WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Bill
1996
Date Introduced: 12 December 1996
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Finance
Commencement: On the same day as the Financial
Management and
The Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Bill 1996 (the CAC
Bill) forms part of a package of four Bills and associated measures
designed to modernise controls on Commonwealth finances and over
businesses owned or operated by the Commonwealth.
The other Bills in the package are:
- the Auditor-General Bill 1996 (the Auditor-General Bill);
- the Audit (Transitional and Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 1996
(the Transitional Provisions Bill); and
- the Financial Management and Accountability Bill 1996 (the FMA
Bill).
The Auditor-General Bill, amongst other things, provides for the
re-establishment of the Office of Auditor-General under the
proposed new financial accountability regime replacing the
Audit Act 1901 (the Audit Act); and styles the
Auditor-General as an 'independent officer of the Parliament'.This
Bill also re-creates the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) as
an independent statutory body employing staff under the Public
Service Act 1922 but with a capacity to contract out work
where considered appropriate by the Auditor-General.Together with
the Transitional Provisions Bill, the Auditor-General Bill makes
provision for a wider role for Parliament (through what will be the
Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit) in selecting the
Auditor-General and in monitoring the performance of that Office
and the ANAO. The Auditor-General Bill also re-establishes the
Office of Independent Auditor who is the Parliament's auditor of
the ANAO.
The Transitional Provisions Bill formally repeals the Audit
Act, proposes consequential changes to enabling
legislation affecting Commonwealth authorities so as to link those
bodies to the CAC Bill, and provides for the Auditor-General in
office at 30 June 1997 to see out the remainder of their 10 year
term.The Public Accounts Committee Act 1951 is to be
amended to enlarge the powers and functions of the Parliamentary
Joint Committee of Public Accounts (JCPA).
The FMA Bill seeks to establish a regulatory framework for
Commonwealth instrumentalities which financially are agents of the
Commonwealth, that is, those bodies which do not 'own' their funds
but operate squarely within the provisions of sections 81 and 83 of
the Commonwealth Constitution.Such bodies include the Departments
of State, the Parliamentary Departments and many Statutory
authorities and government agencies which manage public money or
property on behalf of the Commonwealth.The Bill also specifies the
powers and responsibilities of the Minister for Finance with regard
to their duties as custodian of the Treasury of the Commonwealth
under the Constitution.
The principal object of the CAC Bill is to bring a greater
degree of uniformity and clarity to financial reporting standards
applying to Commonwealth authorities and to establish standards of
conduct for those engaged in the management of those entities.In
doing so the CAC Bill repeals Part XI of the Audit Act and,
together with the Transitional Provisions Bill, replaces a
multitude of specific legislative provisions contained in the
enabling legislation establishing many Commonwealth authorities.
The CAC Bill also extends the mandate of the Auditor-General to all
Commonwealth authorities and Commonwealth companies although
slightly different rules will apply in respect of wholly-owned and
partly-owned Commonwealth companies and in relation to Government
Business Enterprises (GBEs).
The present Bill and the associated measures are similar but not
identical to a package of Bills introduced by the previous
Government in June and December 1994.(1) The earlier Bills were
subject of a JCPA Report(2) and debated in both Chambers. However,
the legislation was not passed before the Parliament was prorogued
on 29 January 1996 for the General Election of 2 March 1996.
Terminology
As the Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation
Committee noted in preparing its most recent List of
Commonwealth Bodies, there is no general agreement or commonly
applied standard in relation to the definition of the various types
of Commonwealth body.(3)The FMA and CAC Bills, if passed, would go
some way to addressing this problem.
The audit Bills collectively set up a reporting and
accountability framework for the full range of Government
bodies.That classification is based not on the type of functions
performed by each those bodies but is applied according to their
legal personality and, in particular, the source or degree of
control they exercise over their funding. Under this schema, budget
dependent agencies such as the Government Departments generally are
dealt with under the FMA Bill whilst independent 'self-funded'
bodies including many Commonwealth authorities and Commonwealth
companies are dealt with under the CAC Bill.
As most readers know, where a term is defined in the Bill, the
meaning given to it in the legislation prevails over the
'dictionary meaning' and any popular or current usage given that
expression.(4) For example, GBEs for the purposes of the CAC Bill
will be any Commonwealth authority or Commonwealth company that is
prescribed by the regulations to be a GBE. Hence, it is possible
(but unlikely) that some of the 13 entities which are now commonly
regarded as GBEs may not be treated as such for the purposes of
this legislation.(5)
The more important terms defined in the CAC Bill are discussed
in the Main Provisions section of this Digest.
Coverage
According to the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public
Administration, as at June 1993 there were 1236 Commonwealth bodies
outside the departmental framework of administration. These
comprised:
- 358 Statutory authorities and statutory offices;
- 327 non-statutory bodies; and
- 551 companies/associations.(6)
In its 1996 Report, the Committee used a slightly different
approach to classification but the results are (unsurprisingly) not
dissimilar:
Commonwealth Bodies by Type and Total
June 1996
Associated Company Controlled Incorporated Non Statutory Statutory Chief
Company Limited Company -Statutory Authority Office Company
by Association Body
Guarantee
49 57 287 140 457 307 51 24
Perhaps the most significant change in the make-up of government
bodies was the reduction in the number of GBEs. In 1993, there were
19, as previously noted there are presently only 13.(7)
A non exhaustive list of Statutory authorities which will be
subject to the CAC Bill forms Attachment A to this
Digest.
Government Accounting Framework
Whilst many Statutory authorities and Commonwealth companies
enjoy a degree of independence from ministerial direction and some
are relatively free from public service staffing controls, they are
subject to government control and supervision either by way of:
- their own enabling legislation;
- the provisions of Part XI of the Audit Act(8); or
- specific reference to the general provisions of the Audit
Act.
Moreover, Statutory authorities and Commonwealth companies are
from time to time required to seek special appropriations or else
pay dividends into consolidated revenue. More fundamentally,
Commonwealth authorities and companies can never be said to be
entirely divorced from the constraints imposed by the Constitution
which sets the parameters for the Government's accounting
framework.
The accounting framework of the Commonwealth is broadly defined
by the Constitution.
Section 51 provides that the Parliament has power to make laws
for taxation and borrowing money on public credit. Parliament also
has the exclusive right to impose customs and excise duties
(section 90).
Money raised or revenue received by the Executive Government
must form part of one Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) which may be
appropriated (drawn on) for Commonwealth purposes (section 81).
No money can, however, be drawn from the Treasury of the
Commonwealth except under an appropriation made by law (section
83).
Public money may only be appropriated on the initiative of the
Executive Government (section 56) as a message from the
Governor-General to the House of Representatives recommending an
appropriation is required.
Since federation, the defining elements of day to day
Commonwealth financial administration have been section 81 and 83
of the Constitution and the Audit Act, which, as has been
frequently noted, was the fourth piece of legislation enacted by
the Commonwealth.
The Audit Act establishes the framework for financial
administration of the Executive Government and the roles, powers
and duties of Commonwealth officers responsible for financial
administration. Three tiers of subordinate (delegated) legislation
prescribe these powers and functions in more detail.They are:
- the Finance Regulations - made on the authority of the
Governor-General
- the Finance Directions - given on the authority of the Minister
for Finance; and
- Secretaries' Directions - given on the authority of the
Secretary of a Department to the staff of that Department.
Commonwealth Authorities and Companies and Audit Controls
Many Commonwealth/Statutory authorities and government companies
are not subject to the standard controls imposed by the Audit
Act but are subject to specific measures contained in the
enabling legislation under which they operate.
In 1979, the Audit Act was amended by inserting Part XI
to establish some basic financial provisions relating to the
operations of Statutory authorities and certain other bodies. This
was a first step towards standardisation of reporting, accounting
and ethical requirements of Statutory authorities to which Part XI
applied. The 1979 amendments did not, however, subject the
authorities affected to the other provisions of the Audit
Act.
Part XI of the Audit Act currently sets out financial provisions
for bank accounts, the keeping of proper accounts, investment,
audit by the Auditor-General, annual reports and financial
statements of prescribed authorities that operate outside the
obligations and safeguards provided by the public account. Division
2 of Part XI applies to commercial authorities; Division 3 applies
to non-commercial authorities.
In addition, the Department of Finance has (since 1983) issued a
special publication,'Guidelines for Financial Statements of Public
Authorities and Commercial Activities'. These guidelines seek to
'facilitate the preparation of general purpose financial reports of
public authorities and commercial activities that convey relevant
and reliable information to users and enable management to
discharge their accountability in an effective manner.'(9)
The Guidelines apply to the financial statements of:
- Commonwealth public authorities required by an Act to comply
with the Guidelines;
- Commonwealth public authorities that are referred to in an
instrument of the Minister for Finance approving the forms of those
statements as set out in Part II of Schedule 2 of the
Guidelines;
- Departmental trust accounts that are required by a
determination of the Minister pursuant to section 41D of the
Audit Act to prepare financial statements in the form set
out in Part II of Schedule 2 of the Guidelines.
The Guidelines do not apply to companies owned
or controlled by the Commonwealth.(10)
Standardisation
In 1986(11) and 1987(12), the Government indicated its intention
to standardise reporting arrangements for incorporated
authorities.
In April 1989, the Parliamentary Joint Committee of Public
Accounts (JCPA) presented its Report No. 296, The
Auditor-General: Ally of the People and Parliament - Reform of the
Audit Office, which recommended that the Audit Act be repealed
and replaced with more modern and flexible financial
management.(13) This recommendation was accepted by the Government
in November 1989.(14)
In November 1989, the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and
Public Administration recommended that general provisions for
formation, reporting audit and disposal of government companies be
set out in a Government Companies Act.(15) The report also gave
added weight to the recommendations made by the JCPA in its 1989
Report cited above.
In June 1990, a new national scheme for the regulation of
companies generally (the Corporations Law) was agreed by
the Commonwealth and the States and Territories. This move to
greater uniformity also added impetus to the push treating
Commonwealth owned companies in a like manner to their private
sector counterparts.
The above developments, and the drive for greater efficiency and
accountability in public enterprises and undertakings generally,
have also added weight to proposals for standardising financial and
reporting requirements for Commonwealth authorities if for no
reason other than to simplify the task of monitoring their
activities.
Ministerial Responsibility
The pursuit of more uniformity and enhanced accountability has
not been entirely free of controversy although the underlying
elements of that controversy have not always been clearly
articulated. In the context of the present package, accountability
and standardisation are seen as fundamental goals.
A theme running through the submissions to the JCPA Enquiry into
the 1994 audit Bills was that relations between Ministers and
Commonwealth authorities and businesses do not readily conform to
any fixed set of principles or a convenient 'one-size-fits-all'
approach. (Subsequent amendments have sought to address a number of
specific concerns raised with the JCPA.)
Attempts to lay down hard and fast rules, particularly those
designed to bolster 'traditional' notions of ministerial
responsibility or extend them to all Statutory authorities, must
circumvent a number of hazards. For example, there is a myriad of
rules governing the financial relations of Commonwealth authorities
and companies because there is a myriad of authorities and
companies serving myriad purposes. These corporate objectives and
functions are not always clearly defined or integrated into policy
formulation. Indeed as the Department of Finance itself
observed,'([in some instances] Statutory authorities have grown up
through a series of ad hoc government decisions, without prior
careful consideration of the national benefits and costs of their
establishment.'(16)
To impose a standard set of requirements on such an array of
interests is an ambitious step but one which has not been
explicitly challenged to date.
This is not, however, to say that efficiency and accountability
are mutually incompatible. In May 1994, the Industry Commission
supported the fundamental tenets of accountability in relation to
GBEs, concluding that:
Boards should be accountable to parliaments through the relevant
minister(s). Accountability is supported by the preparation of a
corporate plan, annual report and indicators of financial and non
financial performance as well as external audit.(17)
The fundamental question is one of degree. How to minimise the
costs of responsible management without unduly inhibiting
managerial initiative or opening the door to political interference
in decision-making. One starting point is to recognise that
Statutory authorities and government companies exist outside
departmental structures for the very purpose of extricating them
from day to day control by Ministers. Another is to acknowledge
that the absence of day to day control should not lead to an
abrogation of responsibility so that at the minimum, Statutory
authorities can be legitimately expected to comply with Government
policies and should endeavour to meet performance targets set for
them by Government.
In attempting to balance the above considerations the Hawke
Government enunciated what may still be a useful set of 'ground
rules' for determining the relationship between a Minister and any
given statutory body or government enterprise:
The responsibility of a Minister for an authority derives from
sections 61 and 64 of the Constitution, and is shown by the
assignment of the enabling Act by the Administrative Arrangements
Order.The following factors have a bearing upon the role a Minister
may be called upon to take and the extent of the responsibility to
be borne in relation to an authority's affairs:
- Authorities are accountable to the Parliament through the
responsible Minister.
- The degree of autonomy of an authority from Ministerial control
will depend upon the nature of the functions which justified its
establishment and for which independence is specifically warranted.
However, outside areas of specific autonomy of an authority,
general government policies should be adhered to. Appropriate
Ministerial controls, including powers of approval or direction,
should normally be provided in the legislation.
- Areas of independence and those subject to Ministerial controls
(and the nature of those controls) should be clearly and precisely
specified in enabling legislation, including activities for which
specific Ministerial approval must be sought.
- Where an authority is required by statute to perform a function
independently of Ministerial direction or superintendence, it is
the authority which must take responsibility for day-to-day
discharge of the function and for reporting to Parliament, through
the responsible Minister, accordingly. The authority's annual
report will be the normal means for rendering this account.
- Even where independence is stipulated, the activities of an
authority will normally be monitored by the Minister to ensure
satisfactory observance of the requirements of the existing
charter, the adequacy of that charter, and the general quality of
performance, including assurances that the conduct of business by
an authority conforms to appropriate public standards of propriety
and probity. In meeting these obligations, the Minister needs to be
kept regularly advised of the activities of an authority.If
suitable procedures do not exist for this purpose they should be
established, if necessary on a statutory basis.
- The nature and extent of a Minister's role and responsibilities
in each particular case vary according to the specific legislative
provisions relating to the respective functions and
responsibilities of the Minister and the statutory
authority.(18)
The CAC Bill
The present CAC Bill closely resembles the Commonwealth
Authorities and Companies Bill 1994 as read a third time in the
House of Representatives, i.e. the 1994 Bill as amended in response
to JCPA Report No. 331 (see below).
A earlier version of the CAC Bill was introduced on 29 June 1994
by the Minister for Finance, the Hon Kim Beazley and referred, on
his motion, to the JCPA for review with an advisory report to be
presented by 23 August 1994. Extensive public hearings were held
and on 23 August 1994 the House agreed to extend the reporting
deadline till 22 September 1994.
The JCPA presented its Report No. 331, entitled, An
Advisory Report on the Financial Management and Accountability Bill
1994, the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Bill 1994 and the
Auditor-General Bill 1994, and on a Proposal to Establish an Audit
Committee of Parliament, in September 1994, which generally
welcomed the introduction of the CAC Bill noting that:
- it would enable Parliament to view the accountability
requirements of the vast range of Commonwealth authorities and
companies as a whole;
- it would ensure that the accountability requirements are
explicit and consistent for each class of Commonwealth entity;
- it would strengthen and clarify the mandate of the
Auditor-General; and
- the task of amending one Bill to reflect contemporary best
practice standards will be far easier than amending individual
enabling Acts, company memoranda and articles.(19)
JCPA Report No. 331, was, however, critical of a number
of aspects of the Bill and the Committee made a series of
recommendations for improving the legislation.
When the CAC Bill was debated, the Government moved a series of
20 amendments which in part addressed the concerns raised by the
JCPA. The Bill was passed by the House on 8 December 1994 and
introduced into the Senate on 6 February 1995. An amendment moved
by the Australian Democrats was passed(20) and the Bill returned to
the House of Representatives which rejected the Democrat amendment
on 29 March 1995. As noted above, the 1994 audit Bills failed to
pass during the life of the previous Parliament.
It should be noted that the substantive provisions of the Bill
do not represent a complete code for the regulation of Commonwealth
authorities and companies.Importantly, the audit package will also
include general policy statements issued by the Government [refer
clauses 28 and 43] and Finance Minister's Orders
to be issued under clause 48 of the CAC Bill.
Definitions
In a generic sense, most the bodies dealt with under this Bill
may be termed 'Statutory authorities'.A 'Statutory authority' is an
organisation established by an Act of Parliament to provide
services to the community. These come in many functional types
including:
- trading
- adjudicatory
- regulatory
- public advisory and research functions
- educational, cultural and media functions
- investigation of and reporting on executive action
- inter-governmental functions.
Whilst Statutory authorities generally derive little or no
revenue from the services they deliver, there are exceptions in the
form of two special types of Statutory authorities:
- 'Statutory Marketing Authorities' (SMAs); and
- 'Government Business Enterprises' (GBEs).
The term 'statutory authority' is not defined in the CAC Bill as
separate operating rules and reporting requirements are intended to
apply to different types of entity coming within the scope of the
legislation.
SMAs and GBEs
SMAs are financed through levies paid by growers or from sale of
produce.
GBEs sell their services and derive a substantial proportion of
their revenue from those sales. Although the absolute amounts of
Budget funding can be large, Budget funding usually represents a
much smaller proportion of total funding of GBEs than is the case
with ordinary Statutory authorities. Some GBEs are completely
independent of the Budget. GBEs may be established either as
Statutory authorities or companies.
The Explanatory Memorandum to the CAC Bill notes that:
- In general, 'GBEs' should satisfy three criteria: they are
commercial, trade outside the public sector, and are not primarily
regulatory bodies.
- 'SMAs' generally are Commonwealth authorities whose operations
are funded significantly from levies (or similar charges) paid by
primary producers for whose benefit the authority performs
marketing functions.(21)
What is, and what is not, a SMA or a GBE for the purposes of the
Bill is left to be determined by regulation [clause 5].
'Commonwealth authority'
Clause 7 sets out the bases for determining
whether a body is a 'Commonwealth authority' for the purposes of
the Bill. A 'Commonwealth authority', as defined, is either:
- a body corporate established for a public purpose by an Act;
or
- a body corporate incorporated for a public purpose by
regulation under an Act or under an Ordinance of a Territory (other
than Norfolk Island) or regulations under such an Ordinance and are
prescribed as Commonwealth authorities under the CAC Act.
The expression 'Commonwealth authorities' does not, however,
include:
- bodies incorporated under the Corporations Law of a State or
Territory;
- Aboriginal associations incorporated under Part IV of the
Aboriginal Councils and Associations Act 1976; and
- trade unions within the meaning of the Workplace Relations
Act 1996.
Subclause 7(3) provides that all money held by
a Commonwealth authority is held on its own account unless it is
specifically defined as public money for the purposes of section 5
of the FMA Bill.This provision seeks to address any possible
ambiguity in relation to money held by a Commonwealth authority on
trust.
'Commonwealth company' and 'wholly-owned Commonwealth
company'
Clause 34 defines the expression 'Commonwealth
company' to be a body corporate that is incorporated, or taken to
be incorporated, under the Corporations Law of a State or Territory
and in which the Commonwealth has a direct controlling
interest.Corporations controlled by the Commonwealth but through a
one or more intermediaries that are themselves Commonwealth
authorities or Commonwealth companies do not come within the
definition of 'Commonwealth company'.
The expression 'wholly-owned Commonwealth company' means any
Commonwealth company, which are beneficially owned by a person
other than the Commonwealth.
'Subsidiary'
The expression 'subsidiary' is used in the Bill to mean an
entity that is controlled by an Commonwealth authority or
Commonwealth company [clause 5].
'Director'
The term includes not only members of governing bodies of
Commonwealth authorities but also persons who are directors of
Commonwealth companies within the meaning of the Corporations
Act 1989[clause 5].
'Officer'
As defined in the Bill, an 'officer' in relation to a
Commonwealth authority means not only a director of an authority
but also any person who takes part in the management of the
authority [clause 5].
Role of Auditor-General
The Auditor-General must audit each Commonwealth authority and
must also audit the financial statements of each subsidiary of
every Commonwealth authority [clause 8] except
certain subsidiaries operating outside Australia [subclause
12(4)].
In relation to Commonwealth companies and their subsidiaries,
the Auditor-General is to be the auditor for the purposes of the
Corporations Law or, if someone else is the auditor, the
Auditor-General is to prepare a report on the company's financial
statements and give it to the responsible Minister [clause
35 and subclauses 36(2) and (3) and subclause 37(3)]. As
with subsidiaries of Commonwealth authorities, subsidiaries of
Commonwealth companies operating outside Australia may be exempted
from being audited by the Auditor-General [subclause
37(4)].
Clauses 16 and 17 of the Auditor-General Bill
provides that the Auditor-General may at any time conduct a
performance audit of a Commonwealth authority or company which is
not a GBE.For GBEs, the Auditor-General may only conduct a
performance audit where:
- the Finance Minister; or
- the responsible Minister; or
- the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA)
requests such an audit.(22)
Reporting Requirements
Annual Reports
Clause 9 provides that the directors of a Commonwealth authority
must prepare an annual report each financial year and that that
report must be given the responsible Minister by the 15th day of
the 4th month after the end of the financial year, i.e. presently
October 15. Subclause 9(3) provides that the
responsible Minister must table the report in each House as soon as
practicable.
Clause 36 provides that at least 14 days before
each annual general meeting, a Commonwealth company must give the
responsible Minister a copy of the company's annual report.There
are, however, differing tabling requirements for Commonwealth
companies and those entirely owned by the
Commonwealth.Subclause 36(4) provides that in
respect of wholly-owned Commonwealth companies the
responsible Minister must table the documents in each House as soon
as practicable.In other cases, where shares or an interest in the
company are held by private interests, the responsible Minister
must table the documents but not until the company has held its
annual general meeting.
Clause 30 further provides that the annual
accounting period for subsidiaries of Commonwealth authorities
should be brought into line with those of the parent body except
where the Finance Minister grants an exemption [clause
31].
Interim Reports
Clause 13 provides that the Finance Minister may require a
particular Commonwealth authority or class of authority to provide
regular interim reports to the responsible Minister. Such a report
must include a report on operations prepared by the directors in
accordance with the Finance Minister's Orders [refer
subclause 13(2) and clause 48]. Under
clause 15, Commonwealth authorities and their
subsidiaries must also inform the responsible Minister where they
propose undertaking any significant restructuring activity (e.g.
form a company or participate in the formation of a company or
undertake a new business venture) as detailed in the clause.
Clause 16 also imposes a general duty on all
Commonwealth authorities to keep both their Minister and the
Finance Minister informed on their activities.
Subclause 38(1) provides that the Finance
Minister may require a particular wholly-owned
Commonwealth company or class thereof to provide regular interim
reports to the responsible Minister. The responsible Minister must
table any such interim report in each House as soon as practicable.
Under clause 40, wholly-owned Commonwealth
companies and their subsidiaries must also inform the responsible
Minister where they propose undertaking any significant
restructuring activity (e.g. form a company or participate in the
formation of a company or undertake a new business venture) as
detailed in the clause. Clause 41 also imposes a
general duty on all wholly-owned Commonwealth companies to keep
both their Minister and the Finance Minister informed on their
activities.
All Commonwealth authorities and Commonwealth companies (other
than GBEs) must also prepare budget estimates for each financial
year and for any other period directed by the responsible Minister
[clauses 14 and 39].
GBEs
As already indicated, the Bill makes specific provision for
GBEs.
Clauses 17 and 43 severally provide that GBEs
which are either Commonwealth authorities or
wholly-owned Commonwealth companies must prepare
corporate plans at least once a year and give them to the
responsible Minister.Such plans must cover a period of at least 3
years. The responsible Minister must also be kept informed of
significant changes to the plan.
As noted above, GBEs which are wholly-owned
Commonwealth companies or are Commonwealth authorities must prepare
budget estimates each financial year.
Clause 19 provides for special conditions to
apply to GBEs and SMAs that are Commonwealth
authorities in relation to banking and investment.The
significant difference between the requirements imposed on
Commonwealth authorities generally and those imposed on GBEs and
SMAs (that are authorities) is that the latter may invest 'surplus
money' in any manner that is consistent with sound commercial
practice [paragraph 19(3)(d)]. Other Commonwealth
authorities do not enjoy such discretion and are confined to
defined forms of deposit accounts and securities and other methods
'approved by the Treasurer' [paragraph
18(3)(d)].
Miscellaneous
Clause 21 makes provision for dealing with
possible conflicts of interest involving directors of Commonwealth
authorities.
Clause 22 provides that anyone involved in the
management of a Commonwealth authority must act honestly and
exercise due care and diligence.
Clause 23 provides that officers of
Commonwealth authorities must not make improper use of information
gained from their holding their office.
Clause 32 provides that each Commonwealth
authority must establish and maintain an audit committee to help
the authority and its directors comply with their obligations under
the Act. It appears that the rules governing the operation of such
committees are to be established by regulation. Wholly-owned
Commonwealth companies are also required to establish and maintain
audit committees [clause 44].
- The Auditor-General Bill 1994, the Commonwealth Authorities and
Companies Bill 1994, the Financial Management and Accountability
Bill 1994 (introduced June 1994) and the Audit (Transitional and
Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 1994 (introduced December 1994).
- The Bills were referred to the JCPA by then Finance Minister,
Kim Beazley, on 29 June 1994.
- June 1996: 4.
- For a slightly different approach to the meaning of key terms
to that taken in the audit Bills, see the introduction to the 1996
Report of the Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation
Committee, List of Commonwealth Bodies.
- Provisionally these are: the Australian Postal Commission,
Telstra, the Defence Housing Authority, Australian Defence
Industries, the Australian Industry Development Corporation, the
Export Finance Insurance Corporation, the Australian Technology
Group Ltd, Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Authority, Airservices
Australia, the Federal Airports Corporation, the Australian
National Railways Commission, ANL Ltd, and the Housing Loans
Insurance Corporation.
- Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration,
List of Commonwealth Bodies, June 1993:v-vi.
- There were 7 'casualties', being: Aerospace Technologies of
Australia Ltd, Commonwealth Funds Management Ltd, the Pipeline
Authority, Qantas Airways Ltd, Civil Aviation Authority, Australian
Maritime Safety Authority, and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The
one addition is Airservices Australia.
- Approximately 80 Statutory authorities are required to meet the
reporting requirements of Part XI. Refer JCPA, Report No. 331:
25.
- Department of Finance, Guidelines for Financial statements of
Public Authorities and Commercial Activities, January 1994: 1.
- ibid.
- Minister for Finance, 'Statutory authorities and Government
Business Enterprises', Discussion Paper, AGPS, June 1986:
13-14.
- Minister for Finance, 'Policy Guidelines for Commonwealth
Statutory authorities and Government Business Enterprises', A
Policy Information Paper, AGPS, October 1987: 14-15.
- JCPA, Report No. 296, The Auditor-General: Ally of the People
and the Parliament - Reform of the Audit Office, 1989, AGPS,
Canberra: 240.
- Minister for Finance, Senator the Hon Peter Walsh, Government
Response to JCPA Report No. 296, 1 November 1989.
- Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration,
'Government Companies and their Reporting Requirements', Report,
AGPS, November 1989: 18-19.
- Department of Finance, Policy Discussion Paper, op cit, 1986:
2.
- Industry Commission, 'Improving the efficiency of GBEs',
Information Paper, May 1994: 11.
- Minister for Finance, Policy Information Paper, op cit, 1987:
8-9.
- JCPA, An Advisory Report on the Financial Management and
Accountability Bill 1994, the Commonwealth Authorities and
Companies Bill 1994 and the Auditor-General Bill 1994, and on a
Proposal to Establish an Audit Committee of Parliament, Report No.
331, September 1994: 23.
- Senate, Hansard, 23 March 1995: 2000.
- Department of Finance, Explanatory Memorandum, Commonwealth
Authorities and Companies Bill 1996: 3-4.
- Refer Bills Digest No. 104, 1996–97: 15.
ATTACHMENT A
Commonwealth authorities and Commonwealth companies for
the purposes of the
Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Bill
1996
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander Commercial Development Islander Commission
Corporation
Aboriginal Councils Airservices Australia
Australia Council Australian Broadcasting Authority
Australian Dairy Corporation Australian Dried Fruits Board
Australian Film Commission Australian Film, Television and
Radio School
Australian Fisheries Management Australian Hearing Services
Authority
Australian Heritage Commission Australian Horticultural Corporation
Australian Industry Development Australian Institute of Aboriginal
Corporation (AIDC) and Torres Strait Islander Studies
Australian Institute of Criminology Australian Institute of Family
Studies
Australian Institute of Health and Australian Institute of Marine
Welfare Science
Australian Maritime College Australian Maritime Safety Authority
Australian Meat and Livestock Australian Military Forces Relief
Corporation Trust Fund
Australian National Maritime Museum Australian National Railways
Commission
Australian National Training Australian National University (ANU)
Authority
Australian Nuclear Science and Australian Pork Corporation
Technology Organisation
Australian Postal Corporation Australian Securities Commission
(for public monies see also FMA Act)
Australian Sports Commission Australian Sports Drug Agency
Australian Telecommunications Australian Tobacco Marketing
Authority (Austel) Advisory Committee
Australian Tourist Commission Australian Trade Union Training
Authority (ceased operation 1 July
1996)
Australian War Memorial Australian Wheat Board
Australian Wine and Brandy Australian Wool Research and
Corporation Promotion Organisation
Civil Aviation Safety Authority Coal Mining Industry (Long Service
(CASA) Leave Funding) Corporation
COMCARE Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation
Companies and Securities Advisory Construction Industry Development
Committee Agency (ceased 1 July 1995)
Cotton Research and Development Criminology Research Council
Corporation
Dairy Research and Development Defence Housing Authority
Corporation
Director of National Parks and Employment Services Regulatory
Wildlife (aka Australian Nature and Authority
Conservation Agency)
Energy Research and Development Export Finance and Insurance
Corporation Corporation
Federal Airports Corporation Fisheries Research and Development
Corporation
Forest and Wood Products Research Grains Research and Development
and Development Corporation Corporation
Grape and Wine Research and Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
Development Corporation Authority
Health Insurance Commission Horticultural Research and
(Functions - Medibank, Medicare, Development Corporation
Pharmaceutical Benefits, Child care)
Housing Loans Insurance Corporation Indigenous Land Corporation
Land and Water Resources Research Land Councils
and Development Corporation
Law Reform Commission Meat Industry Council
Meat Research Corporation National Food Authority
National Gallery of Australia National Library of Australia
National Museum of Australia National Occupational Health and
Safety Commission
National Registration Authority for National Standards Commission
Agricultural & Veterinary Chemicals
Nuclear Safety Bureau Pig Research and Development
Corporation
Pipeline Authority Private Health Insurance
(wound-up August 1996) Administration Council
Private Health Insurance Complaints Reserve Bank of Australia
Commissioner
Royal Australian Airforce Welfare Royal Australian Navy Relief Trust
Trust Fund Fund
Rural Industries Research and Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric
Development Corporation Authority
Special Broadcasting Service Stevedoring Industry Finance
Corporation Committee
Sugar Research and Development Tobacco Research and Development
Corporation Corporation
Torres Strait Regional Authority University of Canberra
Wool International Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community
Council
Note: Some Statutory authorities have not been included in the
list because they are specifically exempted from its application -
for example, authorities established by Commonwealth-State
agreements.
Bob Bennett
25 February 1997
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This Digest does not have any official legal status. Other
sources should be consulted to determine whether the Bill has been
enacted and, if so, whether the subsequent Act reflects further
amendments.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of
the public.
ISSN 1323-9031
Commonwealth of Australia 1996
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
1997.
This page was prepared by the Parliamentary Library,
Commonwealth of Australia
Last updated: 4 April 1997
Back to top