Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Chronology 2 1999-2000

Literacy: A Chronology of Selected Research and Commonwealth Policy Initiatives Since 1975

Marilyn Harrington
Susan McDonald (until December 1997)
Social Policy Group
7 December 1999


Contents

Acronyms

Introduction

Endnotes

Chronology

A Select List of Further Reading

Acronyms

ACER

Australian Council for Educational Research

AEC

Australian Education Council

ALLP

Australian Language and Literacy Policy

ATSI

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

ESL

English as a Second Language

LLP

Literacy and Learning Program

MCEETYA

Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs

NCAELLS

National Collaborative Adult English Language and Literacy Strategy

NEPS

National Equity Program for Schools

SIP

Special Intervention Program

Introduction

In June 1996 Dr David Kemp, the then Minister for Schools, Vocational Education and Training, announced that improving the literacy skills of young people would be a central education policy objective of the Government. To achieve that objective, he advocated a national goal be set to ensure that every child leaving primary school should be able to read, write and spell at an 'appropriate level'.(1) He also stated his belief that:

In addressing the issue of literacy effectively we are addressing a key source of a number of the difficulties and problems faced by young people including the national priority issue of youth unemployment. That is why the Government places so much importance on literacy as the essential key we must give our students with which to unlock their, and Australia's future.(2)

The concern about literacy levels is common to many countries. In the United Kingdom the Blair Government declared early its literacy target that, by the year 2002, 80 per cent of 11 year-olds will be reaching the standards expected for their age in English and 75 per cent in maths.(3) The Government subsequently produced both a literacy and numeracy strategy, declaring 1998 the Year of Reading and introducing a compulsory literacy hour for all schools. In the United States President Clinton issued a 'Call to Action for American Education',(4) declaring as one of his priorities that all children will read independently and well by the end of third grade. To this purpose he has launched an 'America Reads Challenge' to provide the supportive infrastructure to underpin his strategy.

Any debate or policy formulation about literacy is inherently difficult because not only is there no single universally accepted definition of literacy, it is also a very fluid concept which is constantly evolving in response to societal needs and demands. Joseph Lo Bianco and Peter Freebody in their report on literacy policy provide a useful discussion of the definitions of literacy, canvassing definitions from 'skills-based conceptions of functional literacy through to very broad and all-encompassing definitions which integrate social and political empowerment'.(5) They advocate a multidimensional concept of literacy.(6)

The preoccupation with literacy levels is not new. According to one thesis,(7) the concern about literacy levels has had a number of manifestations over the years in response to, and offered as a solution for, contemporary social issues and problems. The authors argue that:

...the literacy debate is rarely about 'literacy' in itself. It is tied up with larger political and moral debates about the directions of communities and cultures, nation-states and economies.(8)

This thesis is in accord with some of the criticisms which the Government's literacy strategies have attracted. The Australian Education Union has accused the Government of manufacturing a 'literacy crisis' for political expediency.(9) Academics have also challenged Government assertions that literacy standards are at crisis levels. Associate Professor Tony Townsend from Monash University has been reported as claiming that Australian students are doing much better than others in the English-speaking world.(10) Statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics have been used to show that there has been no major change in literacy levels over the last twenty years and that those socioeconomic groups about which there has been most concern-those living in poverty, those from non-English speaking backgrounds and indigenous people-have always had significantly lower literacy levels.(11)

Nevertheless the endorsement of the National Literacy Plan in March 1997 by Commonwealth, State and Territory Education Ministers was an acknowledgment that, in spite of this debate, literacy levels needed to be improved. The urgency of the issue has received further impetus from recent research that continues to link low literacy levels to future employment outcomes. The Australian Bureau of Statistics has reported a 16 per cent unemployment rate for people with poor literacy skills compared to a 4 per cent rate for those with very high literacy levels.(12)

The policy developments since 1996 continue the work of previous governments. For instance, the early 1990s saw the formulation of the Australian Language and Literacy Policy, the establishment of specific Commonwealth school literacy programs and a number of adult literacy strategies, with a particular focus on workplace literacy. Throughout concern has been expressed about the links between socioeconomic disadvantage, literacy levels and future life outcomes.

In recent years a multitude of reports and policy initiatives canvassing all aspects of literacy from literacy in schools to adult literacy, socioeconomic disadvantage and literacy, gender and literacy, and generational literacy, have been released. This has been accompanied by a plethora of debate about definitions of literacy, the measurement and reporting of literacy standards, teaching methods, (the 'phonics versus whole language approach'), funding, and literacy in the context of the general strains on the education system. The debate has moved from literacy in schools to adult literacy with a particular focus on young unemployed adults. Lately another strand to the debate has been added with calls for pre-school and early intervention literacy programs.

This chronology is not exhaustive. It is an attempt to plot the course of child and adult literacy research and Commonwealth policy development since 1975. Its emphasis is on research and on Commonwealth policy development since 1996. There has been no attempt to chronicle developments at the State and Territory level nor to include developments relating to numeracy, except where it is dealt in tandem with literacy.

A select list of further reading accompanies the chronology.

Endnotes

  1. 'Appropriate' levels of literacy were later defined with the publication in October 1998 of national literacy benchmarks for Years 3 and 5.
  2. Hon Dr David Kemp MP, 'A national literacy goal', address to the Australian College of Education Conference on General and Vocational Education, Sydney, 21 June 1996.
  3. Dept for Education and Employment, Excellence in Schools, Command paper 3681, The Stationery Office, London, 1997, p. 19.
  4. President Clinton's Call to Action for American Education in the 21st Century, 2 May 1997, web site at: http://www.ed.gov/updates/PresEDPlan/index.html, (Dec. 1999).
  5. Joseph Lo Bianco and Peter Freebody, Australian literacies: informing national policy on literacy education, Language Australia, Belconnen, ACT, 1997, pp. 28-31.
  6. ibid., p. xvi.
  7. Bill Green, John Hedges and Allan Luke, Debating literacy in Australia: a documentary history, 1945-1994, Australian Literacy Foundation, Melbourne, 1994.
  8. ibid., p. 7.
  9. Roy Martin, 'Manufacturing the literacy crisis', Australian educator, Summer 1997, pp. 8-11.
  10. Roslyn Guy, 'Dispelling myths', The Age, 2 June 1998, p. 18.
  11. Craig Ashdown and AAP, 'Literacy 'crisis' denied', Education review, vol. 2, no. 6, July 1998, p. 1.
  12. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Education and training in Australia, Cat. no. 4224.0, ABS Canberra, 1998.

 

 

Chronology

Milestones Details Source
Documents
1975-1977

Select Committee on Specific Learning Difficulties

Survey of 10 and 14 year olds

The absence of reliable national data prompted the House of Representatives Select Committee on Specific Learning Difficulties to commission a survey of the literacy and numeracy levels of school children in Australia. The Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) subsequently conducted the survey for the Education Research and Development Committee. ACER assessed the achievement of 10 and 14 year olds in the areas of reading, writing and numeracy, reporting a wide range of performance and confirming a significant number of children were failing to reach adequate levels of literacy and numeracy.

In its final report, the Select Committee recommended regular surveys of literacy achievement to assess standards and compare results between school systems within Australia as well as internationally. The Select Committee also examined adult literacy problems and recommended the expansion of adult literacy programs and research into adult literacy teaching techniques.

House of
Representatives
Select Committee
on Specific
Learning
Difficulties,
Learning
difficulties in
children and
adults
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1976.

Education
Research and
Development
Committee et al.,
Australian studies
in school
performance
,
vols, 1-3, AGPS,
Canberra, 1976-1977.

1979

Development of assessment methods and performance standards for basic skills recommended

In response to employer concerns about the literacy and numeracy skills of school leavers, the report of the Committee of Inquiry into Education and Training recommended the development of performance standards in basic skills and also the development of appropriate assessment methods for those skills. Committee of
Inquiry into
Education and
Training,
Education,
training and
employment
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1979.
1980

Report on national assessment program for Australia

In 1976 a Study Group was established to examine the effectiveness of national assessment programs in other countries and to consider the need for such a program in Australia. The Study Group concluded a national assessment program such as existed in the United States was not appropriate for Australia and recommended that the individual school be the primary agent to conduct skills assessments. Education
Research and
Development
Committee,
'National
assessment of
educational
progress', ERDC
report
, no. 26,
AGPS, Canberra,
1980.
1980

Increased support for literacy monitoring recommended

The report of the Committee of Inquiry into Technological Change in Australia (the Myers Committee) acknowledged community concern about the literacy and numeracy levels of young people leaving school, recognising that competent levels were integral to adapting to technological change. The Committee recommended the Commonwealth Government increase its support of programs for the national monitoring of general literacy and numeracy. Committee of
Inquiry into
Technological
Change in
Australia,
Technological
change in
Australia
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1980.
1981

Report on literacy and numeracy skills of students aged 10 and 14 years

The Australian Studies in Student Performance Project was undertaken in 1979 by ACER, at the request of the Australian Education Council (AEC), a council of the Commonwealth, State and Territory Education Ministers. The Project surveyed the literacy and numeracy skills of 10 and 14-year-old students and compared those results with a 1975 cohort. The survey results demonstrated a wide range of performance at both age levels, with female students performing better in the younger age group and differences in performance between metropolitan and non-metropolitan students. The study did not find significant changes in results between the 1975 and the 1980 cohort. Bourke, S. F., et
al., Performance
in literacy and
numeracy: 1980:
a report to the
Australian
Education
Council on the
Australian Studies
in Student
Performance
Project
, AGPS
for the AEC,
Canberra, 1981.
1984

Senate Committee recommends additional funding for adult literacy programs

Issues of adult literacy were addressed by the Senate Standing Committee on Education and the Arts in its report on the development of a national language policy. The Committee recommended the assessment of adult literacy levels in Australia, Commonwealth funding for adult literacy programs in the TAFE sector and a campaign to promote adult literacy. It also recommended the establishment of a national committee on adult literacy. Senate Standing
Committee on
Education and the
Arts, Report on a
national language
policy
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1984.
1985

Support for bilingual education programs for aboriginal children

The House of Representatives Select Committee on Aboriginal Education established that the improvement of English literacy standards must be a priority for primary schooling of Aboriginal children. The Committee recommended further funding for bilingual language programs for Aboriginal students and an emphasis on programs that taught English as a second language to Aboriginal students. (Commonwealth funding for bilingual education was first introduced in Northern Territory schools in 1973.) House of
Representatives
Select Committee
on Aboriginal
Education,
Aboriginal
education
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1985.
1987

National Policy on Languages

In response to the Senate Committee report on a national language policy, a national policy on language issues was developed and endorsed by the Prime Minister in April 1987. With regard to literacy, the policy proposed a campaign to improve levels of adult literacy and, subsequently in the 1987-88 Budget, funding was allocated for the Adult Literacy Action Campaign. Lo Bianco,
Joseph, National
policy on
languages
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1987.
1989

First national survey of adult literacy

Australia's first national survey of adult literacy found that a majority of Australian adults could perform straightforward literacy tasks but many were unable to complete tasks of moderate complexity. Ten per cent of the sample failed to achieve at all on quantitative literacy. Those that had greater difficulty with the more complex tasks tended to be older, working in unskilled occupations and come from backgrounds where as children they had had limited access to literacy materials in the home. It was acknowledged that literacy and numeracy skills development was not the sole responsibility of schools, and that it was a lifelong process because of society's constantly changing literacy needs. Wickert, Rosie,
No single
measure: a survey
of Australian
adult literacy
,
Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
Canberra, 1989.
1989

Common and Agreed Goals for Schooling in Australia

State, Territory and Commonwealth Education Ministers reached agreement on the ten Common and Agreed National Goals for Schooling in Australia (the Hobart Declaration). One of those goals was the development of English literacy and numeracy skills. Curriculum
Corporation and
Australian
Education
Council, National
report on
schooling in
Australia 1990
,
Curriculum
Corporation for
the AEC, Carlton,
Vic., 1991.
1990

International Literacy Year

The International Literacy Year Program concentrated on strategic national projects that could form the basis for future literacy programs. Projects included a forum on adult literacy assessment, pedagogical issues relating to adult literacy and a public awareness campaign. A Literacy and Language Task Force was also established in September 1990 to develop a policy strategy for the future. Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training, Annual
report
1990-91,
AGPS, Canberra,
1991.
1990

January

National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Policy

Following on from the report of the Aboriginal Education Policy Task Force released in 1988, the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Policy was endorsed by all governments in 1989 and came into effect from 1 January 1990. The policy articulated specific long-term literacy goals, including proficiency in English language and numeracy skills for children and for adults with limited or no educational experience. Aboriginal
Education Policy
Task Force,
Report of the
Aboriginal
Education Policy
Task Force
,
Aboriginal
Education Policy
Task Force,
Canberra, 1988.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
National
Aboriginal and
Torres Strait
Islander
education policy
,
DEET, Canberra,
1989.

1990

Government discussion paper on an Australian literacy and language policy

The Commonwealth Government released a discussion paper, the purpose of which was to propose a national strategy for the promotion of literacy and language learning. The discussion paper stated that about one million Australians had problems relating to everyday literacy tasks and that the literacy levels of school children required continuing attention. The Paper identified the need for language and literacy education, proposed national goals and objectives, options for implementation, and contained a draft national literacy strategy. Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training, The
language of
Australia:
discussion paper
on an Australian
literacy and
language policy
for the 1990s
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1990.
1991

January

Establishment of workplace and job-seeker literacy programs

The Special Intervention Program (SIP) commenced on 1 January 1991 and was introduced to assist disadvantaged job seekers overcome barriers to employment. Under the Program, individual job seekers were assessed and provided with access to appropriate training, such as upgrading literacy skills. The SIP later became part of Working Nation with greatly increased funds.

The 1991-92 Budget allocated funding for the Workplace Literacy Program. In the following financial year it merged with the English in the Workplace program to become the Workplace English Language and Literacy Program. Under this Program, funding was allocated to workplaces and organisations in industry to develop and implement literacy training activities and resources, as part of the skills training associated with Award competency standards.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training, Annual
report
, 1990-91,
1991-92, AGPS,
Canberra,
1991-1992.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
Programs,
1991-92,
1992-93,
AGPS, Canberra,
1991-1992.

1991

March

Report on literacy needs in the workplace

As a result of concerns about the effect of literacy levels on the capacity for structural adjustment of industry to changing international economic conditions, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training investigated the impact of low literacy levels on productivity and skills improvement in the workplace. The Committee reported workers with inadequate literacy skills across a wide section of industries and workplaces and recommended the urgent establishment of an adult literacy strategy that would meet the needs of workers from both an English and non-English speaking background. House of
Representatives
Standing
Committee on
Employment,
Education and
Training, Words
at work: a report
on literacy needs
in the workplace
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1991.
1991

August

Australian Language and Literacy Policy

School literacy programs for disadvantaged secondary school students and the early years of schooling

The Commonwealth Government's Australian Language and Literacy Policy (ALLP) was released by the then Minister for Employment, Education and Training, John Dawkins. It incorporated the proposal for a national literacy strategy which had been presented in the 1990 discussion paper on literacy and language policy.

The ALLP stated the following goal for literacy:

All Australian residents should develop and maintain a level of spoken and written English which is appropriate for a range of contexts, with the support of education and training programs addressing their diverse learning needs.

Implementation of literacy programs under the ALLP commenced in 1992. These included:

  • the establishment of the Australian Language and Literacy Council to advise on policies, strategies and targets
  • research networks for adult and child literacy to improve the quality and relevance of language and literacy education
  • an Adult Literacy National Projects program to develop and improve the relevance of adult literacy programs in the government and non-government sectors, and
  • increased funding for literacy programs targeting adult literacy, literacy in the early years of school, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) communities.

As a result of the ALLP, the Commonwealth's Literacy and Learning Program (LLP) for schools, introduced in 1991, was replaced by the School Language and Literacy Program from 1992. While retaining the focus of the former program on the needs of disadvantaged junior secondary school students, the new program was expanded to also include a focus on the early years of schooling, (kindergarten to Year 3). The Program was again reformulated under the National Equity Program for Schools (NEPS), introduced in 1993.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
Australia's
language: the
Australian
language and
literacy policy
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1991.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training, Annual
report
, 1991-92,
Canberra, 1992.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training, Review
1992
, DEET,
Canberra, 1992.

1992

Response to International Literacy Year identifies the costs of low literacy levels

Australia's report in response to International Literacy Year was released in 1992. It included a profile of the literacy problem in Australia. The report concluded that the most economically disadvantaged in Australian society were those with the lowest levels of literacy and it also referred to the societal costs of inadequate literacy levels. The report estimated that the cost in lost productivity because of low literacy levels to Australian industry was at least $3.2 billion annually. Putting literacy
on the agenda:
International
Literacy Year end
of year report
1990
, Literacy
and ESL Section,
Language and
Literacy Branch,
Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
Canberra, 1992.
1993

May

Report estimates up to 20 per cent of primary school students with literacy problems

The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training report, The Literacy Challenge, highlighted the lack of reliable national data on literacy. In its final report the Committee estimated that between 10 to 20 per cent of Australian children were finishing primary schooling with literacy problems. The Committee acknowledged that a basic grounding in literacy skills was a prerequisite for later learning and early education needed to be better resourced. Its final recommendations included increased funding for the primary school sector and proposals relating to the selection and training of teachers, the development of standard assessment tasks, and curriculum revision. House of
Representatives
Standing
Committee on
Employment,
Education and
Training,
The literacy
challenge: a
report on
strategies for
early intervention
for literacy and
learning for
Australian
children
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1993.
1993

April

Adult English Language and Literacy Strategy

The National Collaborative Adult English Language and Literacy Strategy (NCAELLS) was endorsed by Commonwealth and State Ministers of Education. The Strategy was an attempt to align and provide the strategic planning basis for the different areas of service provision, including vocational education and training, labour market programs, immigration settlement programs, and workplace reform programs. National
collaborative
adult English
language and
literacy strategy
,
Adult Literacy
Information Office,
[Sydney], 1993.
1994

Smith Family report links social disadvantage to literacy achievement

The Smith Family conducted a research study to measure the impact of social disadvantage on educational performance. The study found that 60 per cent of socially disadvantaged high school students had inadequate literacy skills compared to an estimated 10 to 20 per cent of the total school population. Orr, Elizabeth,
Australia's
literacy
challenge: the
importance of
education in
breaking the
poverty cycle for
Australia's
disadvantaged
families
,
Smith Family,
Sydney, 1994.
1994

May

Working Nation allocates funding for national survey of school literacy

The Commonwealth Government's White Paper on Employment, Working Nation, allocated approximately $2.6 million to collect reliable national data on the literacy levels of school students at three significant stages of schooling, to be completed by 1996.

The White Paper argued that, in relation to young people, there was a strong relationship between low levels of literacy and high levels of unemployment and other forms of social disadvantage.

Working nation:
policies and
programs
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1994.
1994

September

National Review of Education for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

In October 1993 the Commonwealth Government announced a review of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Policy which had been introduced in 1990. A discussion paper issued in May 1994 reported that approximately 45 per cent of ATSI primary school students had significantly lower levels of achievement in literacy and numeracy, compared to about 16 per cent of other Australian students. The final report of the Review, recognising that English was not the first language of many ATSI peoples, recommended that ATSI English language and literacy support services be provided in a similar manner to English as a Second Language (ESL) services provided to non-indigenous students whose first language was not English. Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
National Review
of Education for
Aboriginal and
Torres Strait
Islander People:
a discussion
paper
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1994.

Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
National Review
of Education for
Aboriginal and
Torres Strait
Islander People
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1994.

1995

January

Literacy funding for the early years of schooling

The Early Literacy Component of the NEPS was introduced to support literacy development for children from low socioeconomic backgrounds in the early years of schooling, (kindergarten to Year 3). Funding was provided to support intervention strategies and to provide professional development programs. Department of
Employment,
Education and
Training,
Commonwealth
programs for
schools 1995:
administrative
guidelines
, AGPS,
Canberra, 1995.
1995

June

Literacy survey trial conducted

The Commonwealth Government commissioned ACER to undertake a trial of procedures for collecting valid and reliable data on English literacy for students in Years 3, 5 and 10. On the basis of ACER's report on the trial's results it was recommended that a 1996 survey proceed for Years 3 and 5 only. Masters, Geoff N.,
Forster, Margaret,
Mapping literacy
achievement:
results of the 1996
National School
English Literacy
Survey
, DEETYA,
Canberra, 1997.
1995

August

Report on inter-generational literacy

A report on intergenerational literacy recognised the cross-generational connections in literacy outcomes and the effect of parent literacy practices on children's literacy development. The project surveyed intergenerational literacy programs and recommended the Commonwealth provide separate funding for these programs and encourage cross-sectoral cooperation. Toomey, Derek et al,
Supporting
intergenerational
family literacy
programs
, Dept.
of Employment,
Education and
Training,
Canberra, 1995.
1995

November

Report on teacher education in language and literacy

The Australian Language and Literacy Council in its report on teacher education in language and literacy recommended specific literacy training for teachers and continuing professional development. It also recommended the development of a coordinated strategy for addressing the literacy needs of children before they begin formal education. Australian
Language and
Literacy Council,
Teacher
education in
English language
and literacy
,
AGPS, Canberra,
1995.
1995

November

National Strategy for the Education of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

The National Strategy for the Education of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples was endorsed by all Education Ministers and included literacy priorities across the educational spectrum. The priority in the compulsory years of schooling was for improved English literacy and numeracy outcomes through the delivery of culturally appropriate programs that recognised the home languages of ATSI peoples. The English literacy and numeracy proficiency of adult ATSI peoples was also targeted through the delivery of community development training services. Ministerial
Council on
Education,
Employment,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
A National
Strategy for
the Education
of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait
Islander Peoples:
1996-2002
,
MCEETYA,
South Carlton,
Vic., 1996.
1996

February

Study of desert-based aboriginal communities

The Desert Schools project examined the English language and literacy development of secondary school age remote Aboriginal students. The report of the project acknowledged, as had many of its predecessors, that the goal for remote communities was English language and literacy proficiency for their children and for adults, alongside home language status and maintenance. In spite of the various educational strategies which had been promulgated for ATSI peoples it was reported that there appeared to be little achieved in terms of positive literacy outcomes, with the majority of students in the teenage years educated to functional English for oral communication in local situations and to Year 4 or 5 equivalent level in English literacy.

The recommendations of the report were similar to previous reports, with calls for culturally appropriate pedagogical approaches, equal status for English and community languages in a bilingual context, utilisation of Aboriginal educators with real teaching responsibilities, and the treatment of English as a second language.

Desert schools:
an investigation
of English
language and
literacy among
young Aboriginal
people in seven
communities
,
Dept of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Canberra, 1996.
1996

June

National School English Literacy Survey announced

Paper on a national literacy policy commissioned

Following on from an intention first expressed by the Minister in April, the then Minister for Schools, Vocational Education and Training Dr David Kemp announced, after consultation with State and Territory Education Ministers and peak non-government school authorities, that the National School English Literacy Survey would take place.

Dr Kemp also commissioned the National Language and Literacy Institute of Australia to prepare a paper on literacy policy, its scope being literacy in the school education context. The intention was that the paper would provide the philosophical and policy framework for the development of a national literacy policy.

Hon. Dr David
Kemp, 'A national
literacy goal',
Speech to the
Australian
College of
Education
Conference on
General and
Vocational
Education,
21 June 1996.
1996

July

Literacy Benchmarking Taskforce established by MCEETYA

The July 1996 meeting of the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) agreed to a new national goal 'that every child leaving primary school should be able to read, write, spell and communicate at an appropriate level'. It was further agreed that common literacy benchmarks at Years 3 and 5 and an agreed national framework for reporting achievements in English literacy and numeracy be developed. A MCEETYA Benchmarking Taskforce was subsequently established to develop draft national benchmarks for Years 3 and 5. 'National literacy
first',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David
Kemp, Minister
for Schools,
Vocational
Education and
Training,
18 July 1996.
1996

August-September

National School English Literacy Survey conducted

The National School English Literacy Survey was conducted in government and non-government schools in all States and Territories of Australia over a six week period.

ACER conducted the Survey under the direction of a Management Committee which included representatives from the Commonwealth, all school sectors, and education unions.

Masters, Geoff N.,
Forster, Margaret,
Mapping literacy
achievement:
results of the 1996
National School
English Literacy
Survey
, Dept of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Canberra, 1997.
1997

January

New schools literacy program

As a result of the streamlining of Commonwealth national priority programs for schools, a new literacy program was introduced, combining funding provided under the former Disadvantaged Schools and English as a Second Language (ESL) - General Support programs. It also included additional funding of $45 million over three years for a National Literacy and Numeracy Strategy.

The Literacy Programme has two funding strands:

Grants to Schools to foster literacy, the main objective of which is to improve outcomes for students from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds; and Grants for National Strategies and Projects.

Department of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Commonwealth
programmes for
schools
quadrennial
administrative
guidelines 1997
to 2000
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1997.
1997

March

Survey compares performance of 14 year olds between 1975 and 1995

A comparison of literacy and numeracy outcomes for 14 year olds between 1975 and 1995 found that there had been little change in average standards of reading and numeracy and reaffirmed the influence of socioeconomic factors on literacy outcomes. Marks, Gary N.
and Ainley, John,
Reading
comprehension
and numeracy
among junior
secondary school
students in
Australia
, ACER,
Camberwell, Vic.,
1997.
1997

March

Education Ministers endorse a national literacy and numeracy plan and a new sub goal for literacy and numeracy

Commonwealth, State and Territory Education Ministers endorsed a national literacy and numeracy plan to give effect to the national literacy goal which had been agreed to in July 1996. The plan included the comprehensive assessment of all students as early as possible, to identify those students at risk of not making adequate progress towards the national numeracy and literacy goals and take remedial action. It was also agreed that all students in Years 3 and 5 would be assessed against national benchmarks.

The Ministers also adopted a new sub-goal for literacy and numeracy: 'that every child commencing school from 1998 will achieve a minimum acceptable literacy and numeracy standard within four years'.

'National literacy
plan adopted',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for Schools,
Vocational Education
and Training,
14 March 1997.

Ministerial
Council on
Education,
Employment,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Information
statement,

6th MCEETYA
Meeting,
Melbourne,
14 March 1997,
web site at:
http://www.
curriculum.edu.
au/mceetya/mceetya/
mcee131.htm

(Nov. 1999).

1997

June

Report claims sectoral literacy problems rather than a general literacy crisis

The authors of Australian literacies avowed that there was no general literacy crisis in Australia but, rather, 'systematic underperformance' by particular groups. To achieve acceptable literacy outcomes for all, they argued for a multidimensional concept of 'literacies' encompassing a 'repertoire' of capabilities. The publication set the prerequisites for a literacy policy and synthesised research, practice and policy across Australia. Lo Bianco, Joseph
and Freebody,
Joseph,
Australian
literacies:
informing
national policy on
literacy
education
,
Language
Australia,
Belconnen, ACT,
1997.
1997

July

Literacy and numeracy achievement linked to education and labour market outcomes

Key findings from a study of the relationship between school achievement and future outcomes, included a strong relationship between literacy and numeracy skills and retention rates, and participation in further education. Young people with weak numeracy and literacy skills were more likely to experience long-term unemployment and lower average earnings at age 19. Lamb, Stephen,
School
achievement and
initial education
and labour
market outcomes
,
ACER,
Camberwell, Vic.,
1997.
1997

September

Adult literacy survey

The Australian Bureau of Statistics survey of adult literacy included people aged 15 to 74 across Australia and focussed on 'functional literacy and numeracy' necessary for daily life.

The survey found that approximately 19.5 per cent of those surveyed had very poor literacy skills that could be expected to create significant difficulties in dealing with many of the printed materials found in daily life. Approximately 27 per cent had literacy levels that would create moderate difficulties. The survey also found that people over 45 had weaker literacy skills and that there was a clear relationship between literacy levels and labour force status and income level. There was also a significantly greater proportion of indigenous people at the lower literacy levels.

Australian Bureau
of Statistics,
Aspects of literacy:
assessed skill
levels Australia
1996
,
Cat. No. 4228.0,
ABS, Canberra,
1997.
1997

September

Results of the 1996 National School English Literacy Survey released.

The results of the 1996 National School English Literacy Survey, conducted by ACER, were released by the then Minister for Schools, Vocational Education and Training, Dr David Kemp. The Survey found a wide range of literacy achievement among Australian school children at both Years 3 and 5. The findings, which reported against a range of achievement estimated to contain the draft benchmark, indicated that 21 per cent of Year 5 and 4 per cent of Year 3 students were achieving below the range of achievement for reading. The corresponding figures for writing were 15 per cent for Year 5 and 6 per cent for Year 3.

The publication of the Survey's results was surrounded by some controversy as the Minister released a second report on the survey which had been prepared at his request. This second report, Literacy standards in Australia, assessed the survey's results against required standards of performance for Years 3 and 5. It claimed that 27 per cent of Year 3 and 29 per cent of Year 5 students did not meet the required standards in reading while the corresponding figures for writing were 28 per cent and 33 per cent.

State and Territory Education Ministers released a joint statement which reaffirmed their commitment to the national literacy plan but expressed concern that agreement had not been reached on the proposed literacy benchmarks used in the second report. The statement also contained an alternative literacy plan.

Management
Committee for the
National School
English Literacy
Survey, Mapping
literacy
achievement:
results of the
1996 National
School English
Literacy Survey
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1997.

Australian
Council for
Educational
Research,
Literacy
standards in
Australia
,
Canberra, 1997.

'Education
Ministers reject
Kemp's attempt to
scuttle national
literacy plan',
Joint statement by
State and
Territory
Education
Ministers
,
21 September 1997.

1997

October

C'wealth literacy funding tied to development of literacy plans by States and Territories

The Minister for Schools, Vocational Education and Training, announced that the States and Territories, to secure their 1998 Commonwealth literacy funding, would be required to provide the Commonwealth Government with detailed literacy plans for ensuring that all children were reading and writing adequately by the end of Year 3. 'Literacy funding
conditions', Media
release
, Dr David
Kemp, Minister for
Schools, Vocational
Education and
Training,
6 October 1997.

Department of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
The allocation of
literacy
programme
grants to school
funds from 1998:
discussion paper
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1997.

1997

December

Education Ministers agree on development of literacy benchmarks

Commonwealth, State and Territory Education Ministers approved progress towards a set of literacy benchmarks (writing, spelling, reading), subject to validation and following consultations. 'Doorstop
interview:
Education
Ministers'
Meeting ...',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
11 December 1997.
1997

December

Report explores relationships between literacy learning and technology

The 'information age', as defined in this project which explored the relationships between technology and literacy, has broadened the concepts and parameters of literacy. The project's report called for governments, educational administrators and schools to respond to the pedagogical demands of these changing concepts and made recommendations for action. Department of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Digital rhetorics:
literacies and
technologies
in education-
current practices
and future
directions
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1997.
1998

February

Policy paper on C'wealth literacy policies for Australian schools

The Commonwealth Government released a policy paper consolidating and explaining its literacy and numeracy policies for Australian schools. The paper included an outline of policy principles and goals, funding strategies, contextual framework, and particular aspects of literacy, including the pedagogy of literacy, the needs of ESL, bilingual and indigenous students, assessment and intervention, home-school partnerships, technology and early schooling. Department of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Literacy for all:
the challenge
for Australian
schools
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1998.
1998

February

Literacy benchmarks questioned

The annual report on government services acknowledged the value of the development of national benchmarks. However it questioned the wisdom of and highlighted the limitations and inherent dangers of only using a single benchmark to report performance. The report argued that there was a need for benchmarks across the full spectrum of school performance. Steering
Committee for the
Review of
Commonwealth/
State Service
Provision, Report
on government
services 1999
,
The Committee,
Melbourne, 1999.
1998

May

Mutual obligation provisions for young people

The Commonwealth Government announced additional funding for literacy and numeracy training for young unemployed people as part of the mutual obligation provisions which required young people between 18 and 24 to undertake an additional activity in return for the receipt of their unemployment benefit. '$142.8 million
for literacy and
numeracy training
for unemployed
young people',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Employment,
Education,
Training, and
Youth Affairs,
12 May 1998.
1998

May

Relationships between school, home and community literacy practices explored

A case study was undertaken to explore the relationship between school, home and community group literacy practices and the implications for students' school success. The outcome was a recognition that schools have to be more cognisant of cultural and linguistic diversity to optimise students' success. The recommendations included funding for programs to support such practices and encourage community-based initiatives. Cairney, Trevor H.
and Ruge, Jenny,
Community
literacy practices
and schooling:
towards effective
support for
students
,
DEETYA,
Canberra, 1998.
1998

May

Report on English literacy skills in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students

An ACER report made recommendations to improve English literacy of ATSI students based upon a series of case studies linked to the results of the 1996 National School English Literacy Survey.

The report linked literacy outcomes for ATSI people to: teachers' appreciation of Aboriginal English; the development of strategies to make the transition from the language used at home to the standard Australian English used in the classroom; the importance of strategies to deal with hearing problems in Aboriginal students; the incorporation of the characteristics of the way Aboriginal students learn; homework centres; and the employment of ATSI education workers.

Batten, Margaret
et al., 'Enhancing
English literacy
skills in
Aboriginal and
Torres Strait
Islander students:
a review of the
literature and case
studies in primary
schools', ACER
monograph
, no. 54,
1998.
1998

August

Secondary school literacy and numeracy projects announced

The Minister for Schools, Vocational Education and Training, Senator Chris Ellison, announced funding of $5 million for projects to assist low achieving secondary school students to improve their literacy and numeracy skills. The projects included the development of curriculum materials, professional development of teachers, and piloting of new teaching strategies. '$5 million for
secondary school
literacy and
numeracy', Media
release
, Senator
the Hon. Chris
Ellison, Minister
for Schools,
Vocational
Education and
Training,
6 August 1998.
1998

October

National literacy benchmarks for Years 3 and 5 published

Following the release of draft benchmarks in June 1997, the Curriculum Corporation published national literacy benchmarks in writing, spelling, and reading for Years 3 and 5, approved by all Education Ministers in April 1998. Curriculum
Corporation,
Literacy
benchmarks
,
1998, web site at:
http://www.detya.
gov.au/schools/
Literacy/
Literacy_Bench
marks_Years3and5/
index.htm
,
(Nov. 1999).
1999

January

Report on early literacy development

A project was conducted to investigate literacy development prior to school and the connections between home, preschool and school. The project's findings emphasised the importance of the early years in literacy development, recognised the impact of different social and cultural backgrounds, warned against early testing programs, and recommended the establishment of national literacy guidelines for 3 to 8 years. Hill, Susan et al,
100 children go
to school:
connections and
disconnections in
literacy
development in
the year prior to
school and the
first year of
school
, Dept. of
Employment,
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
Canberra, 1998.
1999

January

Extension of literacy assessment and training requirements for unemployed

The Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Dr David Kemp, announced the extension of literacy and numeracy assessment and training requirements. Previously the policy had applied to 18 to 24 year olds who had been unemployed for six months. With this announcement, all unemployed people with poor literacy and numeracy skills, on Youth Allowance or Newstart Allowance, and sole parents participating in the Jobs, Education and Training Strategy, would be required to undertake literacy assessment and training. 'Government
tightens literacy
requirement for
unemployed',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
28 January 1999.
1999

February

Report on the effect of adult literacy classes

In 1992 the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs commissioned a five-year longitudinal study to examine the economic, educational and social outcomes for adults who participated in literacy education. The study found that literacy classes did affect employment outcomes, with the percentage gaining employment more than twice as high for the sample as in other long-term unemployed groups undertaking a Special Intervention Program. Griffin, Patrick et al.,
Skilling me softly:
a longitudinal
study of the
destination of
adult literacy
students
,
Assessment
Research Centre,
University of
Melbourne,
Melbourne, 1997.
1999

February

Australian Bureau of Statistics correlates literacy skills and employment outcomes

The ABS report on education and training for 1998 demonstrated a strong relationship between literacy skill levels and labour market outcomes. Labour force participation rates for people with high literacy skills were between 86 per cent to 89 per cent compared to 56 per cent to 60 per cent for those with low level literacy skills. Unemployment rates for people with poor literacy were four times that of people with high levels of literacy. Australian Bureau
of Statistics,
Education and
training in
Australia 1998
,
Cat. no. 4224.0,
ABS, Canberra,
1999.
1999

April

New national goals for schooling

Commonwealth, State and Territory Education Ministers endorsed a new set of national goals for schooling (the Adelaide Declaration), including the specific literacy goal that 'every student should be numerate, able to read, write, spell and communicate at an appropriate level'. Ministerial
Council on
Education,
Employment,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
The Adelaide
Declaration on
National Goals
for Schooling in
the Twenty-First
Century
,
MCEETYA,
Carlton South,
Vic., 1999.
1999

April

Primary principals surveyed about literacy and numeracy performance

A survey of primary principals found that primary schools were spending more class time on literacy and numeracy, albeit at the expense of other subjects, as schools struggled with the problems of a crowded curriculum. However, a majority of principals felt that student literacy performance was improving, particularly for low achieving students. Hill, Peter W.,
Hurworth,
Rosalind and
Rowe, Kenneth J.,
The place of
literacy and
numeracy in the
primary school
curriculum: a
national survey
,
DETYA,
Canberra, 1998.
1999

April

Education Ministers agree on the need for comparable literacy tests

Following a report of the MCEETYA Benchmarking Taskforce, which revealed that State and Territory 1998 literacy tests were not universally comparable across all aspects (only reading could be compared), State and Territory Education Ministers agreed to the redesign of their literacy tests for 1999 to allow for meaningful comparability between States and Territories. 'State and
Territory
Ministers
committed to
national literacy
benchmarks',
Joint statement
from State and
Territory
Ministers for
Education
,
23 April 1999.
1999

May

1999-2000 budget provides for literacy in middle schooling and indigenous literacy programs

The 1999-2000 Budget allocated $47.1 million to improve literacy and numeracy outcomes for students in the middle years of schooling, (Years 5 to 10). Prior to this announcement Commonwealth literacy programs had focused on the early years of schooling and, through the Full Service Schools Program, at risk students in the final years of schooling or those who had returned to school as a result of the mutual obligation provisions.

The Budget also provided for a National Indigenous English Literacy and Numeracy Strategy, supporting the general goals for literacy and numeracy by addressing the specific needs of indigenous students through the identification and dissemination of best practice models and teaching methods drawn from various pilot projects. Funding for the Strategy would be provided through existing funds under the Indigenous Education Strategic Initiatives Programme.

'Improving
literacy and
numeracy at
school',
Media Release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
11 May 1999.

'Improving
opportunities for
indigenous
Australians',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
11 May 1999.

1999

August

Nationally comparable literacy tests conducted

For the first time, Year 3 and 5 students in New South Wales, South Australia, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria undertook nationally comparable literacy tests. It is expected that in 2000 all States and Territories will participate in the trialing of a pool of common test items. 'Historic move as
States adopt
nationally
comparable
literacy and
numeracy tests',
Joint statement
from State and
Territory
Education
Ministers
,
4 August 1999.
1999

September

National Literacy Week

Following a ministerial announcement in March 1999, Australia's first National Literacy Week was held from 6 to 10 September 1999, to coincide with International Literacy Day on 8 September. The Commonwealth Government provided $1 million, matched by State and Territory contributions, to support public awareness activities in primary schools and other venues in local communities. A further $160,000 in cash prizes was provided to recognise schools through the National Literacy Week Awards for Literacy and Numeracy Achievement. 'National Literacy
Week',
Media release,
Hon. Dr David Kemp,
Minister for
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
16 March 1999.

Department of
Education,
Training and
Youth Affairs,
National Literacy
Week
, 1999,
web site at: http://www.deetya.
gov.au/literacyweek
, (Nov. 1999).

 

A Select List of Further Reading

Alloway, Nola, 'Reconceptualising early literacy achievement: moving beyond critique-paralysis', Australian journal of early childhood, vol. 24, no. 4, 1999, pp. 1-6.

Alloway, Nola and Gilbert, Pam, 'Reading literacy test data: benchmarking success?', Australian journal of language and literacy, vol. 21, no. 3, 1998, pp. 249-261.

Brock, Paul, 'Breaking some of the myths again', Australian journal of language and literacy, vol. 21, no. 1, 1998, pp. 8-26.

Christie, Frances, 'Point and counterpoint: benchmarking', Curriculum perspectives, vol. 18, no. 3, 1998, pp. 43-77.

Comber, Barbara, et al., 'Literacy debates and public education: a question of 'crisis'?', Reid, Alan, (ed.), Going public: education policy and public education in Australia, Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Deakin West, ACT, 1998, pp. 18-34.

Hammond, Jennifer, 'Literacy crises and ESL education, Australian journal of language and literacy, vol. 22, no. 2, 1999, pp. 120-134.

Hill, Peter, and Crevola, Carmel, 'Characteristics of an effective literacy strategy', Unicorn, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998, pp. 74-85.

Learning lessons: an independent review of indigenous education in the Northern Territory, Northern Territory Department of Education, Darwin, 1999.

Ochiltree, Gay, The first three years: an opinion on the need for and direction of early childhood intervention to improve the life chances of children in disadvantaged families, Brotherhood of St Laurence, Fitzroy, Vic, 1999.

Peach, Frank, 'The national literacy and numeracy strategies: implications for educators', Unicorn, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998, pp. 7-17.

Shopen, Glenda, and Liddicoat, Anthony J., Challenges for partnership: literacy at home and school in the middle years: final report of the ACT Supportive Practices for the Enhancement of Literacy Learning Project (ACT SPELL), ACT SPELL Project, Canberra, 1998.

Wignell, Peter, (ed.), Double power: English literacy and indigenous education, Language Australia, Melbourne, 1999.

 


top