WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
States Grants (General
Purposes)Amendment Bill 1999
Date Introduced: 10 June 1999
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Treasury
Commencement: On Royal Assent
To amend the
States Grants (General Purposes) Act 1994 so as to:
-
- provide for general revenue assistance (including financial
assistance grants and national competition payments) to the States
and Territories in 1999-2000
-
- enable the Commonwealth to make payments to the States and
Territories under the safety net arrangements relating to business
franchise fees in 1999-2000, and
-
- enable windfall tax reimbursements received by the Commonwealth
to be paid to the States and Territories in 1999-2000.
Since the State Governments lost the capacity to
levy income tax in 1942, they have become increasingly financially
dependent on the Federal Government. At present the bulk of their
funds come from Commonwealth sources, and almost half of that comes
from general purpose grants.
All Commonwealth payments to the States and
Territories are made as either Specific Purpose Payments or General
Purpose Grants. The grants are contingent on the fulfilment of a
wide range of terms and conditions.
This Bill covers general purpose grants. These
grants are 'untied' in that the Commonwealth does not specify how
the money should be spent. Nevertheless there are some conditions
attached to the receipt of this money. The conditions are set out
in the States Grants (General Purposes) legislation.(1)
There are two categories of general purpose
grants to be provided by this Bill: financial assistance grants and
national competition payments. According to 1999-2000 Budget
Papers, Commonwealth general revenue assistance to the States and
Territories is expected to be about $17.7 billion in 1999-2000, an
increase of $706.2 million or 4.2 per cent on the previous
year.(2)
Financial Assistance Grants
The financial assistance grants (FAGs) are the
largest category of general purpose grants. The overall pool of
money from which FAGs are allocated is determined according to a
formula which maintains the grants in real per capita terms, making
adjustments for inflation and national population growth. FAG
funding arrangements have been operating since 1985-86, when they
replaced the previous tax-sharing grant arrangements.(3)
FAGs are distributed among States and
Territories essentially upon recommendations by the Commonwealth
Grants Commission. In March 1999 the Commission presented the
Government with its report on general revenue grant
relativities.(4) The basis on which grants should be distributed
between the States and Territories had not been reviewed since 1993
and the Commission recommended a number of changes to the way it
believes the distribution should be decided.
The report was discussed at the Premiers'
Conference on 9 April 1999 where it was agreed that the level of
FAGs to the States and Territories would be maintained in real per
capital terms in 1999-2000. The Premiers' Conference also decided
that the pool of FAGs and 'unquarantined' Health Care Grants (HCGs)
would be distributed using the per capita relativities calculated
by the Commonwealth Grants Commission based on a five year
assessment period and including an assessment for
depreciation.(5)
The effect of the 1999 relativities is to
redistribute funding away from Victoria and Western Australia to
New South Wales and the smaller states. New South Wales gains the
largest increase in grant share, benefiting most from the
introduction of an assessment of depreciation costs.(6) This Bill
gives effect to these decisions of the Premiers' Conference.
National Competition Payments
National competition payments will also be
available to the States and Territories in 1999-2000 in accordance
with the terms of the Agreement to Implement the National
Competition Policy and Related Reforms. A total amount of
$439.1 million is available in 1999-2000 to be divided on an equal
per capital basis among those States and Territories that make
satisfactory progress in implementing the reform conditions
specified in the Agreement.(7)
The background to these payments is as
follows:
The Commonwealth, States and Territories agreed
at the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting of 11 April
1995 to a program for the implementation of the National
Competition Policy and related financial arrangements. The
Commonwealth agreed to make additional general purpose payments to
the States and Territories in the form of a series of national
competition payments. It was agreed that national competition
payments would commence in July 1997 at a level of $200 million,
and increase to $400 million in July 1999 and $600 million in July
2001 (all in 1994-95 prices). States and Territories agree to
comply with certain conditions in order to receive national
competition payments.
Revenue Replacement Payments
Revenue replacement payments are Commonwealth
payments to the States separate from general purpose grants. They
are designed to replace revenues that the States and Territories
previously collected from State business franchise fees on tobacco
and petroleum products and alcoholic beverages. Arrangements for
revenue replacement payments were announced in August 1997
following the High Court's decision that cast doubt on the
constitutional validity of these franchise fees.(8)
The total amount of revenue to be distributed
will be determined by the Commissioner of Taxation and the Chief
Executive Officer of Customs. The distribution of this revenue is
unchanged from the revised shares which were agreed among the
States and Territories in 1997-98.
Windfall Tax Reimbursements
A State or Territory will also be paid any
amounts received by the Commonwealth under the Franchise Fees
Windfall Tax (Collection) Act 1997 which imposes a 100 per
cent windfall gains tax to protect State and Territory budgets
against refund claims in respect of past business franchise fee
payments. Any windfall tax reimbursement payments to a State or
Territory will be equal to the amount collected by the tax in that
State.
Changes to Commonwealth-State Financial
Relations
On 13 August 1998, the Commonwealth Government
announced its plan to reform the Australian taxation system. A key
element of the A New Tax System (ANTS) package is the
reform of Commonwealth-State financial relations. At the 1999
Premiers' Conference on 9 April, the Heads of Government signed an
Intergovernmental Agreement on the Reform of Commonwealth-State
Financial Relations (IGA). A revised IGA was drawn up
following Senate amendments to the Government's ANTS
legislation. The revised IGA, which has been signed by each State
and Territory Head of Government, gives effect to a number of
reform measures including:
-
- From 1 July 2000, the Commonwealth will appropriate all of the
Goods and Services Tax (GST) revenues to the States and Territories
so that no State or Territory is worse off than under current
arrangements.
-
- Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) and revenue associated with
the safety net surcharge arrangements for alcohol, petroleum and
tobacco products will cease from 1 July 2000.
-
- Receipt of GST revenues by States and Territories will be
subject to their meeting other obligations, including funding and
administering a First Home Owners Scheme, and paying to the
Commonwealth the cost of administering the GST.
-
- Initially the GST revenues will not be sufficient to fund the
States and Territories current expenditure and the new
responsibilities they are assuming. The Commonwealth has therefore
guaranteed that, in each of the transitional years following the
introduction of the GST, the budgetary position of each State and
Territory will not be worse off under the new arrangements.
The revised IGA also provides for the setting up
of a Ministerial Council from 1 July 2000, comprising Commonwealth
and State Treasurers, to oversee the implementation and operation
of the Intergovernmental Agreement and to ensure compliance with
its terms. The Ministerial Council will also provide a forum for
the discussion of per capita relativities to apply to the
distribution of the GST revenues among the States and Territories
and remove the need for the annual Premiers' Conference
process.
Amendments to the Government's original GST
package are projected to cost about $4 billion a year by 2002-03.
This will result in decreased revenues to the States, and to
compensate, the Commonwealth will continue to assume responsibility
for providing assistance to local government. In addition, the
abolition of nine State indirect taxes has been rescheduled and in
some cases deferred indefinitely. The following table summarises
the original and revised dates for abolishing the nine State
indirect taxes.
|
Fate of Nine State Taxes
|
|
|
Revenue $m in
2002-03
|
Date of Abolition
|
|
Original
|
Revised
|
|
FID
|
1,360
|
Jan 2001
|
July 2001
|
|
Debits tax
|
1,120
|
Jan 2001
|
July 2005
|
|
Stamp duty on shares
|
750
|
July 2001
|
July 2001
|
|
Business conveyance duty
|
1,460
410
|
July 2001
July 2001
|
Abandoned
Abandoned
|
|
Stamp duty on hiring
|
210
|
July 2001
|
Abandoned
|
|
Stamp duty on leases
|
130
|
July 2001
|
Abandoned
|
|
Stamp duty on mortgages
|
530
|
July 2001
|
Abandoned
|
|
Stamp duty on cheques
|
15
|
July 2001
|
Abandoned
|
|
Bed taxes
|
90
|
July 2000
|
July 2000
|
|
Total
|
6,075
|
|
|
Source: Gittins R, Premiers-and you and
me-to pay for GST trickery, The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 June
1999.
The changes to Commonwealth-State financial
arrangements require the passage of legislation by the
Commonwealth, States and Territories. On 29 June 1999 the House of
Representatives delayed consideration of the Senate's amendments to
the A New Tax System (Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements)
Bill 1999 and the A New Tax System (Commonwealth-State Financial
Arrangements - Consequential Provisions) Bill 1999 because some
States and Territories had not signed the revised IGA at that
time.(9) More detail on these bills can be found in the relevant
Bills Digests.(10) Among the provisions of the A New Tax System
(Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements) Bill 1999 is the
maintenance of the State and Territories' entitlement to national
competition payments and the protection provided by the business
franchise fees windfall tax from 1 July 2000 following the repeal
of the States Grants (General Purposes) Act 1994.
Item 1 of Schedule 1 inserts a new
Schedule 6 into the States Grants (General Purposes)
Act 1994 (the Act) to provide details of entitlements to
financial assistance grants, national competition payments, revenue
replacement payments and windfall tax reimbursements for
1999-2000.
The overall pool of money from which financial
assistance grants (FAGs) are allocated and the distribution of the
pool among the States and Territories is determined according to a
formula set out in Section 9 of the Act. In this formula, the 'base
assistance amount' is to be calculated under new subclause
2(2) of Schedule 6 and the relativities factors are to be
provided by new clause 3 of Schedule 6. Page 4 of
the Explanatory Memorandum to this Bill explains the
operation of the formula in detail.
New clause 4 specifies a
formula which determines the maximum amount which the Commonwealth
Treasury may deduct from a State or Territory's financial
assistance grant under Section 10 of the Act, if a State or
Territory fails to comply with its obligations under the
Agreement to Implement the National Competition Policy and
Related Reforms.
New clause 8 specifies how each
State and Territory's entitlement to a national competition payment
is to be worked out. The formula includes an index factor
multiplied by a figure representing the population of each State
and Territory as at 31 December 1999. The purpose is to divide the
amount available on an equal per capita basis among those States
and Territories complying with the Agreement.
New clause 5 specifies how each
State and Territory's entitlement to a revenue replacement payment
is to be worked out. The distribution of this revenue is on the
same basis as that agreed among the States and Territories in
1997-98.
The effect of new subclause 5(3) and
5(4) will be to facilitate the assessment of safety net
revenues for tobacco on the existing basis. The basis is explained
in detail in the Bills Digest to the States Grants (General
Purposes) Amendment Bill No. 2 1997 (Bills Digest No. 99, 1997-98).
According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the Government
intends introducing a new 'per stick' excise regime for tobacco
from 1 November 1999. New subclauses 5(3) and 5(4)
will ensure that State and Territory shares of tobacco excise under
the safety net arrangements will continue to be calculated on the
existing weight and ad-valorem basis.
New clause 6 specifies how each
State and Territory's entitlement to a franchise fees windfall tax
reimbursement payment is to be worked out. The States and
Territories are the agents for collecting any windfall tax and the
Franchise Fees Windfall Tax (Collection) Act 1997 imposes
on them certain conditions in relation to the manner and timing of
remitting revenues to the Commonwealth. Any windfall tax
reimbursement payments to a State or Territory will be equal to the
amount collected by the tax in that State or Territory.
-
- In 1998 the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit
examined and reported on the conditions which may appropriately be
attached to General and Specific Purpose Payments to the States.
The Committee concluded that, with regard to General Purpose
Payments (GPPs), there is little to be gained from attempting to
prescribe a definitive list of specific conditions which might
appropriately be applied to hypothetical future conditional GPP
funding arrangements. Conditions would need to be determined for
each case. Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit, 'General
and Specific Purpose Payments to the States', Report 362,
June 1998, p. 96-97.
- Federal Financial Relations 1999-2000, Budget Paper No.
3, 1999-2000, p. 6.
- Denis James, 'Commonwealth Assistance to the States since
1976', Parliamentary Library, Background Papers
(Economics, Commerce and Industrial Relations Group), No. 5,
1997/98, 20 October 1997, p. 11.
- Commonwealth Grants Commission, 'Report on general revenue
grant relativities 1999', Press Release, 2 March 1999.
- Federal Financial Relations 1999-2000, Budget Paper No.
3, 1999-2000, p. 7.
- Ibid., p. 31.
- Ibid., p. 32-33.
- Ha and Another v State of New South Wales & Others
and Walter Hammond & Associates v State of New South Wales
& Others (1997) 71 ALJR 1080.
- House of Representatives, Debates, 29 June 1999, p.
P6033.
- A New Tax System (Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements)
Bill 1999, Bills Digest, 164, 1998-99; A New Tax System
(Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements - Consequential
Provisions) Bill 1999, Bills Digest, 170, 1998-99.
Rosemary Bell
2 August 1999
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with
Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1999
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
1999.
Back to top