Bills Digest no. 7 1976
Federal Court of Australia
Bill, 1976
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Summary
Implications
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Federal Court of Australia
Bill, 1976
Date introduced: 21 October 1976
House: House of Representatives
Short Digest of Bill
The purpose of the Bill:
To establish a new federal Court, to be known as the Federal
Court of Australia.
Summary:
The Bill would create the Federal Court
of Australia (cl. 5 (1) (hereinafter referred to as the Court) to be
a superior court of record and a court of law and equity (cl. 5 (2))
and to consist of a Chief Judge and other judges as are appointed (cl.
5 (3)). The Court will sit in two Divisions, the Industrial Division
and the General Division. All the jurisdiction of the Court will be
exercised in the General Division except that which is required by any
Act to be exercised in the Industrial Division. The Court may be constituted
in either Division by a single Judge or as a Full Court. (cl.
13 and 14). The powers of the Court will extend throughout Australia
and the Territories (including every external Territory). (cl.
18 and 3). The Court will be an itinerant Court, go on circuit
and sit as required in each State and Territory. (ss.
12 and 34).
The Court is intended, to have (1) original
and (2) appellate and related jurisdiction. It is not intended that
indictable offences will be prosecuted in the Court.
The original jurisdiction of the Court is
not specified but the Court will have the present original jurisdiction
of the Australian Industrial Court and the Federal Court of Bankruptcy.
The original jurisdiction will be exercised by a Full Court in the Industrial
Division and by a single Judge in the General Division. It is intended
that the Court may make binding declarations of right in any matter
in which it has original jurisdiction. (Part III – Division 1).
In the appellate jurisdiction the Court
has jurisdiction to hear appeals (a) from a single Judge of the Court;
(b) from judgments of the Supreme Court of a Territory; and (c) in such
cases as are provided by any other Act, from judgments of a State court,
other than a Full Court of the Supreme Court of a State, exercising
federal jurisdiction. Under the Constitution the Court will also have
jurisdiction in matters associated with matters of federal jurisdiction
before the Court. These associated matters if they arose in isolation
might not be matters of federal jurisdiction but require to be disposed
of at the sane time as a matter before the Court so that the rights
of the parties may be finally determined.
It is intended that an appeal shall not
lie after the commencing day from a judgment of the Supreme Court of
a Territory except by leave or special leave of the High Court or the
Supreme Court before the commencing day. State and Territory courts
from which an appeal lies to the Court may state a case or reserve a
question of law to the Court alone. (cl. 26).
The appellate jurisdiction of the Court will be exercised by a Full
Court except where otherwise expressly provided in any Act. (Part III,
Division 2). It is intended that an appeal shall lie from the Full Court
of the new Court to the High Court only by special leave of the High
Court. (Part IV).
Implications:
The High Court will be relieved of some
of its work-load in federal and Territory law matters and have more
time to concentrate on constitutional matters and its role as the final
appellate court in Australia.
The Bill does not affect the functions of
the Family Court of Australia nor the original jurisdiction exercised
by State courts. The provisions which enable judges of the Territory
Supreme Courts to sit in the Court on appeals from their own courts
will benefit the appellate work of the Court in Territory matters. The
provisions concerning the Industrial Division of the Court mean that
the special character of the industrial jurisdiction under the Conciliation
and Arbitration Act will be preserved.
The Court is to have jurisdiction only with
respect to those matters specified by Parliament. The effect of the
restrictive appellate provisions from the Court to the High Court is
that the Court will be the authority in the specific matters within
its jurisdiction. The result should be uniformity of interpretation
of the law in these matters.
Complementary legislation will be introduced
to establish a comprehensive appellate structure for the Territories.
K.I. Inglis
29 October 1976
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament
using information available at the time of production. The views expressed
do not reflect an official position of the Information and Research Service,
nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the
public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2006
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their
official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2006.

|