![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
Year |
Total resources for DFAT proposed at budget ($) |
Departmental appropriations |
Departmental appropriation |
Administered appropriations ($) |
| PBS 2008–09[6] |
1.234b |
821.935m |
920.186m |
328.970m |
| PBS 2007–08[7] |
1.167b |
810.425m |
909.257m |
245.307m |
| Estimated actual for 2007–08[8] |
— |
827.860m |
926.035m |
845.395m |
| Forward estimates for 2008–09[9] |
— |
827.788m |
926.072m |
832.817m |
Source: Table compiled by author
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has $67.1 million more in total resources for 2008–09 than in the 2007–08 Budget.[10] This includes additional appropriation funding of $20.7 million (excluding capital funding) in 2008–09.[11] As shown in Table 1, the federal government has provided DFAT with $83 million more in administered appropriations than the Howard Government did in the 2007–08 Budget.
The federal government said it will provide a further $12 million in
2008–09 to DFAT, pending the outcomes of a departmental review.[12] The federal government funding
for DFAT is at its lowest level in relation to the country’s gross domestic
product (GDP) since
1999–2000, amounting to 0.067 per cent of Australia’s GDP in 2008–09.
According to the forward estimates, DFAT’s funding is set to decrease for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 financial years. It will then increase again in 2011–12 prior to the launch of the post-2012 global agreement on climate change, and Australia’s expected final round of bidding for the non-permanent place on the United Nations Security Council in 2013–14.
The portfolio of Foreign Affairs and Trade now has three Parliamentary Secretaries with responsibilities for Trade, Pacific Island Affairs and International Development Assistance. The position of Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs has been abolished.
The responsibility for development and coordination of international climate change policy and negotiations was transferred from DFAT to the Department of Climate Change (within the Prime Minister and Cabinet portfolio), resulting in the reallocation of $0.364 million in the forward estimates from the 2007–08 Budget.[13] Moreover, the Australian Trade Commission (Austrade) took over the function of ‘investment promotion’ and responsibility for delivery of the Global Opportunities Program from the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (DIISR), resulting in the transfer of $11 million to Austrade from DIISR in 2008–09.[14]
Outcome One
Outcome Three
Outcome Four
DFAT Budget documents also indicate that:
In light of these developments, which fall under Outcome One, and in the face of an apparent decline in both domestic and overseas diplomatic positions to support this outcome, it is imperative for the future of Australia’s international diplomacy that DFAT is well-resourced and prepared to deal with the emerging challenges.
The average number of staff for DFAT as a whole has increased by 17 staff. However, 20 overseas positions have been abolished and the abolition of an additional five overseas positions is under consideration. One position was also culled from the Australia–China Free Trade Agreement negotiations, as part of an overall decrease in federal government funding for this measure.[23]
Staffing levels for Outcome Two increased by 82 more than the estimated actual number for 2007–08.[24] This will probably assist the Department in:
In line with a 2005 decision by the Howard Government to index the cost of passports according to the Consumer Price Index, passport fees have increased by $8, with effect from 1 July 2008.[27] A standard adult passport will now cost $208 and passports for children and seniors will cost $104, up from $100.
The $24 million funding for the ‘Australia on the World Stage’ program—a Howard Government measure—has been discontinued in 2008–09.[28] This move has the potential to weaken Australia’s ability to promote its diverse cultural exports and artists overseas. Priority has instead been given to the World Expo in Shangai 2010. This measure has been continued from the previous budget with an initial seven-fold increase of $10 million in the government’s appropriation funding for 2008–09.[29]
The Australia Network of television services, which focuses on the Asia-Pacific region, is also a measure that has been continued from the previous budget, receiving $18.8 million in 2008–09. However, in terms of ‘soft diplomacy’ more funding for Australia’s public diplomacy in the Middle East—our major theatre of military operations—might have been more beneficial for the advancement of Australia’s global image and protection of the country’s vital national interests abroad. As an actively engaged middle power with global interests, Australia should perhaps be investing more in public and cultural diplomacy.
[1]. Unless otherwise indicated, all information is derived from Australia’s International Development Assistance Program 2008–09, Statement by The Hon. Stephen Smith, Minister for Foreign Affairs and The Hon. Bob McMullan, Parliamentary Secretary for International Development Assistance, 13 May 2008.
[2]. Australian Government, ‘Part 2: Expense Measures’, Budget Paper No. 2: Budget Measures 2008–09, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2008, p. 186.
[3]. Australia’s International Development Assistance Program 2008–09, op. cit., p. 9.
[4]. Further information on these initiatives is available in Australian Government, Budget Paper No. 2, op. cit., pp. 186–199.
[5]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, Budget Related Paper No. 1.9, Foreign Affairs and Trade Portfolio, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2008, p. 49.
[6]. ibid., pp. 7 and 49.
[7]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2007–08, Budget Related Paper No. 1.11, Foreign Affairs and Trade Portfolio, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2007, pp. 23 and 59.
[8]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 49.
[9]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2007–08, op. cit., p. 59.
[10]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 7 and Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2007–08, op. cit., p. 23. The provision of an equity/capital injection of $35.6 million to the department under Appropriation Bill No.2 does not seem to appear in the 2008–09 Budget, but it seems that this money will appear in the estimates for future years.
[11]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 47.
[12]. ibid., p. 22.
[13]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2007–08, op. cit., p. 35.
[14]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 73.
[15]. Australian Government, ‘Part 2: Expense Measures’, Budget Paper No. 2: Budget Measures 2008–09, Commonwealth of Australia, 2008, p. 199.
[16]. ibid.
[17]. This calculation is based on the figures presented in Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 34.
[18]. ibid., p. 42.
[19]. ibid., pp. 15 and 26.
[20]. ibid., p. 25.
[21]. Australian Government, Additional Estimates Statements 2007–08, op. cit., pp. 12 and 18.
[22]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., pp. 16 and 28.
[23]. Australian Government, Additional Estimates Statements 2007–08, op. cit., p. 15.
[24]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 34.
[25]. ibid., p. 17.
[26]. ibid., p. 33.
[27]. Australian Passports Act 2005, ‘Indexing of passports’, available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/apfa2005397/s6.html [Accessed in May 2008].
[28]. Australian Government, Additional Estimates Statements 2007–08, op. cit., p. 15.
[29]. Australian Government, Portfolio Budget Statements 2008–09, op. cit., p. 38.