Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Science, Technology, Environment & Resources - Internet Resources

Stem Cells

Parliamentary Library Publications

2 February 2006.

Lockhart Review

  • On 17 June 2005, the former Minister for Ageing, the Hon Julie Bishop MP, appointed a committee to conduct independent reviews of Australia's Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002. The chair was The Hon John S Lockhart AO QC. The Committee's reports were released in December 2005.

The Committee made 54 recommendations.

Recommendation 23

Human somatic cell nuclear transfer should be permitted, under licence, to create and use human embryo clones for research, training and clinical application, including the production of human embryonic stem cells, as long as the activity satisfies all the criteria outlined in the amended Act and these embryos are not implanted into the body of a woman or allowed to develop for more than 14 days.

Council of Australian Governments (COAG)

  • Statement from the 18th COAG meeting in Canberra, 14 July 2006.

Lockhart Review
COAG noted that agreement had not yet been reached across jurisdictions on all the 54 recommendations of the Lockhart Review Committee Report. However, COAG agreed that officials would continue to work on those Lockhart Review recommendations of an administrative nature on which there is agreement and report back to COAG by December 2006.

While COAG restated its preference for nationally consistent arrangements, in the absence of national agreement some States and Territories reserved the right to alter the legislation within their own jurisdictions to the extent that is within their power.

Useful Web Links

Australia

Overseas

United Kingdom


Canada.

United States

  • Judith J. Johnson & Erin D. Williams, Human cloning, CRS Report for Congress, 20 July 2006.

Further References

  • Karen, Tumulty, Nancy Gibbs, & Sonja Steptoe, 'Stem cells. The hope and the hype', Time, 7 August 2006, pp. 27–35.
    • 'Making sense of stem cells'.
    • 'The politics of science'.
    • 'The brawl in California'.
  • 'Stem cells', Nature Insight, vol. 441 no. 7097, 29 June 2006, pp.1059–1102.

    Includes articles:

    • Austin Smith, 'A glossary of stem-cell biology', (p.1060).
    • K. Hochedlinger & R. Jaenisch, 'Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency'—a particularly good, but very technical summary by Jaenisch, a key player, about obstacles faced by scientists for each of the major avenues for obtaining human embryonic stem cells (p.1061–1067).
    • O. Lindvall & Z. Kokaia, 'Stem cells for the treatment of neurological disorders' (p.1094–1096).
    • D. Srivastava & K.N. Ivey, 'Potential of stem-cell-based therapies for heart disease' (p. 1097–1099).
    • C. Bordignon, 'Stem-cell therapies for blood diseases' (p. 1100–1102).
  • Hane Smith, William Neaves & Steven Teitelbaum, 'Letter: Adult stem cell treatments for diseases?', Science, 28 July 2006, vol. 313, no. 5786, p. 439.
    • includes references to claims that applications of adult stem cells provide treatments for 65 human illnesses by David A. Prentice, Family Research Council, and posted on the website of the DoNoHarm: The Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics.
  • 'The lure of stem cell lines', Nature, v 442, n 7101,  2006, pp. 336–337.
    • Nature investigates what human embryonic stem-cell lines have been derived worldwide so far, and why scientists are so desperate to work with new ones.
  • M. Azim Surani and Anne McLaren, 'Stem cells: a new route to rejuvenation', Nature, 21 September 2006, v. 443(7109), pp. 284-285. Embryonic stem cells are prized for their ability to mature into all the specialized adult cell types. It may now be possible to reprogramme adult body cells to have the characteristics of stem cells.

 

See also the Parliamentary Library's Law Internet Resource Guide HEALTH LAW.

 

top


Comments to: Science, Technology, Environment and Resources Section
Last reviewed 6 November, 2006 by the Parliamentary Library Web Manager
© Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament of Australia Web Site Privacy Statement
Images courtesy of AUSPIC