 |
Bills Digest No. 32 2000-01
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1)
2000
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Legislation Amendment Bill (No.
1) 2000
Date Introduced: 28 June
2000
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Agriculture,
Fisheries and Forestry
Commencement: With
the exception of a technical amendment to the Public Employment (Consequential
and Transitional) Amendment Act 1999 (item 8 of Schedule 2), this
Act is to commence on a date to be fixed by Proclamation, or not later
than 6 months after Royal Assent. The amendment to the Public Employment
(Consequential and Transitional) Amendment Act 1999 is to commence
retrospectively on 11 November 1999 which is the date that Act received
Royal Assent.
Schedule 1 of the Bill proposes to
amend the Quarantine Act 1908 to
- recognise that quarantinable pests and diseases may themselves be
matters of quarantine concern
- confirm that offences against State and Territory laws may be relevant
to a person's suitability to manage a place where goods subject to quarantine
may be treated or dealt with
- allow seizure notices to be given to consignees, particularly of mail
articles, even though they may not be the importers of the goods, and
- introduce a regime for the use of electronic notices in the quarantine
clearance of goods.
Schedule 2 of the Bill proposes to:
- amend the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation Act 1980 to
correct an anomoly with voting arrangements at the Australian Wine and
Brandy Corporation's Annual General Meetings, and
- make a technical correction to the Public Employment (Consequential
and Transitional) Amendment Act 1999 by substituting the term 'an
Agency' for 'a Department of the Commonwealth'.
As there is no central theme to the Bill, the background
to the amendments will be included in the Main Provisions of this Digest.
Amendments to the Quarantine Act 1908
Quarantine in Australia is administered by the Australian
Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS), an operating group within the
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Following the Nairn
Report on Australian Quarantine: a shared responsibility (1996),(1)
AQIS has concentrated on measures to address pre-border, border and post-border
quarantine concerns.(2) AQIS tries to ensure that, to the maximum
extent possible, quarantine risks are addressed overseas before goods
are imported into Australia. It does this by monitoring the animal and
plant health situation and by setting up certification procedures (eg.
for fumigation) in exporting countries.
Australian quarantine services at the border include
surveillance, monitoring, examination and clearance, and are normally
performed at airports, seaports, quarantine stations and authorised premises.
Quarantine officers are stationed in both capital cities and regional
centres such as Broome, Cairns and Newcastle. Items of quarantine concern
are seized and placed under quarantine control. Quarantine officers may
issue orders about the movement and treatment of goods. Some goods are
treated before being returned to the person who has imported them, and
others are destroyed or exported. According to the latest annual report,
AQIS intercepted almost 228 000 prohibited items in 1998-99. Of these,
9 000 involved pests or diseases of economic concern.(3)
International mail is also subject to quarantine clearance, and this is
carried out by profiling, scanning or inspection. During 1998-99 162 million
mail articles were processed.(4)
In general, pests and diseases are declared as quarantinable
diseases and quarantinable pests if they are not established in Australia.
At present all goods infected with a quarantinable disease or quarantinable
pest are subject to quarantine under subsection 18(2) of the Quarantine
Act 1908 (the Act). Item 5 of Schedule 1 of the Bill inserts
a proposed new paragraph 18(2)(ba) to define quarantinable diseases
and quarantinable pests themselves as 'goods'. The effect of this is that
they will now become subject to quarantine control. Section 35 of the
Act deals with the order into quarantine which a quarantine officer may
issue in writing. Item 6 inserts a proposed new subsection 35(1AA)
to cover the order into quarantine of quarantinable pests and diseases,
consistent with the amendment made to subsection 18(2) of the Act. Items
13 and 14 make similar amendments to the treatment of vehicles and
the treatment of premises that may have been exposed to a quarantinable
pest or disease. In the same manner, item 16 extends the definition
of 'infected goods' in subsection 66AA(5) to include quarantinable diseases
or quarantinable pests.
Section 46A enables the Director of Quarantine to approve
a place other than a quarantine station as a place where goods that are
subject to quarantine may be treated or dealt with. In order to obtain
approval to manage such a place, the owner or occupier must submit a written
application, pay a fee and be prepared to make and sign a declaration
regarding any prior offences concerning the importation or movement of
goods. At present, section 46A is limited to offences against Commonwealth
laws. Items 7, 8 and 9 amend section 46A so that information about
offences against prescribed State and Territory laws may be sought from
an applicant and taken into consideration by the Director of Quarantine
when granting an approval or suspending or revoking approvals under the
section. Item 11 substitutes a proposed new paragraph 48(1)(a).
The effect of this amendment is to remove the restriction that allows
goods to be detained at the place where they are located, at the time
they are located, only when the goods are located on board a vessel or
installation.
Under section 68 a quarantine officer may give a notice
to the importer or the owner of plants, animals and other goods imported
into Australia, stating that the goods have been seized and forfeited
to the Commonwealth, and that they will be sold, destroyed, exported or
otherwise disposed of in any way that a Director of Quarantine thinks
appropriate. The amendment proposed by item 20 extends paragraph
68(4)(a) so that the notice may also be given to a consignee. The purpose
of this proposed amendment is to allow the requirements of section 68
to be satisfied by giving the notice to the addressee of a mail article,
even though he or she may not be the importer in the usual sense of the
word.
Automated systems for quarantine clearance
of cargo
AQIS uses a number of computerised information systems
to improve the efficiency and reliability of its operations. These systems
are directly linked to the Australian Customs Service (ACS). In 1996 the
Nairn Report on Australian quarantine recommended that:
[Recommendation 63]
...Quarantine Australia develop and increase the
use of electronic information systems to speed the clearance of cargo,
subject to the development of satisfactory quality assurance systems
and audit procedures.(5)
In August 1997 the Government responded to the Nairn
Report and said, with regard to the increased use of electronic systems
for cargo clearance:
The Government endorses the proposal that AQIS continue
to develop and enhance electronic systems that facilitate cargo clearance
and that AQIS incorporate into its electronic systems industry requirements
for the electronic clearance of cargo.
The electronic system AQIS uses to process approximately
195,000 quarantine entries a year and transmit electronic cargo releases,
commonly known as AIMS, requires redevelopment to continue to be an
effective cargo processing and clearance system. The application has
been in operation since 1992 and the changes in technology and modifications
of adjoining systems have made it essential that the system undergo
significant redevelopment to ensure it will continue to function effectively
in a changing electronic trading environment.
The importance of redeveloping the AIMS application
is apparent in the direct impact on AIMS of a number of other recommendations
made by the Nairn Review Committee, which rely on the system for retrieval,
processing and transmission of import data. The AIMS application is
also integral to gathering data to enable AQIS to target exotic pests
and diseases and develop policy strategies.
The Government has approved additional funding of
around $2.597 million over the next four years to improve existing
joint systems with the ACS consistent, whenever possible, with the
ACS Cargo Management Strategy.(6)
Item 15 of Schedule 1 inserts a proposed
new Part VA to provide for the automation of procedures for goods
arriving in Australia. Proposed new subsection 56(1) provides
that an electronic notice may be given to a person, or to an agent of
that person, who has imported goods that have not been released from quarantine.
An electronic notice is defined in proposed new subsection 56(11)
to mean a notice generated from a computer program under the control of
the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine.
Proposed new subsections 56(5) and 56(6) create
offences for contravening a requirement contained in an electronic notice.
According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the requirement that the
person be 'given' the notice will protect him or her from being prosecuted
if they do not receive the electronic notice.(7) The Explanatory
Memorandum states that the courts have interpreted the word 'given'
as requiring service of the notice on the relevant person. If the electronic
notice is lost or sent to the wrong person, the intended recipient remains
unaware of the notice and therefore has not been 'given' the notice.
Proposed new subsections 56(5) and 56(6) deal
with the presumption of whether an electronic notice has been received
or not. Section 16 of the Act already provides for written notices to
be sent by electronic means. At present the presumption under section
16 is that if a notice has been sent electronically, then it has been
received. Regulations made under section 16AG deal with the evidence that
a person may use to prove that they have, or have not, been given an electronic
notice. The proposed new subsections 56(5) and 56(6) appear to
reverse this presumption. Following the information in the Explanatory
Memorandum, the presumption seems to be that if a person denies receiving
an electronic notice, then the prosecution has to prove that it was given.
Proposed new subsection 56(8) provides that if
an electronic notice is inconsistent with an earlier electronic notice,
the earlier notice is of no effect to the extent of the inconsistency.
This is a rule intended to reconcile any inconsistent electronic notices
generated by the computer.
The existing powers of quarantine officers under the
Act are not altered by the introduction of the automated system. Proposed
new subsection 56(10) provides that where an order or direction given
by a quarantine officer in inconsistent with an electronic notice under
section 56, the electronic notice is, to the extent of the inconsistency,
of no effect.
Amendments to the Australian Wine and
Brandy Corporation Act 1980
The Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation (AWBC) is
the statutory authority with responsibility for the promotion and regulation
of Australian wine, wine products and brandy. The Corporation draws the
bulk of its revenue from the wine and brandy producers who pay the Wine
Grapes Levy and the wine and brandy exporters who pay the Wine Export
Charge. These levy and charge payers are recognised under the Australian
Wine and Brandy Corporation Act 1980 (the Principal Act) as having
the right to attend and vote at the Annual General Meetings of the Corporation.
A charge on exports of Australian wine is imposed by
the Wine Export Charge Act 1997. The purpose of the charge is to
raise funds from the industry to fund the export promotion program managed
by the AWBC.(8) The export charge is imposed at the request
of the wine industry in order to carry out a generic export promotion
program which the industry regards as an essential component of its export
growth strategy.(9) In the twelve months ending July 1999,
the wine industry achieved $1 billion in export sales.(10)
Estimated revenue from the Wine Export Charge and Wine Grapes Levy is
as follows:
| |
Estimated Revenue 1999-2000
$ 000
|
Estimated Revenue 2000-2001
$ 000
|
|
Wine Export Charge
|
994
|
1 011
|
|
Wine Grapes Levy
|
5 346
|
5 581
|
Source: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Portfolio,
'Portfolio Budget Statements 2000-01, Budget related paper no. 1.1,
p. 83.
Section 29U of the Principal Act defines who may attend
the annual general meetings of the AWBC. Only people identified on the
annual list of producers as levy or charge payers have voting rights at
the annual general meetings (subsection 29V of the Principal Act). The
effect of items 1 and 2 of Schedule 2 is to treat trusts and partnerships
liable for the wine export charge consistently with those that pay the
wine grapes levy.
Item 3 of Schedule 2 repeals section 29Z of the
Principal Act which deals with voting at AWBC annual general meetings.
The provisions of section 29Z are to be incorporated into the Australian
Wine and Brandy Corporation (Annual General Meeting of the Industry) Regulations
1999. Section 46 of the Principal Act contains the regulation making
powers of the legislation. Items 5, 6 and 7 add to the matters
on which the Governor-General may make regulations concerning the annual
general meeting of the AWBC. In particular, item 6 adds the power
to make regulations on the method of determining votes that an eligible
producer may cast (presently included in subsection 29Z(1)). Item 7
adds the power to make regulations on the confidentiality of voting presently
included in subsection 29Z(2).
Schedule 13 of the Primary Industries (Customs) Charges
Act 1999 deals with the wine export charge. Subclause 5(1) of that
Act concerns regulations for working out the amount of the charge. The
effect of item 4 of Schedule 2 is to provide a reference to the
existing requirements that permit the AWBC to make recommendations to
the Minister, under certain circumstances, on the rate of the wine export
charge.
The purpose of item 8 of Schedule 2 is to correct
an earlier amendment to the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation
Act 1980 by substituting the term 'an Agency' for 'a Department of
the Commonwealth'. This proposed amendment is to commence retrospectively
from 11 November 1999, this being the date on which the Public Employment
(Consequential and Transitional) Amendment Act 1999 received Royal
Assent. (The amended section of the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation
Act 1980 deals with the wine label integrity program and enables the
Corporation to provide levy information to the relevant Agency. The earlier
amendment was misdescribed to subsection 39ZL(1) instead of to subsection
39ZL(1A).)
- Australian Quarantine Review Secretariat, Australian Quarantine:
a shared responsibility, [by] M.E.Nairn, P.G.Allen, A.R.Inglis and
C.Tanner, Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Canberra, 1996.
- The Australian Quarantine Report, 'Quarantine Activities and
Achievements, August 1997-December 1998', AQIS, May 1999, p. 2.
- Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Annual Report
1998-1999, p. 40.
- ibid., p. 29.
- Australian Quarantine Review Secretariat, op cit, p. 136 (Recommendation
63).
- Australian quarantine: a shared responsibility: the Government
response, circulated by John Anderson, Department of Primary Industries
and Energy, Canberra, August 1997, p. 27.
- Explanatory Memorandum, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Legislation Amendment Bill (No 1) 2000, p. 7.
- Press Release, Minister for Primary Industries and Energy,
13 February 1997.
- Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation, Annual Report 1995-96,
p. 22.
- Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation, Annual Report 1998-99,
p. 23.
Rosemary Bell
4 September 2000
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and
Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure
that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information
publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are
those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and
Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues
contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and
for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal
opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary
or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2000
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their
official duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2000.

|
 |