![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1: Average New Mortgage 1990-91 to 1999-00 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No. of housing loans (000) |
Average new mortgage (current $) |
Average new mortgage (real $)1 |
Change in real average mortgage (%) |
|
|
1990-91 |
293.7 |
70739 |
83814 |
|
|
1991-92 |
379.3 |
75239 |
87487 |
4.4 |
|
1992-93 |
453.1 |
81170 |
93406 |
6.8 |
|
1993-94 |
544.5 |
87846 |
99261 |
6.3 |
|
1994-95 |
451.3 |
93743 |
102675 |
3.4 |
|
1995-96 |
451.5 |
96740 |
101617 |
-1.0 |
|
1996-97 |
481.4 |
103818 |
107583 |
5.9 |
|
1997-98 |
482.2 |
113362 |
117473 |
9.2 |
|
1998-99 |
488.2 |
125969 |
128934 |
9.8 |
|
1999-00 |
549.0 |
136490 |
136490 |
5.9 |
1 Expressed in 1999-00 dollars.
Source: Housing Finance for Owner Occupation ABS Cat. No. 5609.0, various issues
It is important to note that the average new mortgage is not the same as the average mortgage. The former refers to the latest period, i.e. month or year, for which data is available whereas the average mortgage covers all home loans in existence regardless of when they were commenced.
In estimating the size of the average mortgage it is assumed in this Research Note that the vast majority of mortgages have commenced in the last decade. This is based on the fact that in 1999, 70 per cent of home buyers had lived in their current dwelling for eight years or less.(3) This situation appears little different from 1994 when 80 per cent of homebuyers had lived in their home for ten years or less.(4) While some current mortgages may date back as much as 25 years, their number and size will be of little significance compared with housing finance activity of the last decade.
Given this, the analysis presented in Table 2 provides a useful basis for estimating the size of the average mortgage. It shows that 54 per cent of mortgages taken out during the last decade were commenced in the last five years and these accounted for 62 per cent of the housing finance. It therefore seems reasonable to suggest that the average mortgage is currently in the range of $110 000 to $115 000. This is considerably less than the figure of $140 000 used by some commentators.(5)
|
Table 2: Summary of Housing Finance 1990-91 to 1999-00 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount lent ($m nominal terms) |
Number of loans ('000) |
Average new mortgage ($) |
|
|
5 years 1990-91 to 1994-95 |
176230 |
2121.9 |
83053 |
|
5 years 1995-96 to 1999-00 |
284750 |
2452.3 |
116115 |
|
1990-91 to 1999-00 |
460980 |
4574.2 |
100778 |
Source: Housing Finance for Owner Occupation ABS Cat. No. 5609.0, various issues
Variation between States
As reported in 1995, there is considerable difference in mortgage size between States. Table 3 shows the average mortgage size by State for 1999-00 and 1994-95. This comparison shows that:
With the variation in mortgage size between States there is also substantial variation in the level of repayments required of borrowers. Table 3 shows monthly repayments on average new mortgages in 1999-00 at current interest rates (8.05 per cent) by State. These vary from $1282 in NSW to $624 in Tasmania. Average repayments for new borrowers in Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory are less than $1000 per month.
|
Table 3: Mortgage size by State, 1994-95 and 1999-00 and current repayments for recent borrowers |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NSW |
VIC |
QLD |
SA |
WA |
TAS |
NT |
ACT |
|
|
New mortgage 1994-95 ($) |
110 324 |
94 117 |
90 090 |
88 749 |
85 393 |
79 051 |
64 585 |
97 644 |
|
Ratio to Australian average ($93 734) |
1.17 |
1.00 |
0.96 |
0.95 |
0.91 |
0.84 |
0.69 |
1.04 |
|
New mortgage 1999-00 ($) |
165 393 |
132 791 |
122 486 |
98 756 |
119 554 |
80 465 |
109 028 |
129 090 |
|
Ratio to Australian average ($136 490) |
1.21 |
0.97 |
0.90 |
0.72 |
0.88 |
0.59 |
0.80 |
0.95 |
|
Current repayments for 1999-00 new mortgages (shown above) at current interest rates (8.05%) ($/month) |
1282 |
1029 |
950 |
766 |
927 |
624 |
845 |
1001 |
Source: Housing Finance for Owner Occupation ABS Cat. No. 5609.0, various issues
When State variations in average weekly earnings are taken into account, NSW still stands out from national trends; in 1999-00, the ratio of average weekly payments on new mortgages (AWPNM) in NSW to average weekly earnings (AWE) in that State was 0.40-higher than in any of the other States, and even though NSW residents have the highest AWE of all the States (other than the ACT). The corresponding proportions for the other jurisdictions in that year were 0.34 (Vic.), 0.33 (Qld), 0.30 (WA), 0.28 (ACT), 0.27 (SA), 0.27 (NT) and 0.22 (Tas.).
Interest rate increases
During 1999-00 the Reserve Bank of Australia increased official interest rates several times. As a result, housing interest rates also increased after declining since mid-1996. After reaching a thirty year low(6) of 6.5 per cent in December 1998, standard bank interest rates for variable home loans first increased in July 1999 and progressively increased to 8.05 per cent in August 2000. For a borrower with a $110 000 mortgage this would have resulted in an increase in monthly repayments from $743 to $853.
It is likely, however, that the interest rate increases in 1999-00 have not resulted in increased repayments for the vast majority of mortgage holders. There are two reasons for this conclusion. First, in 1999, 70 per cent of home buyers had purchased their home prior to 1997(7) when interest rates were higher than at present.(8) And, due to the widespread practice of repayments not being decreased when interest rates fall,(9) this group of home buyers would have established a buffer protecting them from the recent interest rate rises.
Secondly, many borrowers who commenced their loans in the low interest rate environment of 1998 and 1999 have chosen to repay more than the minimum requirement. This has cushioned the impact of recent rate rises for them.(10)