Another step towards referendum on Constitutional recognition of local government

Parliament house flag post

Another step towards referendum on Constitutional recognition of local government

Posted 25/01/2013 by Rob Lundie


On 24 January 2013 the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government recommended in its preliminary report that a referendum on the financial recognition of local government be held in conjunction with the 2013 federal election.
The Committee was established in late 2012 to build on the work done by the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government, specifically to inquire into ‘financial recognition of local government', the majority finding of the Expert Panel, to assess the likelihood of success for such recognition through a referendum, the consequences of recognition for local, state and territory governments, as well as whether and when a referendum should be put.

The Committee agreed with submissions that expressed the view that the recent Pape and Williams High Court cases have provided 'a moment for action'. It feels that there is sufficient time to build community support for the proposal and to ensure that the appropriate legislation and administrative requirements are in place.

It recommended that the referendum be held in conjunction with the 2013 federal election noting a submission which indicated that where a state election and referendum had occurred together in New South Wales this had not created problems and that the referendum proposal is 'rarely the most contentious political issue at stake' during the election campaign. Another factor favouring simultaneity is that a stand alone referendum would cost $121 million, an extra $17 million to $18 million than if both were held together.

The Committee recommended that Section 96 of the Constitution be amended so that it reads:
... the Parliament may grant financial assistance to any State or to any local government body formed by State or Territory legislation on such terms and conditions as the Parliament thinks fit. 

Recognising that any referendum is unlikely to be passed without the support of all levels of government, the Committee recommended the Commonwealth commence negotiations with the states and territories to secure their support for the proposal.

The Committee also recommended that preparatory activities for the referendum be initiated. These include such things as the development of a national civics education campaign about the referendum including a "yes/no" case pamphlet, and the drafting of the constitution amendment bill by the end of January.

In a dissenting report, Coalition members of the Committee expressed concern that there may not be enough time to gain the support of the states and territories, nor for the public to be fully educated as to the merits of the case for change. Given that it is recommended that the referendum is held in conjunction with the federal election, the time for such processes could be significantly shortened if an election is held much sooner than the latest possible date of 30 November 2013.

The Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) had expressed similar concerns to the Committee indicating they would rather have the referendum postponed than to see it fail through lack of time and effort to properly educate the public so as to ensure that it is passed. It said that a failed referendum would set back the cause of local government recognition for 50 years.

While still concerned about the time available for the referendum process, the ALGA welcomed the recommendations of the preliminary report. It also urged the Government to establish a Joint Standing Committee on Constitutional Recognition.

Local Government Minister Simon Crean welcomed the report and called on the Coalition and local government bodies to join with the Government in lobbying the states and territories for change.

Image source: Wikimedia Commons

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 2:04 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    If there is a referendum coincident with a general election I am incapable of seeing how it could cost approximately $m100 (=121-18). Printing a simple form and a booklet should cost about 1/10th of that. Could AEC explain their costings that arrive at the total? Secondly I wonder if there has been any analysis of the effects of a referendum on the outcome of an election. For example does an unpopular (or misunderstood) referendum appear to reduce the vote for the sponsoring Government? Martiin

  • 21/01/2014 2:04 PM
    Rob Lundie said:

    The costs of administering a referendum involve more than just the printing and distribution of a pamphlet. The AEC’s submission (number 129, para 3.7) to the committee gives further details. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=jsclg/localgovt/subs.htm As to the effect of a simultaneous referendum and Federal election on the electoral fortunes of the sponsoring Government, it is difficult to make any firm conclusions. Referenda have been held at the same time as a federal election on eight occasions. The Government retained office on six of those occasions (1906, 1919, 1928, 1946, 1974, 1984) and lost office on two occasions (1910, 1913). The fate of the Government at such elections appears not to be related to the outcome of the referenda. Twenty-one referenda questions have been put on the same day as a Federal election. Of the four referenda which were carried, the Government won the election on two occasions and lost the election on two occasions. Referenda have been held on 11 occasions that did not coincide with a federal election. Of the 23 referenda questions put on these dates four were carried and 19 not carried.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration climate change Australian foreign policy parliament social security elections welfare reform welfare policy school education Australian Defence Force health financing higher education emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 disability Sport Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia Afghanistan income management Middle East Medicare health forced labour Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health taxation Australian Electoral Commission WADA criminal law transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system ASADA Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling debt international relations constitution New Zealand food Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers election results voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing by-election European Union family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top