New rules for media-related activity in Parliament House and its precincts

Parliament house flag post

New rules for media-related activity in Parliament House and its precincts

Posted 5/12/2012 by Nicholas Horne

On 28 November 2012 the Presiding Officers issued new rules for media-related activity in Parliament House and its precincts. The rules will come into effect with the commencement of the 2013 parliamentary sittings on 5 February 2013 replacing the previous rules and guidelines on filming and photography (issued December 2008). The rules will apply to all occupants of Parliament House and visitors to the building and its precincts.

The rules are issued under the Parliamentary Precincts Act 1988 (Cth) and operate alongside resolutions of the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Joint Committee on the Broadcasting of Parliamentary Proceedings. The rules state that media-related activity includes: conducting interviews; seeking public comment from individuals; photography for print or online publication; ‘sound and vision recording for radio or television broadcast or web streaming’; and ‘any other digital capture of text, images or sound for broadcast purposes or public distribution’.

The rules specify locations in public and private areas where media-related activity is prohibited, permitted, or permitted with approval and set out conditions for approvals where required. The rules also deal with media coverage of parliamentary proceedings and specify penalties for non-compliance.

The new rules introduce four guiding principles: 
  • ‘openness and accessibility of the Parliament’
  • ‘facilitation of fair and accurate reporting by the media of parliamentary proceedings’
  • respect for the privacy of parliamentarians and ‘other building occupants and visitors’, and
  • ‘non-interference with the operations of the Parliament’ or the ability of parliamentarians and other occupants to fulfil their duties. 

Main differences between the new rules and the previous rules include: 
  • the new rules provide greater clarity regarding where media-related activity is prohibited, permitted or permitted with approval in public and private areas
  • the new rules prohibit the digital manipulation of broadcast material or still photographs of parliamentary proceedings
  • a restriction in the previous rules on filming, and the use of still photography of chamber proceedings, for satire or ridicule has been removed
  • the new rules set out a range of penalties that may be applied for non-compliance (for example denial of access to all chamber galleries for a sitting week). 

While the previous restriction on filming and the use of still photography of chamber proceedings for satire or ridicule has been removed from the media rules, restrictions on the use of broadcasts of chamber proceedings for the purposes of satire and ridicule are still in place in the resolutions of the Senate and the House of Representatives and in the Joint Committee on the Broadcasting of Parliamentary Proceedings’ conditions of access to Senate and House proceedings for recording and broadcasting. This discrepancy may be rectified in the future.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

immigration refugees elections taxation asylum Parliament criminal law election results Australian Bureau of Statistics social security disability citizenship Indigenous Australians political parties United Kingdom UK Parliament Census statistics banking early childhood education Middle East Australian foreign policy OECD Australian Electoral Commission voting mental health Employment military history by-election election timetable China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Productivity Defence income management asylum seekers High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title Senate ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories leadership aid Papua New Guinea emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding Electoral reform politics refugees immigration asylum Canada procurement Australian Public Service firearms Indigenous health constitution High Court e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament women 2015 International Women's Day public policy ABS Population Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade skilled migration Private health insurance Medicare Financial sector EU national security fuel China soft power education violence against women domestic violence Fiji India Disability Support Pension disability employment welfare reform Tasmania Antarctica China Diplomacy Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency Sport ASADA Federal Court WADA ADRV by-elections state and territories terrorism terrorist groups Bills corruption anti-corruption integrity fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform science innovation research and development transport standards Afghanistan Australian Defence Force NATO United States social media Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism higher education Higher Education Loan Program HECS welfare policy pensions social services welfare ASIO Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Australian Secret Intelligence Service intelligence community Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 sexual abuse online grooming sexual assault of minors labour force workers

Show all
Show less
Back to top