A. Submissions and evidence

Submissions

1
Air Commodore (Ret) Ted Bushell AM
2
Dr Andrew Carr
3
Raytheon Australia
4
Government of SA
5
Ai Group Defence Council
6
Dr Simon Reay Atkinson
7
Thales Australia
8
Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI)
9
Rear Admiral (Ret) James Goldrick
10
Mr Steve Kuper
11
Defence Materials Technology Centre
12
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
13
Government of Tasmania
Attachment 1
14
Professor Richard Tanter
15
Chamber of Commerce and Industry WA
16
Medical Association for Prevention of War (Australia)
17
Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR)
18
The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)
19
Australian Anti-Bases Campaign Coalition
20
Marrickville Peace Group

Exhibits

1
'I'm here for an argument: Why bipartisanship on security makes Australia less safe', Australia Institute, 2017, Dr Andrew Carr, (Submission 2)
2
'Is Bipartisanship on National Security Beneficial? Australia's Politics of Defence and Security', Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 63, no. 2, 2017, Dr Andrew Carr, (Submission 2)

Answers to questions on notice

1
Raytheon Australia, received 27 February 2018
2
Department of Defence, Q1 – Defence White Papers – Community Consultation, received 25 May 2018
3
Department of Defence, Q3 – Defence Strategy Framework, received 25 May 2018
4
Department of Defence, Q4 - Metrics for Long Term Projects, received 25 May 2018

 |  Contents  | 

About this inquiry

The Committee will inquire into the benefits and risks of a Bipartisan Australian Defence Agreement, as a basis of planning for, and funding of, Australian Defence capability. 



Past Public Hearings

23 Feb 2018: Canberra