Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Contents

Introduction
Commonwealth parliament
New South Wales
Victoria
Queensland
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory
Selected Overseas Parliaments
United Kingdom
Scotland
Wales
Northern Ireland
Republic of Ireland
Canada
United States
New Zealand
Summary of codes of conduct in Australian and selected overseas parliaments
 

 

 

 

 


Background Note Index

Background Note

A survey of codes of conduct in Australian and selected overseas parliaments

Online Only issued 15 June 2006; updated 19 July 2006

Deirdre McKeown Analysis and Policy
Politics and Public Administration Section

Introduction

The conduct of ministers and members of parliament is often in the news. The need for parliamentary codes of conduct, particularly ministerial codes, is discussed when the public duty and private interests of members of parliament are reported to conflict.

The development of parliamentary codes of conduct has varied in Australian federal, state and territory parliaments. In some states codes have been developed as the result of inquiries, for example in NSW (Independent Commission Against Corruption and the Greiner/Metherell affair) and in Queensland (Electoral and Administrative Review Commission formed as a result of the Fitzgerald inquiry).

This background note summarises the approach taken in federal, state and territory and some overseas parliaments to codes of conduct for ministers and members of parliament, registers of interests, the post-separation employment of ministers and the use of ethics commissioners in providing advice on and/or conducting investigations into breaches of codes. Where possible the publication provides links to relevant documents. It does not compare codes of conduct.

Some Australian parliaments have adopted codes of conduct for members while others only have a code governing ministerial behaviour. Only four Australian parliaments (New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia and Australian Capital Territory) have separate codes for ministers and members. All Australian parliaments have adopted registers of pecuniary interests and five have introduced codes governing the post-separation employment of ministers. Two Australian parliaments (New South Wales and Queensland) have ethics or standards mechanisms in place.

This e-brief also examines the codes of conduct in the parliaments of the United Kingdom, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland, Canada, New Zealand and the USA.

The Australian federal parliament and the New Zealand parliament have adopted a ministerial code of conduct and a register of interests while the Northern Territory parliament has introduced a register of interests. It could, therefore, be said that comparatively these three parliaments are the least accountable of those examined in this e-brief.

For background information on the feasibility, options and importance of a code of conduct for parliamentarians see A Code of Conduct for Parliamentarians?, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Research Paper No. 2, 1998–99, by Dr Andrew Brien. Information on the regulation of the post-separation employment of ministers is contained in Post-separation Employment of Ministers, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Research Note No. 40, 2001–02 by Dr Ian Holland.

top

Commonwealth parliament

Ministerial code of conduct

At present the Commonwealth has a guide to ministerial conduct titled A Guide on Key Elements of Ministerial Responsibility but no code of conduct for parliamentarians. Though the Hon. John Howard is the first Australian Prime Minister to establish a public ministerial code, academic John Uhr has noted that:

… given that the document is not a law or regulation and that it does not even have any formal parliamentary authorisation, there is nothing to stop the Prime Minister as author of the document from using his authority to alter or amend it or to interpret it as he sees fit. (John Uhr, ‘Howard's ministerial code’, Res Publica, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1998.)

This highlights how ministerial codes in Westminster-type systems are generally controlled by the executive itself rather than the parliament.

Members’ and senators’ code of conduct

Discussion on the introduction of a code of conduct covering senators and members has continued for more than two decades.

The issue of a code of conduct for parliamentarians was raised in the Joint Committee on Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament Report on Declaration of Interests tabled in both houses on 30 September 1975. The committee noted that the drafting of a code of conduct was beyond its terms of reference but recommended that a proposed Joint Standing Committee:

… be entrusted with the task of drafting a code of conduct based on Standing Orders, conventions, practices and rulings of the Presiding Officers of the Australian and United Kingdom Parliaments and such other guidelines as may be considered appropriate.

A committee of inquiry chaired by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, the Hon. Sir Nigel Bowen, was established by the Prime Minister, the Hon. Malcolm Fraser, on 15 February 1978 to report on public duty and private interest. The committee, known as the Bowen Committee, reported in July 1979 and recommended that a code of conduct be adopted for general application to all officeholders who were defined as Ministers, members of parliament, public servants and statutory office holders. A draft code was included in the report. The committee recommended in relation to members of parliament that:

The Senate and House of Representatives be invited to consider:

(a) amending their Standing Orders to include new Standing Orders requiring, respectively, Senators and Members of the House of Representatives to conform to the Code of Conduct; or

(b) passing a resolution adopting the Code of Conduct; and

(c) providing that a subsequent breach of the Code of Conduct should constitute misconduct and a breach of the privileges of Parliament.

An all-party working group of parliamentarians was established in 1992 to consider a code of conduct but the group's deliberations were interrupted by the 1993 election. The group was reconvened in March 1994 and produced a draft code of conduct for senators and members.  The group was not a formally constituted committee of the parliament.

On 21 June 1995 'A Framework of ethical principles for members and senators' was tabled in the Senate and the House of Representatives. An additional framework covering ministers and presiding officers titled 'A Framework of ethical principles for ministers and presiding officers' was also tabled. The then Speaker, the Hon. Stephen Martin, noted that the draft code for senators and members reflected the majority view of the working group that the code should be ‘an aspirational set of principles or values, within which each member must make appropriate decisions concerning his or her own behaviour’. This approach was considered preferable to ‘a very detailed set of rules and procedures governing all aspects of the behaviour of a member of parliament’. The working group did not recommend that the code be supported by an ethics committee or ethics commissioner. To date a code of conduct has not been adopted by the Senate or the House of Representatives.

Although there is no formal code of conduct, the conduct of members within parliament is guided by the Standing Orders of the Senate and the House of Representatives, while corruption and bribery of members of parliament is prohibited under the Commonwealth Criminal Code. The Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 prohibits other forms of interference with members of parliament.

top

Register of Interests

Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are required to report on their interests within 28 days of making the oath or affirmation as a member or senator. Registers of Interests were adopted by resolution of the House of Representatives on 8 October 1984 and the Senate on 17 March 1994. The Senate resolution also applies to senior officers of the Department of the Senate. Failure to comply with the requirements of the registers results in a contempt of the Parliament. Notification of alterations to members’ interests is tabled from ‘time to time as required’. Notification of changes to senators’ interests is tabled every six months.

On 15 September 2003 the Senate agreed to amendments to the resolutions relating to senators’ interests and declaration of gifts to the Senate and the Parliament. The amendments increase the value of gifts and assets that must be declared and remove the requirement that senators declare a conflict of interest or financial interest in an issue before voting in the Senate. The House of Representatives agreed to similar amendments relating to gifts and assets on 6 November 2003.

2004 Election policy

In the 2004 election the Australian Labor Party policies relating to ministerial and post-separation employment codes of conduct reflected the ALP’s National Platform and Constitution 2004. Chapter 16 ‘Delivering quality government’, paragraph 30 states:

Labor ministers will be required to adhere to a formal code of conduct which sets out the action to be taken when conflicts of interest, or perceived conflicts of interest, arise and which prohibits behaviour likely to bring discredit to the government. Former ministers will be required to adhere to a twelve month waiting period before they can take up employment in their most recent area of responsibility.

top

New South Wales

Ministerial code of conduct

In 1988 the Greiner Government introduced the ‘Code of Conduct for Ministers of the Crown’ which included a section on the post-separation employment of ministers. In October 1992 the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) produced a discussion paper on the resignation and post-ministerial appointment of the Hon. Terry Metherell titled Recruitment of Former Members of Parliament to the Public Service and Related Issues. This paper provides some details on the ministerial code. In April 1997 ICAC produced a report titled Managing Post Separation Employment which noted that the then ministerial code did not include post-separation employment. In 1998 an ICAC report on Parliamentary and electorate travel (second report) recommended that ‘… as a priority a new Ministerial Code of Conduct should be implemented.’ On 10 October 2000, in answer to a question without notice dated 31 August 2000 on the development of a new code of conduct, the then Treasurer, the Hon. Michael Egan, stated ‘The Government has an existing Ministerial Code of Conduct. The Government will keep this code under review, including examination of developments in other jurisdictions’.

Members of Parliament code of conduct

The 'Code of Conduct, Members of Parliament, New South Wales' was proposed by the then Premier, the Hon. Bob Carr, on 31 March 1998 as a way of solving the disagreement between the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council over the code. The ‘Premier's Code’ as it was known was adopted by resolution of the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1998 and by resolution of the Legislative Council on 26 May 1999. The Code covers six areas: conflict of interest, bribery, gifts, use of public resources, use of confidential information, and duties as a member of parliament.

The members’ code of conduct was adopted in response to section 9 (1) of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 which states:

that conduct does not amount to corrupt conduct unless it could constitute or involve … in the case of conduct of a Minister of the Crown or a member of a House of Parliament—a substantial breach of an applicable code of conduct.

Should the ICAC find that a member of parliament has substantially breached the code of conduct the finding is reported to the member's House which decides on the disciplinary action it should take.

The NSW Parliament fact sheet on accountability claims that the link between the breach of a code of conduct and corrupt behaviour is unique among legislatures and that this link gives the code ‘teeth’ that many other codes lack.

The ICAC Act also established standing ethics committees for each House of the NSW Parliament. The committees are required to review the code of conduct at least once in each two-year period.

Post-separation and secondary employment codes of conduct

ICAC reviewed the members’ code of conduct in relation to secondary employment for members of the Legislative Assembly. ICAC’s report titled Regulation of Secondary Employment for Members of the NSW Legislative Assembly was released in September 2003. It recommended amendments to the code of conduct including a prohibition on paid advocacy and a much stricter regime of disclosure for members engaged in secondary employment. The report also recommended that the register of pecuniary interests should be publicly available on the internet. On 18 February 2004 the Legislative Assembly Standing Committee on Parliamentary Privilege and Ethics resolved to examine ICAC’s recommendations and report to the House. The Committee’s report was tabled in September 2004.

ICAC also reviewed the post-separation employment of ministers in the report released in June 2004 titled Report on the Investigation into the Conduct of the Hon. J. Richard Face. One of the report’s recommendations was that ‘the Government introduce rules to restrict the range of employment that Ministers can take up immediately after leaving office’.

On 28 March 2006, in answer to a question without notice, the Premier, Hon Morris Iemma, announced amendments to the ministerial code of conduct relating to the post-separation employment of ministers. He stated that these amendments:

provide that former Ministers must, during the first 12 months of leaving office, obtain written advice from the Parliamentary Ethics Adviser before accepting any employment or engagement, or providing services to third parties. This obligation will apply where the proposed employment relates to portfolio responsibilities held during the last two years of ministerial office. A similar obligation will apply to current Ministers who, while still in office, are planning post-separation employment or businesses.

The Premier also announced changes covering the secondary employment of members:

… members of Parliament will be required to update the register of members’ interests every six months instead of every year. The Government will also introduce motions in each House to amend the members’ code of conduct, requiring members to disclose at the start of a parliamentary debate the identity of any person by whom they are employed or engaged. It will also require the disclosure of the identity of any client of any such person or any former client who benefited from a member’s services within the previous two years. … The Government will also propose amendments to the members’ codes of conduct to strengthen the prohibition on bribery in response to recommendations made by the former Legislative Assembly Standing Ethics Committee.

top

Disclosure of Pecuniary Interests

The requirement that members disclose their pecuniary interests was introduced in the Constitution (Disclosures by Members) Amendment Act 1981. This was achieved through the introduction of Section 14A into the Constitution Act 1902.

The Parliamentary Ethics Adviser

In September 1998 the Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council passed resolutions to appoint a parliamentary ethics adviser. The then Premier, Hon Bob Carr, described the role of the ethics adviser as providing independent assistance and advice ‘to members of Parliament in resolving ethical issues and problems’.  The ethics adviser does not give legal advice and does not investigate breaches of the code of conduct. The adviser is required to report to Parliament at the end of his/her annual term on the number of ethical matters raised, the number of members who sought advice, the amount of time spend on these matters and the number of times advice was given.

The President of the Legislative Council, the Hon. Dr Meredith Burgmann, outlined the models considered for the Parliamentary Ethics Adviser in her paper Constructing Legislative Codes of Conduct delivered in June 2000.

top

Victoria

Victoria's Code of Conduct is included in the Members of Parliament (Register of Interests) Act 1978 (Victoria). This legislation also contains clauses referring to a register of interests. The code states that members of the Victorian Parliament are bound to observe a range of standards (listed in paragraphs (a) to (f)) which cover confidential information, receipt of financial benefits, avoidance of conflict of interest, ad hoc disclosure and obligation as ministers. Under the Register of Interest provisions members are required to provide information on: income source, company positions and financial interests, political party membership, trusts, land, travel contributions, gifts, and other substantial interests. Infringement of the code constitutes contempt for which the member may be fined up to $2000 by his or her House. The non-payment of this fine renders the member's seat vacant.

top

Queensland

The office of Queensland Integrity Commissioner was created by the 1999 amendment to the Public Sector Ethics Act 1994. The Integrity Commissioner is an independent officer who ‘advises Queensland Government public officials on conflicts of interest’. Those able to request advice include the Premier, ministers and parliamentary secretaries and chief executive officers of government agencies. The list of ‘designated persons’ who may seek advice from the Integrity Commissioner also includes government members but not opposition members of parliament. Questions can relate to conflicts of interest relating to persons under their administration or their own situation. According to the Commissioner's First Annual Report to the Premier in June 2001, the Commissioner's purpose 'is to help Ministers and others to avoid conflicts of interest, and in so doing to encourage confidence in public institutions'.

On 5 September 2000 the Members' Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee tabled the Report on a Code of Ethical Standards for members of the Queensland Legislative Assembly and proposed Code of Ethical Standards. The Government's response was provided to the Clerk of the Parliament on 5 December 2000.

Queensland's current Code of Ethical Standards Legislative Assembly of Queensland, dated September 2004, consists of the following sections:

  • the Statement of fundamental principles (first adopted by the Assembly on 17 May 2001);
  • Overview of obligations;
  • Complaints procedure including Procedures for raising and considering complaints (first adopted by the Assembly on 8 August 2001); and
  • Resolving conflict of interest.

The Code includes other requirements derived from legislation, Standing Orders, resolutions of the House, and practice and procedure. The disclosure of interests was adopted by resolution by the Legislative Assembly on 25 May 1999, effective from 1 July 1999. The Members' Interests Resolution is included in the Code of Ethical Standards (Appendix 1).

On 28 February 2006, in response to complaints about the prolonged absences in Thailand of MP Robert Poole, the Premier, Hon Peter Beattie, stated that tougher accountability measures should be examined for all members. He moved that the Legislative Assembly:

… request that the Members’ Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee review the provisions covering the absence and leave of members of parliament including:

  • how many days a member can be absent from the Legislative Assembly before he or she is required to notify the House;
  • the development of guidelines on how members of parliament should be required to notify the parliament or their
  • electorate if they will be absent for a sustained period of time;
  • consideration of appropriate reasons for extended absence from both parliament and the member’s electorate; and
  • whether it is appropriate for members of parliament to engage in business activities or employment which would require

    significant time away from electoral duties and, if so, whether guidelines for such activities should be developed

In reviewing these provisions the Premier suggested that the Committee needed to look at ‘Westminster systems elsewhere in the world and in Australia’. He also stated that ‘I have not set a time line for this issue’. The motion was passed.

The role of the Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee is outlined in sections 90–93 of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001.

top

Western Australia

One the Hon. Dr Geoff Gallop’s first acts after becoming Premier in February 2001 was to introduce a Ministerial Code of Conduct (tabled 30 May 2001). The current code, dated March 2005, contains a section on post-separation employment of ministers.

On 11 April 2006, in answer to a question on notice on changes to the ministerial code of conduct, the Leader of House representing the Premier in the Legislative Council, Hon Kim Chance, stated that:

… a number of changes to the Code to enhance the capacity to deliver good government are currently under consideration, including the development of new guidelines to better define the obligations of Ministers under sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Code.

He also said that a date for the introduction of the revised code ‘has not been scheduled at this time’.

Dr Gallop tabled a Draft Code of Conduct for Members of the Western Australian Legislative Assembly on 14 March 2002. The code was considered by the Procedure and Privileges Committee which presented its report on 27 February 2003.  The majority report contains background information on the development of a members’ code of conduct. Following an often bitter personal debate an amended code was adopted by the Legislative Assembly on 28 August 2003. The code does not include specific penalties for breaches of the code. These are dealt with under Standing Orders.

A Draft code of conduct for Members of the Western Australian Legislative Council was tabled on 20 March 2002. The draft code was referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and Privileges for consideration and report.

Under the provisions of the Members of Parliament (Financial Interests) Act 1992 all members are required to declare their pecuniary interests. Section 4 states that 'a Member of either House who wilfully contravenes or fails to comply with section 4 (1) is guilty of a contempt of the House of which he is a Member, and that House may deal with him accordingly'.  Section 4 (1) details when members are to lodge returns with the Clerk:

A Member shall — 

(a) within 30 days after the day on which he is sworn in lodge a primary return with the Clerk;
(b) not later than 30 September in each year lodge an annual return with the Clerk.

top

South Australia

On 16 May 2002 the Premier, the Hon. Mike Rann, announced the introduction of a Code of Conduct for Ministers. The code came into effect on 1 July 2002 and contains a statement on post-separation employment of ministers at Section 7.

On 20 February 2003 the Premier moved that a joint committee of the parliament be established to introduce a code of conduct for all members of parliament. On 14 July 2003 the House of Assembly passed an amended motion which included the removal of the committee's reporting deadline of 1 October 2003.

The committee report dated 14 October 2004 recommended that a code of conduct in the form of a Statement of Principles be adopted for Members of Parliament. The Committee believed that the Statement of Principles would provide:

  • A valuable statement of the principles applying to public life for the benefit of Members;
  • A reference point for both Members and the public of South Australia to assist them to understand a Member’s duties in complying with the obligations of public life; and
  • An educational tool to better inform the public of the duties and obligations of Members of Parliament.

The committee also recommended that the Statement of Principles be adopted by way of a resolution of each House of Parliament. To date the Statement of Principles has not been adopted by either House.

Members are required to declare their interests under the provisions of the Members of Parliament (Register of Interests) Act 1983. Section 7 states that failure to comply with the Act will result in 'a penalty not exceeding five thousand dollars'.

top

Tasmania

The ‘Code of Ethical Conduct for Members of the House of Assembly’ and ‘A Code of Race Ethics for Members of the House of Assembly’ are located in the House of Assembly Standing Orders and Rules (Part 2). This code was adopted in 1996 and has a brief preamble, a statement of commitment and a list of nine general declarations about a range of issues. There is also a statement on post-separation employment which states that members ‘when leaving public office and when they have left public office, must not take improper advantage of their former office’.

Members are required to report on their interests under the provisions of the Parliamentary (Disclosure of Interests) Act 1996. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act may result in a member being in contempt of Parliament.

top

Australian Capital Territory

A Code of Conduct Governing Ministers was tabled by the then Chief Minister, the Hon. Kate Carnell, on 2 May 1995. In her tabling speech Ms Carnell noted that the code ‘is applicable to the immediate families or close relatives of Ministers and ministerial staff employed under the Legislative Assembly (Members' Staff) Act of 1989’. A revised ministerial code was tabled on 26 August 1998. This code was reviewed and a revised Code of Conduct for Ministers was released in February 2004. The code includes a section on post-separation employment of ministers.

The Standing Committee on Administration and Procedure has tabled a number of reports on a code of conduct for members recommending that a code be adopted. On 25 August 2005 the Legislative Assembly voted to adopt the Code of conduct for all Members of the Legislative Assembly of the Australian Capital Territory. The code covers subjects such as conflict of interest, receipt of gifts, advocacy/bribery, use of confidential information, conduct as employers, use of entitlements and use of public resources.

Members are required to report on their interests in accordance with a Resolution dated 7 April 1992 titled 'Declaration of Private Interests of Members' (amended 27 August 1998 and 17 March 2005).

top

Northern Territory

On 20 June 2002 the Chief Minister, the Hon. Clare Martin, moved that the draft Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards and draft amendments to the Legislative Assembly (Register of Members’ Interests) Act 1982 be referred to the Standing Orders Committee for inquiry and report during the October sittings 2002. In June 2003 the Committee’s reporting date was extended to February 2004. The Committee’s report was tabled on 26 February 2004 and recommended that:

  • Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
    Your committee recommends that the following Code be adopted by the Legislative Assembly subject to the enactment of a Legislative Assembly (Members Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards) Act; and  
  • Legislative Assembly (Registration of Members’ Interests) Bill
    Your committee recommends that the following Draft Bill be agreed to by the Legislative Assembly in conjunction with the Draft Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Members.

The committee’s report was adopted on 31 March 2004.

Currently members are required to report on their interests under the provisions of the Legislative Assembly (Register of Members’ Interests) Act. A new Legislative Assembly (Disclosure of Interests) Bill is being drafted in the terms of the Committee’s recommendation.

Selected Overseas Parliaments

United Kingdom

Ministerial code of conduct

Ministerial conduct is governed by A Code of Ethics and Procedural Guidance for Ministers dated July 2005. The code notes (paragraph 1.4) that:

Ministers only remain in office for so long as they retain the confidence of the Prime Minister. He is the ultimate judge of the standards of behaviour expected of a Minister and the appropriate consequences of a breach of those standards, although he will not expect to comment on every allegation that is brought to his attention.

Since its 9th report in 2003 the Committee on Standards in Public Life* has pushed for changes to the system for inquiries into allegations of breaches of the Ministerial Code. On 16 March 2006 the Prime Minister, the Hon Tony Blair, used his monthly press conference to announce the appointment of an independent adviser on ministers’ interests:

we will look at establishing a new independent adviser on Ministers’ interests that won't simply advise on the fact of individual cases, though the judgement in the end has to be for the Prime Minister, but also advise Ministers specifically on how to handle their interests in any potential conflict of interest. 

* Note that the Committee on Standards in Public Life is an independent, non-departmental body of the Cabinet Office which reports to the Prime Minister with policy recommendations to ensure the highest standards of propriety in public life.

On 23 March 2006 the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman announced that Sir John Bourn, former Comptroller and Auditor General, had been appointed as the independent adviser on ministers’ interests.

The ministerial code (paragraph 5.29) also outlines arrangements governing post-separation employment:

On leaving office, Ministers should seek advice from the independent Advisory Committee on Business Appointments about any appointments they wish to take up within two years of leaving office.

The Code states (paragraph 1.6) that ‘Ministers must also comply at all times with the requirements which Parliament itself has laid down, including in particular the Codes of Conduct for their respective Houses’. For Ministers in the House of Commons these are outlined in the Resolution carried on 19 March 1997 and for Ministers in the House of Lords in the Resolution carried on 20 March 1997.

The Code also requires Ministers to report overseas visits costing in excess of Ł500 and gifts received over the value of Ł140. This information is publicly available on the Cabinet Office: the Propriety and Ethics team website.

Members’ code of conduct

The first report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life (the Nolan Committee) recommended that the House of Commons introduce a new code of conduct for members; an improved Register of Members’ Interests; an independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; and a strengthened Committee on Standards and Privileges.

The Code of Conduct together with the Guide to the Rules Relating to the Conduct of Members was adopted by the House of Commons on 24 July 1996. It included the seven general principles of conduct underpinning public life which were advocated by the Nolan Committee: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership.

The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standard’s most recent annual report (2004–05) reports on the review of the code of conduct. The Commissioner believes that the recommended changes:

… give the Code greater prominence and clarity as well as strengthening it along lines previously recommended by the Committee on Standards in Public Life

The Committee on Standards and Privileges advised the House of Commons to accept all the recommended changes to the Code. The House approved the new version of the Code of Conduct together with the Guide to the Rules Relating to the Conduct of Members on 13 July 2005.

The seventh report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life (the Neill Committee) recommended that the House of Lords adopt a code of conduct. The House of Lords Code of Conduct came into effect on 31 March 2002.

Register of Interests

Under a Resolution agreed by the House of Commons on 22nd May 1974, and under the Code of Conduct, Members are required to register their pecuniary interests in a Register of Members' Interests. The duty of compiling the Register rests with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards whose functions are set out in a Standing Order of the House of Commons and include those formerly exercised by the Registrar of Members’ Interests. The first annual report (2002–03) of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards outlines the history of the position and its current role.

The Commissioner is also responsible for maintaining and monitoring the Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants and the Register of Journalists’ Interests.

The Register of Lords’ Interests is compiled by the Lords Registrar under the authority of the Clerk of the Parliaments.

The Register of Members’ Interests and the Register of Lords’ Interests are available electronically.

top

Scotland

The Scottish Ministerial Code sets out ‘a code of conduct and guidance on procedures for Members of the Scottish Executive and Junior Scottish Ministers’. Section 9.24 contains a statement on the post-separation employment of ministers. On the question of policing the Code, section 1.2 states:

Ministers must also … adhere at all times to the requirements the Parliament has itself laid down. It is for individual Ministers to judge how best to act in order to uphold the highest standards. They are responsible for justifying their conduct to the Parliament. And they can only remain in office for so long as they retain the First Minister’s confidence.

The Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament was agreed by resolution of the Parliament on 24 February 2000 and came into force immediately. The Code was revised on 1 May 2003. On 27 June 2002, the Parliament passed the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002, establishing an independent Commissioner to deal with complaints against Members. Details of the complaints procedure are outlined in Section 10 of the Code of Conduct.

At its meeting on 25 April 2006 the Standards and Public Appointments Committee considered a paper on a revised structure for the Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament. The Committee noted that any changes to the Code would require the agreement of the Parliament.

Members of the Scottish Parliament are required to report on their interests under the provisions of The Scotland Act 1998 (Transitory and Transitional Provisions) (Members' Interests) Order 1999. A Register of Members’ Staff Interests has also been established. The Register covers staff employed under the Members’ Allowances Scheme, as agreed by the Parliament on 16 March 2000, to assist members in carrying out their parliamentary duties.

Wales

An amended Ministerial Code: a Code of Conduct and Guidance on Procedures for Ministers was approved by the National Assembly for Wales on 4 December 2001. Chapter 10 deals with ministers’ private interests including the acceptance of appointments after leaving ministerial office.

The Assembly also has a Code of Conduct for Members. The Committee on Standards of Conduct considers complaints referred to it by the Presiding Officer and any matters of principle relating to the conduct of Assembly Members generally and oversees the Register of Members’ Interests. The National Assembly Commissioner for Standards is an independent person appointed by the National Assembly. The Commissioner provides:

… advice and assistance on any matters of principle relating to the conduct of Assembly Members, and is an independent investigator of complaints that Members of the Assembly have breached any Code, Protocol or resolution of the Assembly

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland has a Ministerial Code (not available in electronic format) which was adopted by the Executive on 9 February 2000. The code was under review when the process of devolution was suspended in October 2002.  The Northern Ireland Assembly remains suspended. The current code contains a section on the post-separation employment of ministers.

On 14 December 1999 (amended 15 October 2001) the Northern Ireland Assembly approved the Code of Conduct together with the Guide to the Rules relating to the Conduct of Members. This document also contains rules governing the registration and declaration of Members’ Interests, as well as offering guidance on their practical application.

Republic of Ireland

The Cabinet Handbook provides guidance to ministers and ‘facilitates the dispatch of government business’. It includes a section on ethics and conflict of interest. In December 2002 the Standards in Public Office Commission published a revised document titled Guidelines on compliance with the provisions of the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001 for office holders. These guidelines were drawn up by the Government and cover office holders such as the Prime Minister, Ministers of State and Ministers of Government.

The relevant acts governing conduct of members of the Oireachtas (Irish Parliament) are the Standards in Public Office Act 2001 and the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995. The Standards in Public Office Commission is an independent body established in December 2001 by the Standards in Public Office Act. The main functions of the Commission are to:

… publish guidelines, to provide advice on request to assist compliance with the Ethics Acts and to investigate and report in relation to possible contraventions. Generally, these functions relate to office holders, special advisers and designated directors and employees of specified public bodies.

The Standards in Public Office Act (section 10) also created a Committee on Members’ Interests for the Dáil (lower house) and a Committee on Members’ Interests for the Seanad (upper house). These Committees are required to draw up codes of conduct which are adopted by resolution of the relevant house. The Dáil Code was adopted on 28 February 2002 and the Seanad Code was adopted on 18 April 2002. Members of the Oireachtas are required to declare their interests in accordance with the provisions of the Ethics in Public Office Act.

In April 2006, in answer to questions on the code of conduct for office holders, the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) outlined the operation of the ethics framework in the Irish Parliament:

The code of conduct does not stand in isolation. It is part of the wider framework of the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 and the Standards in Public Office Act 2001. They must be read together and that is the point made by the commission. The code cannot impose new requirements that are not legislatively based. It can, however, be used by the commission as guidance to whenever a complaint is made under section 4 of the Act, which provides for complaints of a breach of ethics. The Standards in Public Office Commission oversees implementation of the Acts and guidelines and has specific statutory powers to investigate and make findings on failures of compliance with the Acts. The Acts are taken together and the code is admissible in any proceedings before a court, a tribunal or a committee of the House. The code, in its own right, indicates standards of conduct and integrity for officeholders where these are not expressly covered by legislation. It can be used against a Member.

top

Canada

The Privy Council Office publishes Accountable Government: a Guide for Ministers (2006) which ‘sets out core principles regarding the role and responsibilities of Ministers in Canada’s system of responsible parliamentary government’. This guide operates in conjunction with the code covering ministers’ ethical behaviour outlined below.

In March 2004 an amendment to the Parliament of Canada Act created the Office of the Ethics Commissioner. The Office is vested with parliamentary privileges and operates within the parliamentary framework.

The major responsibilities of the Ethics Commissioner, who reports directly to Parliament, are:

  • administer the Prime Minister’s Conflict of Interest and Post-employment Code for Public Office Holders (2006) including the Public Registry for Public Office Holders, including Ministers, Ministers of state and Parliamentary secretaries. Under this code Public Office holders are required to report on their interests. This code also governs the post-separation employment of ministers.
  • administer the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons adopted by the House of Commons on April 29, 2004. As part of this responsibility, the Office maintains the registry of the public disclosure summaries of Members. This code is an appendix to the Standing Orders of the House of Commons.
  • provide confidential opinions to Members of the House of Commons and advice to Public Office Holders, on any matter regarding their obligations under the Code to which they are subject
  • conduct inquiries, on behalf of Parliament, at the request of Members of Parliament, of Members of the House of Commons, either as members or as Public Office Holders, on questions of compliance with either Code, as applicable

The Ethics Commissioner is required to submit two reports each year to Parliament on activities related to Members of the House of Commons and on activities related to Public Officer Holders. The first annual report (2004–05) on Members of the House of Commons also contains background information on the Office of the Ethics Commissioner.

The Office of the Senate Ethics Officer was created in 2004 as a result of An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (Senate Ethics Officer and Ethics Commissioner) and other Acts in consequence.

The Senate’s first Ethics Officer was appointed in February 2005 and assumed responsibilities in April 2005. The Senate approved the Conflict of Interest Code on 18 May 2005.

The Senate Ethics Officer is independent of government and is an Officer of the Senate. The Ethics Officer operates under the general direction of a committee established under the Parliament of Canada Act for the purposes of the Code.

The role of the Ethics Officer includes providing advice and recommendations to Senators on the standards and obligations set under the Conflict of Interest Code, preparing annual public disclosure statements and undertaking inquiries and investigations.

top

United States

Under the US Constitution, (Article 1, Section 5) the Senate and the House of Representatives are responsible for establishing rules to govern the conduct of their members, as well as judging members alleged to have violated those rules. The Senate Select Committee on Ethics publishes an Overview the Senate Code of Conduct and Related Laws of (Senate Rules 34–43) and the Senate Ethics Manual.

The House of Representatives Committee on Standards of Official Conduct has jurisdiction over the rules and statutes governing the conduct of Members while performing their official duties. The Committee publishes Highlights of House Ethics Rules and an Ethics Manual which is currently under revision. The Code of Official Conduct (Rule XX111) is found in the House of Representative Rules.

As a result of the conviction for fraud in March 2006 of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, the Senate and the House of Representatives introduced related bills in late 2005 and early 2006 aimed at making the relationship between lobbyists and members of the legislature more transparent. These bills include a range of provisions that place restrictions on the relationship between lobbyists and members of both Houses and their staff and impose additional disclosure requirements on lobbyists. The legislative process is still underway.

The Ethics in Government Act 1978 requires members, officers, and certain employees of the US Congress and related offices to file annual Financial Disclosure Statements.

The post-separation employment of heads of executive agencies (appointed by the President) and other government employees is governed by Title 18 Section 207 of the US Code. The Office of Government Ethics provides advice on compliance with this code. This Office is the supervising ethics office for the executive branch of government.

top

New Zealand

Information on the conduct of ministers is contained in the section titled Public duty and private interests of ministers and parliamentary under-secretaries (paragraphs 2.46-2.77) in the Cabinet Manual. All Ministers and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries are also required to lodge an annual declaration of assets and interests with the Registrar of Ministers’ Interests. The Prime Minister tables the Register of Ministers’ Assets and Interests in the House each year. The administration of the Register is the responsibility of the Cabinet Office.

The Members of Parliament (Pecuniary Interests) Bill was introduced into Parliament on 7 October 2003 and read a first time on 16 October 2003. The main purpose of the Bill was to require Members of Parliament to disclose their pecuniary interests through a Register of Pecuniary Interests. The Parliament voted to refer the bill to the Standing Orders Committee.

The Standing Orders Committee presented its report on 23 June 2005 and recommended that the bill not proceed but that its provisions, with amendments, be incorporated into the Standing Orders.

On 12 August 2005 the Speaker’s Office issued a press release stating that the changes proposed in the bill had been incorporated into the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. An electronic summary of annual returns is made available by the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Summary of codes of conduct in Australian and selected overseas parliaments

Australian parliaments

 

Federal

NSW

Vic

Qld

Tas

SA

WA

ACT

NT

Ministerial Code

   

 

Members’ code

 

 

 

Post–separation employment

 

   

 

Register of interests

Ethics/standards mechanism providing advice or conducting investigations

 

 

         

Overseas parliaments

 

UK

Scotland

Wales

Nthern Ireland

Republic of Ireland

Canada

New Zealand

USA

Ministerial Code

 

Members’ code

 

Post–separation employment

 

 

Register of interests

Ethics/standards
mechanism providing advice or conducting investigations

 

For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.

top