The National Food Plan: food policy or something else?

Parliament house flag post

The National Food Plan: food policy or something else?

Posted 17/07/2013 by Rob Dossor

The Australian Government released the National Food Plan White Paper (the Paper) on 25 May 2013. At the time the then Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry said ‘For the first time, Australia’s food businesses and consumers have a road map for the future…’ The Paper, however, is not about food for Australians; it has minimal focus on what Australians eat, or food processing in Australia. It is more an export plan, particularly for Australian producers.

What’s in the National Food Plan White Paper?

In 2010 the Government said the National Food Plan would better integrate food policy by looking at the food supply chain from paddock to plate.The Paper makes 16 recommendations for food policy in Australia. A number of these recommendations are grounded and achievable such as: Australian children will have a better understanding of how food is produced and Australia will have reduced per capita food waste. Others however, are rather aspirational, for example by 2025:
  • Australia’s agricultural productivity will have increased by 30%
  • Australia will be among the top five most efficiently regulated countries in the world
  • the value of Australia’s food-related exports will have increased by 45% (in real terms) and
  • Australia will have a globally recognised food brand that is synonymous with high-quality, innovative, safe and sustainable food, services and technology.
Along with the release of the Paper almost $40.0 million in initiatives were announced, the largest of which ($28.5 million) was the establishment of the Asian Food Markets Research Fund (p. 8).
Other initiatives include:
  • an additional $5.6 million to build relationships with trading partners in key and emerging markets (p. 8)
  • a review by the Productivity Commission of the impact of regulatory burdens across the food chain (p. 9)
  • support the skills and workforce needs of the food industry (p. 9) and  
  • $2.0 million to develop a brand identity for Australian food and related technolog (p. 8)
In addition to these initiatives, a number of current programs and projects were referred to. These include:
  • continued investing in the rural research and development system – currently around $700 million annually
  • the investment of $9 billion over five years from 2012-13 through the states and territories for the National Vocational Education and Training System (including agricultural studies) 
  • the investment of $60 billion in transport infrastructure through the National Building Program since 2008 (including in regional and agricultural areas) (p. 9).

The real deal

The original stated goal of the National Food Plan was to assess food sustainability, affordability and security. The Paper, however, only briefly addresses any of these issues. The Paper reads as if the goal of food policy in Australia is to enhance the brand of Australian food and help to feed the world, particularly Asia and China. Many of the existing policies articulated in the Paper seem to have only a tenuous link with agriculture and food. Of the new programs and projects almost all are export oriented. Where the Paper makes links to actual producers and processes, it is limited to calls for them to become more export oriented and water efficient and to reduce emissions.
The possibility of adding value to Australia’s agricultural resources receives scant attention. Indeed, the food processing industry is utterly ignored. This is odd if only because the food and beverage manufacturing industry employs around 226,000, not far short of the total employed in agriculture at around 289,000.

Critical reception 

The Paper received a mixed response. Some key producer stakeholders were supportive. Duncan Fraser the President of the National Farmers Federation (NFF) was quoted as saying ‘This is a great outcome for Australian farmers, the NFF and agriculture in general’. The Australian Greens, on the other hand, were less so, claiming that the Paper fails to tackle the key issues: the supermarket duopoly, the impacts of climate change on future food production, and lax food labelling laws.

Food plan or export plan?

The emphasis the Paper places on Asian demand is understandable, as Asian countries already buy almost 50 per cent of Australia’s agricultural exports, in addition to the rapid growth of a number of Asian countries. However, due to this emphasis, the Paper is not a food plan. It is rather an export plan and would better have been incorporated into the Australia in the Asian CenturyWhite Paper.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top