Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 26 1997-98

What is Happening to Full-Time Jobs?

Tony Kryger
Statistics Group
3 March 1998

Introduction

Full-time jobs, relative to the size of the population, are in decline. Over the past 20 years, the full-time employment to population (FTEP) ratio has fallen from 49 to 42 per cent. This fall however, has been anything but steady with most of the damage occurring at times of recession. The fall in the FTEP ratio in the 1982-83 and 1990-91 recessions was sudden and sharp, and was not fully reversed during the period of economic recovery which followed (see Figure 1).

1. F/T Employment to Population Ratio

Differences by Gender

The phenomenon of a declining FTEP ratio is largely confined to males. Figure 2 shows that, while males and females have experienced a sudden decline in the ratio with each recession, for males the ratio (of full-time male jobs to male population) has tended to flatten out after each recession whereas for females the ratio (of full-time female jobs to female population) has increased after each recession. The net effect is that the male FTEP ratio has been on a trend downward for the last 20 years whereas the female FTEP ratio has slowly trended upwards.

2. F/T Employment to Population Ratio - by Gender

Differences by Industry

Figure 3 shows the change in the FTEP ratio by industry division between 1984 and 1997. Manufacturing industry has experienced the biggest fall in the ratio over the period, but still remains by far the largest provider of full-time jobs. It should be noted however, that part of the loss in the FTEP ratio for manufacturing industry is due to an outsourcing of functions to service industries. In other words, the loss of manufacturing employment does not necessarily mean a commensurate loss of manufacturing function. Figure 3 also shows that only five industries have increased their FTEP ratio since 1984 and these all occur in the services sector.

3. F/T Employment to Population Ratio - by Industry

The pattern of decline in the FTEP ratio varies significantly between industries (Figure 4). In some industries-agriculture; mining; and electricity, gas and water-the decline has been fairly steady over time. Other industries have followed a cyclical, but downward trend over time-examples are wholesale trade; retail trade; and communication services. Manu-facturing industry has exhibited its own particular trend with the ratio falling suddenly at times of recession, but remaining fairly steady thereafter. Other industries, however, have gone against the downward trend altogether and have increased their FTEP ratio-accommodation, cafes and restaurants; property and business services; and personal and other services.

4. F/T Employment to Population Ratio - Selected Industries

4. F/T Employment to Population Ratio - Selected Industries

Why?

Several factors have contributed to the overall decline in the FTEP ratio:

  • Structural change (or change in the industry composition of the workforce) has significantly altered the distribution of employment by full-time and part-time status. During the past couple of decades, manufacturing industry, a major provider of full-time jobs, has been in decline. At the same time however, the service industries, which are major providers of part-time jobs, have been experiencing strong growth. Particularly strong growth has been recorded in those service industries with very strong concentrations of part-time workers, viz. property and business services; retail trade; health and community services; and accommodation, cafes and restaurants. Structural change however, does not explain why there has been a decline in the FTEP ratio within a large number of industries (Figure 3).
  • Fixed labour costs of full-time labour has meant that part-time work, and especially part-time casual work, offers significant advantages to employers. Employers have the choice to either 'hire or fire' casual staff as they need them rather than keep idle people on the payroll. Employers also have the choice of purchasing the services of casual staff through a contractor who in turn may either employ staff on a contract basis or 'refer' clients to the principal employer. Moreover, it can often be cheaper to employ casuals, even if they receive more remuneration per hour than full-timers for the same work. This is because casuals, as yet, do not qualify for costly employment benefits such as sick leave and recreation leave. The sudden and permanent fall in the FTEP ratio during times of recession may be a response to this factor.
  • Increased participation by women in the workforce, many of whom prefer to work part-time, has given employers a ready supply of female part-time labour from which to choose. While it is probably true that the greater availability of part-time jobs has been the main inducement for women to enter the workforce, an effect in the opposite direction is also likely. That is, the increased supply of female labour has given employers an incentive to alter working arrangements in order to tap into this supply of labour.

 

top