Australia’s efforts against foreign bribery – an update

Parliament house flag post

Australia’s efforts against foreign bribery – an update

Posted 1/11/2012 by Cat Barker


Image source: Small Business NSW
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released its latest assessment of Australia’s implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (Anti-Bribery Convention) in October 2012. Outlined below is an overview of the positive and negative findings and their implications for the Australian Government.

The Anti-Bribery Convention was adopted in 1997 to address the widespread phenomenon of bribery in international business transactions. It entered into force on 15 February 1999 and has been ratified by all 34 member countries of the OECD (of which Australia is one) and five other countries. 

The Anti-Bribery Convention is one of the key international instruments on corruption, along with the 2005 United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), which Australia has also ratified. The focus of the Anti-Bribery Convention is on the ‘supply side’ of bribery—that is, the offer, promise or giving of a bribe, as opposed to the solicitation, acceptance or receipt of a bribe. 

Australia ratified the Anti-Bribery Convention in 1999 and underwent its third formal evaluation this year. Detailed information on the Anti-Bribery Convention, Australia’s implementation of it and the results of previous evaluations are set out in a Parliamentary Library Background Note published in February 2012. The principal obligation is criminalisation of the bribery of foreign public officials. Other obligations include: 
  • effective prevention, detection and reporting of foreign bribery 
  • effective investigation and prosecution of foreign bribery and related conduct 
  • providing for confiscation of bribes and the proceeds of bribery and 
  • taxation measures to combat bribery. 

Positive developments 

The report of the OECD Working Group on Bribery (Working Group) identifies the following positive developments since 2008, when it published a follow-up report to its 2006 evaluation of Australia’s implementation of the Convention: 
  • foreign bribery is becoming a priority for the Australian Government 
  • the announcement of the development and implementation of a whole of government National Anti-Corruption Plan (expected by the end of 2012) 
  • significant increases to the maximum penalty for individuals and bodies corporate for the foreign bribery offence in the Criminal Code Act 1995 
  • public consultation on the existing facilitation defence to the foreign bribery offence (which permits benefits of a minor nature for the dominant purpose of expediting or securing the performance of a routine government action of a minor nature, provided appropriate records are made and kept) and 
  • improved sharing of taxation information. 

Areas requiring improvement 

While the Working Group welcomed Australia’s recent efforts, it has ‘serious concerns that overall enforcement of the foreign bribery offence to date has been extremely low’ (p. 4). In particular, of 28 referrals to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) for foreign bribery, 21 have been concluded without any charges being laid. Of the remaining seven, only one has so far resulted in prosecutions, with charges laid against Securency International, Note Printing Australia and several individuals beginning in July 2011. The Working Group made 33 recommendations and identified a further 11 issues that it would follow up (by comparison, in 2006 the Working Group made 19 recommendations and identified six issues for follow-up). Tellingly, the first recommendation is that Australia review its overall approach to enforcement in order to effectively combat international bribery of foreign public officials. Another was that the AFP: 
  • take sufficient steps to ensure foreign bribery allegations are not prematurely closed 
  • be more proactive in gathering information at the pre-investigative stage 
  • take steps to ensure it explores all avenues for exercising jurisdiction over related legal persons (such as corporations) in foreign bribery cases 
  • continue to systematically consider concurrent or joint investigations with foreign or other domestic law enforcement agencies and 
  • routinely consider investigations of related charges such as false accounting and money laundering, especially when a substantive charge of foreign bribery cannot be proven. 
Other recommendations included:
  • increasing the maximum penalty for legal persons for false accounting to a level that is effective, proportionate and dissuasive 
  • ensuring the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has sufficient resources to prosecute foreign bribery cases 
  • improving awareness among state law enforcement officials and the private sector, including targeting companies (particularly small and medium enterprises) that conduct business overseas 
  • improve foreign bribery reporting requirements across the Australian Public Service and for officials and employees of independent statutory authorities 
  • introduce whistleblower protections for public and private sector employees who report suspected foreign bribery to competent authorities in good faith and 
  • consider taking concrete steps to encourage companies, ‘in the strongest terms’, to conduct due diligence on agents, including those referred to them by Austrade (one of several recommendations of direct relevance to the current prosecutions). 

Implications for Government 

The Attorney-General’s Department has been tasked with developing Australia’s first National Anti‑Corruption Plan by the end of 2012. Combating foreign bribery is only one aspect of the broader anti-corruption framework. However, the extent of the issues identified by the Working Group, and the public attention on the issue following allegations of foreign bribery within Reserve Bank of Australia subsidiaries, means there will be pressure for the Plan to adequately respond to at least the key recommendations. 

A 2011 study undertaken by CAER—Corporate Analysis. Enhanced Responsibility. for the Australian Council of Super Investors found that 75 per cent of the top 100 and 63 per cent of the top 200 companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange operate in a high-risk sector, a high-risk country or both. In chapter seven of the Australia in the Asian Century White Paper the Australian Government has outlined a number of national objectives with the aim of making the most of growing markets in Asia, such as increasing Australia’s trade links with Asia from one quarter in 2011 to one third by 2025. Australia should of course attempt to capitalise on the economic rise of the Asian region, but it should also ensure that corruption risks are appropriately managed in doing so. 

Transparency International publishes an annual Corruption Perceptions Index that ranks the perceived level of public sector corruption in different countries based on a variety of surveys and assessments on issues such as bribery of public officials, kickbacks in public procurement and embezzlement of public funds. The 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index ranked 183 countries. While some Asian countries, such as Singapore (ranked 5th), Hong Kong (12th) and Japan (equal 14th), ranked among the least corrupt countries along with Australia (ranked equal 8th with Switzerland), others did not fare so well. Malaysia came in at 60, China at 75, India at 95, Indonesia at 100, Vietnam at 112 and Myanmar at 180 out of 182, ahead only of North Korea and Somalia tying for 182nd place. With Australian foreign bribery prosecutions on foot involving allegations of the bribery of officials in Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal and Malaysia, the increasing integration of Australian organisations into Asian markets should take place alongside significant improvements to Australian efforts to combat foreign bribery.



Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare policy elections welfare reform school education health financing Australian Defence Force emissions trading indigenous Australians women higher education private health insurance people trafficking illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 United Nations Employment Asia disability income management Middle East Medicare Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics sport health forced labour federal budget Afghanistan Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health United States aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Criminal Law Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling transport debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme pensions public service reform children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships corruption coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy welfare ASIO intelligence community terrorist groups Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court Higher Education Loan Program HECS military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia social media children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy science social inclusion human rights paternalism Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse terrorism World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats research and development new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional mental health alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran transparency ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct integrity retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition standards conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office NATO work-life balance

Show all
Show less