Budget impacts of negative gearing

Parliament house flag post
Street of residential houses

Budget impacts of negative gearing

Posted 4/08/2015 by Tarek Dale

‘Negative gearing’ has been a topic of frequent debate. This flagpost summarises some of the estimates of the impact of negative gearing on the Commonwealth Budget.

Negative gearing is a strategy of borrowing to invest in an asset which generates income, but not enough to cover the investor’s costs (including interest and depreciation). Although this results in a loss for the investor, the loss can be used to reduce other taxable income, lowering the investor’s tax liability. A deliberate negative gearing strategy relies on an expectation that gains from selling the asset at a higher price will be greater, in after-tax terms, than the earlier losses.

The Treasury’s Tax Expenditure Statement (TES) does not include any estimates in relation to negative gearing, because negative gearing is not considered to be a tax expenditure under the benchmarks used for the TES. The Government’s tax discussion paper notes that ‘negative gearing is … simply the operation of Australia’s tax system allowing deductions for expenses incurred in producing assessable income’ (p. 64).

However, the fact that Australia’s tax system allows the deduction of investment losses against other taxable income impacts the Commonwealth Budget, in particular due to housing investment. The tax discussion paper notes that ‘investment properties constitute a substantial proportion of the total value of negatively geared assets’ (p. 64).

Table 1 below compiles estimates of the budget impact of negative gearing from a range of sources. These vary based on the methodology used, the period covered, and the benchmark against which they are measured. Importantly, some estimates focus purely on residential property (see Ernst and Young below), but others include negative gearing of all asset classes (such as the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) costing cited below). For that reason not all estimates are directly comparable, but show the range of estimates of different aspects of negative gearing.

The estimates suggest that negative gearing has an impact that is likely greater than $2 billion annually. The only explicit estimate of additional revenue raised is the Parliamentary Budget Office’s estimate cited below, in relation to a particular policy proposal. 

Table 1: Estimates of the budget impact of negative gearing

Period estimate applies to   Estimate ($b)   Source   Notes 
2017-18 2 Australian Greens, Reforming negative gearing: A fairer housing market for all Australians, 2015, p. 2.  Cites modelling by the Parliamentary Budget Office of changes to ‘Remove negative gearing for all asset classes, for assets purchased on or after 1 July 2015’. This therefore does not include negative gearing of assets purchased before that date, which may be included in other estimates. 
2016-17 0.9 Australian Greens, Reforming negative gearing: A fairer housing market for all Australians, 2015, p. 2.  Cites modelling by the Parliamentary Budget Office of changes to 'Remove negative gearing for all asset classes, for assets purchased on or after 1 July 2015'. This therefore does not include negative gearing of assets purchased before that date, which may be included in other estimates. 
2014-15 3.7 M Grudnoff, Top Gears: How negative gearing and the capital gains discount benefit the top 10 per cent and drive up house prices, The Australia Institute, 2015, pp. 4-5. Cites modelling by the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling, based on 2011-12 Australian Taxation Office (ATO) data projected forward to 2014-15. 
2011-12  2.4 J Kelly, Renovating Housing Policy, Grattan Institute, 2013, p. 25.  Estimate based on the Australian Bureau of Statistics Survey of Income and Housing (SIH), which the report notes may underestimate the impact. 
2010-11 >5 S Eslake, Australian housing policy: 50 years of failure, submission to the Senate Economics References Committee inquiry on Affordable Housing, 2013, p. 10. Based on ATO statistics; assumes investors are on a 38 per cent marginal tax rate. 
2010-11 2.6-3.6 M Johnson and D Baker, submission to the Senate Economics References Committee inquiry on Affordable Housing, The Australia Institute, 2014, p. 8. Based on 2010-11 ATO tax statistics. 
2007-08 >4.8 S Eslake, ‘Imagine a tax system that penalised work’, Sydney Morning Herald, 2011. Based on 2007-08 ATO statistics; assumes investors are on a 38 per cent marginal tax rate. 
2007-08 2 Senate Committee on Housing Affordability in Australia, A good house is hard to find: Housing affordability in Australia, 2008, p. 61.  Based on 2005-06 ATO statistics, assuming a marginal tax rate of 30 per cent, and projected forward to 2007-08. The committee report notes that this was below several estimates provided by witnesses to the inquiry. 
2006-07 >0 J Freebairn, Tax Breaks for Owner Occupied Housing, 2009, cited in J Yates, Tax expenditures and housing, AHURI, 2009, p. 52. 
2005-06 1.2 J Yates, Tax expenditures and housing, AHURI, 2009, p. 52. Based on the 2005-06 SIH data. 
2004 1.6 P Abelson and R Joyeux, ‘Price and efficiency effects of taxes and subsidies for Australian housing’, in M Stewart, ed, Housing and Tax Policy, 2010, p. 98.   -
2002-03 0-1.4 Ernst and Young, Negative Gearing: Report prepared for the Property Council of Australia, 2006, pp. 25-26. Uses $1.37 billion in net loss on rental properties, and notes that ‘just over 50 per cent’ of total rental deductions are comprised of interest. Because this focuses on net rental losses, it only relates to residential property (and not other asset classes). 

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament elections climate change social security women welfare reform taxation Indigenous Australians Australian Defence Force welfare policy school education higher education private health insurance health financing emissions trading Middle East Senate Australian Bureau of Statistics employment people trafficking Asia statistics illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Public Service income management Medicare disability Sport United Nations environment industrial relations constitution transport politics criminal law Afghanistan health forced labour food public service reform aged care aid Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Carbon Pricing Mechanism dental health international relations governance regulation Fair Work Act voting law enforcement electoral reform OECD Australian Electoral Commission WADA child protection poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention 43rd Parliament slavery health system leadership domestic violence parliamentary procedure International Women's Day accountability defence capability multiculturalism ASADA Australian Federal Police labour force people smuggling debt New Zealand Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme political parties coal seam gas Human rights crime China Census election results UK Parliament Papua New Guinea banking corruption pensions children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment Youth Allowance sea farers United Kingdom energy food labelling Australian economy violence against women vocational education and training military history by-election High Court skilled migration mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations youth paid parental leave same sex relationships customs planning doping health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy ANZUS Rural and regional trade unions Foreign affairs election timetable Indigenous royal commission Productivity firearms public policy Population ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council forestry Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report social inclusion paternalism environmental law US presidential election nutrition ODA Defence sitting days electoral divisions Southeast Asia administrative law universities TAFE Ireland citizenship asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing water health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution Turkey Syria marine pollution sustainability prisons police deaths in custody electoral margins electoral pendulum electoral redistribution redistribution NSW redistribution WA redistribution ACT electoral boundaries ASEAN Sustainable Development Goals Double dissolution Senators safety vehicles MYEFO Pathology tertiary education Taiwan Xi Ma meeting family violence government financial advisers financial planners Financial System Inquiry Murray Inquiry China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top