National
Emergency Intervention in the Northern Territory
A series of reports about levels of child-sex
abuse in Indigenous communities in the Northern
Territory (most notably the June 2007
Little
Children are Sacred) prompted the Commonwealth to announce,
then legislate for a series of emergency measures.
The measures included financial and non-legislative
measures, such as child-health checks and additional child-protection
workers, and legislative measures such as:
- removing the permit system governing access to Aboriginal
land in the Northern Territory
- creating five-year Commonwealth leases, and enabling the
Commonwealth to acquire certain rights, titles and interests
in certain town camps
- introducing an Income Management Regime, which might involve
many Indigenous people having some or all of their welfare
payment diverted
- discouraging the use of alcohol in Aboriginal communities
by using various penalty provisions
- providing that the Commonwealth can retain an interest
in buildings and infrastructure that it funded on Aboriginal
land
- banning the possession of pornography within ‘prescribed
areas’, and requiring the installation of filters on publicly
funded computers
- extending the mandate of the Australian Crime Commission
to include ‘Indigenous violence and child abuse’
- removing customary law as a consideration in sentencing
or setting bail, but requiring the impact on victims and witnesses
to be taken into account, and
- providing for Commonwealth management of ‘business management
areas’ and closer management by the Commonwealth of community
stores.
Many people welcomed the intervention as
offering a long-overdue injection of resources and attention
to a chronic problem. However, others raised questions, including:
whether it was necessary to go beyond the recommendations
in the Little Children are Sacred report (which the Howard
Government acknowledged it was doing)
- whether the lack of consultation might produce counter-productive
disempowerment
- whether measures regarding communal land ownership and
the permit system were related to the Howard Government’s
desire to make changes in this area from the time of the Reeves
report, Building on Land
Rights for the Next Generation, and
- whether a ‘real jobs’ plan, such as Work for the Dole and
the Strategic Training Employment Program (STEP), could support
the employment and environmental management that the Community
Development Employment Projects (CDEP) had been supporting.
In addition, the legislation itself gave
rise to a number of controversies.
First, the Australian Labor Party, minor
parties and the Human
Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission raised concerns
about the manner in which the legislative package overrode the
Racial
Discrimination Act 1975. If affected communities had
enjoyed appropriate consultation, the package could have been
seen as a ‘special measure’ under both the International Convention
on Race Discrimination (CERD) and the Racial Discrimination
Act. As it stands, the legislation is likely to breach the provisions
of the CERD.
Second, it has been claimed in a High Court
action (Wurridjal v Commonwealth, set down for
a directions hearing on 3 December 2007) that the legislation
provides for the acquisition of native-title rights other than
on ‘just terms’ as required by section 51(xxxi) of the
Constitution.
Third, the alcohol provisions have had unexpected
consequences both in the Northern Territory
major population centres and in Aboriginal communities. (See,
for example, Paige Taylor,
‘Grog
ban leaves people hungry’, in The Australian, which
describes higher prices and hunger in communities.) A Northern
Territory parliamentary
inquiry has suggested other ways forward.
There is sure to be much more debate on this
intervention as elements are reviewed and evaluated.
Library documents
‘Northern Territory
National Emergency Response Bill 2007’, Bills Digest,
no. 28, Parliamentary Library, Canberra,
2007–08.
‘Social Security
and Other Legislation Amendment (Welfare Payment Reform) Bill
2007’, Bills Digest, no. 27, Parliamentary
Library, Canberra,
2007–08.
‘Families, Community
Services and Indigenous Affairs and Other Legislation Amendment
(Northern Territory National Emergency Response and Other Measures)
Bill 2007’, Bills Digest, no. 21, Parliamentary Library,
Canberra, 2007–08.
‘Appropriation
(Northern Territory National Emergency Response) Bill (No. 1)
2007-2008’, Bills Digest, no. 24, Parliamentary
Library, Canberra, 2007–08.
‘Aboriginal Land
Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Township Leasing) Bill
2007’, Bills Digest, no. 165, Parliamentary
Library, Canberra, 2006–07.
Documentation
Jon Altman and Melinda Hinkson (eds), Coercive Reconciliation:
Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia, Arena Publications,
Melbourne, 2007.
Jon Altman, The
'National Emergency' and Land Rights Reform: Separating fact
from fiction. An assessment of the proposed amendments to the
Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976,
Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU, 2007, briefing
paper for Oxfam Australia.
A proposed
Emergency Response and Development Plan
to protect Aboriginal Children in the Northern Territory:
a preliminary response to the Australian Government’s proposals,
Combined Aboriginal Organisations of the Northern
Territory, 2007.
|