Stronger targets proposed in Climate Change Authority draft report

Parliament house flag post

Stronger targets proposed in Climate Change Authority draft report

Posted 30/10/2013 by Anita Talberg

Today the Climate Change Authority (CCA) released a draft version of its ‘Targets and Progress Review’. The review, which according to the Clean Energy Act 2011 must be finalised by 28 February 2014, is to be used by the Minister in determining Australia’s emissions reduction goals under the carbon price mechanism. The draft report proposes two sets of caps; each set of caps defines a different emissions trajectory between now and 2020, and then to 2030. The CCA is calling for stakeholder input until 29 November 2013.

The proposed targets
Two scenarios are put forward. The more ambitious scenario aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 25% below 2000 levels by 2020 and 40 to 50% by 2030. The less ambitious scenario aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 15% below 2000 levels by 2020 and by 35 to 50% by 2030.

Australia’s current (and bipartisan) 2020 target is 5% below 2000 levels by 2020. Both of the above options represent a strengthening of Australia’s national and international commitment. The CCA justifies this on a number of fronts:

  • The science: the recently released report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change confirms that anthropogenic warming is real and a genuine risk. See this recent FlagPost for what the IPCC report said about Australia.
  • International action: the world has agreed to try to maintain the global average temperature rise to below 2 degrees; and Australia has agreed to do its fair share in this. The CCA reviewed the scale and pace of climate action internationally and concluded that Australia’s 5% target was relatively low. For example, the EU’s target is to reduce emissions by 20% on 1990 levels.
  • Progress to date: history has shown that although the growth in Australian emissions has slowed, growth in the Australian economy has not halted. In essence GDP need not be directly coupled with greenhouse gas emissions. Also, in the 2008-12 period Australia bettered its agreed Kyoto Protocol target by 3%. This means that Australia already has 3% of its emissions reduction effort ‘in the pocket’, so to speak. Increasing a post-2012 target by the same margin would require no additional effort.
  • Updated projections: according to early modelling, Australia’s 5% reduction target called for a total abatement of 754 megatonnes of greenhouse gases by 2020. Under updated figures and assumptions, the CCA concludes that the same volume of abatement now results in an 11% reduction. This is important because merely by accepting the premise of the initial emissions reduction effort, the government could now pledge a target of 11% rather than 5%. This is without taking into account the 3% windfall gain mentioned in the previous point.
Interaction with legislation
According to the legislation that supports the carbon price mechanism:
(1) The Minister must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a set of regulations that:
(a) declares the carbon pollution cap, and the carbon pollution cap number, for the flexible charge year beginning on 1 July 2015; and
b) declares the carbon pollution cap, and the carbon pollution cap number, for each of the next 4 flexible charge years;
is tabled in each House of the Parliament under section 38 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 not later than 31 May 2014.
To this end, the CCA has provided a table of annual pollution caps that would satisfy the targets outlined above.

 
Annual pollution caps
(in megatonnes of greenhouse gases)
Year
15% target
25% target
2015-16
234
193
2016-17
229
178
2017-18
224
182
2018-19
219
171
2019-20
214
165

In proposing these caps, the CCA suggests including emissions abatement from international projects (as long as the abatement can be demonstrated to be genuine).

Should the Minister fail to introduce regulations by 31 May 2014, default caps apply. Market research group Reputex estimates that the default cap for 2015-16 might be around 300 megatonnes.

Implications for the future
The CCA has released this draft for consultation. Submissions will be accepted until 29 November 2013. The CCA then plans to release its final review by 28 February 2014. However, the newly-elected Coalition government has vowed to repeal both the carbon price mechanism and legislation supporting the CCA. On 15 October 2013, the government released eight exposure drafts of legislation to carry out these repeal actions. The final date for submissions to the exposure drafts is 4 November 2013. This would allow the Minister to introduce the Bills into Parliament on 12 November 2013.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment indigenous Australians Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations health financing gambling Asia Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA income management Industrial Relations emissions trading dental health Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police people smuggling poker machines National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission 43rd Parliament slavery election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service constitution International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection Aviation debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment political parties Census politics High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS governance youth paid parental leave environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs Senate doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform banking firearms public policy Population violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism science research and development social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation accountability public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning Senators and Members United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs health reform Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing health system money laundering early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity transparency Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration Australia Greens federal election 2010 servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency productivity human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits ANZUS qantas

Show all
Show less
Back to top