Senate inquiry into corporate tax avoidance

Parliament house flag post

Senate inquiry into corporate tax avoidance

Posted 19/12/2014 by Jaan Murphy

In October, the Senate referred an inquiry into corporate tax avoidance (the Inquiry) to the Senate Economic References Committee (the Committee).  The Inquiry will examine tax avoidance and aggressive minimisation by multinational companies operating in Australia.  Public submissions close on 2 February 2015, and the Committee will report in June 2015.

Background

A report by the Tax Justice Network shows that of Australia’s largest 200 publicly listed companies, 29 per cent have an effective tax rate of 10 per cent or less, and 14 per cent have an effective tax rate of 0 per cent, well below the statutory tax rate of 30 per cent.  Recent media coverage has also highlighted that some multinational companies pay little income tax, despite operating profitable businesses.

Multinational corporation tax avoidance and minimisation practices

Multinational corporation tax avoidance and minimisation are generally achieved through profit shifting to low tax countries or utilising intra-company or related party dealings among subsidiaries.  In Australia, it was estimated that in 2009, the volume of related party dealings exceeded 20 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).  Common jurisdictional profit shifting mechanisms include intra-company:

  • sale of products and services
  • provision of debt financing and
  • charging of royalties for the use of intellectual property (IP) rights.    

These techniques allow multinational companies to shift revenue to low tax countries and expenses to high tax countries, leading to the reduction of taxable profits in individual countries and a minimisation of the overall tax liabilities of the consolidated entity.

Tax avoidance structures and practices adopted by multinational corporations can be very complex, and can involve exploiting differences in tax rules (residence shopping) and taxation treaties (treaty shopping). 

Current multinational corporation taxation legislation in Australia

Both the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) and the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997  (ITAA 1997) contain anti-tax avoidance provisions.  Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 counters arrangements entered into for the dominant purpose of avoiding tax.  Specific provisions relating to multinational intra‑company dealings, including transfer pricing, the arm’s length principle and thin capitalisation are governed under Division 815 of the ITAA 1997.  Recent legislative reform in 2012-13 was aimed at strengthening the general anti-avoidance rules and implementing an internationally aligned, comprehensive and robust transfer pricing regime.

Difficulties in ‘policing’ tax avoidance

Although tax authorities in many countries impose stringent measures to ensure the genuine commercial nature of intra-company dealings, there are often difficulties in finding truly comparable independent arms-length transactions.  These are often caused by the complexity of related party relationships and corporate structures, or the uniqueness of products, services or IP rights involved in intra-company transactions.  These complexities significantly impact on the monitoring cost of tax authorities.

Recent international responses to tax avoidance

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and G20

In July 2013, the OECD presented to G20 finance ministers an Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), outlining 15 clearly defined actions for implementation within a two-year period aimed at improving international tax cooperation and transparency.  In September 2014, the OECD released the first BEPS recommendations to the G20, dealing, in part, with model tax treaty provisions.

European Union (EU)

The EU loses an estimated 1 trillion euros tax revenue every year to tax fraud, avoidance and aggressive tax planning.  In response, the European Parliament passed a resolution in May 2013 calling for improved intergovernmental cooperation and information sharing, and urging member states to crack down on corporations abusing tax rules and non-transparent and non-cooperative tax havens. 

United Kingdom (UK)

In the UK, the Select Committee on Economic Affairs of the House of Lords launched an inquiry into multinational corporation tax avoidance practices in 2013.  The inquiry recommended the review of the existing UK corporate taxation regime and the establishment of a joint parliamentary committee to exercise greater oversight of tax settlements with multinational corporations. In December 2014, the Chancellor, George Osborne, announced that the UK Government would introduce ‘a 25% tax on profits generated by multinationals from economic activity here in the UK which they then artificially shift out of the country’, an initiative that is being closely monitored by the Australian Government.

United States (US)

Between 2012-2014, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) held hearings on profit shifting by multinational corporations, and conducted case studies of Microsoft, Hewlett-PackardApple and Caterpillar.  PSI’s recommendations included strengthening the tax code on transfer pricing and US participation in OECD multinational corporate tax efforts.

Alternative approaches to taxation of multinational corporations

Many of the proposed approaches noted above focus on combating tax avoidance to improve the existing tax base of company profits.  The European Parliament for example, is of the view that ‘broadening already existing tax bases, rather than increasing tax rates or introducing new taxes, could generate further incomes for the Member States’. 

One option is to tax multinational companies as a single entity, attributing company profit in individual tax jurisdictions according to a predetermined formula based on turnover, number of employees, or tangible assets in each jurisdiction.  However, some argue that this ‘unitary tax’ model relies on global coordination and exchange of information, and hence would be difficult and time‑consuming to implement.

Others believe that the existing company profit tax base is in need of a radical reform and introducing an alternative tax base would be a more effective solution.  For example, the UK parliamentary inquiry recommended the examination of a destination-based tax on corporate cash flows, based on a UK Institute of Fiscal Studies review.  This model taxes cash sales to customers instead of company profits, and is designed to tackle the challenge of profit shifting (as, unlike profits, a company’s ability to shift its customer base is limited).  As a tax base, cash sales are also easier to calculate than profit, potentially reducing monitoring cost of tax authorities and compliance effort of companies.   This model also does not require cross country coordination, making it easier to implement than the ‘unitary tax’ model.

* This FlagPost was prepared by Daphne Cockerill, an intern from the University of Canberra.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Parliament Australian foreign policy elections climate change social security women welfare reform taxation Indigenous Australians Australian Defence Force welfare policy school education higher education private health insurance health financing emissions trading Senate Australian Bureau of Statistics employment people trafficking Asia statistics Middle East illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 income management Medicare disability Sport United Nations industrial relations constitution transport Australian Public Service politics criminal law Afghanistan health forced labour environment aged care aid Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Carbon Pricing Mechanism dental health regulation food Fair Work Act voting law enforcement electoral reform public service reform OECD Australian Electoral Commission WADA child protection poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention 43rd Parliament slavery health system domestic violence parliamentary procedure International Women's Day accountability defence capability multiculturalism ASADA Australian Federal Police governance labour force people smuggling debt international relations New Zealand Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme Human rights crime China leadership Census election results UK Parliament Papua New Guinea banking corruption pensions children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment Youth Allowance sea farers Australian economy violence against women vocational education and training military history by-election political parties High Court skilled migration mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning doping health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy Rural and regional trade unions Foreign affairs election timetable Indigenous royal commission Productivity United Kingdom firearms public policy Population ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council forestry food labelling Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion paternalism nutrition ODA Defence sitting days electoral divisions Southeast Asia administrative law universities TAFE Ireland citizenship asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing water health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution marine pollution sustainability prisons police deaths in custody electoral margins electoral pendulum electoral redistribution redistribution NSW redistribution WA redistribution ACT electoral boundaries ASEAN Sustainable Development Goals Double dissolution Senators safety vehicles MYEFO Pathology tertiary education Taiwan Xi Ma meeting family violence government financial advisers financial planners Financial System Inquiry Murray Inquiry China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top