Quantitative easing - What do we know about the Fed's exit strategy?

Parliament house flag post

Quantitative easing - What do we know about the Fed's exit strategy?

Posted 28/11/2013 by Robert Dolamore



For much of this year there has been speculation about when the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) will begin tapering quantitative easing (QE) as a first step to normalising monetary policy. This would be a welcome development for Australia because the Australian dollar, which remains at uncomfortably high levels, would likely depreciate. This note provides a quick summary of what the Fed has said about its exit strategy. It follows on from an earlier flagpost Exiting quantitative easing – the need for a deft touch and some luck.





The Fed has clearly done a lot of work to prepare for exiting QE and restoring its balance sheet to a more normal configuration in the longer term. An important first step was ensuring it had the necessary tools to begin to tighten monetary policy when economic and financial conditions justify such a move.
The Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, outlined how the Fed had augmented its toolkit in a statement in 2010. This included Congress giving the Fed statutory authority to pay interest on balances that banks hold at the Federal Reserve Banks. This should provide a floor for short-term market interest rates. By changing this interest rate the Fed can adjust the incentives for banks to hold reserves to a level appropriate for monetary policy. In the context of exiting QE, it gives the Fed better control of the level of excess reserves flowing into the financial system. As the US economy strengthens the Fed will be keen to avoid bank lending reaching levels that lead markets to expect higher inflation.

The June 2011 minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) included a set of principles to guide the normalisation of monetary policy. These principles suggest a multi-step process involving:
  • The FOMC will likely first ease reinvesting some or all of the proceeds from maturing securities it holds on its balance sheet.
  • The FOMC will at the same time or at some point further down the track signal a change in the likely path of the federal funds target rate. By doing this the markets would be put on notice that the federal funds rate is expected to rise to effect a further tightening of monetary policy in response to improving economic and financial conditions.
  • When economic conditions warrant the FOMC will begin to raise the target for the federal funds rate. From this point, changing the level or range of the federal funds rate target will be the primary means of adjusting monetary policy. During the normalisation process, the FOMC will adjust the interest rate it pays on excess reserves to bring the federal funds rate toward its target.
  • Sometime after the first increase in the federal funds rate the FOMC will likely commence selling assets. The pace of sales will be calibrated to reflect changes in the economic outlook or financial conditions.
  • The process of returning to a normalised balance sheet, involving the sale of housing related securities, will occur over a two to three year period.
Following the June 2013 FOMC meeting the Fed Chairman indicated that as part of prudent planning the committee had been reviewing the above principles in recent meetings. While the FOMC continues to consider these broad principles remain applicable, the Chairman did identify one notable change. As first articulated the principles envisaged the FED would offload mortgage‑backed securities as part of normalising its balance sheet. This reflects a view the Fed’s portfolio should consist mostly of Treasury securities. However, it now appears the FOMC does not envisage the sale of mortgage-backed securities during the process of normalising monetary policy. However it remains possible that in the longer-term the Fed might use limited sales to reduce or eliminate its residual holdings of these securities.

The first step to normalising monetary policy will be the Fed beginning to slow the pace of its asset purchase program. The Fed is currently purchasing US$40 billion of mortgage‑backed securities and US$45 billion of longer-term Treasury securities each month. The Fed will be hoping to achieve a smooth and gradual phase out of asset purchases over a number of months that does not trigger excessive market volatility. It is likely to be a case of ‘learning by doing’ as the Fed tries to gauge how the US economy and financial markets are responding to the tapering of asset purchases. A lot is riding on the Fed getting the pace of tapering right. If the Fed tapers too quickly the US economy could slow down.

It is likely that tapering the asset purchase program will spark speculation about when the Fed will start raising the federal funds rate back to more normal levels. Following the October 2013 meeting the FOMC reaffirmed its view that the federal funds rate will remain at exceptionally low levels as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6.5 per cent, inflation is forecast to be no more than half a percentage point above the Committee's 2 per cent longer-term target, and inflationary expectations remain well anchored.

By articulating a set of principles and providing forward guidance about the likely path of the federal funds rate the Fed has reduced some of the uncertainty for markets about how the process of exiting QE and normalising monetary policy is likely to unfold. However, the Fed has always indicated this is not set in stone but will depend critically on economic and financial conditions. As the Fed’s thinking continues to evolve and adjust to changing circumstances it will be important this is clearly communicated to the markets if excessive volatility and unintended consequences are to be avoided.
 

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 1:37 PM
    Anonymous said:

    But surely, if the Fed stops QE (and therefore stops re-inflating America's new housing & equities bubble) won't the whole house of cards collapse? QE is the only reason the US economy hasn't disintegrated. Can they afford to stop? Or will they just keep saying they're going to taper, without actually doing so?


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes comments that are not relevant to the article, factually incorrect or politically partisan, as well as spam, profanity and personal abuse. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration climate change Australian foreign policy parliament social security elections welfare reform welfare policy school education Australian Defence Force health financing higher education emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Middle East disability Sport Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia Afghanistan income management Medicare health forced labour Taxation Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health Australian Electoral Commission WADA criminal law transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system ASADA Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling debt international relations constitution New Zealand food Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme OECD corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers UK Parliament election results voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning doping crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing by-election European Union family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top