A short history of increases to the Medicare levy

Parliament house flag post

A short history of increases to the Medicare levy

Posted 3/05/2013 by Amanda Biggs

Green Medicare card with chip
The Government is proposing to introduce legislation during budget week to raise the Medicare levy by 0.5% in order to help fund DisabilityCare, the name of the new National Disability Insurance Scheme. This recent Flagpost outlined some of the reasons for securing funding for the scheme. The Medicare levy has been increased a number of times, and there have also been occasions where an increase has been proposed in order to fund other proposals.

The Medicare levy is used to help fund Australia's national health insurance scheme, Medicare and is currently set at 1.5% of taxable income (with exemptions for those on low incomes and aged pensioners). Funds raised by the levy go into general government revenue—it is not hypothecated, which would mean it was dedicated to one purpose. In 2011–12, the levy raised around $9 billion in revenue, only partially offsetting the cost of Medicare services, which totalled around $17.6 billion.

When Medicare was introduced in February 1984 by the then Hawke Government, the Medicare levy was set at 1% of personal taxable income and was applied to all but those on the lowest incomes. In December 1986, the levy was increased to 1.25% to help offset an increase in medical costs. At the same time, the low income threshold exemptions were also increased.

From July 1993, the levy was raised to 1.4% of income to help fund additional health outlays (and the low income exemption thresholds were also raised). Two years later in July 1995 the levy was raised to 1.5%, to help offset a decline in Medicare levy receipts. The low income exemption thresholds were again increased.

In July 1996, the Howard Government introduced a 0.2% temporary surcharge on the levy to fund its gun buy-back scheme in the wake of the Port Arthur shootings. The surcharge was forecast to raise around $500 million. The gun-buy back surcharge was removed after one year, returning the Medicare levy to its previous level of 1.5%.

From July 1997, a surcharge of 1% on the Medicare levy was applied to high income earners who declined to purchase private hospital cover. This became known as the Medicare levy surcharge. At the same time, a capped means-tested rebate for hospital and ancillary insurance cover was introduced.

In late 1999, the Howard Government proposed a Medicare levy increase in order to fund Australia's military commitment in East Timor. The levy was to apply to those on taxable incomes above $50 000. The Government argued the levy increase was needed to offset the unexpected costs of the deployment and keep the budget in surplus. A bill was subsequently introduced but just weeks before the increase was due to take effect, the Timor Levy was scrapped. The reason given was that the cost of Australia's involvement in East Timor was lower than originally forecast and the budget had returned to surplus.

Adjustments to the Medicare low income and aged pensioner exemption thresholds continued to occur annually.

In the 2009–10 budget, the Rudd Government proposed proportional increases to the Medicare levy surcharge paid by high income earners who choose not to purchase private hospital cover. The measure was eventually passed in early 2012. From July 2012, individuals without private hospital cover on incomes over $97 000 will pay a 1.25% surcharge (in addition to their Medicare levy) and those on incomes over $130 000 will pay a 1.5% surcharge.

As well as the current proposal to raise the levy to fund the NDIS (also proposed by Queensland Premier Campbell Newman) there have been a number of proposals to use a rise in the levy to fund other measures. Examples include lifting the levy in order to fund dental services, a proposal supported by Independent MP Tony Windsor and the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission which recommended the levy rise by 0.75% increase in order to fund a new dental scheme called Denticare. In the lead up to the 1998 Federal election, Labor proposed a 0.2% increase to the Medicare levy in order to fund its proposed Hospital Trust Fund. Increasing the levy to better fund health services has been proposed by among others Queensland State Labor MP, Gordon Nuttall in 2004, and the NSW Government in 2003.

Image source: Medicare Australia


  • 21/01/2014 1:56 PM
    Anonymous said:

    I think it's worth mentioning "Medibank Mark II" under Fraser i.e. a 2.5% levy, with the option of taking out private health insurance instead of paying the levy. There has always been some recognition and reward for self insurance

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top