If switching health insurance funds can save money, why don't more Australians do so?

Parliament house flag post

If switching health insurance funds can save money, why don't more Australians do so?

Posted 30/06/2011 by Amanda Biggs

A path that splits into two different directions
A recent report by Choice, the publication of the Australian Consumers' Association, found that if some people switched health insurers they could make substantial savings to their health insurance costs. Reviewing some 17 000 health insurance products as part of its annual survey of health insurance, Choice found that families could save more than $1500 a year by switching to a better value fund. In some cases, the savings could be even higher.

Under Australia's health insurance arrangements, consumers are guaranteed portability. Portability means consumers can change private health insurers at any time without incurring additional waiting times, provided the new product offers similar benefits.

Despite this guarantee, very few of the 10 million Australians covered by private health insurance switch health insurers. The most recent statistics from the Private Health Insurance Administration Council (PHIAC) (see page 2 'Changes during the Quarter') show that 62 495 people, or just 0.6 per cent of the total number of people covered by health insurance, transferred to another fund in the March 2011 quarter. It is notable that during this quarter the Government announced the annual premium increases to apply from April 2011; with an average increase of 5.57 per cent across the sector.

It might be expected that the announcement of a premium increase would prompt consumers to consider their health insurance options with some then opting to switch to a better value fund.

However, although the figures fluctuate, the rate of transfer between health insurers over the last five years has hovered between 0.3 and the 0.6 per cent seen in the March 2011 quarter.

A higher proportion of people drop their cover each quarter—in the March 2011 quarter some 1.7 per cent dropped their cover (although some of these drop-outs may be people who later go on to purchase new cover). The number of those switching to a new fund in the March 2011 quarter represents the highest proportion since September 2006, but this still remains a tiny proportion of members.

Switching funds is not straightforward and there are a number of reasons why there are difficulties. Firstly, many funds offer loyalty schemes with bonuses for longer term members. If a consumer switches to a new fund, they will most probably lose all the loyalty bonuses they have accrued. Some of these bonuses are in the form of benefits for high cost extras such as for orthodontic or major dental costs, which can act as a strong disincentive to switch funds.

Secondly, although portability is mandated, there are limits and restrictions, as this brochure from the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman explains. If a member switches to a new fund that offers a product with additional benefits, their right to portability is not assured. Policies can be complex and so the consumer has to be assiduous in comparing policies to determine if they will lose their portability. Having a pre-existing medical condition can also affect portability. While new injuries or conditions will be covered, the consumer may have to wait a specified period for treatment of a pre-existing condition. If a consumer does not know they have a condition but exhibits symptoms of the condition prior to changing funds, then portability may be affected and they may have to wait an additional period for treatment or pay an excess. It is recommended that consumers who are considering switching check with their new insurer, but doing so takes time and effort.

The Government has recognised that consumers need to be able to easily compare policies in order to purchase the most suitable product so it has set up this website to enable comparisons to be made across all health funds. An industry funded website has also been established. But a complete assessment is not always available online, and consumers are still advised to contact the insurer for full details. Furthermore, consumers are warned they may face additional out-of-pocket costs, unless the insurer has a specific agreement with the consumer's choice of doctor to limit such costs.

While some consumers remain loyal to their health fund for particular reasons, such as a link with their employment conditions, it appears that many consumers still face a maze of information and uncertainty when it comes to choosing a health insurer and may decide that the risks of changing funds are too great.

(Image courtesy Pauline Eccles licensed for reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license)


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top