Quantitative easing - What do we know about the Fed's exit strategy?

Parliament house flag post

Quantitative easing - What do we know about the Fed's exit strategy?

Posted 28/11/2013 by Robert Dolamore


For much of this year there has been speculation about when the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) will begin tapering quantitative easing (QE) as a first step to normalising monetary policy. This would be a welcome development for Australia because the Australian dollar, which remains at uncomfortably high levels, would likely depreciate. This note provides a quick summary of what the Fed has said about its exit strategy. It follows on from an earlier flagpost Exiting quantitative easing – the need for a deft touch and some luck.





The Fed has clearly done a lot of work to prepare for exiting QE and restoring its balance sheet to a more normal configuration in the longer term. An important first step was ensuring it had the necessary tools to begin to tighten monetary policy when economic and financial conditions justify such a move.
The Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, outlined how the Fed had augmented its toolkit in a statement in 2010. This included Congress giving the Fed statutory authority to pay interest on balances that banks hold at the Federal Reserve Banks. This should provide a floor for short-term market interest rates. By changing this interest rate the Fed can adjust the incentives for banks to hold reserves to a level appropriate for monetary policy. In the context of exiting QE, it gives the Fed better control of the level of excess reserves flowing into the financial system. As the US economy strengthens the Fed will be keen to avoid bank lending reaching levels that lead markets to expect higher inflation.

The June 2011 minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) included a set of principles to guide the normalisation of monetary policy. These principles suggest a multi-step process involving:
  • The FOMC will likely first ease reinvesting some or all of the proceeds from maturing securities it holds on its balance sheet.
  • The FOMC will at the same time or at some point further down the track signal a change in the likely path of the federal funds target rate. By doing this the markets would be put on notice that the federal funds rate is expected to rise to effect a further tightening of monetary policy in response to improving economic and financial conditions.
  • When economic conditions warrant the FOMC will begin to raise the target for the federal funds rate. From this point, changing the level or range of the federal funds rate target will be the primary means of adjusting monetary policy. During the normalisation process, the FOMC will adjust the interest rate it pays on excess reserves to bring the federal funds rate toward its target.
  • Sometime after the first increase in the federal funds rate the FOMC will likely commence selling assets. The pace of sales will be calibrated to reflect changes in the economic outlook or financial conditions.
  • The process of returning to a normalised balance sheet, involving the sale of housing related securities, will occur over a two to three year period.
Following the June 2013 FOMC meeting the Fed Chairman indicated that as part of prudent planning the committee had been reviewing the above principles in recent meetings. While the FOMC continues to consider these broad principles remain applicable, the Chairman did identify one notable change. As first articulated the principles envisaged the FED would offload mortgage‑backed securities as part of normalising its balance sheet. This reflects a view the Fed’s portfolio should consist mostly of Treasury securities. However, it now appears the FOMC does not envisage the sale of mortgage-backed securities during the process of normalising monetary policy. However it remains possible that in the longer-term the Fed might use limited sales to reduce or eliminate its residual holdings of these securities.

The first step to normalising monetary policy will be the Fed beginning to slow the pace of its asset purchase program. The Fed is currently purchasing US$40 billion of mortgage‑backed securities and US$45 billion of longer-term Treasury securities each month. The Fed will be hoping to achieve a smooth and gradual phase out of asset purchases over a number of months that does not trigger excessive market volatility. It is likely to be a case of ‘learning by doing’ as the Fed tries to gauge how the US economy and financial markets are responding to the tapering of asset purchases. A lot is riding on the Fed getting the pace of tapering right. If the Fed tapers too quickly the US economy could slow down.

It is likely that tapering the asset purchase program will spark speculation about when the Fed will start raising the federal funds rate back to more normal levels. Following the October 2013 meeting the FOMC reaffirmed its view that the federal funds rate will remain at exceptionally low levels as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6.5 per cent, inflation is forecast to be no more than half a percentage point above the Committee's 2 per cent longer-term target, and inflationary expectations remain well anchored.

By articulating a set of principles and providing forward guidance about the likely path of the federal funds rate the Fed has reduced some of the uncertainty for markets about how the process of exiting QE and normalising monetary policy is likely to unfold. However, the Fed has always indicated this is not set in stone but will depend critically on economic and financial conditions. As the Fed’s thinking continues to evolve and adjust to changing circumstances it will be important this is clearly communicated to the markets if excessive volatility and unintended consequences are to be avoided.
 

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 1:37 PM
    Anonymous said:

    But surely, if the Fed stops QE (and therefore stops re-inflating America's new housing & equities bubble) won't the whole house of cards collapse? QE is the only reason the US economy hasn't disintegrated. Can they afford to stop? Or will they just keep saying they're going to taper, without actually doing so?


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top