What can be done about the social determinants of health?

Parliament house flag post

What can be done about the social determinants of health?

Posted 5/07/2012 by Rebecca de Boer

Three recent reports: the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) report on perinatal depression, Australia’s Health 2012 (produced by the AIHW) and the Council of Australian Government (COAG) Reform Council performance report on the National Healthcare Agreement (2008) have highlighted the impact of the social determinants of health. These reports demonstrate the relationship between income, health status and access to health care. They clearly show that Australians with low incomes usually have poorer health outcomes.

The AIHW report on perinatal depression shows that low income households have the highest rates of perinatal depression (14%). Perinatal depression is less likely if the mother has a high level of education attainment (bachelor or higher), is working and spoke another language than English at home.

Australia's Health 2012, while noting the difficulties associated with measuring socioeconomic status (SES), outlined the association between SES and health measures. Poorer health outcomes were generally associated with low income and other SES factors such as occupation and low education attainment.

The COAG Reform Council Report highlighted the inequity of access experienced across the health care system. One example is access to dental care - around 25% of Australians do not see a dentist due to cost, rising to 30% outside of capital cities. The 'Great Dividing Range' also signified societal divide with those living over the range usually experiencing: longer waits for GPs, higher rates of preventable disease, higher rates of preventable hospitalisation, lower rates of cancer survival and poorer access to mental health care.

These reports give further weight to what the Catholic Health Australia (CHA)-NATSEM reports on Health Inequalities have previously found. The first report, Health lies in wealth, showed the socio-economic gradient in health that exists among working aged Australians. It quantified the difference between low and high income groups; 65% of low income groups have long term health problems, compared to only 15% in high income groups. Obesity rates were three times as high among low income families. These outcomes were attributed to education level, stability of housing and employment and the size of social and family networks. Access to health services was not considered to be a significant factor.

The second CHA-NATSEM report, The Cost of inaction on the social determinants of health, calculated the potential savings to the Government if the health status of the 400 000 individuals of working age in the bottom income quintile was improved. It estimated that this would result in a reduction of 5.5 million Medicare services with a saving of around $273 million per annum. Improvements in health across all income brackets would also result in less Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme scripts with an estimated reduction of 5.3 million in script volume. There would also be flow-on effects to savings in income and welfare support as people with poor health or who have a long-term health condition usually receive between 1.5 to 2.5 times the level of financial assistance from Government than those in good health or without chronic illness.

The evidence is compelling, but with the exception of a few countries, national governments have been slow to act. The World Health Organization (WHO) established a Commission on the Social Determinants of Health from 2005–2008 to support countries in addressing social inequities. The final report of the Commission challenged governments and WHO to achieve health equity within a generation. This commitment was reiterated in 2011 at the Rio Political Declaration on the Social Determinants of Health. The Declaration also acknowledged that more needed to be done by governments to address the unequal distribution of health resources and the social determinants of health.

Countries such as the United Kingdom, Norway and Finland have commenced implementation of programs and policies to address the structural inequalities contributing to poor health outcomes. The UK government commissioned Sir Michael Marmot in 2008 to conduct an independent review of the most effective and evidence based strategies to reduce inequalities in England. The final report Fair Society, Healthy Lives’ (2010) proposed action on six policy objectives:
  1. Give every child the best start in life
  2. Enable all children, young people and adults to maximise their capabilities and have control over their lives
  3. Create fair employment and good work for all
  4. Ensure healthy standard of living for all
  5. Create and develop healthy and sustainable places and communities
  6. Strengthen the role and impact of ill-health prevention
Recent results from the UK measuring the impact of this approach show some improvements but inequalities persist. This is not a reflection on the approach, rather, action on the social determinants of health is a long term investment and it will take some time to see results.

Despite being a member state of WHO, Australia is yet to implement a targeted response to the 2008 and 2011 WHO Declarations on the Social Determinants of health. Some state governments (for example, NSW, SA, VIC and TAS) have taken the initiative and integrated this understanding into policy development and health planning. South Australia is perhaps the most well known for its ‘Health in All Policies’ approach and an evaluation of this framework is currently being developed. The Public Health Act 1997 (TAS) requires a report on the public health status of Tasmania every five years. The most recent report (2008) reported on the interaction of the social determinants of health and health status and showed that Tasmanians in more disadvantaged circumstances had worse health and higher mortality rates than those in more advantaged socio-economic circumstances.

Fran Baum, an Australian academic and Commissioner on the Social Determinants of Health Commission, has recommended that Australia establish an Australian Health and Equity Commission to address health inequities. This would assess the health and equity impacts of a range of government policies. CHA has long advocated for a Senate Inquiry into the social determinants of health. It has also recommended that the Government adopt a ‘health in all policies' (part of WHO’s response in addressing the social determinants of health) as a means of addressing health inequities. Minister Butler has acknowledged these calls but has not endorsed their suggestions. The Senate Committee on Community Affairs will consider whether this will form part of their work program for this year.

Recent reports have added to the long standing evidence about the relationship between social inequity and health. Perhaps an Inquiry which grapples with practical aspects of addressing the social determinants of health in the Australian context might be a good place to start.


  • 21/01/2014 2:47 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    I recall a presentation to the Conference of Commonwealth Statisticians in the late 1980s in which a statistician from the UK ministry of Health showed two maps. One indicating areas of low income - I think based on their 1980 Census - and the other areas of high rates of heart disease. The two were almost exact replicas showing a high level of correlation. I'm surprised it took a further 20 years to commission an enquiry.

  • 21/01/2014 2:47 PM
    Helen Keleher said:

    The 1980 UK Black Report also showed that patterns of poor health are related to the conditions in which people live, but PM Thatcher tried to bury the report.Since then there has been a wealth of evidence to show the relationships between the various determinants of health. The NATSEM-CHA report shows that ignoring this evidence is actually very costly for governments - it's time to take action, not just because of the cost but because we can do much to improve the quality of people's lives and improve their health.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top