What is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and how does it work?

Parliament house flag post

What is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and how does it work?

Posted 4/10/2013 by Anita Talberg

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released on 27 September the first instalment of its eagerly anticipated Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). As with past reports, this one is likely to spark ongoing discussion about the threat from climate change and how to deal with it. But what is the IPCC and what exactly does it do?

What is the IPCC?
The IPCC is an intergovernmental body established by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organisation in 1988 to provide the world with a clear statement of the current scientific knowledge of climate change, and potential environmental and socio‑economic impacts.

Open to all member countries of the United Nations, the IPCC currently has 195 member countries. Representatives from these countries review and endorse the contents of IPCC reports before publication.

Work of the IPCC
The IPCC does not conduct its own research nor does it monitor climate-related data. Rather, it reviews and assesses recent scientific, technical and socio‑economic information relevant to the understanding of climate change. From this published material, it creates its reports. Thousands of scientists worldwide contribute to the IPCC's work on a voluntary basis.

One of the main activities is to prepare comprehensive Assessment Reports about the state of knowledge on climate change, its causes, potential impacts and possible responses. The IPCC also produces Special Reports and Technical Papers on specific issues.

The first IPCC Assessment Report was published in 1990. Subsequent reports were produced in 1995, 2001 and 2007. There was some controversy after the release of AR4 in 2007 over the inclusion of some errors. For example, because of a mistaken claim that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035, the IPCC was accused in some quarters of a lack of rigour, and of using sources that were not peer-reviewed. However, the number of confirmed errors in the report is small considering that the document ran over 3000 pages and incorporated over 6000 peer-reviewed studies. Nevertheless, the criticism prompted a review of, and subsequent changes to, processes and procedures.

Inevitably, the IPCC has been the target of criticism from both ends of the spectrum of opinions about climate change. For some, it is seen as overly cautious and conservative. Others view it as a green-dominated, extremist organisation. Both groups criticise the process by which reports are produced.

So what is the process?
IPCC assessment reports are produced in three volumes, each of which is prepared by a 'working group'. Working Group One (WGI) examines scientific evidence for climate change and the extent to which human activity is the cause. WGII focuses on the impacts of climate change, and how plants, animals and humans can adapt. WGIII focuses on climate mitigation—that is, measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon 'sinks' which absorb greenhouse gases.

Reports are prepared by IPCC 'lead authors', who are experts selected by the IPCC Bureau, based on nominations by governments and observer organisations. The process for preparing each report is governed by comprehensive procedures. A first draft is prepared by authors based on an assessment of all relevant scientific information. Priority is given to peer-reviewed literature. To deal with uncertainty, the scientists use very defined language to express varying levels of confidence in their conclusions.

There is then a multi-stage review process. Expert reviewers and governments are invited to comment on the accuracy and completeness of the content. Review editors ensure that all comments are taken into account by the author teams. After the first draft has been reviewed, authors prepare a second draft report which includes a 'Summary for Policymakers'. The second draft and the summary are then reviewed by both governments and experts. Authors then prepare final drafts of the report and summary. These are distributed to governments who provide comments on the draft summary. All reports must be endorsed by the relevant Working Group and a meeting of the IPCC before final publication.

For example, the first stage of AR5 had 209 lead authors, 50 review editors and more than 600 contributing authors. The first draft received 21,400 comments from 659 experts, and the second received 31,422 comments from 800 experts and 26 governments.

All of this takes time, and some critics have suggested that the laborious six-year process is too slow, rendering reports out-of-date before they are published, and that in this fast-moving field, information should be released more frequently.

What next?
AR5 will be released in four parts. The first part focusses on the physical science basis of climate change. The second part will be released in March 2014 and will focus on climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. The third section, examining mitigation of climate change, is due in April 2014. The final Synthesis Report in October 2014 will integrate the material contained in previous three parts.

Post authored by Sophie Power

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top