Can the Direct Action Plan be blocked in the Senate?

Parliament house flag post
Senate chamber

Can the Direct Action Plan be blocked in the Senate?

Posted 24/04/2014 by Alex St John

The leader of the Palmer United Party (PUP), Clive Palmer, has this week expressed an intention not to support the Abbott Government’s Direct Action Plan, the Coalition’s climate change policy, in light of reports that the Government was planning to tighten eligibility for the aged pension. Mr Palmer has suggested that his party would block the policy in the Senate when three PUP senators take their seats after the first of July. The Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, cast doubt on this by saying that the Direct Action Plan will be part of the federal Budget, which is traditionally passed by the Senate. Mr Palmer replied that PUP could ‘reconsider its stance’ on passing the repeals of the carbon pricing mechanism and the Minerals Resource Rent Tax, if this happened. So which parts of Direct Action will actually need to be passed by the Senate?

There are a number of elements to the Direct Action Plan, although the details of many parts of the policy are still under development by the Government. The best information on the policy comes from the Green Paper on the Emissions Reduction Fund, and a speech given by Minister Hunt in December 2013. These elements include:

The Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF): a competitive tender process through which the Government will purchase greenhouse gas emissions abatement from Australian entities at the lowest available price. This will be a grants program costing $1.55 billion over its first three years, which could be set up in a number of ways:

(a) It could be enabled through new legislation that appropriates funds for the program and sets out how it will operate at a basic level – examples of this include the Automotive Transformation Scheme and the Steel Transformation Plan;

(b) It could be appropriated through the Budget process, and set up by regulations that operate under existing legislation (an example is the Clean Technology Investment Program, which was appropriated for in the budget process, and administered by regulations made under the Industry and Research Development Act 1986;

(c) It could be appropriated through the Budget, and administered under ministerial direction, without any specific legislation – like the Ethanol Production Grant Scheme.

If the ERF is set up under option (a), legislation must be passed by the new Senate to set up the fund, requiring the support of PUP, the Australian Labor Party or the Australian Greens. If option (b) is used, the regulations used to set up the fund could be disallowed by either house. If option (c) is used, the only way for the Senate to block it is to refuse to pass the Government’s appropriation bills, otherwise known as ‘blocking supply’, which is a highly unusual event. Although option (c) may be the most expedient way to appropriate money, governments may use the other options to set up grant schemes to ensure good governance, or place legal requirements on scheme participants (like the Green Army scheme).

Emissions safeguard mechanism (baselines): Under the DAP, entities will be prevented from emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases once the carbon price is repealed by the setting of ‘emissions baselines’, which entities must not exceed. Although the collection of emissions data is already provided for under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting System, new legislation will be required to impose baselines on emitters and compliance measures  for exceeding them. The emissions safeguard mechanism are an essential part of the DAP; in the absence of financial constraints on emissions (a carbon price), these safeguards are necessary to ensure that any emissions reductions achieved through the ERF are not cancelled out by increased emissions from other emitters.

One million solar roofs: Part of the DAP is to provide $500 rebates to install an additional one million solar hot water heaters or photovoltaic systems over ten years, at a cost of $500 million. Like the ERF, this scheme could be set up by legislation or by administrative measures. Previous schemes to provide these rebates have generally been set up administratively, with funds appropriated through the Budget process, not requiring passage of separate legislation.

Solar schools and towns and twenty million trees: These elements of the DAP will provide for the installation of solar panels in schools and towns, and for the planting of twenty million new trees in green corridors and urban forests. Few details have been released about how these schemes will operate, but it is likely that they could be set up through the Budget.

So the only part of the DAP that will certainly require enabling legislation (beyond the appropriations bills) to be passed by the Senate is the provision of emissions safeguards. Whether the new Senate will oppose any or all of the measures is a story that is still unfolding.


  • 28/04/2014 9:22 AM
    Jeremy Dore said:

    If the Government wishes to change the existing Carbon Farming Initiative in any way, they will need legislation as it is an act of Parliament.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top