Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 49 1996-97

Economic Status of Women in Australia:
A Statistical Profile - 1997 Update

Geoff Winter
Statistics Group

Consie Larmour
Social Policy Group
May 1997

Women and Employment

The participation of women in the labour force has increased steadily: in April 1997, 54.1 per cent of women aged 15 years and over were participating in the labour force, compared with an all-time high of 54.4 per cent in February 1997, 49.3 per cent in February 1988 and 43.0 per cent in May 1979. The proportion of women in the labour force in Australia is lower than in Great Britain and Canada among Commonwealth countries, and lower than in a number of other OECD countries including the United States of America and Scandinavian countries. Women predominate in the part-time labour force.

Table 1: Women and the Labour Force
(per cent)


February- Characteristic 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1996 1997
Female proportion of the civilian population (a) 50.8 50.8 50.7 50.6 50.8 50.8 50.8 Female proportion of the labour force 35.2 36.8 38.4 41.6 42.6 42.8 43.4 Participation rate (b): males 81.5 78.3 75.8 75.5 74.3 74.1 73.3 females 43.2 44.4 46.1 52.3 53.5 53.9 54.4 Female proportion of employment: full-time 27.2 28.3 29.5 31.6 32.4 32.7 32.9 part-time 80.9 78.9 78.7 78.1 74.7 74.8 74.6 total 34.3 36.0 38.0 41.1 42.5 42.8 43.3 Unemployment rate (b): full-time workers - males 3.6 4.9 8.1 5.6 8.9 8.7 9.0 - females 6.7 8.7 10.1 7.7 10.2 9.5 9.9 part-time workers - males 9.3 6.7 7.8 8.5 9.6 8.6 9.3 - females 6.8 5.7 6.9 6.3 6.9 6.1 6.6 total - males 3.8 5.0 8.1 5.9 9.0 8.7 9.0 - females 6.8 7.7 9.0 7.2 8.7 8.1 8.5
(a) Aged 15 years and over. (b) Seasonally adjusted.
Source: The Labour Force, various (ABS).

Since late 1990 the unemployment rate of women has been lower than the male unemployment rate. (Some possible reasons for this are discussed in Are Women Taking Jobs Away From Men, Research Note No. 46, May 1997.) The unemployment rate of women fell from 11.0 per cent in September 1983 to 8.3 per cent in June 1986 and was at its lowest in the past nineteen years at 6.4 per cent in December 1989. In April 1997 it was 8.5 per cent. However, women still predominate among discouraged jobseekers, i.e. in 'hidden unemployment'. In September 1996, of 118 900 persons classified as discouraged job-seekers by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 75 per cent were women. This situation had deteriorated compared with September 1994 when 70 per cent of the 106 500 discouraged jobseekers were women.

Despite 'equal pay' decisions dating back to 1969, women still have not achieved earnings parity. For adult employees, in February 1997, women's full-time average ordinary time weekly earnings were 84 per cent of men's. For adult full-time average total weekly earnings the female/male proportion was 80 per cent and for all employees average total weekly earnings, the female/male proportion was 67 per cent. These ratios are much the same as in February 1988. The female/male proportion for all employees average total weekly earnings in May 1975 was also 67 per cent and this has fluctuated little in the past 22 years.

The latest earnings distribution figures, for May 1996, show that 63.6 per cent of workers with total earnings of under $100 per week were women, and only 20.8 per cent of people with total earnings of $800 per week and over were women. This latter figure may reflect an improvement in the situation of some women as in May 1994 an estimated 19.0 per cent of people with total earnings of $800 per week or more were women.

In May 1996, the median total earnings figure for all female employees was $434.20 per week compared with $630.00 for all male employees, and the median total weekly earnings for full-time adult female employees was $576.80 compared with $701.30 for full-time adult male employees.

Reasons for the disparity in earnings levels include the lower awards for traditionally female occupations and the predominance of women in part-time employment. In addition Australia has one of the highest incidences of both occupation and industry segregation of women workers amongst OECD countries.

Women are over-represented in the lowest paid jobs (traditional female occupations). Two-thirds of women workers are concentrated in five occupational groups: teaching, nursing, clerical, sales and personal services. They are under-represented in many occupations such as engineering, science and technology positions, and trades. In February 1997, for example, only 9.3 per cent of tradespersons and related workers were women, while 90.1 per cent of advanced clerical and service workers were women. Within industries, women tend to be clustered at the lowest salary levels.

Management

The progress of women into management positions has been generally slow. According to a survey by Korn/Ferry International, Study of boards of directors in Australia, by 31 December 1995 women in companies comprised only 4.2 per cent of board members, only 1 per cent of executive directors and only 5.6 per cent of non-executive directors. Of the companies surveyed (including government business enterprises) only 26 per cent had at least one woman on their boards. By comparison, in the USA 63 per cent of companies had at least one woman on their boards and 7 per cent of directors overall were women.

In terms of appointments to Commonwealth Government statutory boards, councils and authorities, 28.9 per cent of members were women (as at 31 December 1995). Following a 1988 Government resolution that at least 25 per cent of places on government boards, councils and committees be filled by women the proportion increased from 12 per cent to approximately 20 per cent by 1992.

Income

Of persons whose principal source of income in 1994-95 was wages or salaries, the mean gross total income (from all sources) of women was only 65.8 per cent of the average (mean) for men. For all persons, the mean gross total income (from all sources) of women was only 55.8 per cent of the average (mean) for men. The distribution of total gross incomes from all sources is distorted against women: 60.4 per cent of people with annual incomes of less than $5 000 were women whilst only 19.1 per cent of people with incomes of $40 000 and over were women (compared with 17.4 per cent in 1991).

Table 2: Persons(a) whose Principal Source of Income was Wages or Salaries, 1994-95


Men Women All persons
Annual gross Prop. Prop. Prop. Prop. income(b) of of of who Number total Number total Number total were women ($) ('000) (%) ('000) (%) ('000) (%) (%)
Less than 5 000 187.6 4.7 286.3 9.6 473.9 6.8 60.4 5 000 ¾ 12 499 234.5 5.9 476.4 16.0 710.9 10.2 67.0 12 500 ¾ 19 999 391.1 9.8 587.8 19.7 979.1 14.0 60.0 20 000 ¾ 29 999 1 061.2 26.5 883.4 29.7 1 944.7 27.9 45.2 30 000 ¾ 39 999 955.1 23.9 483.6 16.2 1 438.8 20.6 33.6 40 000 ¾ 49 999 594.3 14.9 175.9 5.9 770.2 11.0 22.8 50 000 and over 577.6 14.4 85.8 2.9 663.4 9.5 12.9 Total 4 001.6 100.0 2 979.4 100.0 6 981.0 100.0 42.7
(a) Aged 15 years and over. (b) From all sources.
Source: Survey of Income and Housing Costs, 1994-95 (ABS).

Women and Poverty

In Australia, in June 1996 women made up about 62 per cent of Australia's adult (civilian) pensioners and beneficiaries (compared with 58 per cent in June 1994), and 93.6 per cent of sole parent pensioner families were headed by women. Single parent families were over-represented at the lowest income levels and therefore those most likely to be living below poverty level standards were women and children. Of all families with dependent children, 20.5 per cent are sole parent families, and of these about 78.6 per cent are headed by women.

 

top