Australia's current debt position - December 2013 update

Parliament house flag post

Australia's current debt position - December 2013 update

Posted 20/12/2013 by Alan Payne

Here we present a snapshot of Australia’s current debt position and how it has changed since the previously published articles on Australia’s debt position. This update provides the latest available data on Australia’s level of debt for both the public and private sectors in gross and net terms, and compares it with previously published data. For definitions of gross and net debt the reader is referred to the Library’s earlier Flagpost titled Australia’s current debt position from April 2011.

Chart 1 presents Australia’s current foreign debt for the September quarter of 2013 in gross and net terms for the public and private sectors. From Chart 1 it is clear that the private sector is still the largest contributor to Australia’s foreign debt. The private sector is responsible for 80.5 and 75.0 per cent of Australia’s gross and net foreign debt respectively. This is an increase of 1.7 and 3.1 percentage points of gross and net foreign debt respectively since the March 2013 quarter.

General government, as defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) comprises all government units (of local, state and national governments) and non-profit institutions controlled and mainly financed by the government. The general government gross and net foreign debt currently stands at 14.1 and 12.3 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) respectively. There has been no change in the gross debt, but there has been an increase of 0.1 per cent in net debt as a percentage of GDP since March 2013. The total Australian public sector (including general government, and financial and non-financial corporations controlled by governments) gross and net foreign debt currently stands at 19.5 and 13.5 per cent of GDP respectively. Gross and net foreign debt has decreased 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points respectively since March 2013.

The private sector gross and net foreign debts as a per cent of GDP have increased since March 2013, and the public sector gross and net foreign debts have decreased since March 2013. Combined, this has resulted in Australia’s total gross foreign debt (aggregate of the public and private sectors) as a proportion of GDP increasing by 4.7 percentage points since March 2013 to 100.2 per cent of GDP. Australia’s total net foreign debt as a proportion of GDP has increased 3.1 percentage points since March 2013 to 54.0 per cent of GDP.

Chart 2 presents the Commonwealth’s gross and net debt position for years spanning 1970–71 to 2016–17. Data for 2013–14 and onwards are estimates, based on expected GDP and debt growth. The national government gross and net debt currently (2012–13) stands at 18.8 and 10.1 per cent of GDP respectively. National government gross and net debt has increased 6.6 and 6.8 percentage points respectively since 2009–10. These debt figures are composed of all foreign and domestic liabilities, including financial and non-financial corporations, for the national government.

Sources: Gross debt-1971-1995:  RBA Occ Paper no. 8 Historical stats - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue, 1995-2000: RBA table e10 - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue, 2001-2013:  Budget final outcome, Commonwealth Securities on Issue, 2014-2017: 2013-14 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue (estimated/projected), 1971-2012: ABS, Annual National Accounts, 5204.0 Table 2, 2014-2017: Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (estimated/projected nominal GDP growth rates applied). Net debt- 2013-14 Mid Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook.

To gain an insight into what this actually means for the national government’s overall financial health, it is helpful to compare these data with previous governments and that of other countries. Chart 3 presents gross and net debt for successive governments spanning Whitlam to the Rudd/Gillard/Rudd Governments.  The levels of debt recorded in Chart 3 reflect what the gross and net debt positions were at the end of each term of government. The most recent forecasts for gross and net debt figures for 2013-14 onwards indicate that both are expected to rise during the term of the Abbott Government.

Sources: Gross debt- 1971-1995: RBA Occ Paper no. 8 Historical stats - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue, 1995-2000: RBA table e10 - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue, 2001-2013: Budget final outcome, Commonwealth Securities on Issue, 2014-2017: 2013-14 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook - Commonwealth Government Securities on Issue (estimated/projected), 1971-2012: ABS, Annual National Accounts, 5204.0 Table 2, 2014-2017: Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (estimated/projected nominal GDP growth rates applied). Net debt- 2013-14 Mid Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook.

In gross and net terms the Rudd/Gillard/Rudd Labor government recorded the second largest debt position of all previous governments over the reporting period with only the Hawke/Keating Labor government experiencing a higher debt position.

Chart 4 presents general government gross and net debt for Australia in 2012 compared with other countries. The term general government used here is from the International Monetary Fund and is defined as all entities that fulfil the function of the government as their primary activity. Chart 4 clearly shows that Australia’s general government gross and net debt, which currently stands at 27.9 and 11.9 per cent of GDP respectively, is much lower than those of a range of other countries.

Alan Payne, with assistance from Alicia Hall and Toby Bellwood
Senior Researchers, Statistics and Mapping Section, Parliamentary Library


  • 24/10/2014 3:15 PM
    Alicia Hall said:

    As you point out, private households, as well as the government, can accumulate debt. The ABS published an article Trends in Household Debt in May 2014 which considered this issue in an historical and international context (Australian Social Trends 2014, cat. no. 4102.0). This publication states that total household debt was $1.84 trillion at the end of 2013, or $79,000 for every person in Australia. This was the highest it had been in the last 25 years. In terms of household debt compared to income, Australia’s household debt was almost 1.73 times the amount of gross disposable income received by households during 2012. ABS note that Australia’s household debt to income ratio is high when compared to the G7 countries, for example Italy (0.82) and Germany (0.93). This level of household debt is significant in times of economic decline, where households struggle to meet their debt repayments.

  • 25/07/2014 10:41 AM
    Zetetic said:

    It is impossible to have an informed debate about debt without including information about public debt. The abilty for the goverment to pay the interest and principle on their debt is dependent upon the abilty of the people to pay taxes. Peoples ability to pay taxes is affected by the amount of public debt. what is ratio of gov+public debt to GDP and how does this compare with other countries?

  • 7/06/2014 8:03 AM
    Bill W said:

    Thank you for this information. Would it be possible to compare (graph) the rise in private debt by year (or government) against the change in public debt. I suspect there may be an inverse relationship!

  • 26/05/2014 1:46 PM
    Alan Payne said:

    Yes I agree. When comparing Australia's debt with other countries it is best to directly compare it with other developed countries, which is why countries such as the US, UK and France were included in the article. However, it is also useful to compare Australia's debt with other countries to give a rounded picture of how Australia debt position compares with the rest of the world.

  • 23/05/2014 1:01 PM
    Peter said:

    It is normal to compare Australia to countries of similar levels of development, OECD member nations, countries with similar economies. There are some countries who have lower levels of public debt then Australia, and these include several middle eastern oil exporting countries. Comparing Australia to these countries is less relevant; as it would be comparing Australia to poorer, less developed economies.

  • 18/05/2014 7:28 AM
    Norton said:

    Comparisons with other economies appear to give people, poiticians, and sometimes economists enormous comfort. I note comparisons are not made as a rule with the very best economies in relation to debt. Why is the benchmark of success being ahead of nations with high debt levels? This may suit politicians attempting to appease a cohort of voters but surely a nation that is sustainable lives within it's means?

  • 30/04/2014 2:21 PM
    Alan Payne said:

    To analyse the overall financial health of an organisation or to compare one organisation with another it is better to report relative measures (for example, percentage of GDP) as opposed to absolute measures. It is indeed possible to report absolute measures of debt in both net and gross terms, as found in the Commonwealth Budget Papers, however my FlagPost was attempting to analyse the financial health of the government not to report its total current interest bearing liabilities.

  • 29/04/2014 1:56 PM
    Dale Hartley said:

    I would like to see hard dollar figures in addition to percentage of GDP to bring these figures from theoretically vague to real world sharpness.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament elections climate change social security women welfare reform taxation Indigenous Australians Australian Defence Force welfare policy school education higher education private health insurance health financing emissions trading Middle East Senate Australian Bureau of Statistics employment people trafficking Asia statistics illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Public Service income management Medicare disability Sport United Nations environment industrial relations constitution transport politics criminal law Afghanistan health forced labour food public service reform aged care aid Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Carbon Pricing Mechanism dental health international relations governance regulation Fair Work Act voting law enforcement electoral reform OECD Australian Electoral Commission WADA child protection poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention 43rd Parliament slavery health system leadership domestic violence parliamentary procedure International Women's Day accountability defence capability multiculturalism ASADA Australian Federal Police labour force people smuggling debt New Zealand Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme political parties coal seam gas Human rights crime China Census election results UK Parliament Papua New Guinea banking corruption pensions children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment Youth Allowance sea farers United Kingdom energy food labelling Australian economy violence against women vocational education and training military history by-election High Court skilled migration mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations youth paid parental leave same sex relationships customs planning doping health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy ANZUS Rural and regional trade unions Foreign affairs election timetable Indigenous royal commission Productivity firearms public policy Population ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council forestry Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report social inclusion paternalism environmental law US presidential election nutrition ODA Defence sitting days electoral divisions Southeast Asia administrative law universities TAFE Ireland citizenship asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing water health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution Turkey Syria marine pollution sustainability prisons police deaths in custody electoral margins electoral pendulum electoral redistribution redistribution NSW redistribution WA redistribution ACT electoral boundaries ASEAN Sustainable Development Goals Double dissolution Senators safety vehicles MYEFO Pathology tertiary education Taiwan Xi Ma meeting family violence government financial advisers financial planners Financial System Inquiry Murray Inquiry China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top