Statute Law Revision Bill 2002

Numerical Index | Alphabetical Index

Bills Digest No. 150  2001-02

Statute Law Revision Bill 2002

This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.


Passage History
Main Provisions
Contact Officer & Copyright Details

Passage History

Statute Law Revision Bill 2002

Date Introduced: 16 May 2002

House: House of Representatives

Portfolio: Attorney-General

Commencement: Each item in Schedule 1 commences at the time specified in column 2. Each item in Schedule 2 commences when the amending Act commenced. There are various commencement dates because the commencement of each item is tied to the commencement of the provision that created the error. All other amendments commence on Royal Assent.



To correct technical errors such as misspellings, punctuation errors, numbering errors and incorrect cross-references that have occurred in Acts as a result of drafting and clerical mistakes.


Statute Law Revision Bill

A statute law revision bill was first introduced in the Commonwealth Parliament by the Fraser Government in 1981. The then Attorney-General, Senator the Hon Peter Durack, explained in his second reading speech that:

The Government has decided to introduce Statute Law Revision Bills into the Parliament on a regular basis, at least once in each year and, if required, once in each sitting. This will enable the prompt correction of mistakes and errors and removal from the statute book of expired laws. In the absence of the regular passage of Bills of this kind, the correction of an error in an Act can only be achieved by having a special Bill passed for that purpose or waiting until the Act needs to be amended for some other more important purpose.(1)

The then Opposition supported the introduction of the Statute Law Revision Bill process. In the second reading debate the then Shadow Attorney-General, Senator the Hon Gareth Evans said:

The Statute Law Revision Bill is a fascinating Bill, for the contents of which the Government is to be much congratulated. The first innovation is the very existence of the Bill as a vehicle a compendious vehicle for tidying up oversights, errors and oddities that creep into even the best laid drafting plans and also to accommodate minor changes that become necessary because of changing circumstances. The Opposition notes that it is the Government s intention to introduce housekeeping Bills of this kind at least once each year, and perhaps every sitting. I, for one, certainly applaud that as a rational legislative measure aiding in the avoidance of the unnecessary cluttering of the parliamentary process with what are on any view small issues most of the time.(2)

Since 1981 there have been a number of Statute Law Revision Bills, the most recent being in 1999.(3)


The Bill has two Schedules. Schedule 1 amends errors in 20 Principal Acts, whereas Schedule 2 amends misdescriptions in 23 amending Acts. The commencement date of each item is tied to the commencement of the provision that created the error. The effect of this process is that the error is taken to have been corrected immediately after it was made. According to the Explanatory Memorandum, none of the amendments proposed by either Schedule will alter the content of the law.(4)

Main Provisions

Due to the nature of the amendments proposed by this Bill, the Bills Digest does not provide an item by item analysis. However, Members, Senators and Parliamentary staff who wish to have an analysis of specific provisions should contact the Law and Bills Digest Group on (02) 6277 2526.


  1. Sen the Hon Peter Durack, Second Reading Speech , Statute Law Revision Bill, House of Representatives, Debates, 27 May 1981, p. 2166.

  2. Sen the Hon Gareth Evans, op.cit., 28 May 1981, p. 2308.

  3. Statute Stocktake Bill 1999.

  4. Explanatory Memorandum, Statute Law Revision Bill 2002, p. 3 (paragraphs 8 and 15).


Contact Officer and Copyright Details

Rosemary Bell
29 May 2002
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services

This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document.

IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public.

ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2002

Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties.

Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2002.

Back to top