New marine reserve proposals

Parliament house flag post

New marine reserve proposals

Posted 19/06/2012 by Bill McCormick

The Commonwealth is proposing the proclamation of 44 new marine reserves covering a total of 2.34 million square kilometres by the end of the year. The move has drawn criticism from fisheries bodies for excluding fishing in substantial areas of the ocean; at the other end of the spectrum, some conservation bodies were disappointed that the government had not banned oil and gas exploration in areas adjacent to existing marine parks.

The proposal for 44 new reserves was released on 14 June 2012 as part of the Marine Bioregional planning exercise. This exercise covered five Marine Regions (South-west, North-west, North, and East (Temperate East) and Coral Sea). The proposed marine reserves contain various different zones. Activities are permitted or restricted according to the zone and the Marine Region in which it lies, but differ between Marine Regions. For example, demersal trawling is permitted in the Special Purpose zones of marine reserves in the Temperate East Marine Region but not in Special Purpose zones of marine reserves in the South-west Marine Region. The zone with the highest protection for environmental assets is termed the Marine National Park Zone, which prohibits extractive activities such as commercial and recreational fishing, as well as oil and gas exploration.

Within the nearly 2.4 million square kilometres of these reserves, more than 860,000 square kilometres are classified as Marine National Park Zones, in which all commercial and recreational fishing is banned.

Marine Region – new reserves
Area of final Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Proposal (square kilometres)
Area of Marine National Park Zones in final Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Proposal (square kilometres)
South West – 14 reserves
North West – 13 reserves
North – 8 reserves
Coral Sea – 1 reserve
Temperate East – 8 reserves
Total – 44 reserves

There will be a formal process for the proclamation of these marine reserves under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). This process allows 60 days for public comment, and it is expected that the reserves will be proclaimed by the end of the year. Minister Burke said that the public consultation is not about the location of the boundaries of the reserves, or of the zones within the reserves, but rather to say whether or not Australia should proclaim the marine reserves at all.

As the Minister put it: "We now go through one final 60 day consultation period. It's too late for people to say I want this line shifted or I want this zone painted a different colour. The question now is very straight forward. Do we go ahead with the most comprehensive marine park network in the world or do we not?"

This ‘all or none’ restriction appears to be at odds with the spirit of the EPBC Act.

Concerns about the marine reserve network proposal have come from both the conservation and fisheries interests. For example:
  • Don Henry of the ACF noted that oil and gas exploration are to be banned in the Coral Sea but not in the North-west Marine Region. 
  • Bob Pressey, of James Cook University, was critical of the network proposal saying that the reserves should have separated “marine biodiversity from processes that threaten its persistence” but instead “the reserve system had been designed to avoid any marine areas of commercial interest to fishing or petroleum companies.” 
  • Commonwealth Fisheries Association spokesman Brian Jeffriess argued that the price of prawns and shark will rise due to closure of some areas to fishing. Guy Leyland of the Western Australian Fishing Industry Council stated that the industry doesn’t overfish, and therefore wondered what is the point of the reserves. 
  • Australian Recreational Fishing Foundation spokesman, Allan Hansard, and Andrew Rowland, CEO of Recfishwest, are opposed to the declaration of more marine national park zones. Mr Hansard said "The government treats Aussie anglers in the same way it treats industrial-scale commercial fishing and oil and gas developments".
 Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Senator Joe Ludwig, argued that the new reserves would have little or no impact on recreational fishing. He said “In almost two-thirds of the announced reserve area recreational fishing is unimpeded – even where there are other restrictions.”

As the Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network proposal will reduce access by fishers to their present catch, there will need to be a fisheries adjustment assistance package. The socio-economic reports of the predicted impacts of the new reserves on individual fisheries and regions will be released in coming weeks and will be used in the development of assistance in line with the 2011 Fisheries Adjustment Policy. The Commonwealth will negotiate with the fishing industry over details of the package, which will be started by the time the reserves are proclaimed. The compensation will be decided on a case-by-case basis and package measures may include:
  • Transitional business assistance to support changes to fishing business operations
  • Assistance for employees including payments
  • Investment in research and monitoring
  • Removal of commercial fishing effort from impacted fisheries through possible purchase of entitlements
  • Targeted assistance to vertically integrated fishing businesses
 An issue of dispute is the level of the assistance. The Government estimated the impact of the reserves as displacing 1-2 per cent of annual fish catch, giving a likely assistance package of about $100 million. Brian Jeffriess maintained that this figure was not enough; he pointed out that the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park structural assistance package was $250 million for a much smaller area than that of the proposed new reserves.

If precedent is followed, it is worth examining two previous structural adjustment packages for the fishing industry: the first following creation of no-take zones in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in 2004, and the second as a result of the proclamation of the South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserve network in 2007. According to the review of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Structural Adjustment package, $213.7 million was provided up to 28 June 2010 to 1782 fishers, seafood processors and upstream providers. This was much greater than the $14-26 million of the 2004 estimates, which were based on the impact of rezoning on fishers but not on upstream and downstream processers. However the review also indicated that only $20 million in assistance went to the fishing industry affected by the South-east Marine Reserve network.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top