Big changes to Queensland’s electoral laws

Parliament house flag post

Big changes to Queensland’s electoral laws

Posted 26/05/2014 by Brenton Holmes

On 22 May 2014 the Electoral Reform Amendment Bill 2013 was passed in the Queensland Legislative Assembly, amending the Electoral Act 1992 (Qld).

Changes effected by the legislation include:

  • a deep cut to taxpayer funding to political parties for campaign and related purposes
  • increasing the percentage of votes parties or independents must attract to receive public funding  from four per cent to six per cent
  • raising the threshold at which donations must be declared from $1,000 to $12,400 which is more in line with Federal electoral law
  • removing the limit on what can be spent on election campaigning in each electorate
  • the publication on the Electoral Commission of Queensland’s website of official, party-authorised how-to-vote cards
  • requiring voters to produce some form of ID at a polling booth, such as a utilities bill or similar. If enrolled electors do not produce ID at the time of casting a ballot they will need to make a declaration vote that will later be checked for its validity.

The Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Jarrod Bleijie said the Government's new reforms ‘would simplify, modernise and protect' Queensland's electoral system and would save $3 million annually. He said that the reforms ‘clean up electoral amendments, made by Labor in the dying months of its final term’ that resulted in a ‘massive blow out of projected taxpayer funding to $24.3 million over the 2012–2015 election cycle’.

Under the new reforms, public funding for political parties will revert back to a dollar amount per vote. For each first preference vote a party receives, the party will receive  $2.90 in public funding and the party’s candidate will receive $1.45. Independent candidates will receive $1.45 for each first preference vote.

Under the previous public funding arrangements the amount of public election funding that a registered political party was entitled to was:

  • all of the first 10 per cent of electoral expenditure
  • three-quarters of the next 80 per cent of electoral expenditure
  • one-half of the remaining 10 per cent of electoral expenditure.

But election expenditure by political parties, candidates and third parties was previously capped as follows:

  • registered political party: expenditure cap—$80,000 per district contested.
  • endorsed party candidate: expenditure cap—$50,000
  • independent candidates: expenditure cap—$75,000.
  • registered third party: expenditure cap—$500,000 but no more than $75,000 in relation to a particular electoral district, in the first financial year
  • unregistered third party: expenditure cap—$10,000 but no more than $2,000 in relation to a particular electoral district, in the first financial year.

Previously, a registered political party was also eligible for administrative funding that was the lesser of $40,000 indexed for each elected member, or a state wide amount of $1 million indexed. It is not yet clear whether administrative support for parties will remain. [For more details of former arrangements see Political financing: regimes and reforms in Australian States and Territories.]

The reforms followed the publication of a discussion paper in 2013 to which the Queensland Government made a formal response.  In that 2013 response, the Attorney-General declared that ‘changes to the rules governing political donations, public funding of elections and electoral expenditure will be made to ensure the opportunity for full participation in Queensland’s electoral process. Disclosure requirements will ensure transparency and accountability’.

Opposition Leader Annastacia Palaszczuk said the new donations rules would mean ‘donations from big business would be kept secret. There will be no transparency, there will be no accountability and it is a backwards step’. Ms Palaszczuk said under the changes most donations made to the Liberal National Party (LNP) during the 2012 election campaign would not have been disclosed.

On the matter of voter ID, the Human Rights Law Centre said that the votes of ‘tens of thousands of vulnerable people are threatened by voter ID laws. Those most at risk are elderly and young voters, people in remote rural regions, people with disabilities, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and the homeless’. 


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top