Australia's public diplomacy and social media

Parliament house flag post

Australia's public diplomacy and social media

Posted 28/06/2011 by Nina Markovic

On 6–7 June 2011 the Forum on Public and Citizen Diplomacy was convened in Canberra to formulate recommendations for Australian public diplomacy practitioners, with the aim of identifying best practice and emerging trends in this field. Innovative ways of conducting public diplomacy, including through the use of social media, have been advanced by Australia's partners. But what exactly is public diplomacy?

Experiences from the US, UK, and the EU

United States of America
In the US, public diplomacy constitutes an essential part of the US foreign policy establishment, and is seen as an element of ‘soft power’, a term which was made popular by Professor Joseph Nye. Soft power refers to a state’s ability to achieve what it wants through attraction, rather than through force or payment.

According to research undertaken by the Congressional Research Service in December 2009, public diplomacy embodies:

...a government’s efforts to conduct foreign policy and promote national interests through direct outreach and communication with the population of a foreign country. Public diplomacy activities include providing information to foreign publics through broadcast and Internet media and at libraries and other outreach facilities in foreign countries; conducting cultural diplomacy, such as art exhibits and music performances; and administering international educational and professional exchange programs.
 The US Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, expanded the concept for US purposes by remarking in 2009:

We must use what has been called “smart power”: the full range of tools at our disposal -- diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural -- picking the right tool, or combination of tools, for each situation. With smart power, diplomacy will be the vanguard of foreign policy.
One of the functions of the US State Department’s Under-Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs is to assist in the efforts of the US Government to counter ideological support for terrorism. This strategy, which utilises modern means of online communication (including Facebook, Twitter, and blogs) has been successfully implemented by US missions in the Middle East, and it is likely to be advanced further in response to the events surrounding democratic change in the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ which began in December 2010.

The Forum participants observed that the Australian Government should make greater use of these rather inexpensive social media tools to counter radical ideologies and threats to Australian interests, particularly in the Southeast Asian context. For this purpose, it was also suggested Australia should also harness the language expertise of its citizens to a larger extent.

A global network of US State Department information centres also provide foreign citizens with up-to-date information about US politics, scholarship and funding opportunities, and connect foreign researchers with their US counterparts.

United Kingdom
The UK Government has developed a distinct public diplomacy strategy, which was revisited in a UK parliamentary review in 2005. In this document, Lord Carter (who led the review) expanded the definition of public diplomacy to include: aiming to inform and engage individuals and organisations overseas, in order to improve understanding of and influence for the United Kingdom in a manner consistent with governmental medium and long term goals.
In addition to the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), which is the lead agency on this front, the British Council, the British Broadcasting Corporation’s (BBC) World Service, and the Wilton Park conferences, are all involved with promoting UK interests abroad. Events of international interest, such as the Royal Wedding and the 2012 Olympic Games, are also being used to showcase the UK to international audiences.

The FCO states:

Public Diplomacy is a process of achieving the UK’s international strategic priorities through engaging and forming partnerships with like-minded organisations and individuals in the public arena. So beyond traditional government-to-government channels, we talk to NGOs, think tanks, opinion formers, young people, businesses and individual citizens.

The FCO uses a variety of online communication tools—blogs (including video blogs by the Foreign Secretary), Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, foursquare, podcasts, RSS feeds, etc.—in order to inform domestic and international audiences about UK foreign policy and to promote the Government’s representation and engagement overseas.

European Union
On 12 May 2011, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on cultural diplomacy. The resolution explicitly stated that: media and communication technologies, such as the internet, can be an instrument for freedom of expression, pluralism, the exchange of information, human rights, development, freedom of assembly, democracy and inclusion and for facilitating access to cultural content and education.
It also emphasised:

...the importance of cultural diplomacy and cultural cooperation in advancing and communicating throughout the world the EU's and the Member States' interests and the values that make up European culture.
On 16 August 2007, the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee published a report on Australia's public diplomacy, one of the key program areas of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). The Committee defined public diplomacy as: or activities undertaken to understand, inform and engage individuals and organisations in other countries in order to shape their perceptions in ways that will promote Australia and Australia's policy goals internationally.
The second recommendation of this report called on the Australian Government to ‘attach greater importance to creating an awareness of public diplomacy domestically’. Since this report, there have been calls for a greater focus on the use of social media to strengthen Australia’s public diplomacy. The Forum participants concluded that in this respect, much remains to be done in the Australian context, and that the Government should engage more with civil society organisations, particularly youth groups, to achieve this objective.

The Forum also suggested that Australia should to a much greater extent harness the comparatively inexpensive opportunities presented by social media tools. It was also recommended that the Government should work on developing a whole-of-government public diplomacy strategy that would be consistent across different agencies and portfolios. The participants also noted that some Australian states/territories, such as Western Australia, have independently conducted their own public diplomacy campaigns overseas targeting particular audiences, such as in China and Singapore. The Forum attendants felt that a more integrated approach and improved knowledge-sharing would benefit Australia as a whole.

The Forum recommended that an institution with a distinctively Australian name should be established in order to promote Australian culture and acquaint foreign audiences with modern Australia, emphasising Australia’s prosperity, multi-ethnic communities, and Australian innovation. Some of the participants felt that stereotypical images of Australia as merely a holiday destination may not adequately reflect other distinguished attributes of Australian society, including science and research, the arts, and expertise on a number of fronts in the Asia-Pacific region.

One of Australia’s key cultural and public diplomacy projects in recent years was the Australian Pavilion at the 2010 Shanghai World Expo, which was visited by eight million people. Most of its visitors were Chinese nationals. According to the UN World Youth Report 2007 there are about 738 million people in Asia between the ages of 15 and 24, comprising 18 per cent of the total Asian population.

The Forum participants observed that Australia’s cultural and public diplomacy should be more diversified and focused on the Asia-Pacific region by targeting to a larger extent non-English speaking groups. It was observed that non-traditional public diplomacy tools, including the use of social media, could be used as a communication platform for Australia’s public diplomacy 2.0.

(Image sourced from:

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top