Families, Community Services and
Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment
(Child Support Reform
Consolidation and Other Measures) Bill 2007
Date introduced:
28 March 2007
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Families, Community Services and
Indigenous Affairs
Commencement:
Item 3 of the Bill
includes a table showing the commencement dates for each measure.
There is no common commencement date but an array of dates and
arrangements for Schedules and parts of Schedules, ranging from
Royal Assent to consequential commencements and from 1 October 1997
to 1 July 2008.
The Bill makes
consequential amendments flowing from the passage of the Child
Support Legislation Amendment (Reform of The Child Support Scheme
New Formula And Other Measures) Act 2006. It also
includes minor refinements to that legislation.
In addition the Bill includes minor amendments
to family assistance, the pension assets test and the means testing
of income streams.
The Bill was referred to the Senate Community
Affairs Committee on 29 March 2007. The committee has received
submissions and held hearings. It is due to report on 8 May 2007.
Many of the issues raised related to broader issues that were dealt
with in the 2006 legislation.(1)
The government announced major changes to the
Child Support Scheme (CSS) on 28 February 2006. The changes were
the Government s response to the Ministerial Taskforce Report on
Child Support (the Parkinson Report).(2) The taskforce
was announced on 16 August 2004 and the report was released on 14
June 2005. The Bills Digest for the Child Support Legislation
Amendment (Reform of The Child Support Scheme New Formula And Other
Measures) Bill 2006 sets out the background to the reforms and
gives details of the changes made to the scheme. This Digest, No.
43 of 2006 07, is at:
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2006-07/07bd043.pdf.(3)
The major legislation implementing the reforms
passed into law in 2006. This Bill contains minor adjustments to
the workings of the reformed CSS and picks up provisions of the
Child Support Legislation Amendment Bill 2004 that are still
required under the reformed scheme. Only the more significant of
the measures in the Bill will be examined here. The Explanatory
Memorandum to the Bill deals adequately with the other
measures.
Among a range of administrative changes is a
change to the arrangement for out of time applications to the
Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT) for a review of a child
support decision. Currently the Executive Director of the SSAT has
60 days to make a decision about allowing such an application, and
if the decision is not taken in the time frame the application is
deemed to have been refused. This deeming provision will be removed
by the Bill and, according to the Explanatory Memorandum, the
mechanism for ensuring timeliness in decision making will be left
to other mechanisms, such as the SSAT's reporting requirements.
(4) The inflexibility of the deeming provisions could
clearly cause problems, however, relying on reporting requirements
does not necessarily adequately address the issue of delays (as is
shown by other Tribunals and court processes where reporting
requirements have failed to address such problems). The Bill also
relaxes the requirements for the application for an extension of
time to be made before the substantive application is made. The
changes may allow oral applications to be made (depending on
specifications to be established by the Registrar). The
consequences of these time-management amendments may need on-going
monitoring.
The new child support formula does not
significantly differentiate child support between children where
they are covered by different cases and their ages differ. The new
formula relies on the age of a child to determine the cost of that
child. This leads to some complicated situations where child
support is paid to more than one former partner and the children
are of differing ages. The level of care provided by each parent is
a further complication. The new method provided in this amendment
apportions child support between the children involved in the cases
by relying on a range of factors involved, including a variation of
costs for children of differing ages. The Explanatory Memorandum
includes a lengthy explanation of the new method with examples.
The National Council of Single Mothers and
their Children (NCSMC) in their submission to the Senate Inquiry
expressed concerns over the approach of differentiating the cost of
children by age. They reiterate their earlier argument that the
costs of caring for younger children or providing child care is
high, whereas, as they get older there is a reduced load of unpaid
care (or child care costs), which means parents can more easily
increase hours of paid work.(5)
The Lone Father s Association also express
concern regarding these amendments to the formula in the 2006
legislation. They question where the proposed amendment originates
from and believe this amendment will create considerable further
complexity in the formula.(6)
Child Support collection from
contractors
Ongoing child support can only be collected
from employers if the payer is a wage or salary earner or they
receive a Centrelink payment. This amendment will broaden the power
to issue notices requiring the deduction of child support and the
forwarding of that deduction to the CSA to include cases where the
payer is under contract for service arrangements that are
effectively substituting for wages. This change extends ongoing
child support collection by employers to independent
contractors.
Only the more significant amendments are
addressed below. The other amendments are minor and are adequately
addressed in the Explanatory Memorandum.
At present, income
received in the form of maintenance is not lumped in with other
sources of income, rather it is only counted against the
more-than-base rate of Family Tax Benefit part A (FTB-A), with a
special free area and taper rate. Maintenance received is not
regarded as income for most pensions or allowances and therefore
has no effect on the rate of these payments.
The origins of the
special test that applies to maintenance income lie in the
significant reductions in assistance that some payees used to
suffer, when receiving large amounts of maintenance, especially
non-cash maintenance. Prior to January 1993, maintenance income was
lumped in with all other income and applied under the general
income test for pensions and allowances. From January 1993,
maintenance received has been subject to a special income test
(MIT) and only affects more-than-base rate FTB-A. The partial or
total loss of more-than-minimum rate FTB-A, is less of a problem
than the loss of an income support such as Parenting Payment or
Newstart Allowance. The MIT only applies if a person is eligible
for more than the base rate of FTB. The current MIT has an annual
free area of $1 215 (plus $405.15 for each extra child after the
first) and thereafter income reduces the FTB rate by 50 cents in
each dollar.
The Bill amends the
workings of the MIT where part of the child support is paid under a
child support agreement or a court order in the form of a lump sum
or non-periodic payments and there has been an underpayment by the
paying parent. The agreement or court order will specify how much
of the lump sum and non-periodic payments can be offset against the
child support otherwise payable under the Child Support Formula.
The method for determining the amount under-paid will be adjusted
to more adequately take account of this feature of these agreements
and court orders.
The Bill also refines
the provisions that ensure that FTB-A is reduced only for those
children who attract child support. FTB-A can include rent
assistance that may be reduced under the MIT. That rent assistance
rate may be determined with reference to children who do not
qualify for FTB because the claimant has care of a regular care
child. The term regular care child was introduced as part of the
2006 child support reforms. It refers to a child who is in the care
of a parent for more than 14% and less than 35% of the time.
The changes ensure
that only the rent assistance generated by the FTB children is
affected by the MIT.
Maternity Payment (MP) was introduced from
July 2004 and replaced Maternity Allowance and the First Child Tax
Offset (at that time known as the Baby Bonus). The new payment was
a lump sum paid for each child born or adopted with no means test.
The preceding payments were rather more complicated and had various
rates and means tests that produced payments that varied according
to family income or the workforce behaviour and tax paid by the
mother.
One concern raised by commentators and in the
media from the inception of the new payment related to the wisdom
of providing lump sum payments to very young mothers who may not be
sufficiently experienced to make the best decisions about managing
the payment.(7) The Bill addresses this issue by making
it mandatory for the MP to be provided to mothers under the age of
18 years as 13 fortnightly payments. There appears to be no
discretion to pay MP in any other way to this group. Current
discretionary provisions will be superseded by this change.
The NCSMC express concerns that this lack of
flexibility (detailing situations where a lump sum could be
appropriately utilised) and suggest that these arrangements should
be able to be varied with the recommendation of a qualified social
worker. They also suggest lump sums could be paid by direct credit
in appropriate circumstances.(8)
The Bill will also provide for payment only
after the birth has been registered with the relevant state or
territory body. This provision has been welcomed by ANU
demographers and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. It is
regarded as a more effective mechanisms of ensuring registrations
of birth take place, and has been recommended by them for some
time.(9)
The name of the MP will also be changed by
this Bill. MP and its predecessors have often been referred to as
the baby bonus. That will become the official name.
Normally FTB is only payable at the full rate
to people overseas for up to 13 weeks. A discretion to extend that
period exists where certain prescribed events such as war or civil
unrest prevent or delay their return. Members of the Australian
Defence Forces and the Australian Federal Police who are deployed
overseas are not presently covered adequately by this discretion.
The Bill makes amendments to rectify this problem.
The amendments do not provide for those in
comparable situations in other government agencies, for instance
AusAid, to be considered for a similar latitude. Nor does it enable
coverage of those in non-government agencies who may also be
performing comparable tasks while deployed overseas.
Only the more significant amendments are
addressed below. The other amendments are minor and are adequately
addressed in the Explanatory Memorandum.
RAA is a payment for income support recipients
who receive no or little benefit from the Income Zone Tax Offset
through the taxation system. It is income and asset test free and
paid at single and couple rates with an additional rate for each
dependent child.
The reforms to child support that take effect
from July 2008 introduce the concept of a regular care child . This
is a child who is cared for by a parent for at least 14% and less
than 35% of the time. The Bill provides for the rate of RAA to be
increased by an additional allowance for each regular care child in
a family in addition to each FTB child.
The assets test was introduced in 1985 to
improve the targeting of pensions towards those with the greatest
need. People with assets above certain thresholds receive a reduced
rate of pension or if their assets are large enough no pension at
all. People with sufficient assets to have their entitlement
affected are able to generate income from their assets. Where this
is not possible hardship provisions apply to modify the effect of
the assets test. The assets test now applies to most income support
payments but not to family assistance.
The principal home of a person receiving a
payment subject to the assets test is an exempt asset. In addition
the proceed from selling the principal home are exempt for a period
of twelve months to allow for the sale of one home and purchase or
construction of another. Similarly where a person is temporarily
absent from their home for any reason, it is still regarded as
their principal home for 12 months. There has been concern from
people affected by this feature of the assets test that 12 months
can be insufficient time in certain circumstances to complete
transition from one home to another.
The Bill provides for these twelve month
periods to be extended to 24 months in certain circumstances. These
circumstances recognise that delays or events outside the control
of the person can prevent the building or repairs needed to allow
occupation of the new or repaired home within the present time
limit. So where action has been started within a reasonable
timeframe this extension of time will be available.
The financial impact of the Bill will be $3.9
million over 4 years.
Part 2, Schedule 1, Item 28
adds new section 65AA to the Child Support
(Registration and Collection) Act 1988. This change extends
ongoing collection of child support by employers to independent
contractors.
Part 4 of Schedule 1,
Items 108 to 117 and 187 to 192 make amendments to
the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 implementing a new
method for apportioning child support between children of different
ages in situations where parents have more than one child support
case.
Part 1 of Schedule 5 amends
Schedule 1 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act
1999 to adjust the workings of the Maintenance Income Test
where child support is paid under the provisions of a child support
agreement or a court order and there has been an underpayment.
Part 2 of Schedule 5 amends
Schedule 1 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act
1999 to adjust the workings of the Maintenance Income Test so
that reductions to Family Tax Benefit only affect amounts paid with
regard to children for whom child support is paid.
Part 1 of Schedule 6 amends
the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 and the
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act
1999 to make payment by instalments of the Baby Bonus to
mothers aged under 18 years compulsory rather than
discretionary.
Part 2 of Schedule 6 amends
subsection 36(2) of the A New Tax System
(Family Assistance) Act 1999 to require registration of the
birth of a child before the Baby Bonus can be paid.
Part 3 of Schedule 6 amends
the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999, the
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and the Income Tax
Assessment Act 1997 to change the name of the Maternity
Payment to the Baby Bonus .
Schedule 7 amends
section 63A the A New Tax System (Family
Assistance) Act 1999 to allow the application of a discretion
to extend the period of portability overseas of Family Tax benefit
to members of the Australian Defence Forces and the Australian
Federal Police who are deployed overseas.
Schedule 8 amends the
Social Security Act 1991 and the Veterans Entitlements
Act 1986 to ensure that the rate of Mobility Allowance paid
takes account of regular care children in addition to Family Tax
Benefit children .
Schedule 10 amends the
Social Security Act 1991 and the Veterans Entitlements
Act 1986 to allow for a 24 month asset test exemption for the
proceeds of the sale of a principal home or absence from a
principal home in certain circumstances.
Endnotes
- For submissions and
transcripts of hearings see:
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/clac_ctte/child_support07/index.htm
- In the Best
Interests of Children - Reforming the Child Support Scheme: Report
of the Ministerial Taskforce on Child Support, 2005. The full
text of the report is available at:
http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/via/childcare/$file/best_interests_children_full-%20report.pdf
- Peter Yeend, Child
Support Legislation Amendment (Reform of the Child Support Scheme -
New Formula and Other Measures) Bill 2006, Bills Digest
No. 43, 2006 07: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2006-07/07bd043.pdf
- Explanatory
Memorandum, p. 3.
- Submission No. 5 to
the Senate Community Affairs Committee Enquiry into the Families,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment
(Child Support Reform Consolidation and Other Measures) Bill 2007,
April 2007, Appendix 1, p. 12.
- Lone Fathers'
Association Australia Inc (ACT), Submission No. 8 to the Senate
Community Affairs Committee Enquiry into the Families, Community
Services and Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment (Child
Support Reform Consolidation and Other Measures) Bill 2007, April
2007, p. 5.
- For examples of press
coverage see: Grattan M., Baby Bonus tempts teens, claims labor ,
The Age, 24 May 2004 .
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/TranslateWIPILink.aspx?Folder=PRESSCLP&Criteria=CITATION_
ID:TRMC6%3B and Teen mothers to get bonus in instalments ,
Canberra Times, 13 November 2006.
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/TranslateWIPILink.aspx?Folder=PRESSCLP&Criteria=CITATION_
ID:R6FL6%3B
- Submission No. 5 to
the Senate Community Affairs Committee Enquiry into the Families,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment
(Child Support Reform Consolidation and Other Measures) Bill 2007,
April 2007, pp. 7-8.
- McDonald, Professor
Peter & Kippen, Dr Rebecca (ACT), Submission No. 3 to the
Senate Community Affairs Committee Enquiry into the Families,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment
(Child Support Reform Consolidation and Other Measures) Bill 2007,
April 2007 and Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (ACT),
Submission No. 4 to the Senate Community Affairs Committee Enquiry
into the Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
Legislation Amendment (Child Support Reform Consolidation and Other
Measures) Bill 2007, April 2007.
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional
legal opinion.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2007.