DisabilityCare Australia launches

Parliament house flag post

DisabilityCare Australia launches

Posted 2/07/2013 by Luke Buckmaster

DisabilityCare Australia, a new scheme for providing support for people with disability, has commenced in locations across Australia. The launch of the scheme, formerly known as the NDIS, is the culmination of years of advocacy from the disability and carers sectors. It builds on work undertaken through the National Disability Strategy, the Productivity Commission, COAG and agreements reached between the Australian and state and territory governments.

This post provides a brief guide to some key aspects of the DisabilityCare Australia launch.

What is DisabilityCare Australia?


DisabilityCare Australia is a major and highly complex reform to the way in which disability support is funded, accessed and provided.

The main component of DisabilityCare Australia will be individualised, long term funding to provide support for people (aged under 65 years) with permanent and significant disability or eligible for early intervention support. Participants in the scheme will meet with DisabilityCare Australia to identify a set of supports agreed as 'reasonable and necessary' to meet their goals. Participants will be provided with funding for these supports and will have choice over how their needs are met (including choice of provider). When DisabilityCare Australia is fully introduced it is expected that around 460,000 Australians will receive support under this component of the scheme.

DisabilityCare Australia also has a broader role in providing information, coordination, referral and funding to assist people with disability (including those not eligible to participate in the main component of the scheme).

For further background, see the Parliamentary Library's Bills Digest for the NDIS legislation.


What is the DisabilityCare Australia launch?


The scheme is being introduced in stages from 1 July 2013 commencing with a pilot phase known as the DisabilityCare Australia launch. This encompasses:
  • South Australia, where support will be provided to 1,600 children aged up to five years (with an additional 3,400 to be included when all children aged up to 14 years participate from 1 July 2015) 
  • Tasmania, where support will be provided to 1,000 young people aged 15-24 years 
  • Newcastle, New South Wales, where support will be provided to 3,000 people aged up to 65 years (with 7,000 to be added with the inclusion of Lake Macquarie in 2014 and Maitland in 2015) and 
  • the Barwon region of Victoria, where support will be provided to 4,000 people aged up to 65 years (with 500 participants added in both 2014 and 2015).
The launch will commence in the Australian Capital Territory (2,500 participants aged up to 65 years) and the Barkly region of the Northern Territory (100 participants aged up to 65 years) from 1 July 2014.

There is no launch site in Queensland (though the full scheme will be rolled out there in 2019) or Western Australia, which is yet to reach agreement with the Commonwealth on the introduction of the scheme. The full scheme is to be introduced in all states and territories except (unless an agreement is reached) Western Australia from 1 July 2019.

Objectives of the launch


According to the DisabilityCare Australia website, the scheme is being launched in stages 'because it’s a big change, and we want to get it right and make it sustainable'. People with disability and service providers will be encouraged to be innovative in their thinking about the kinds of services that might be accessed.

An important part of 'getting it right' will be the use of the launch stage is to test the effectiveness of the scheme in supporting particular sub-groups (e.g. based on age and geographic location) of people with disability.

For example, 15-24 year olds in Tasmania were selected because this group 'is seen as particularly high risk as they make the transition from adolescence to adulthood'; while the younger group of children was chosen in South Australia 'to assess the effectiveness of early intervention processes, and because of the potential
benefits to individual children in terms of reduced lifelong support needs' (see the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights for the NDIS legislation, p. 9).

A formal evaluation of the DisabilityCare Australia launch, to be conducted by the National Institute of Labour Studies (Flinders University), is intended to provide 'insight into what works and what refinements might needed to the scheme'.

Broader issues


Apart from matters relating to the particular groups of people with disability in launch locations, some broader questions that may be clarified by the launch include:
  • who specifically will receive support and what specific supports will they receive? 
  • to what extent will disability service providers be capable of meeting the increased demand for support? Will small providers be able to adapt or will the scheme be dominated by large providers? Will there be enough disability care workers to provide support? 
  • will the system provide sufficient support for innovative and flexible approaches to service design? 
  • are the projected costs realistic? 
  • will there be sufficient monitoring and other protections in place for participants? 
  • will the complaints and appeals process for the scheme be sufficient? 
The introduction of DisabilityCare Australia has raised expectations about the extent, standard and distribution of support to people with disability. It will undoubtedly be transformative but complex and, most likely for some, disappointingly short of expectations.

The launch of the scheme provides the first opportunity to observe the transformation of disability support in Australia but also the 'messy reality' of implementation, with all its inevitable political and policy implications.



Comments

  • 21/01/2014 1:51 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    I have read (most of) the Digest on this topic and have been unable to find what prevents people from outside an early onset are (eg Queanbeyan NSW) moving to an early implementation area (eg Oaks Estate ACT, just across a railway line). Will the (otherwise eligible) people in WA migrate to the Rest of Australia if the WA Government doesn't sign up?

  • 21/01/2014 1:51 PM
    Luke Buckmaster said:

    Hi, Martin. The National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Subclause 23(3)) provides that rules made under the Act may establish requirements relating to residency (e.g. must reside in an area on a prescribed date, for a prescribed period etc). Residency requirements for each launch location can be found in Fact Sheets (under the heading, ‘For people with disability’) on the DisabilityCare Australia website: http://www.disabilitycareaustralia.gov.au/people-disability/fact-sheets-and-publications


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top