WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background - Tax Reform
Package
Background - Wine Equalisation
Tax
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer and Copyright Details
A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax)
Bill 1999
Date Introduced: 24 March 1999
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Treasury
Commencement: 1 July 2000
The purpose of the A New Tax
System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Bill 1999 (the Bill), is to maintain
wine prices and revenue collection from wine sales at current
levels.
Wine prices and taxation revenues would
otherwise fall upon the abolition of Wholesale Sales Tax (WST) and
the introduction of the proposed Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Accordingly the following Bills will introduce a
new tax on wine to be levied in addition to the GST:
-
- A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Bill 1999
-
- A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax Imposition-General)
Bill 1999
-
- A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax Imposition-Customs)
Bill 1999
-
- A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax Imposition-Excise) Bill
1999
The current WST rate on wine is 41 per cent. The
wine equalisation tax will be levied at a rate of 29 per cent and
will apply to wine (including non-grape wine) and to cider, perry,
mead and sake.
On 13 August 1998 the Federal Government
released proposals for reform of the Australian tax system(1) of
which, a GST was the centrepiece.
The tax reform plan proposes to:
-
- Introduce a GST which eliminates sales tax and a range of nine
other indirect taxes
-
- Change Commonwealth-State financial relations by providing
States and Territories with an independent revenue base
-
- Implement significant changes to individual marginal tax
rates
-
- Implement a major rationalisation of family assistance
-
- Replace the various existing taxation payment and reporting
systems of company tax, provisional tax, PAYE,(2) PPS(3) and RPS(4)
by one quarterly tax payment system, PAYG(5)
-
- Introduce a new universal business number system
-
- Move toward an entity taxation system which is directed toward
the elimination of tax advantages between different business
structures, and
-
- Simplify the imputation system and introduce refunds for excess
franking credits.
As part of the tax reform package the Government
proposed that wine, and beverages consisting primarily of wine,
will become subject to a Wine Equalisation Tax to replace the
difference between the current 41 per cent wholesale sales tax and
the proposed GST.
On 25 November 1998, the Senate referred issues
relating to the GST and the new tax system to a Select Committee
and three of its Reference Committees.(6) In February 1999 the
Senate Select Committee produced its First Report.(7) The three
Reference Committees produced their reports in March 1999.(8)
1. A brief history of Wine Tax
The Australian wine industry has been subject to
an array of taxation measures over the years, commencing in
1930.
These measures are summarised in the following
table:
Year
|
Taxation measure
|
1930
|
General rate of Wholesale Sales Tax (WST) of
2.5% introduced
|
1931
|
WST of 2.5% removed
|
1970
|
Excise of 50 cents per gallon applied
|
1971
|
Excise of 50 cents per gallon halved and then
removed after six months
|
1984
|
WST of 10% introduced
|
1986
|
WST increased to 20%
|
1993
|
WST increased to 31%
|
1993
|
WST reduced to 22% in October
|
1994
|
WST increased to 24%
|
1996
|
WST increased to 26%
|
1997
|
High Court decision on State franchise/licence
fees led to an increase in WST from 26% to 41% with the additional
15% rebated to the State governments and in turn rebated to
wineries for their cellar-door component of sales
|
2. Current taxation of alcoholic
beverages
Alcoholic beverages in Australia are essentially
subject to either sales tax (which is an ad valorem tax) or
volumetric excise or both.
Ad valorem tax is a rate of tax, which is fixed
according to the value of the dutiable transaction or item.
A volumetric tax is also an indirect tax but one
directly related to the alcohol content of the beverage.
Wine is subject to sales tax at the rate of 41
per cent.
Beer and spirits are subject to a combination of
sales tax at the rate of 37 per cent plus a volumetric tax, which
is calculated by multiplying the percentage of alcohol content of
the beverage by a fixed dollar amount per litre.
3. Position of the wine industry
The position of the wine industry put forward by
its representative body, the Winemakers' Federation of Australia
(WFA), and as stated in its submission to the Senate Select
Committee on A New Tax System,(9) is that the wine industry:
-
- Supports the introduction of a broad based goods and services
tax
-
- Does not seek a discount from current tax levels to a GST only
position in the short term
-
- Supports an ad valorem based top-up tax, and
-
- Rejects a volumetric tax.
The WFA also recommended that:
-
- The level of the Wine Equalisation Tax (Wine Tax) be set at a
rate equivalent to the tax burden on the industry under the current
WST regime, that is at a maximum of 24.5%
-
- Wine used for promotions/tastings/samples should be exempt from
Wine Tax in addition to being GST-free, and
-
- Cellar-door sales for small winery businesses should be free
from Wine Tax, although they should continue to be subject to
GST.
1. Summary
-
- Wine Tax is a single stage tax applying generally to assessable
dealings in wine, unless an exemption applies, at the wholesale
level
-
- Wine Tax is imposed on the wholesale selling price of wine
-
- If wine is not sold by wholesale:
-
- tax will be imposed on the retail sale or use of the wine,
and
-
- will be based on alternative values such as the notional
wholesale selling price
-
- If the wine has already been taxed, then a credit for the
earlier tax will reduce the tax payable on the later dealing,
and
-
- Wine Tax is calculated on the GST exclusive value of wine in
most cases.
2. Liability to Wine Tax
Proposed Part 2 sets out the
rules that establish liability for Wine Tax.
2.1 General rules for
taxability
The general rules relating to taxability are
found in proposed Division 5.
The Assessable Dealings Table (proposed
subclause 5-5(4)) is central to establishing liability to
the tax and sets out:
-
- All the assessable dealings that can be subject to Wine
Tax
-
- Who is liable for the tax
-
- The time the liability is incurred, and
-
- Normal taxable value.
There are essentially four categories of
assessable dealings subject to Wine Tax:
-
- Sales (wholesale and retail)
-
- Application to own use
-
- Local entry, and
-
- Removal from customs clearance area.
The wine must be in Australia at the time of the
dealing.
The amount of tax is calculated by determining
the taxable value of the dealing and multiplying the result by 29
per cent. (Subclause 5-5(3))
2.2 Exemptions
Proposed Division 7 sets out
the circumstances when a dealing with wine is exempt from Wine Tax,
even if it is an assessable dealing.
There are three general categories of
exemption:
- If the dealing is a supply that is GST-free (10) (other than
child care)
(Proposed subclause 7-5)
- If there is a quote in relation to the dealing, and
(Proposed subclause 7-10)
-
- Other specified exemptions.(11)
2.3 Taxable
value
Proposed Division 9 contains
the rules for working out the taxable value of a dealing.
2.3.1 Assessable Dealings Table
Generally the rules for calculating the taxable
value are set out in the Assessable Dealings Table.
(Proposed subclause 9-5(1))
In some cases the Assessable Dealings Table will
refer to the notional wholesale selling price as the taxable
value.
2.3.2 Notional wholesale selling price
Proposed Subdivision 9-B sets
out how to work out the notional wholesale selling price.
Essentially there are two methods available to
work out the notional wholesale selling price for a retail sale or
application to own use connected with a retail sale of grape wine:
(Proposed subclauses 9-25, 9-35
and 9-40)
-
- Half retail price method, or
- Average wholesale price method.
The notional wholesale selling price for a taxable dealing that
is a retail sale or an application to own use connected with a
retail sale of wine that is not grape wine is worked out using the
half price method.
(Proposed subclause 9-30)
2.3.3 Additions to taxable value
Under proposed Subdivision 9-C
specified amounts are added to taxable value provided that they
have not already been included in the taxable value. These are:
- The value of any container associated with the wine
(Proposed clause 9-65)
- The value of any royalty paid or payable in connection with the
manufacture, importation, local entry or sale of the wine,
and
(Proposed clause 9-70)
- The amount of customs duty to which the wine would have been
subject if it was for home consumption.
(Proposed clause 9-75)
3. Quoting
3.1 Purpose of
quoting
Proposed Part 3 sets out the
rules for quoting for dealings in wine. This is designed to avoid
Wine Tax becoming payable on sales preceding the last wholesale
sale.
Quoting is an exemption under proposed
Division 7 and as such Wine Tax is not payable on a sale
for which the purchaser has quoted.
3.2 Form of
quoting
Quoting refers to the quotation of an Australian
Business Number (ABN) and must be in the approved form and made at
or before the time of the dealing. (Proposed clause
13-20)
Quoting is optional. A wine tax credit is
available where Wine Tax has been borne by a registered entity that
was entitled to quote an ABN, but did not quote or where a quote
was not accepted by the entity to whom it was given.
3.3 Standard grounds for
quoting
There are four standards grounds for quoting an
ABN under proposed subclause 13-5(1). The quoter,
who must be registered for the purposes of the GST, must have the
intention of dealing with the wine by:
-
- Selling the wine by wholesale or indirect marketing sale
-
- Selling the wine by any kind of sale if the quoter is mainly a
wholesaler
-
- Using the wine as a material in manufacture or other treatment
or processing, or
-
- Making a supply of a wine that is GST-free.
3.4 Periodic
quoting
Proposed clause 13-15 allows an
entity to provide a single quotation to a supplier for all
purchases proposed to be made from that supplier during a period
not exceeding twelve months.
4. Wine tax credits
Proposed Part 4 sets out the
circumstances when wine tax credits can arise. Generally, wine tax
credits prevent Wine Tax applying more than once to the same
goods.
4.1 Grounds for claiming wine
tax credits
The Wine Tax Credit Table sets out the
situations in which a wine tax credit may be claimed.
(Proposed clause 17-5)
There are basically five categories under which
credits may be claimed:
-
- Where Wine Tax has been overpaid
-
- To avoid double taxation
-
- To provide credits on wine exported
-
- To refund customs duty on the destruction of imported wine and
a drawback of customs duty on imported wine subsequently exported,
and
-
- Where the sale price is written off as a bad debt.
Clawback provisions apply on later recovery of
bad debts or later sale of defective wine. (Proposed
clauses 17-30 and 17-35)
4.2 Two methods of obtaining
credits
There are two methods of obtaining a credit:
- By a reduction in the GST net amount, or
(Proposed subclause 17-10(1))
- By applying directly to the Commissioner of Taxation.
(Proposed subclause 17-10(2))
An entity that is registered or required to be registered for
GST can only claim credits by including the amount of the wine tax
credit in the reduction of the GST net amount.
For non-registered entities that claim directly from the
Commissioner special provisions ensure that:
- The Commissioner is not required to consider claims for under
$200, and
(Proposed clause 17-15)
- The Commissioner must apply the wine credit first against any
liability outstanding under the Wine Tax law or any other law of
which the Commissioner has the administration and then refund any
excess to the claimant.
(Proposed clause 17-20)
5. Payments and refunds of wine
tax
Proposed Part 5 sets out the
manner in which Wine Tax is to be paid and refunded.
5.1 Inclusion of wine tax and
wine tax credits in net amounts
Proposed Division 21 provides
that Wine Tax (except Wine Tax on customs dealings) is added to net
amounts under the GST law. Wine tax credits are subtracted from the
net amount.
5.2 Wine tax on customs
dealings
Proposed Division 23 provides
that Wine Tax on a customs dealing is not included in net amounts
under the GST law. It is paid together with customs duty.
This is consistent with the treatment of GST
payable on taxable importations.
1. Volumetric -v- Ad valorem
Following the release of the Government's tax
reform package and the inevitability of the imposition of an
additional tax on wine, debate turned to the nature of the tax to
be imposed. Should the tax be a 'value-based' or 'volume-based'
tax?
This has been the subject of considerable debate
both within the industry and between the WFA and Treasury.
The WFA, while recognising that they represent
members with divergent interests, came to the conclusion that it
would support an ad valorem tax and reject a volumetric tax. The
WFA came to this policy position after commissioning independent
research by the Centre for International Economic Studies at the
University of Adelaide on the implications of alternative wine tax
options being considered in the context of tax reform.
The results of this research clearly showed that
a switch from the current ad valorem wine tax to a volumetric tax
which raises the same government revenue would harm the industry as
a whole and especially the non-premium sector, even though it would
help the premium wine producers and consumers.(12)
The Winegrape Growers' Council of Australia Inc.
(WGCA) supports the WFA in rejecting a volumetric tax.(13)
The Vineyards Association of Tasmania Inc. (VAT)
opposes an ad valorem based wine tax arguing that 'the ad valorem
nature of the proposed Wine Tax adversely impacts on the small
(less than 500t) regional winery.'(14)
The National Small Wineries Coalition (NSWC)
similarly rejects an ad valorem tax and argues for a volumetric tax
on the basis that an ad valorem tax increases the price of quality
wine and hurts small wineries.(15)
2. Rate - does it reflect revenue
neutrality and is it 'locked in' at 29%?
The WFA recommended that the Wine Tax rate be
set at a maximum of 24.5 per cent. It concluded that the true Wine
Tax level for revenue neutrality would be somewhere between 19.6
per cent and 24.5 per cent.(16)
The rate has been set at 29 per cent.
The WFA also stated that the major influence of
taxation reform on the Australian wine industry will be the rate of
Wine Tax applied to wine under the package. The level will be
critical for the continued viability and competitiveness of the
industry.
The WFA continued to state that 'as long as the
rate of the Wine Tax is set so that there is no increase in the tax
burden on the industry'(17) the industry would accept the
additional tax in the short term.
According to the WFA data, it appears that by
setting the rate at 29 per cent the tax burden imposed on the
industry has increased.
Additionally, there doesn't appear to be
anything in the Bill to suggest that the Wine Tax will not be
increased above 29 per cent, even though the GST will purportedly
be locked-in at the rate of 10 per cent.
3. Wine tax: should it be short term -
to be removed in the long term?
Wine Tax is a distinct tax imposed on the wine
industry in addition to the GST. The goal, with respect to indirect
taxes, was stated to be a system that taxes a broad range of goods
and services at a single low rate.(18) Wine Tax will mean, however,
that the wine industry will still be subject to a differential tax
burden following the introduction of the GST.
The WFA support Wine Tax, but only in the short
term, and has stated:
While the Australian wine industry understands
that politically it may not be possible to remove these
differential taxes immediately, it considers that unless a sound
economic rationale for these can be demonstrated (for example,
quantifiable evidence of net negative externality effects) then the
government should consider reducing then removing such
distortionary taxes in the future.
The NSWC, WGCA, VAT and The Victorian Wine Grape
Growers' Council Inc.(19) all oppose the introduction of a wine
tax, arguing strongly for a GST-only tax on wine, based on the
Federal Government's own rationale, namely that any new indirect
tax (GST) must be simpler and more equitable than the current WST.
A new tax should therefore apply equally across all goods and
services. Additional taxes are incompatible with these
principles.
4. Exemption for small business for
cellar-door sales and promotional activity?
4.1 Cellar-door sales
exempt?
The WFA recommended that cellar-door sales for
small winery producers should be free from Wine Tax, although they
should be subject to the GST.
Apparently the amount of revenue raised from
small operators' cellar-door sales is small in aggregate terms but
on an individual basis is particularly important to the viability
of small wineries.(20)
Traditionally State governments levied a tax of
approximately 15 per cent on alcoholic beverages through State
business franchise fees. However, cellar-door sales were not
subject to these fees. In 1997, following a High Court
decision,(21) the State business franchise fees were considered
unconstitutional and the Commonwealth government introduced
measures to collect the revenue on behalf of the States. (Hence the
WST rate on wine increased from 26 per cent to 41 per cent).
The revenue is returned to the States. All
States then apply a 15 per cent rebate to wineries for all wine
sold through the cellar-door and have indicated that they will
continue this practice after the introduction of GST and Wine
Tax.(22)
Therefore, as long as the States continue to
honour a liquor subsidy scheme to wineries in respect of
cellar-door sales the small wineries will generally be in the same
position as they are now. (This assumes the rate of 29 per cent
does, in fact, reflect a revenue neutral position for the wine
industry.) It is unlikely, however, that relying on State based
subsidies is the most desirable and least complicated form of
effective exemption from Wine Tax.
For small wineries to remain in the current
position also assumes that potential distortionary effects of the
imposition of an additional tax on the industry over and above the
GST will not adversely impact on wine sales. The WFA is of the view
that the increased burden from the additional level of tax over the
GST is likely to have a serious adverse impact on investment and
viability in the small winery sector.
4.2 Promotional activity
exempt?
There are some benefits to the wine industry
from the introduction of the GST, including the fact that GST will
not apply to promotional activity (eg promotions, tastings and
samples). Wine Tax will, however, apply to such applications for
own use.
Currently, as with cellar-door sales, the States
rebate 15 per cent to wineries in respect of wine used in
promotional activity. The rebate is intended to continue, however,
the WFA remain of the view that promotional activity for all
wineries should be exempt from Wine Tax. Such a position would,
they believe, be consistent with the spirit of the tax reform
package.
-
- Treasurer, Tax Reform: not a new tax - a new tax
system; Tax Reform Plan, 13 August 1998, Commonwealth of
Australia.
- Pay As You Earn.
- Prescribed Payments System.
- Reportable Payments System.
- Pay As You Go.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System; Senate Community
Affairs References Committee; Senate Employment, Workplace
Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee and
Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the
Arts References Committee.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, First
Report, February 1999.
- Senate Community Affairs References Committee, The Lucky
Country Goes Begging, Report on the GST and a New Tax System,
March 1999; Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business
and Education References Committee, Report of the Inquiry into
the GST and A New Tax System, March 1999 and Senate
Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts
References Committee, Inquiry into the GST and a New Tax
System, March 1999.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winemakers'
Federation of Australia Submission at p. 27.
- Example: wine that is to be exported or used in a religious
service.
- If the dealing is a specified customs dealing that is an
importation of wine, or if the wine has been previously taxed while
in bond. (Proposed subclauses 7-15 and
7-20).
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winemakers'
Federation of Australia Submission No. 938, at pp. 27 to 29.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winegrape
Growers' Council of Australia Inc., Submission No. 880.
'WGCA's policy is one of strong support for the current ad valorem
system for the wholesale sales tax be maintained for the WET. The
alternative, a volumetric tax based on the volume of alcohol in
wine, would have a significant negative impact on the industry as a
whole, but particularly the three regions of the Riverland,
Riverina and Sunraysia because they produce the vast majority of
grapes used for wine at the lower end of the market. The three
regions also account for over 60% of all winegrape production in
Australia and to destroy the economic viability of these regions
would have a disastrous impact on the rest of the winegrape growing
areas of Australia.'
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Vineyards
Association of Tasmania Inc., Submission No. 84, Executive
Summary.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, National Small
Wineries Coalition, Submission No. 1322, Executive Summary.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winemakers'
Federation of Australia Submission No. 938, at p. 28.
- Ibid. p 18.
- Treasurer, Tax Reform: not a new tax - a new tax
system; Tax Reform Plan, 13 August 1998, Commonwealth of
Australia, at p 77.
- Refer to endnotes 13, 14 and 15 and to the Senate Select
Committee on A New Tax System, Victorian Wine Grape Growers'
Council Inc., Submission No. 1359.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winemakers'
Federation of Australia Submission No. 938, at p. 39.
- Ha and Anor v State of New South Wales and
Ors 189 CLR 465.
Held. By Brennan CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ, Dawson,
Toohey and Gaudron JJ dissenting, that the licence fees were duties
of excise within section 90 of the Constitution and hence were
invalid.
- Senate Select Committee on A New Tax System, Winemakers'
Federation of Australia Submission No. 938, at p. 38.
Lesley Lang
13 April 1999
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with
Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1999
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
1999.
Back to top