WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer and Copyright Details
A New Tax System
(Family Assistance)(Administration) Bill 1999
Date Introduced: 9 June 1999
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Family and Community Services
Commencement: For the most part immediately
after commencement of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance)
Act 1999 which commences after the commencement of specified
goods and services tax legislation proposed to commence on 1 July
2000.
Purpose
The purpose of
the A New Tax System (Family Assistance)(Administration) Bill 1999
(the Bill) is to complement the A New Tax System (Family
Assistance) Bill 1999 which aims to introduce a simplified
structure and delivery mechanism for the provision of family
assistance through the tax and social security systems.
The Bill contains administrative provisions that
govern such matters as the making of claims for benefits,
determination of claims, payment of benefits, recipient
obligations, termination of payments and the review process.
Background - Tax Reform
Package
On 13 August 1998 the Federal Government
released proposals for reform of the Australian tax system(1) of
which, a goods and services tax (GST) was the centrepiece.
The tax reform plan proposes to:
-
- Introduce a GST which eliminates sales tax and a range of nine
other indirect taxes
-
- Change Commonwealth-State financial relations by providing
States and Territories with an independent revenue base
-
- Implement significant changes to individual marginal tax
rates
-
- Implement a major rationalisation of family assistance
-
- Replace the various existing taxation payment and reporting
systems of company tax, provisional tax, PAYE,(2) PPS(3) and RPS(4)
by one quarterly tax payment system, PAYG(5)
-
- Introduce a new universal business number system
-
- Move toward an entity taxation system which is directed toward
the elimination of tax advantages between different business
structures, and
-
- Simplify the imputation system and introduce refunds for excess
franking credits.
As part of the tax reform package to implement a
major rationalisation of family assistance the Government proposes
to simplify the structure and delivery of family assistance.
Accordingly, twelve family benefits are proposed to be reduced to
three and a new Family Assistance Office will deliver the new set
of simplified family assistance programs.(6)
On 25 November 1998, the Senate referred issues
relating to the GST and the new tax system to a Select Committee
and three of its Reference Committees.(7) In February 1999 the
Senate Select Committee produced its First Report.(8) The three
Reference Committees produced their reports in March 1999.(9) In
April 1999 the Senate Select Committee released its second
report.(10)
Background -
Family Assistance Package
1. Summary of the A New Tax System
(Family Assistance) Bill 1999
The A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Bill
1999 introduces a proposed new family benefits structure that will
reduce the existing payment mechanisms from twelve to three.
It also relocates Maternity Allowance from the
Social Security Act 1991 to the A New Tax System (Family
Assistance) Bill 1999. This is to ensure that all family assistance
benefits are located in one Act.
It is proposed that there will be three distinct
family benefits:
- Family Tax Benefit Part A
Family Tax Benefit Part A (FTB-Part A) will provide assistance to
families to raise children.
- Family Tax Benefit Part B, and
Family Tax Benefit Part B (FTB-Part B) will provide additional
assistance for single income families with children
- Child Care Benefit
Child Care Benefit (CCB) will provide assistance with the costs of
childcare outside the home.
An individual's annual rate of family tax
benefit is the sum of FTB-Part A and
FTB-Part B.
Maternity Allowance (MA), assistance in the form of a one-off
payment to meet additional costs at the time of the birth of a
child, will continue to be available with some minor changes.
2. Further background information on
family benefits
For further information please refer to the
Bills Digest for the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Bill
1999, No. 175 of 1998-99, and in particular to the sections on
family assistance initiatives and family benefits found on pages 2
to 5 inclusive. It includes a summary of family assistance from
1941 to 1999 in table format.
Main Provisions
1. Summary
There are four principal administrative issues
dealt with in the Bill:
-
- payment of family assistance
-
- overpayments and debt recovery
-
- review of decisions, and
-
- approval of child care services and registered carers.
2. Payment of family assistance
There are basically three forms of family
assistance dealt with by new Part 3:
-
- Family Tax Benefit (the sum of FTB-Part A and FBT-PartB)
-
- Maternity Allowance and Maternity Immunisation Allowance (MIA),
and
-
- Child Care Benefit.
New Divisions 1,
3 and 4 of new Part
3 deal with claims, determinations and payments for FTB,
MA and CCB.
2.1Family Tax Benefit
2.1.1 Claims
An individual or approved care organisation must
make a claim in order to be paid family tax benefit. (New
section 5)
Under new section 7 a person
may choose one of two payment options:
-
- Payment by instalment, or
-
- fortnightly payments for a current period paid by the Family
Assistance Office (Centrelink).(11)
- Payment for a past period.
-
- a lump sum payment paid through the Australian Taxation Office
(ATO).
A person choosing to receive payments through the ATO can also
elect to have their tax instalment deductions (TIDs) reduced in
anticipation of the end of year lump sum payment.
A lump sum payment may also be paid by the Family Assistance Office
(Centrelink) for up to 2 years in arrears, if a person is making a
claim for current fortnightly payments and realises that they were
eligible for a past period.
A person making a claim (and their partner) must also meet the
tax file number (TFN) requirements specified in new section
8. Basically the requirement is to supply a TFN.
Under new section 10 a claim for a past period
must be made before the next income year. This means that persons
choosing to receive payment through the ATO will have to lodge a
claim every year with their tax return. Recipients of fortnightly
payments through Centrelink will receive their payments on a
continuing basis (subject to continuing eligibility etc) without
the need to claim each year.
2.1.2 Determinations and variations of determinations
Pursuant to new section 13 the
Secretary must make a determination in relation to an effective
claim. That is, the Secretary must decide whether the claimant is
entitled to be paid family tax benefit and at what rate the
Secretary considers the claimant to be eligible.
Under new section 20 a
determination may be based on an estimate of income where the
taxable income of an individual is not known.
Pursuant to new sections 23 and
24 the Secretary must pay the instalment or lump
sum amount to the claimant at such time and in such manner as the
Secretary considers appropriate. This is subject to the provisions
relating to overpayment and debt recovery.
Variations of entitlement determinations may be
made where a person:
-
- fails to provide a TFN (new section 27)
-
- does not lodge an income tax return (new section
28)
-
- fails to provide information or documentation (new
section 29), or
-
- fails to notify a change of address (new section
30)
Under new section 31 a
variation may also be made to reflect changes in eligibility.
2.1.3 Comments
The current income testing arrangements under
the Social Security Act 1991 for family allowance refer to
taxable income. Income from the previous complete financial year is
used to determine eligibility under the income test. For example,
payment for the 1999 calendar year is based on the taxable income
for the 1997-98 financial year.
This method of retrospective examination of
income is problematic in that it may refer to income that may be up
to 18 months old, which may not be indicative of real and current
need for assistance.
There are provisions that require recipients to
notify changes in circumstances so that payments can be adjusted to
more accurately reflect current income. However, these arrangements
are cumbersome and do lead to a significant number of incorrect
payments.(12)
The proposal to use current financial year
income will address the problems associated with the use of
retrospective income levels but may create difficulties connected
with the requirement to estimate income.
The requirements to estimate income should not
impact greatly on families whose income is consistent and
predictable, but the incidence of families with varying incomes is
becoming more prevalent given the changes to the labour market over
the past years.(13) For those whose income varies, there is much
potential for under or overpayment.
Given that the effect of the income test for the
proposed FTB-Part A targets this assistance to lower income
families, it is highly probable the vast majority of claimants will
elect to receive payment by way of periodic instalments during the
year, rather than as a refund at the end of the year. Therefore,
the vast majority of assessments will require forward estimates of
annual income. This means there is the potential for a significant
number of reconciliations required to be made at the end of the
year and the resultant recovery of overpayments and the refund of
underpayments. Given a natural and rational desire to receive some
assistance and to maximise this assistance, this process will
probably mean far more overpayments than underpayments. See
paragraph 3 of the Mains Provisions section of this Bills Digest,
which refers to overpayments and debt recovery.
2.2 Family Tax Benefit Advances
There is provision in new sections
33, 34 and 35, for the
payment of family tax benefit advances. Advances are restricted to
persons whose adjusted taxable income does not exceed $73,000 plus
$3,000 for each child after the first and whose FTB-Part A rate is
twice the amount of the FTB advance rate.(14)
2.3 Maternity Allowance and Maternity Immunisation
Allowance
As with family tax benefit the only way a person
can become entitled to be paid MA or MIA is to make a claim in the
form and manner required by the Secretary. (New sections
36, 37 and 38)
The Secretary must determine the claim and if
the claimant is entitled to be paid MA or MIA the Secretary must
pay the allowance to the claimant. (New sections
41 and 47)
2.4 Child Care Benefit
2.4.1 Regulations
The provisions of the Bill relating to Child
Care Benefit are rather different from the provisions concerning
family tax benefit. Rather than set out the requirements in the
Bill concerning claims, determinations and payments new
Division 4 basically provides for the making of
regulations about how individuals and approved child care services
can become entitled to have payments of child care benefit made,
and how such payments are to be made.
2.4.2 Comment
Under the A New Tax System (Family Assistance)
Bill 1999, eligibility for CCB depends upon the individual and
child care service being conditionally eligible for CCB under the
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act
1999. It was expected that the rules governing such
conditional eligibility would therefore be set out in the Bill,
however, the path chosen has been to state that the regulations may
prescribe circumstances in which, and procedures by which
conditional eligibility will be determined.
This theme is continued throughout new
Division 4 with the obvious consequence that until the
regulations are available administrative detail concerning CCB will
not be available and therefore no assessment can be made of any
rules that will impact upon eligibility.
3. Overpayments and Debt
Recovery
3.1 Amounts recoverable
Where an amount is paid to a person not entitled
to the amount or where a person is overpaid, the amount so paid is
a debt due to the Commonwealth by the person or in some
circumstances the approved child care service. (New
sections 70, 71 and
72)
Interest is payable on a debt at a penalty rate
of 20% where a person fails to enter into an agreement to pay the
debt or where the agreement to pay the debt is breached.
(New sections 77, 78 and
79)
3.2 Methods of recovery
Pursuant to new subsection
82(1) a debt owed by a person is recoverable by:
-
- deductions from family assistance payments made to the person
or to another person who consents to have their family assistance
payments applied against the debt
-
- the application of an income tax refund owed to the person or
to another person who consents to have their refund applied against
the debt, or
-
- legal proceedings or garnishee notice.(15)
Pursuant to new subsection
82(2) a debt owed by an approved child care service is
recoverable by:
-
- deductions from any group payments made to the service, or
-
- legal proceedings or garnishee notice
4. Review of Decisions
The review process in relation to decisions of
an officer under the family assistance law follows a particular
path. Initially an application must be made to the Secretary for
internal review. Following this a person may apply to the Social
Security Appeals Tribunal and then eventually the Secretary or the
person affected by the decision may apply to the Administrative
Appeals Tribunal.
4.1 Internal review
Under new section 221 the
Secretary has the general administration of the family assistance
law.(16)
A person affected by a decision may apply for
internal review of the decision. The Secretary must then review the
decision and notify the applicant of the outcome, including reasons
therefore and advise the person of their further rights of review
by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT) and the
Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). (New sections
105 and 109)
Under new section 222 the
powers of the Secretary may be delegated and it is presumed that
the Commissioner of Taxation (or his delegate) may be empowered to
conduct internal reviews of decisions taken by ATO officers
administering the family assistance law.
It is clear that this is contemplated because
new subsection 106(2) provides that where the
officer belongs to an agency other than the Department of Family
and Community Services, the Secretary can only appoint an officer
as an authorised review officer with the consent of the head of the
relevant agency. It is also stated in the Second Reading Speech for
the Bill, that 'It is expected that where family tax benefit is
paid through the tax system, the Commissioner, as delegate of the
Secretary, will carry out the review functions for those
customers.'(17)
4.2 Review by Social Security Appeals
Tribunal
Under new section 111, if there
has been an internal review of the decision and person is not
satisfied with the outcome of the review, they may apply to the
SSAT for review of the decision as varied or affirmed.
This makes it clear that after the point of
internal review, the review process is proposed to be kept separate
from the ATO appeal and review process.
Pursuant to new sections 131
and 132 the SSAT is not bound by legal
technicalities or rules of evidence and the hearing is to be in
private.
4.3 Review by Administrative Appeals
Tribunal
Pursuant to new section 143, if
a decision has been reviewed by the SSAT, the Secretary or the
person affected by the decision may apply to the AAT for review of
the decision made by the SSAT.
5. Approval of child care services and
registered carers
5.1 Approval of child care services
Under new section 195 a person
who operates centre based long day care service, family day care,
occasional care or an outside school hours care service may apply
to have the service approved for the purposes of the family
assistance law.
Pursuant to new section 196 the
Secretary must approve the service if it meets certain criteria
including eligibility requirements and allocation of child care
places.
The criteria for eligibility and allocation of
child care places will be the subject of guidelines and rules
determined by the Minister. (New sections 206 and
207)
5.2 Approval of registered carers
Under new section 210 an
individual who provides care for a child or children may apply to
the Secretary to be approved as a registered carer for the purposes
of the family assistance law.
Under new section 211 the
Secretary must approve the individual as a registered carer if they
meet either an age requirement or qualification requirement (made
by determination of the Minister) and TFN requirement.
The care by the individual must comply with all
applicable Commonwealth, State or Territory laws and any other
conditions imposed by the Secretary. The Minister may also, by
determination, impose other conditions in relation to registered
carers generally. (New section 214)
5.3 Determinations
A determination made by the Minister in relation
to approval of child care services and registered carers is a
disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the
Acts Interpretation Act 1901, which means that the
determination must be gazetted and tabled before each House of
Parliament. Either House may pass a resolution to disallow the
determination.
6. Delegation of Secretary's
powers
Under new section 222 the
Secretary may delegate all or any of the powers of the Secretary
under the family assistance law.
This will be the mechanism used to create the
Family Assistance Office - a virtual office or joint venture
between the ATO, Centrelink and Medicare.
Concluding Comments
1. Same rules to apply to
everyone
All recipients of family assistance will be
subject to the same eligibility rules and rate of payment whether
they choose to receive their payment fortnightly through Centrelink
or through the ATO. The eligibility criteria for each payment are
found in the proposed A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Bill
1999 which does not link eligibility to delivery
mechanisms.
2. Income Testing
Under the new proposal, calculation of income
will be based on current year adjusted taxable income. This change
will better reflect the current means of recipients, however, it
will require income to be estimated. It will also mean that
discrepancies between estimates of taxable income and actual income
will need to be resolved. This will result in the repayment of
overpayments and in the top-up of underpayments. Frequent
overpayments and underpayments would seem to be inevitable under
this arrangement and some would argue that this will cause
administrative complexity.
It should be relatively straightforward to make
top-up payments but may be more complex in relation to the recovery
of overpayments. It should be noted that there is a current
requirement to repay overpayments but deductions cannot currently
be made from the income tax refund owed to the person.
Currently families do not receive any top-up for
underpayments. The proposed adjustment mechanism therefore provides
a fairer result in this respect.
Please refer to paragraph 2.1.3 under the Main
Provisions section of this Bills Digest for additional commentary
in relation to income testing.
3. Regulations for Child Care
benefit
Please refer to comments in paragraph 2.4 of the
Main Provisions section of this Bills Digest relating to proposed
regulations for CCB.
Endnotes
-
- Treasurer, Tax Reform: not a new tax - a new tax
system; Tax Reform Plan, 13 August 1998, Commonwealth of
Australia.
- Pay As You Earn.
- Prescribed Payments System.
- Reportable Payments System.
- Pay As You Go.
- Treasurer, Tax Reform: not a new tax - a new tax
system; Tax Reform Plan, 13 August 1998, Commonwealth of
Australia, pp. 52-55.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System; Senate Community
Affairs References Committee; Senate Employment, Workplace
Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee and
Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the
Arts References Committee.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, First
Report, February 1999.
- Senate Community Affairs References Committee, The Lucky
Country Goes Begging, Report on the GST and a New Tax System,
March 1999; Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business
and Education References Committee, Report of the Inquiry into
the GST and A New Tax System, March 1999 and Senate
Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts
References Committee, Inquiry into the GST and a New Tax
System, March 1999.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Main
Report, February 1999.
- Warren Truss MP, A New Tax System (Family
Assistance)(Administration) Bill 1999, Second Reading, 9 June
1999. The Family Assistance Office 'will be a "virtual"
organisation using the existing infrastructure of Centrelink, the
Australian Taxation Office and the Health Insurance Commission
(Medicare Offices). It is expected that all Australian Taxation
Offices, all Centrelink offices and all Medicare offices will have
a Family Assistance Office as part of their office.'
- Warren Truss MP, Reducing Social Security Fraud,
Ministerial Press Release, 13 May 1999, Table 2.
In the period 1 July 1998 to 31 December 1998, the total number of
family allowance reviews were 85,950, which was 6.4% of all reviews
(ie. 1,342,501). However, the number of family allowance debts
arising from these reviews was 27,477, being 32% of all family
allowance reviews.
This is far higher than the average number of reviews raised of 13%
for all payments.
- ABS, Weekly Earnings of Employees (Distribution), Cat.
No. 6310.0, The incidence of part-time employment in the workforce
was about 19% in 1988 and about 27% in 1998.
- The FTB advance rate is defined in the A New Tax System (Family
Assistance) Bill 1999 in section 3 and is basically $956.30 per
child divided by two.
- Under new section 89 the Secretary may serve a
garnishee notice on another person who holds or may hold money on
behalf of the debtor requiring that person to pay to the
Commonwealth the amount of the debt.
'Garnishment: A court order by which a third party who holds money
for a judgment debtor is directed to attach certain amounts of
money to the judgment debt. A common example of a garnishment is
where a court requires an employer of the judgment debtor to
'garnish' the employee's wages by paying a portion of those wages
directly to the judgment creditor.' Butterworths Australian
Legal Dictionary, 1997, p 516.
- 'Family assistance law' is defined in new section
3 to mean any one or more of the following:
- the A New Tax System (Family
Assistance)(Administration) Act 1999;
- the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act
1999;
- regulations under A New Tax System (Family
Assistance)(Administration) Act 1999.
- Warren Truss MP, A New Tax System (Family
Assistance)(Administration) Bill 1999, Second Reading, 9 June
1999, p 4.
Lesley Lang, Dale Daniels & Peter Yeend
24 June 1999
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with
Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1999
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
1999.
Back to top