004, p. 2;
When is a library a think-tank? , Canberra Times
Public Sector Informant, May 2004 [response to Woolner
article] p. 2; D. Woolner,
Letter: Parliamentary Library debate, Canberra Times
Public Sector Informant, June 2004, p. 2; S. Sherlock,
Good management is what matters , Canberra Times
Public Sector Informant, July 2004, p.4.
-
Between 1901 to the present, there have been eight Parliamentary
Librarians. They were:
Arthur Wadsworth 1901-1927 (librarian); Kenneth Binns 1928-1947
(librarian); Sir Harold White 1947-1967 (librarian); Allan Fleming
1968-1970 (journalist, diplomat); Andrew Moore 1970-1978 (public
servant, diplomat); Harold Weir 1978-1981 (psychologist); Hillas
MacLean 1981-1992 (librarian); John Templeton 1991-2004
(journalist, public servant).
-
Podger report, op.cit., p. 49. See Recommendation 5.4.
-
Podger report, ibid.
-
Enlightenment , a term generally used to describe the
philosophic, scientific, and rational spirit, the freedom from
superstition, the scepticism and faith in religious tolerance of
much of 18th century Europe. See Enlightenment , M.
Drabble and J. Stringer (eds.), The Concise
Oxford Companion to English Literature, Oxford
University Press, 1996.
-
T. Paine, The Rights of Man: being an answer to
Mr. Burke s attack on the French
revolution (introd. by E. Foner), Harmondsworth, Middlesex,
England, Penguin Books, 1984.
-
House of Commons Library, Information Factsheet G18, p.
3.
-
ibid.
-
ibid., p. 6
-
Chairman of the First Joint Committee on the Library, Senator
Samuel Latham Mitchell, in Joseph Ross and Hugh Finstein, Research
Services in Congress and Parliament, Canadian Parliamentary
Review, vol.11, no. 4, Winter 1988-89 at p. 10.
-
USCA 2 s.166 (b) (2). The legislation deals with the functions
and objectives of the Service, the appointment and conditions of
service relating to the Director, Deputy Director and other
necessary personnel, duties of service as well as procedures on the
joint Committee on the Library.
-
ibid.
-
Ross and Finstein, op. cit., at p. 11.
-
Part V of the Parliament of Canada Act (RSC 1985, c.P-1).
-
Ross and Finstein, op. cit., at p. 11.
-
C. Caccia, Democratic Deficit? What Democratic Deficit? ,
Policy Options, vol. 25, no. 2, May 2004, pp. 48-51 at p.
48.
-
ibid.
-
Podger report, op.cit., p. 46.
-
Podger report, op.cit., pp. 47 49.
-
Parliamentary departments: proposed Department of Parliamentary
Services , Senate Debates, 18 August 2003, p. 13498;
Parliamentary departments: proposed Department of Parliamentary
Services , House of Representatives, Debates, Hansard, 14
August 2003, p. 18509.
-
Schedule 1, Item 8 of the Parliamentary Service Amendment Bill
2004 at clause 38B lists the functions of the Parliamentary
Librarian.
Jane Grace and Moira Coombs
12 August 2004
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
senators and members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2004
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2004.
Back to top