![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LP |
ALP |
OIG |
Grn |
MI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
*Carnell |
*Berry |
*Osborne |
*Tucker |
*Moore |
|
*Cornwell |
*Corbell |
Rugendyke |
||
|
*Hird |
Hargreaves |
|||
|
*Humphries |
Quinlan |
|||
|
*Kaine |
Stanhope |
|||
|
Smyth |
*Wood |
|||
|
*Stefaniak |
||||
|
* Sitting member |
||||
The Campaign
The main task confronting the Carnell government in the campaign was to divorce its policies from those of the federal government. Since coming to power in March 1996 the Howard government has enacted a number of policies (public sector downsizing, contracting out of functions etc) that have not been well received by the Canberra electorate. Mrs Carnell has been able to distance her government from the actions of her federal colleagues and to promote a pro-Canberra image. The Liberal Party was able to take advantage of Mrs Carnell's high approval rating and conduct a largely presidential style campaign.
By way of contrast the Labor Party's campaign was hamstrung by the unpopularity of the Opposition Leader, Mr Wayne Berry, who only became party leader six months before the election. Early in the campaign Mr Berry's approval rating was a low 24% compared to Mrs Carnell's 59%.(1)
The Result
The election result was a personal triumph for Mrs Carnell, who received 33.5% of the vote in her electorate of Molonglo. By way of contrast Mr Wayne Berry received only 12.4% of the vote in Ginninderra.
Despite a small swing against it (down 2.7% on the 1995 result) the Liberal Party was able to maintain its level of representation in the Assembly at seven seats.
The Labor Party received 27.6% of the vote (down 4.0% on the 1995 result) and retained its six seats in the Assembly. The vote for the Labor Party was the second worst result for the party in any State or Territory election since the end of the Second World War (the worst result was in the ACT in 1989 - the first election after self-government).
For the other parties and groups contesting the elections the results were mixed. The Australian Democrats increased their vote from 3.9% to 6.0% but again failed to win a seat. The Osborne group, contesting all three electorates for the first time, increased its vote from 3.4% to 9.1% and won two seats. The Moore group only contested one electorate and as a consequence saw its vote decline from 7.0% to 2.9%. The Greens lost a seat although their vote remained virtually unchanged. In Ginninderra, the Greens candidate lost to the Osborne group candidate largely because a significant number of Democrat preferences, which would normally favour the Greens, exhausted instead of being distributed.
1998 ACT Legislative Assembly Election
|
Seats |
Votes % |
Swing % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Liberal Party (LP) |
7 |
37.8 |
-2.7 |
|
Australian Labor Party (ALP) |
6 |
27.6 |
-4.0 |
|
ACT Greens (Grn) |
1 |
9.1 |
0.0 |
|
Osborne Independent Group (OIG) |
2 |
9.1 |
+5.7 |
|
Australian Democrats (AD) |
0 |
6.0 |
+2.1 |
|
Moore Independents (MI) |
1 |
2.9 |
-4.1 |
|
Others |
0 |
7.5 |
+3.0 |
Candidates
A total of 108 candidates contested the 1998 election, a significant increase on the 74 who contested the previous election.
Two significant features of the election were: firstly, the considerable turnover among the ALP members elected (although the number of members remained unchanged) and secondly, the lack of success of women candidates.
Only three of the sitting ALP members (Berry, Corbell and Wood) were re-elected. The new Labor members, Hargreaves in Brindabella, Quinlan in Molonglo, and Stanhope in Ginninderra, represent a shift from the left in the factional balance of the Labor caucus.
The only other sitting member to be defeated was the Liberal Party's Ms Littlewood, who narrowly lost her seat to the former Liberal Chief Minister Mr T Kaine.
Prominent among the new members of the Assembly are the former federal Liberal member for Namadgi, Mr Brendan Smyth, and policeman Mr Dave Rugendyke of the Osborne group.
The relatively high turnover in Labor Party members has been partly attributed to a new phenomenon in ACT elections, the party linear vote. See box section for an explanation.
Despite 40 women contesting the 1998 election, only two, Mrs Carnell and the Greens Ms Tucker, were elected. This represents a significant fall from the five who were elected at the previous election. It has been suggested that the lack of success of women candidates represents a failing in the Hare- Clark system, when compared to party- list proportional representation systems(2). The argument is that under a party- list system, parties are more likely to select women candidates for winning positions, thus ensuring more women are elected than under a system that allows more voter choice. A more likely explanation possibly is the propensity of the Hare- Clark system to elect high profile 'identity' candidates at the expense of low profile candidates. Apart from Mrs Carnell none of the other women candidates attracted significant media attention during the campaign. At least one women member, Ms Littlewood, could also attribute her loss to the vagaries of the party linear vote.
|
Party Linear Vote Under the Robson Rotation system used in the ACT (and Tasmanian House of Assembly) elections, the name of each party candidate appears on the top position of the party column on an equal number of ballot papers. This is designed to limit the influence of the parties in determining the order of candidates elected by spreading the effect of any party ticket voting. This is in contrast to the Senate system where party ticket voting is encouraged by the party ticket vote option. However, the system of candidate rotation under Robson Rotation is largely limited to the top position on the ballot paper. The other positions are determined by a schedule which does not account for all of the possible combinations. The schedule lists five combinations where there are five candidates in a party list while there are 120 possible combinations. With the effective banning of 'how to vote' cards in ACT elections many voters recorded what has become known as a party linear vote. That is, they voted for the party candidates in the same order as the candidates names appeared on the ballot paper presented to them. The restricted number of ballot paper rotations means that under some circumstances some candidates can receive more party linear votes than other candidates. It has been suggested1 that the advantage flowing from the party linear vote probably determined the outcome of four seats in the ACT election. 1Canberra Times, 9 March 1998. |