WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Legislation Amendment Bill
(No. 2) 2000
Date Introduced: 1 June 2000
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Industry, Science and Resources
Commencement: Royal Assent.
To facilitate a
lump-sum pay-out of the Commonwealth's obligations to Western
Australia arising under a royalty sharing agreement over the North
West Shelf project.
The North
West Shelf Project
The North West Shelf extends from North West
Cape to the Arafura Sea and includes the northern Carnarvon,
offshore Canning, Browse, Bonaparte, and Arafura Basins. The 'North
West Shelf project' comprises the North Rankin, Goodwyn, Perseus
and Angel gas and condensate fields off north-western Australia. It
is defined in the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act
1987 and the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Royalty) Act
1967 as a set of exploration permits in the North West Shelf
area.
The project has two phases: the domestic gas
phase and the liquefied natural gas phase. Initial production from
the project commenced in 1995. Production in 1999 was 8.2 million
barrels of oil/condensate, 108 thousand tonnes LPG, 12.7 billion
cubic feet of gas and 1.3 thousand tonnes LNG.(1) Total
investment in the project to date has been around A$12bn. A
significant expansion project has been proposed.(2) The
project is apparently responsible for maintaining more than 60,000
jobs a year and the joint venturers pay more than $200 million
annually in royalties to State and Commonwealth
Governments.(3)
Historical
Account
In 1967 interest in offshore petroleum
exploration led to negotiations between the Commonwealth and the
States and Northern Territory which produced an agreement regarding
joint responsibility over offshore petroleum exploration and
exploitation. This agreement was reflected in the Petroleum
(Submerged Lands) Act 1967 (the 1967 Act).
The 1967 Act established joint authorities and
an exploration permit/exploitation licence regime. However, the Act
did not resolve controversy surrounding the constitutional basis of
the Commonwealth's claim vis-à-vis the States and the
Northern Territory.
The issue was tested in the early 1970's by two
pieces of legislation.(4) The Seas and Submerged
Lands Act 1973 asserted for the Commonwealth territorial
sovereignty over the 'territorial sea' and sovereign rights over
the 'continental shelf'.(5) The Petroleum (Submerged
Lands) Act 1973 specifically extended Commonwealth control
over offshore petroleum exploration and extraction by extending the
limits of the 'adjacent areas' (very broadly, areas of sea adjacent
to each State between 3 nautical miles and the limit of the
'continental shelf') under the 1967 Act.
The issue was resolved in the Seas and
Submerged Lands Case.(6) Effectively the High Court
determined that the Commonwealth has control vis-à-vis the
State over all offshore mineral exploration and extraction. The
consequence was that, while the States arguably retained their
extra-territorial jurisdiction under common law,(7) it
was considered desirable to effect a 're-ordering and readjustment
of powers and responsibilities' to reflect the underlying
sovereignty of the Commonwealth.(8) Negotiations
commenced between the Commonwealth and the States resulting in the
Offshore Constitutional Settlement and amendments to
various Acts including the 1967 Act.
Tax Revenue
The Commonwealth has received royalties from
petroleum production since production commenced in Bass Strait in
1968. Excise was first levied by the Commonwealth on the production
of crude oil, commingled condensate and liquefied propane gas in
1975. In 1983 an excise and royalty regime was implemented which
distinguished between onshore and offshore petroleum production,
revenue associated with the latter being centralised in accordance
with the Offshore Constitutional Settlement.(9)
In 1987 the regime was largely replaced by a new regime based on a
'petroleum resource rent tax' (PRRT), a profit based tax levied on
40% of a project's taxable profits.(10) An outline is
given elsewhere.(11)
North West
Shelf
Significantly, the North West Shelf project was
exempted from the PRRT. Thus, exploration permits, leases and
licences for this project are dealt with specifically by the
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Royalty) Act 1967 (the
Royalty Act). Apparently, the exclusion of the project from the
PRRT regime was 'primarily a reaction to economic problems which
would be encountered in calculating resource rent tax on the
production of the project, were the [Act] applied to
it'.(12) More specifically:
In exempting the North West Shelf fields from
the PRRT, it was argued that there had been a massive investment in
infrastructure involving vast sums of financing over a long lead
time. Critically, contracts to supply gas to Japanese customers had
only just been signed, and had the PRRT been implemented, it would
have been necessary to renegotiate these contracts. In view of the
potentially harmful effect on Australia's trade relationship with
Japan that such contract renegotiation may have had, the existing
excise and royalty regime was maintained.(13)
Section 5 of the Royalty Act makes the holder of
an interest liable to pay a monthly royalty at the prescribed rate.
The prescribed rate is 10 per cent of the value at the well head of
petroleum recovered under a lease, permit or licence, by virtue of
section 5(2) of the Act, while the rate for a secondary licence is
stated in section 5(3) to be determined in accordance with
subsection 42(1) of the Act. This provision sets the rate at
between 11 per cent and 12 per cent of the value of petroleum
recovered at the well head. Section 9 of the Royalty Act allows for
the value of the petroleum at the well head to be determined, while
section 10 sets out a procedure for ascertaining the quantity of
petroleum recovered.(14)
Arrangements with Western
Australia
Under the Royalty Act, the States and the
Northern Territory were paid a share of around 2/3rds of
the monthly royalty collected by the Commonwealth. Section 130
establishes an arrangement whereby the Commonwealth shares with
Western Australia an additional share of its royalties from the
domestic gas phase of the North West Shelf project. The additional
share equates to:
-
- the remainder of the yearly royalty retained by the
Commonwealth, or
-
- a fixed yearly royalty based on the yearly royalty collected by
the Commonwealth in 1984-85 and weighted according to changes in
GDP
whichever is the lesser.
The arrangement was introduced to 'help Western
Australia meet its contractual obligations to the North West Shelf
operators and so ensure the continued viability of the
project'.(15) It seemed that, in negotiating a
take-or-pay contract with the joint venturers, the Court Government
in Western Australia had over-estimated the domestic demand for
gas. As a result, the State Energy Commission of Western Australia
might have incurred 'major payment obligations for gas that could
not be used'.(16) The Commonwealth Minister for
Resources and Energy said, 'It was clear that the basic principle
of the take or pay contract had to be honoured, and a sufficient
cash flow ensured to the joint venturers to enable the financing of
the export phase of the project.'(17) The arrangement
was to last until 2004-05.
Since the arrangement was introduced, royalty
receipts have grown exponentially, outstripping the fixed regime
and reducing the proportional burden on the Commonwealth.
Actual Petroleum Royalties
Collected by the Commonwealth (to May
2000)(18)

One-off Payment to Discharge the
Obligation
The Explanatory Memorandum indicates that the
Commonwealth and Western Australia have agreed for the Commonwealth
to make a one-off payment of $79,118,990 ($117.1m in 1984/85
dollars) to discharge the entire obligation under section 130. It
is estimated that the one-off payment will save the Commonwealth
$93.9m.
However, given the fact that section 130 creates
an exclusive regime for making these payments, it effectively ties
the hands of the Commonwealth Treasurer. Therefore, in order to
make the one-off payment, it is necessary to repeal section
130.
Schedule 1 Item 1 repeals
section 130 of the 1967 Act.
- http://www.bhp.com.au/aboutbhp/fastfacts/northwest.htm.
- For an overview of its economic and fiscal impacts see
North West Shelf Expansion Project: Australian Economic and
Fiscal Impacts, prepared by Access Economics for Woodsite
Offshore Petroleum Pty Ltd at http://www.ae.aust.com/~bhaccess/nwsaust.doc
[8/6/00]. For a general critique of the project's prospects see
Brian Robbins, 'North Slope poses a threat to NW Shelf',
Business News Resources, 24/8/98 at http://www.brw.com.au/content/240898/brw08.htm
[8/6/00].
- 'Economic Impact' on the Woodside webpage at http://www.woodside.com.au/anws/impact.html
[8/6/00].
- In fact, the issue was first tested in 1970 with the
Territorial Sea and Continental Shelf Bill 1970, but the Bill never
proceeded. The Seas and Submerged Lands Bill 1973 followed a report
by the Senate Select Committee on Offshore Petroleum Resources that
recommended the issue be resolved by Commonwealth legislation.
- These terms reflected the terminology in the Convention on
the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone and Convention
on the Continental Shelf, op. cit. note 35.
- NSW v The Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 337.
- For example, the High Court held that the States retained a
power over fisheries in the territorial sea: Pearce v
Florenca (1976) 135 CLR 507.
- Offshore Constitutional Settlement: A milestone in
co-operative federalism, Commonwealth of Australia,
Attorney-General's Department, AGPS, Canberra, 1980, p. 4.
- Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Amendment Act 1980 and the
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Royalty) Amendment Act 1980.
Both these Act commenced in 1983.
- Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Act 1987 and the
Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987.
- Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Legislation Amendment Bill 1999,
Bills Digest
no. 45, 1999-00 at http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/1999-2000/2000BD045.htm
[8/6/00].
- Ian Ireland & Marco Bini, 'Mineral resources: taxation,
levies & charges - a legislative overview', Background
Paper no. 28, 1994-95 at
http://search.aph.gov.au/search/ParlInfo.ASP?Folder=PRSPUB&Criteria=citation_id:VH520;&action=bookmark.
- Michael Ridd, 'Royalties and natural resources: a discussion
paper', Background Paper No. 11 1992 at
http://search.aph.gov.au/search/ParlInfo.ASP?Folder=PRSPUB&Criteria=citation_id:U7T00;&action=bookmark.
The author cites a press release: Australia. Treasurer (Paul
Keating) and Minister for Resources (Alan Griffiths). 'Review of
petroleum production excise and royalty arrangements'. Press
release, no. 78, 21 Aug. 1990.
- This description is paraphrased from Ian Ireland & Marco
Bini, 'Mineral resources: taxation, levies & charges - a
legislative overview', Background Paper no. 28,
1994-95.
- The Hon Kim Beazley, MP,
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Amendment Bill 1985, Second Reading
Speech, Parliamentary Debates, 23/4/85, p. 1697 at
[8/6/00].
- Senator Gareth Evans QC, 'Agreement Reached on North West
Shelf', Press Release, 11/3/85.
- ibid.
- Source: Personal Communication, Department of Industry Science
and Tourism.
Nathan Hancock
20 June 2000
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with
Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2000
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
2000.
Back to top