Lost in translation: resettling locally engaged Afghan staff

Parliament house flag post

Lost in translation: resettling locally engaged Afghan staff

Posted 20/12/2013 by David Watt


Image source: Department of Defence
Recent media reports indicate that the Taliban have killed an Afghan man who had worked as an interpreter for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in Afghanistan. With the bulk of ADF personnel being withdrawn from Uruzgan, this provides a reminder of the dangers to Afghan nationals who have worked for Australian government agencies as locally engaged staff and again raises the question of what the Government is doing to assist.

What Australia should and could do for such people has been discussed for some time. As the withdrawal of Australian and other International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) personnel drew near local interpreters spoke out about Taliban threats and some ADF officers expressed the hope that the ‘terps’ (as the ADF calls them) would be looked after. Initially there was little comment from the Department of Defence or the companies contracted by the Australian Government to employ interpreters.

In response to these concerns and the lack of any government announcement, in November 2012 the Australian Greens introduced the Migration Amendment (Special Protection Scheme for Afghan Coalition Employees) Bill 2012. This Bill sought to create a new Special Protection Visa for non-citizens who are ‘fleeing persecution in their home country as a result of assisting either the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), the Australian Embassy or a subcontractor for a Commonwealth defence agency operating in Afghanistan’. It proposed establishing 600 places annually, in addition to the usual humanitarian intake, for people who had assisted for a minimum of 12 months.

The Greens’ Bill went no further than a second reading speech but during December 2012 the Minister for Immigration and the Minister for Defence announced that the Government would offer resettlement in Australia to ‘eligible locally engaged Afghan employees at risk of harm due to their employment in support of Australia’s mission in Afghanistan’.

The Ministers stated that ‘locally engaged Afghan employees interested in resettling in Australia will firstly need to be assessed by their employing Australian agency against specific threat criteria’. They stated that this assessment would ‘consider the level of direct support the applicant has provided to Australia’s mission in Afghanistan as well as its public profile, location and the period of employment’. A person found to be eligible would have to apply for a humanitarian visa, but it was not made clear how long this would take or whether an immediate threat to an applicant might expedite the process. The man killed recently was said to have been awaiting resettlement to Australia.

In an interview earlier in 2013 the Minister for Defence noted that no one was guaranteed a visa and that normal security and health checks would be made. This was in keeping with a similar approach taken during 2008 with Iraqi nationals employed by the ADF during the Iraq war, 557 of whom were resettled in Australia.

The current Minister for Immigration has confirmed that the Abbott Government would be ‘continuing to progress the issue of humanitarian visas for Afghan interpreters and other locally engaged personnel who have offered crucial support to Australia's personnel serving in Afghanistan’. At Senate Estimates in November 2013, the Department of Immigration advised that there would be up to 800 places for locally engaged Afghan staff who were considered to be at risk.

A number of other ISAF countries are already operating special programs to resettle locally engaged Afghan staff.

Between 2009 and 2011 (when its combat forces were withdrawn) Canada offered ‘special immigration measures’ for Afghans who had worked with Canadian forces, although media reports suggest that many were denied visas for failing to meet the requirement of having worked for Canadian forces for a minimum of 12 months.

Also in 2009, the US established a program to provide 1500 ‘Special Immigrant Visas’ per year until 2014 for Afghan nationals who had assisted US forces. The US has similar arrangements in place for Iraqis who assisted US forces, although these are scheduled to end on 31 December 2013 and media reports suggest that relatively few visas have been granted.

The New Zealand Government has offered resettlement places to some Afghan nationals who had worked as interpreters with the New Zealand Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT). The media reports that to date 39 people have been resettled.

During June 2013 the UK’s Secretary of State for Defence announced a £60 million package of measures to assist Afghans who had worked with UK forces. The package includes settlement in the UK for those people thought to be most at risk from reprisals from the Taliban (approximately 600) but also money for retraining, or direct cash payments. The UK’s program also requires a minimum of 12 months employment. Perhaps in response to criticism that the package was inadequate, a further intake was announced by the Immigration Minister in September 2013.

To date, there have been no announcements from the Australian Government that any resettlement visas have been offered to locally engaged Afghan staff.

Comments

  • 23/03/2014 7:25 PM
    Edward Rowe said:

    I worked as a contractor to the ADF from August 2012 through to the base closure in Dec 2013. We employed afghan personnel who had been contracted to ADF in some instances 10+ years. These people were all from the Uruzgan Province. These personnel were all briefed on the above screen and advised by the ADF representative that they should ensure they had Taskira's and valid passports as apart of the process. Despite numerous briefings by ADF these specific personnel were not picked up relocation to Australia except for those that came from other provinces! One in particular worked at the ADF Trade Training School for many years and acts and sounds more Australian than most Australians. He has been left in TK despite being one of a few who were informed they were elligible and despite having provided all the required documentation not once but 3 times to the Embassy in Pakistan who have again seemed to have misplaced them.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare policy elections welfare reform school education health financing higher education Australian Defence Force emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 United Nations Employment Asia disability income management Middle East Medicare Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics sport health forced labour federal budget Afghanistan Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health United States aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Criminal Law Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling transport debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme pensions public service reform children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships corruption coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy welfare ASIO intelligence community terrorist groups Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia social media children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy science social inclusion human rights paternalism Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse terrorism World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats research and development new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional mental health alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran transparency ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct integrity retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition standards conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office NATO work-life balance

Show all
Show less