From: PITMAN
[bigripple@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, 22 September 2003 10:50
PM
To: ECITA, Committee (SEN)
Subject: Submission Re Telstra
(Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2003
To
Chairperson
Senate Environment, Communications, Information
Technology and the Arts Committee
I wish to make this submission to the above
Committee concerning the proposal to fully privatise Telstra.
I have just returned from three weeks stay in
America where I frequently used both public pay phones and private fixed
line phones in various States in the US.
If the American fully privatised phone system is an
indication of what we will have upon privatising all of Telstra - then we
will live to regret it - for the following reasons:-
* Pay phones operated by the various phone
companies are not compatible. The phone cards for one company do
not work for the others. If you use coins - the cost is
extraordinarily high. A call to the other side of Los Angeles for instance
is interrupted every thirty seconds requesting another 50c.
* It is impossible to speak to a live operator
- all the phone companies use robot speakers. If the robots do not
understand what you want - there is nothing you can do about it. And you
pay dearly for all of these so called "assistance calls".
* the phone books do not contain all subscriber's
numbers - it seems that phone companies have their own directories - which means
that you are forced to the trauma of using the robotic directory assistance
facility.
* While the cost of mobile phone calls is low
compared to Australia - the reverse is the case for fixed phone calls - most
local calls are time charged.
* I do not believe that any future federal
government would legislate to make phone companies lose money. Future
proofing is an unrealistic concept. Governments here have demonstrated
that they will not regulate even minor service deficiencies in the banking
industry. They will not do it to phone companies either.
Rather the reverse is true, the government can, and is, dictating improvement
for regional and rural Australia now - only because the corporation is 51%
publicly owned.
* It is untrue to say, as National Party Leader
Anderson says, that the technical advances made in our telephone system in
recent years are due to the partial privatisation of
Telstra. When Telstra/Telecom was 100% publicly owned - that
corporation possessed world class communication research facilities
and led the field in the development of associated hardware and
software.
* The continual income stream from a majority
public owned Telstra will far exceed the tax revenue from a privatised Telstra -
and that income stream will benefit all Australians, not just
the shareholders.
For the above reasons I urge the Committee to
reject the full sale of Telstra.
Greg J Pitman
PO Box 600 Nambour
4560
Telephone 07 5441
7878