Market concentration in the banking sector - household loans

Parliament house flag post

Market concentration in the banking sector - household loans

Posted 29/11/2010 by Scott Kompo-Harms

Open wallet showing Australian bank notes
Recently, there has been considerable concern amongst politicians, the media and the broader community regarding competition in the Australian banking sector. Specifically, concerns have been raised regarding banks increasing certain lending rates over and above rises in the RBA’s official cash rate, particularly for housing loans. This observation has led to a debate about collusion and ‘price-signalling’ within the banking sector. This post examines data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on market shares and concentration in the household lending sector to see whether there has been any increase in the capabilities of financial institutions to use market power to their advantage.

Tables 1 and 2 below show measures of market share and market concentration for household loans only in September 2007 and September 2010. These dates were chosen so as to encompass the ‘global financial crisis’, which began in late 2007. Non-bank financial institutions, such as credit unions and building societies, are included in the analysis as they often compete with the banks by offering similar products. However, each non-bank market segment is counted as being one 'firm' in the market.

The tables show that whilst the market share of household loans held by banks has only increased slightly (from around 91.5 per cent to 92.9 per cent), the share of the ‘big four’ major banks (ANZ, Commonwealth, NAB and Westpac) has increased substantially, from under 70 per cent to over 80 per cent. The biggest contributors to this were the takeovers of St George and BankWest by the Westpac and Commonwealth banks respectively (in addition to takeovers of some smaller, non-bank lenders). This is reflected by the increase in the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) between September 2007 and 2010.

Table 1: Market shares and concentration: household loans September 2007
September 2007
Household loans
($ million)

Market Share

Contribution to HHI

Building Societies

15375

1.9221%

0.00037

Credit Unions

29252

3.6570%

0.00134

Money Market Corporations

79

0.0099%

0.0000

Finance Companies and General Financiers

22971

2.8717%

0.00082

TOTAL BANKS

732224

91.5393%

0.12730

- Big 4 Banks

546718

68.3482%

-

TOTAL OTHERS

67677

8.4607%

-

TOTAL

799901

100%

0.12983

Sources: Banks - APRA, Monthly Banking Statistics, Historical data and September 2010, http://www.apra.gov.au/Statistics/Monthly-Banking-Statistics.cfm
Other Financial Institutions - RBA, Tables B7, B8, B9 and B10, http://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/index.html
Includes all types of loans to households including owner-occupier and investor housing, personal loans and credit cards. HHI contributions do not sum exactly to total due to rounding errors.

Table 2: Market shares and concentration: household loans September 2010
September 2010
Household loans
($ million)

Market Share

Contribution to HHI

Building Societies

17721

1.52%

0.00023

Credit Unions

34853

2.99%

0.00106

Money Market Corporations

20

0.00%

0.00000

Finance Companies and General Financiers

30208

2.59%

0.00067

TOTAL BANKS

1 084 222

92.9%

0.16094

- Big 4 Banks

942925

80.8%

-

TOTAL OTHERS

82802

7.10%

-

TOTAL

1167024

100%

0.16289

Sources: Banks - APRA, Monthly Banking Statistics, Historical data and September 2010, http://www.apra.gov.au/Statistics/Monthly-Banking-Statistics.cfm
Other Financial Institutions - RBA, Tables B7, B8, B9 and B10, http://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/index.html
Includes all types of loans to households including owner-occupier and investor housing, personal loans and credit cards. HHI contributions do not sum exactly to total due to rounding errors.

An increasing HHI over time shows increasing market concentration. The HHI is calculated by summing the squared market shares of all market participants. The HHI can take any value between zero and one and will increase as an individual firm increases market share and/or the number of firms reduces. If the HHI is close to zero, then the market in question is not very concentrated, whereas if it is close to one, then the market is considered concentrated.

So what is considered ‘close to zero’ or ‘close to one’? Both the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and the US Department of Justice (DoJ) use the HHI (they calculate it as a number between 0 and 10,000 as they use market shares expressed as percentages, whereas I have calculated the HHI below using market shares expressed as decimals). The ACCC’s 2008 Merger Guidelines (p. 37) explain the way the ACCC use the HHI:

7.14. As part of its overall assessment of a merger, the ACCC will take into account the HHI, as a preliminary indicator of the likelihood that the merger will raise competition concerns requiring more extensive analysis. The ACCC will generally be less likely to identify horizontal competition concerns when the post-merger HHI is:

  • less than 2000, or
  • greater than 2000 with a [change in the HHI of] less than 100.
The US DoJ defines a mildly concentrated industry sector as one that has a HHI of below 1000 (or 0.1 in decimal calculations), while anything within 1000 to 1800 (0.1 to 0.18) is considered moderately concentrated. A calculation in excess of 1800 is considered highly concentrated. Any transactions that increase the HHI in concentrated markets by 100 or more points are likely to prompt further investigation.

As the tables reveal, the change in market concentration, as measured by the HHI, is around 330 basis points (0.03306). This is a substantial change. The household lending market has been quite ‘broadly’ defined here. The risk with this approach is that due to a smaller than assumed degree of substitutability between products, the HHI will underestimate market sector concentration. Thus, the analysis here may understate the degree of concentration because of the lack of substitution possibilities for households between, for example, an owner-occupier housing loan from a bank and a credit card from a finance company. If this is the case, then the household and other lending sectors may be even more concentrated than the analysis presented above suggests, although the initial degree of concentration may also be understated.

Whilst this analysis only compares two points in time and only covers lending to the household sector (and so does not give a picture of the markets for deposits or lending to non-financial corporations, for example), it nevertheless provides some evidence that the sector has become more concentrated. It is likely that concentration has increased in other sectors of the financial industry as well. At the very least, these results superficially suggest that significant change has occurred in the financial industry and a deeper investigation is warranted.

(Image sourced from: Martin Kinglsey's photostream http://www.flickr.com/photos/43426549@N00/1812312679/ )


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top