Higher Education Legislation
Amendment Bill 2003
Date Introduced: 26 June
2003
House:
House of Representatives
Portfolio:
Education, Science and
Training
Commencement:
Royal
Assent
This Bill will
amend the Higher Education
Funding Act 1988 (the HEFA) and the Australian Research Council Act
2001 (the ARCA) to set new grant levels that will reflect
indexation increases and other technical adjustments. It will also
make a number of administrative and technical amendments to the
ARCA.
The major sources of Commonwealth funds for
higher education are Part 2.2 of the Higher Education Funding
Act 1988, which provides grants for universities, and the
Australian Research Council Act 2001, which funds the
research grant schemes administered by the Australian Research
Council. The HEFA provides maximum global amounts for broad
categories of expenditure on a calendar year basis. The categories
include operating grants (section 17), superannuation expenses
(section 20), research and other special purposes (section 23), and
capital projects (section 27A). Allocations for individual
institutions are the subject of determinations by the Minister,
which are disallowable by Parliament. Both Acts are amended
annually to adjust grants for movements in prices. Some background
information on the indexation of higher education grants is
provided below.
The indexation of higher education grants has
become a matter of some controversy with regard to the Commonwealth
Government s higher education policy changes announced in the
2003-04 Budget.(1) While endorsing the thrust of the
changes, the Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee (AVCC)
criticised the lack of a real index that reflects real costs , and
urged the government to index higher education funding by the same
level as schools indexation.(2)
Higher education grants are indexed on the
basis of movements in the Higher Education Cost Adjustment Factor
(CAF). The CAF does not measure actual price increases in the
sector. It is comprised of two elements:
The proportions given above are notional
because they bear no relation to the actual expenditure of higher
education institutions. In 2001, expenditure on salaries and salary
related costs constituted around 59 per cent of total adjusted
university operating expenses. For expenses on academic activities
only, salaries and salary related costs constituted around 69 per
cent of the total.(4)
In the Higher Education Report for the 1999
to 2001 Triennium, the Government stated that it would review
the salary component of the CAF after the Australian Bureau of
Statistics had developed its new Wage Cost Index
(WCI).(5) When asked about the proposed review of the
CAF at the 2002-03 Supplementary Estimates Hearings (21 November
2002), the Department stated that indexation arrangements would be
considered in the context of the Higher Education
Review.(6) The Funding Paper for the Review discussed
indexation issues and noted that some submissions had argued the
WCI would be a more appropriate measure in respect of university
salary costs. It also noted that full wage indexation may remove
any incentive for institutions to seek genuine enterprise based
agreements and productivity trade-offs.(7) The scale of
the difference between the WCI and the SNA was indicated in the
Overview Paper for the Higher Education Review, which noted that
Over the period from August 1997 to August 2001 the WCI increased
on average by 3.25 per cent per year compared with the SNA average
of 1.55 per cent .(8) Actual wage outcomes for
university employees have been around 4 per cent p.a. since
1997.(9)
Indexation procedures vary significantly
between sectors. For example, the average indexation for schools
grants was 5.8 per cent in 2001-02 and 5.9 per cent in 2002-03. The
corresponding figures for higher education grants were 2.1 and 2.2
per cent.(10) School grants are indexed on the basis of
the Average Government School Running Costs (AGSRC) index.
This is derived from total expenditure on government
schools, less capital expenditure on buildings and grounds,
redundancy payments and Commonwealth Specific Purpose Payments. The
AGSRC index therefore reflects actual cost movements for the
sector, unlike the higher education CAF. In the language of the
Department of Finance, the indexation of schools grants is based on
program specific parameters , while higher education indexation is
based on economic parameters .(11)
Up to January 1996
higher education grants were adjusted according to movements in the
salary and non-salary components of the costs which faced
institutions. The link to the SNA followed a review of indexation
arrangements by the Department of Finance. According to the Higher
Education Funding Report for the 1996-98 Triennium, the new
approach to indexation was accepted by Cabinet because it
was simpler, fairer and more rational policy , with the particular
objective of ensuring that salary-related indexation fully excluded
the impact of productivity-based wage rises.(12)
Indexation arrangements for schools were also altered as a result
of the review, with redundancy repayments and Commonwealth Specific
Purpose Payments being removed from the AGSRC. However, no attempt
appears to have been made to completely exclude the impact of
productivity based wage increases in the government schools sector
from the AGSRC. This inconsistency in the indexation treatment of
education sectors has continued since 1995.
According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the Bill
increases the overall appropriations made under the HEFA by $49.368
million in 2002 and $58.385 million in 2003.
The 2002 increment is said to be for
accounting purposes in relation to the Higher Education (HECS)
Special Account. The Government makes payments to institutions from
this Account in respect of the HECS liabilities of students who
elect to defer their contributions and to cover the 25 per cent
discount for those students who pay their HECS upfront. Repayments
in respect of HECS debts are paid into the Account. The annual
shortfall is made up by a Commonwealth contribution to the Special
Account: in 2001-02 this payment was $766 million.(13)
The funds provided to institutions for operating purposes each year
are a combination of appropriated operating grants (section 17 of
the HEFA) and HECS Special Account funding (Part 4.3 of the HEFA).
The amendment will adjust section 17 funding levels to reflect
actual, as opposed to estimated, HECS liabilities.
In addition to supplementation funding
resulting from indexation, the 2003 increment incorporates
additional funding to rebuild the Mt Stromlo Observatory, which was
destroyed in the Canberra bushfires. The 2003-04 Budget included
$7.3 million for this purpose.(14)
The Bill will increase ARCA appropriations for
the period 1 January 2003 to 30 June 2007 by $436.313 million (not
$436.331 million as stated in the Explanatory Memorandum). Around
65 per cent of this increase can be attributed to the move from
calendar to financial year funding, with the remainder resulting
from the indexation of existing grants. Section 49 of the ARCA
contains the annual maxima for funding for approved research
programs under Division 1 of Part 7 of the Act. These are currently
expressed for calendar years 2001 to 2006. The Bill will replace
2004, 2005 and 2006 with 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07, entailing an
additional half-year s funding ($286.557
million(15)).
The Bill will also amend the ARCA to improve
the administration and financial management of the Australian
Research Council (the ARC).
Schedule 1 amends the HEFA
to substitute new funding levels for operating grants
(Item 1),
superannuation (Item
2), special research assistance (Item 3), teaching hospitals
(Item 4),
special capital projects (Item 5) and international
marketing and promotion (Item 6).
Schedule 2 contains
amendments to the ARCA. Items 8 to 13 contain
provisions relating to the replacement of the calendar years 2004,
2005 and 2006 with financial years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 for
funding purposes under the Act.
Item 14 amends section 49 to
substitute funding caps for 2003, the first half of 2004, 2004-05,
2005-06 and 2006-07.
Section 50 of the ARCA provides that the
Minister must divide the funding cap for a year between categories
of research programs. Item 15 will insert a new
sub-section 50(1A) which will allow the Minister to express these
funding cap proportions in terms of a range.
1.
Documents
relating to the Government s new higher education policy can be
obtained from http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/
2.
The AVCC s
response to the higher education policy, Excellence and Equity: foundations for
the future of Australia s universities (June 2003) can be downloaded from
http://www.avcc.edu.au/news/public_statements/publications/ResponseFinal03.pdf
3.
See Appendix A
of the Higher Education
Report for the 2003 to 2005 Triennium, which can be downloaded
from http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/he_report/2003_2005/default.htm
4.
DEST, Finance 2002 Selected Higher Education
Statistics (2003), Table 2. This can be obtained from http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/statpubs.htm#financepubs
5.
DEST,
Higher Education Report for
the 1999 to 2001 Triennium (March 1999), p.207.
6.
Employment,
Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee. Questions
on Notice 2002-03 Supplementary Estimates Hearing. DEST Question
Nos.E405_03 and E406_03.
7.
DEST, Setting Firm Foundations: Financing
Australian Higher Education (July 2002), pp.38-9. Available
from http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/pubs.htm#1
8.
DEST, Higher Education at the Crossroads An
Overview Paper (April 2002), p.34. Available from http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/pubs.htm#1
9.
ibid
10.
Employment,
Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee. Questions
on Notice 2002-03 Budget Estimates Hearing. DEST Question
Nos.E028_03, E029_03, E043_03.
11.
See
http://www.finance.gov.au/budgetgroup/other%5Fguidance%5Fnotes/indexation.html
for the Department of Finance s description of indexation
methodologies.
12.
Higher
Education Funding Report for the 1996-98
Triennium, p. 92.
13.
DEST, Annual Report 2001-02, p.
147.
14.
See
http://www.dest.gov.au/ministers/nelson/budget03/bud49_130503.htm
for the Minister s Media Release on the subject.
15.
This represents
half of the 2006-07 appropriation of $573.115 million.
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
2003.