Where in the world is doping a crime? (doping in sports pt. 6)

Parliament house flag post

Where in the world is doping a crime? (doping in sports pt. 6)

Posted 24/04/2013 by Jaan Murphy


In the previous FlagPost in this series we examined actions related to doping in sport that can also be prosecuted as crimes in Australia. Do other countries criminalise doping in sport, or is Australia unique in having criminal offences that apply to conduct associated with Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs)?

The situation overseas


In Australia some actions related to doping in sports (e.g. trafficking, possession, use or administration of steroids) are also crimes under various Commonwealth, state or territory statutes. However, none of those laws are sports-specific but rather reflect a mixture of criminal, therapeutic goods or customs legislation that happen to cover conduct related to some ADRVs.

In contrast, some countries have enacted sports-specific laws that criminalise the use of a World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) Prohibited Substance (most notably Austria, France and Italy). In other words, they have criminalised doping as it is colloquially understood.

A larger number of countries have enacted sports-specific legislation that criminalises other ADRVs (other than the use of a WADC Prohibited Substance) including:
  • the possession of WADC Prohibited Substances or Methods
  • the supply or distribution of WADC Prohibited Substances or Methods (trafficking)
  • the administration or prescription of WADC Prohibited Substances or Methods to athletes, and
  • failing to cooperate with anti-doping investigations being conducted by a National Anti-Doping Organization (NADO) or other public authority.

Doping crimes in Europe


Austria has adopted a unique approach to criminalising doping in sports. Under section 147 of the Austrian StGB, any person who commits fraud (entailing more than ‘insignificant damage’) by using a substance or method prohibited under the European Anti-Doping Convention faces up to three years imprisonment. If the damage caused by the use of prohibited substance or method exceeds €50,000 the maximum sentence increases to ten years imprisonment.

As noted in the previous FlagPost, some commentators here in Australia have argued that the use of WADC Prohibited Substances or Methods by professional athletes or scholarship holders may be regarded as obtaining money, property, services, a benefit, or an advantage dishonestly or by deceit, and therefore could be prosecuted as fraud (and attract a term of imprisonment) under various state criminal statutes. What makes Austria different to Australia is that Austria has created a sports-specific fraud, rather than relying on existing criminal laws.

Austria’s laws aren’t just for show. There have been a number of notable prosecutions for criminal doping offences including:

  • Stefan Matschiner, a manager of Austria cyclist Bernhard Kohl was sentenced to 15 months in prison for assisting cyclists engage in blood doping and selling WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods
  • Mikhail Botvinov, an Austrian cross-country skier was given a suspended 4 month prison term for giving false testimony as a witness in a doping case against ex-Nordic coach Walter Mayer and
  • Walter Myer, a biathlon coach was given a partially suspended 15-month prison term for the trafficking of WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods, including EPO.

The situation in Italy is different again from Australia. In Italy the Disciplina della tutela sanitaria delle attivita’ sportive e della lotta contro il doping (Law number 376 of 2000) establishes three distinct types of criminal doping offences. 

The first two offences concern both athletes and support personnel procuring, administering, consuming (or even encouraging the use of) WADC Prohibited Substances or Methods, with the aim of improving an athlete’s competitive performance or to modify the results of an anti-doping test. Imprisonment from three months to three years and a fine from €2,580 to €51,645 are the sanctions for these offences.

The third offence (arguably the most innovative) aims to tackle illegal suppliers who trade in WADC Prohibited Substances outside official distribution channels. Imprisonment from two to six years and a fine from €5,164 to €77,468 are the sanctions for this offence. Notable prosecutions for criminal doping offences in Italy include:

  • Antonio Giraudo and Riccardo Agricola, the manager and chief sports physician respectively of the Juventus football (soccer) club were found guilty by Italy’s Supreme Court in 2007 of sporting fraud for purchasing and administering WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods, such as corticosteroids.
  • In 2011, Luciano Moggi the director general the Juventus football (soccer) club was found guilty of sports fraud and sentenced to five years and four months imprisonment, but the decision is currently subject to an appeal.
  • Michele Ferrari, a doctor and cycling coach was convicted in October 2004 of sporting fraud and sentenced to one year in prison (suspended) and fined €900.00, but this was later overturned on appeal.
 
In France, under the Code du sport, the use of a WADC Prohibited Substance or Method is criminal offence. In addition the Code du sport criminalises the supply and administration of a WADC Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to cooperate with anti-doping investigations.
 
Spain too has criminalised doping in sports. Under the Public General Act 7/2006, of 21st November, on the protection of health and the fight against doping in sport it is an offence to prescribe, provide, dispense, supply, administer, offer or make available banned substances or pharmacological groups, as well as non-authorised methods aimed at increasing athletes physical capacity or modifying the results of competitions.
 
However, Austria, Italy, France and Spain – whilst unique in criminalising the use of WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods – are not the only countries to have criminalised certain ADRVs.
 
Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary Iceland, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Spain and Sweden have enacted sports specific legislation that criminalises the trafficking of WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods.
 
Whilst it might appear that criminalising doping in sport is a European concept, Europe isn’t alone in introducing laws that criminalise the trafficking of WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods (which is also an ADRV). China, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua and Tunisia have all enacted laws of various breadth and scope that deal with the trafficking of WADC Prohibited Substances and Methods.
 
In the next FlagPost, we will explore who is bound by the WADC and various anti-doping policies here in Australia.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]




Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment indigenous Australians Sport illicit drugs gambling people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations health financing Asia Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget school education forced labour statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA income management Industrial Relations emissions trading dental health Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention 43rd Parliament Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police aid people smuggling poker machines National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Australian Public Service constitution International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection Aviation debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment Census politics High Court skilled migration election results voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS governance Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs Senate doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur Electoral reform political parties banking firearms public policy Population violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism science research and development social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation accountability public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning Senators and Members United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs health reform Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing pharmaceutical benefits scheme Parliamentary remuneration health system money laundering early childhood education Canada Financial sector UK Parliament national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity transparency Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Australia Greens federal election 2010 servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship human rights child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency productivity human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia United Kingdom GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits ANZUS qantas counselling Korean peninsula

Show all
Show less
Back to top