 |
Research Note no. 13 2003-04
The Use of Cannabis for Medical Purposes
Maurice Rickard
Social Policy Group
15 September 2003
The Premier of NSW has proposed that a four year
trial of the medicinal use of cannabis be conducted in NSW.(1)
This research note examines the background to the medicinal use of cannabis,
recent overseas experience, and areas of possible Commonwealth involvement
with the NSW trial.
The Proposed Cannabis Trial
The proposal for a trial follows an advisory report
commissioned by the NSW government, and a public consultation process.
In line with the advisory report's recommendations, cannabis would be
prescribed in the trial for (i) the relief
of chronic or severe pain in patients for whom other palliative and
analgesic treatments have proven unsuccessful; and (ii) the relief of
symptoms of certain medical conditions for which cannabis has been shown
to have therapeutic benefits, including:
It is proposed that patients would register with
an Office of Medical Cannabis in the NSW Department of Health, and provide
a certificate from their long-standing medical practitioner that conventional
treatments have been unsatisfactory. Those not eligible for the trial
would include people under 18 years of age, pregnant women, people on
parole, and those who have been convicted of a drug offence (other than
for minor personal use).
There are different ways of providing cannabis for
the trial. The NSW Premier has indicated a particular interest in an
oral spray that has been trialled in the UK
over the past three years.(2)
The Therapeutic Evidence
There is debate about the therapeutic effectiveness
of cannabis. It is generally agreed, however, that there is sufficient
pre-clinical evidence to justify conducting more extensive controlled
clinical trials. The beneficial actions attributed to the active components
of cannabis are:(3)
The most recent survey of the evidence(4)
suggests that the most promising therapeutic uses for cannabis are in
the management of chronic pain which is unresponsive to standard analgesics,
and also in the management of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis.
Cannabis may also slow the progress of degenerative neurological conditions,
such as Parkinson's disease.
Some studies warn against over-optimism, noting that
cannabis may, in some cases, have no greater effect on chronic pain
than existing analgesics.(5)
Adverse Effects
Cannabis is known to have adverse effects, including
short-term impairment of motor-coordination, attention span and memory.
The effects of longer-term smoking of cannabis include low level cognitive
impairment, as well as the possible inducement or exacerbation of psychotic
disorders in individuals vulnerable to them. It is unclear whether cannabis
causes psychosis, or whether people with incipient psychosis are using
cannabis as a form of 'self-medication' to relieve symptoms. However,
very recent evidence does not support the 'self-medication' view.(6)
There is also emerging evidence that heavy cannabis use is linked with
depression.(7)
In a clinical trial, the occurrence of adverse effects
is monitored, as well as the positive therapeutic ones. A medical practitioner
will take potential 'unwanted' effects into account when deciding whether
a patient will benefit on balance from cannabis therapy.
Overseas Experience
The International Narcotics Control Board has encouraged
research into the therapeutic possibilities of cannabis.(8)
Canada and the US
states of Oregon, Alaska, Hawaii and California(9) have recently
adopted laws allowing the medicinal use of cannabis. The Netherlands
has recently made cannabis available on prescription from pharmacies.
In all these cases, a physician's recommendation
is required. The medical conditions for which cannabis is supplied in
these overseas locations are generally the same as those for which it
will be available in the NSW trial. In the US
states, patients use cannabis they acquire or cultivate themselves.
Canada and The Netherlands
are making pre-packaged therapeutic grade cannabis available to patients.
In Canada,
there have been 582 approved medical cannabis users as of July 2003
(0.002% of its population). This is a 54% increase since its inception
in July 2001.(10) Of the total population of Oregon,
Alaska and Hawaii, 0.05% (2,454 people) were registered as medical cannabis
users, as of September 2002.(11)
Commonwealth Involvement
The NSW trial would need reliable access to research
grade cannabis. Cannabis is not currently approved by the Therapeutic
Goods Administration (TGA) for therapeutic use in Australia.
Application or notification needs to be made to the TGA to exempt the
supply or importation of cannabis from restriction. A medicinal cannabis
trial must be approved and monitored by an appropriate Human Research
Ethics Committee, in accordance with National Health and Medical Research
Council guidelines. The TGA must also be assured of the safety of the
trial. Under certain conditions, if the TGA becomes aware that a trial
is 'contrary to the public interest', it can direct that the trial not
be conducted.(12)
Various other Commonwealth
laws may need to be considered in the conduct of a medicinal cannabis
trial. Depending on how cannabis is to be supplied for the trial, these
might include the Customs Act 1901, the Narcotic Drugs Act
1967, and the Crimes (Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances) Act 1990. The Commonwealth has extensive constitutional
power to legislate in relation to drugs, including illicit drugs.
Sending the Wrong Message?
It is sometimes argued that to allow an illegal substance
like cannabis to be legally used in certain contexts, sends a 'wrong'
or 'mixed' message. It might be thought that this weakens the deterrence
that a legal prohibition of cannabis might have, and therefore acts
to increase cannabis use, particularly among young people. Some brief
observations can be made about this.
-
Most drugs and substances are 'scheduled' in state
legislation to allow some uses, but not others. This is not generally
thought of as sending mixed messages.
-
Some drugs, like cocaine and morphine are routinely
used for medical purposes. This has not led to questions about mixed
messages, nor has it resulted in a discernible increase in their illicit
use.
-
Although it is not conclusive, there is evidence
that the frequency of cannabis use among young people has not increased
in overseas jurisdictions with medicinal cannabis programs. Since
medicinal cannabis programs began in Oregon and Hawaii, there has
been no increase in the frequency of cannabis use among final year
high school students.(13)
Similarly, in California, juvenile marijuana arrests did not increase
between 1996 and 2001.(14)
These three observations do not support the view
that trialling the medicinal use of cannabis will have the detrimental
impacts thought to be associated with sending a wrong or confusing message.
-
Mr
Bob Carr, NSW Legislative Assembly, 20
May, 2003, p. 696.
-
ibid.
-
P.
Robson, 2001, 'Therapeutic Aspects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids', British Journal of Psychiatry, no. 178,
pp. 10715.
-
D. Baker, et
al., 2003, 'The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis', The
Lancet, vol. 2, pp. 291298.
-
P.
Campbell, et al., 2001 'Are Cannabinoids
an Effective and Safe Treatment Option in the Management of Pain'
British Medical Journal, no. 323,
pp. 1316.
-
J. Rey, & C. Tennant, 2002, 'Cannabis and Mental Health:
More Evidence Establishes Link Between use of Cannabis & Mental
Illness' British Medical Journal, no. 325, pp. 118384.
-
ibid.
-
Annual Report 1998, International Narcotics Control Board, Section 106.
-
Along with
four other states.
-
Office of Medical Cannabis Access, Canada.
-
US General Accounting Office, 2002, Marijuana: Early
experience with Four States' Laws that allow use for medical purposes.
-
If the trial is conducted under the TGA's 'CTN' scheme
for clinical trials. (Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990, Schedule
5A, Item 3(e)).
-
State of Oregon, Dept. of Human Services, Centre for Health Statistics.
State of Hawaii, Dept. of Health 2002 Hawaii Student
Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use Study.
-
Crime and Delinquency in California, California Dept. of Justice, 2001.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to Members
of Parliament.

|
 |