Has the United Kingdom sold their student debt?

Parliament house flag post

Has the United Kingdom sold their student debt?

Posted 30/10/2013 by Coral Dow

On a recent Q&A program Education Minister Christopher Pyne, in response to a question about selling HECS debt, stated: ‘Britain have sold their HECS debt as an asset and we should investigate whether that is a sensible move for us to do so.’ This Flag Post looks at the UK experience of selling some of their student loan; of a 2007 proposal to sell more that did not proceed and of recent proposals to again sell part of their student debt asset.

Pre 1998 debt
The UK Labour Government introduced an income contingent student loan scheme similar to Australia’s HECS HELP programme in 1998. The student loan scheme that had existed since 1990 was a loan with fixed rate repayments over five years in 60 equal monthly instalments repayable from the April after graduation or when their gross income exceeded the threshold of 85 per cent of national average earnings. These loans were called Mortgage Style Loans.

In 1998 the UK Government announced a sell off the Mortgage Style Loans and the Education (Student Loans) Act was amended to facilitate the sale. The amendments enabled the Government to make subsidy payments to the purchaser and to prevent existing loan conditions being changed by the purchaser.

Two sales of the student loan debt of £1 billion each were made in 1998 and 1999.

A House of Commons Library Research paper concluded:

The Government received £1 billion for each of the two sales of the student loan portfolio. The face value of the loans sold was £1.02 billion and £1.03 billion in 1998 and 1999 respectively. As the interest rate of student loans was below market level the Government paid a subsidy [£350 million in 1998 and £395 million in 1999] to the purchasers to reflect this and make the sale attractive to the private sector. The difference between this and the cost that the Government would have incurred by holding on to the loans was the net cost of the sell off. The Government benefited by the transfer of risk to the private sector.
At present this is the only student debt that has been sold. 

2007 proposal
In June 2007 total student loan debt for England was £18.1 billion. In the UK’s 2007 Budget the Government announced plans to sell £6 billion of the debt over the period 2008-11.

When the Sale of Student Loans Bill 2007 was introduced the Government expected the loan sale programme to proceed indefinitely and extend to loans that are made in the future as well as those already on the loan book. It also expected that ‘transactions will only proceed if they represent good value for money and include a genuine transfer of risk to the private sector; terms and conditions for individual borrowers will stay the same and Government will retain control of all loan arrangements and regulations, including interest rates and repayment thresholds’.

In June 2009 the Minister of State, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, Lord Drayson, told the Parliament that market conditions did not allow sales to make a good return for the taxpayer and they would look for sale opportunities when market conditions improved. 

No sales were made.

2013 proposal
In March 2013 the UK Government announced it would sell off the last of the pre 1998 Mortgage Style Loans. In the media release it stated ‘The remaining loans owned by the government are mostly either in deferment or in arrears, so total annual repayments are low. The loans to be offered for sale have a face value of around £900 million but, the market value will likely be significantly lower’.

In relation to Income Contingent Loans Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, told the House of Commons in a speech on infrastructure spending in June 2013:

We will take action to sell off £15 billion worth of public assets by 2020. £10 billion of that money will come from corporate and financial assets like the student loan book. And the other £5 billion will come from land and property.

No details are yet available but media discussion, in the Guardian and New Statesman based on a Rothschild Investment Bank report commissioned by the Government and obtained under FOI suggests that conditions for a successful sale would have to provide incentives to the purchaser, such as the ability to change the borrowers’ conditions, which were not permitted under the 2007 legislation.

The UK student loan debt is estimated at £40 billion. To date only £2 billion has been sold.

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 1:39 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    Is it known what the payback rate was for the sold loans? If so, how does that compare with the rate when the Government owns the asset.

  • 21/01/2014 1:39 PM
    Carol Ey said:

    The House of Commons Library research paper does provide some information on repayment rates. We are not aware of any evidence of a change in rate following the sale, but the loan conditions did not change so it is probable that repayment rates were not affected.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment indigenous Australians Sport illicit drugs gambling people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations health financing Asia Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA income management Industrial Relations emissions trading dental health Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police people smuggling poker machines National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission 43rd Parliament slavery election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service constitution International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection Aviation debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment Census politics High Court skilled migration voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS governance youth paid parental leave environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs Senate doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur UK Parliament Electoral reform political parties banking firearms public policy Population violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism science research and development social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation accountability public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning Senators and Members United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs health reform Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing health system money laundering United Kingdom early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity transparency Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration Australia Greens federal election 2010 servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency productivity human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits ANZUS qantas counselling

Show all
Show less
Back to top