Bills Digest No. 83 1998-99
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Imposition - Customs) Bill 1998
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does
not have any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted
to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Date Introduced: 2
December 1998
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Treasury
Commencement: 1
July 2000
Purpose
To impose the tax that is payable
under the GST law, insofar as it is a duty of customs, within the meaning
of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1998.
Background
1.0 Exclusive Power Over Customs, Excise
and Bounties
Section 90 of the Constitution prohibits the
States from levying customs duties and excise duties. The expression
of section 90 also prevents self-governing Territories from imposing
customs and excise duties. By virtue of section 90, only the Federal
Parliament can impose such taxes.
'A customs duty is a tax imposed on goods imported
into, or exported out of, Australia. In contrast an excise duty is a
tax which is imposed on goods which are already in circulation in Australia.'(1)
2.0 Further Background
For additional background information please refer
to the Bills Digest for the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax
Imposition-General) Bill 1998.
Main Provisions
1.0 Imposition
Subclause 3(1) states that the tax that is payable
under the GST law(2) (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Goods
and Services Tax) Act 1998) is imposed by this section under the name
of goods and services tax (GST).(3)
Subclause 3(2) imposes the GST only so far as
it is a duty of customs within the meaning of section 55 of the Constitution.
Please refer to the discussion above at paragraph 3.0 for further information
in relation to this issue.
2.0 Rate
Clause 4 imposes the rate of the goods and services
tax payable under the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act
1998 at 10 per cent.
3.0 State Property
Clause 5 ensures that the legislation imposing
the GST does not apply to property of any kind belonging to a State.(4)
The Territories are not included within the ambit of this section. Please
refer to 'Concluding Comments' for further discussion on this topic.
Concluding Comments
1.0 The Constitution
does not protect the States from a GST on transactions which affect
its property unless the tax can truly be characterised as a tax on the
ownership or holding of property
Section 114 of the Constitution(5) is one of
the few sections in the Constitution defining the nature of intergovernmental
immunities. It prevents the Commonwealth Parliament from legislating
so as to tax property of any kind belonging to a State. The definition
of a 'State' does not include a Territory.(6)
Judicial decisions appear to have adopted a narrow
interpretation of section 114 so as only to protect the States against
a tax imposed by reason of the ownership or holding of property. (7)
This approach has led the High Court to decide, for
example, that section 114 did not prevent the Commonwealth from taxing
car and housing fringe benefits provided by the State to its employees.
This is because section 114 'protects the property of a State from a
tax on the ownership or holding of property but it does not protect
the State from a tax on transactions which affect its property, unless
the tax can truly be characterised as a tax on the ownership or holding
of property.'(8)
Thus section 114 does not afford the States with protection
from a GST in relation to every form of transaction to which a State
is a party. It is restricted to prohibiting the imposition of a goods
and services tax where such a tax is characterised as one on the ownership
or holding of property.
2.0 Naming of GST bills
From a practical perspective, the titles of all GST
Bills appear to be unnecessarily lengthy and indeed cumbersome. The
words 'A New Tax System' could be deleted from each title without affecting
the relevance of the title to the particular piece of legislation. Presumably,
the title has been used to make it easier for the Parliament to identify
those Bills which form part of the GST package. The use of lengthy titles
may, however, cause some problems for practitioners who will be referring
to the legislation in later years.
Endnotes
- Lumb & Moens, The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia,
Annotated, Fifth Edition, Butterworths, 1995, p 438.
- A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1998
GST law means:
(a) this Act; and
(b) any Act that imposes GST; and
(c) the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Transition) Act
1998; and
(d) the Taxation Administration Act 1953, so far as it relates
to any Act covered by paragraphs (a) to (c); and
(e) any other Act, so far as it relates to any Act covered by paragraphs
(a) to (d) (or so much of that Act as is covered); and
(f) regulations under any Act, so far as they relate to any Act covered
by paragraphs (a) to (e) (or so much of that Act as is covered).
- A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1998
GST means tax that is payable under the GST law and imposed as goods
and services tax by any of these:
(a) the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Imposition-General)
Act 1998; or
(b) the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Imposition-Customs)
Act 1998; or
(c) the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax Imposition-Excise)
Act 1998.
- Property of any kind belonging to a State has the same meaning
as attributed to it by judicial interpretation in respect of section
114 of the Constitution. It is not actually defined in section
114.
- Section 114: A State shall not, without the consent of the
Parliament of the Commonwealth, raise or maintain any naval or military
force, or impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to the
Commonwealth, nor shall the Commonwealth impose any tax on property
of any kind belonging to a State.
- The Constitution, section 6
- South Australia v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR235, 248.
- Queensland v Commonwealth (1987) 162 74, 98.
Lesley Lang and Simon Lang
21 January 1999
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and
Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure
that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using
information publicly available at the time of production. The views
expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the
Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal
policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary
debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official
parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators
and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1999
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of
their official duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1999.
|